CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01901185Updated Sep 4, 2018Results posted

Study to Evaluate the Ability of Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis to Effectively Use a Reusable Autoinjector to Self-inject Etanercept

A Phase 3 interventional study of Etanercept / Autoinjector A in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 13 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-04.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) to use an experimental autoinjector to self inject etanercept (Enbrel®).

Read the detailed description

Study participants need to have been self-administering etanercept for greater than or equal to 6 months prior to screening. You will be in this study for about 9 weeks. This includes a 4-week screening period and a 5-week treatment period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Psoriatic Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is below the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject has diagnosis of RA or PsA and indicated for treatment with etanercept per the current label, based on history.
  • Subject is willing to self-inject per investigator judgement at screening.
  • Subject has no known history of tuberculosis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Latex allergy.
  • Subject has any active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 4 weeks prior to first study dose of etanercept.
  • Subject had prosthetic joint infection within 5 years of screening or native joint infection within 1 year of screening.
  • Other criteria may apply.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Etanercept / Autoinjector A

    Participants self-injected 50 mg etanercept subcutaneously using autoinjector A at the study center on Day 1 and then once a week from Weeks 1 to 5 (total of 6 injections).

    Drug: Etanercept / Autoinjector A

Interventions

  • DrugEtanercept / Autoinjector A

    Autoinjector A, a hand-held, reusable electromechanical device, and a single-use, disposable cassette preassembled with an etanercept 50-mg liquid prefilled syringe (PFS).

    Also known as: Enbrel®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Successful Self-injections to Total Non-missed Injections

    The successful self-injection of etanercept using the Autoinjector A, as evaluated by the percentage of successful injections of the total nonmissed injections administered by participants in the non-health care setting during Weeks 1 to 5. Successful self-injection was assessed by Question 1 in the Participant Self-injection Questionnaire, which was completed by each participant after each self-injection. Successful injection is defined as the Autoinjector A signaling a complete injection and no liquid medication pooled on your skin.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Autoinjector A System Failures

    The autoinjector A and prefilled syringe (PFS)/cassettes used by the participants were examined at the end of the study by device engineers. System failure was defined as the failure of the Autoinjector A or PFS/cassette to meet the device design requirements during Weeks 1 to 5. The percentage of system failures is reported out of the total number of injection attempts during the study, including multiple attempts per week.

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5

  2. Percentage of Errors in Each Step of the Self-injection Process

    For all the nonmissed injections recorded on the Participant Self-injection Questionnaire, the percentage of the following steps in the self-injection process that were not successfully completed out of the total nonmissed injections during Weeks 1 to 5 are reported. If multiple attempts were recorded, all the recorded attempts were considered, regardless whether it was a successful attempt or not. • Error Icon lit up (Question 2) • Could not load cassette successfully (Question 3) • Could not remove purple cassette cap successfully (Question 4) • Could not press start button to begin self-injection successfully (Question 5).

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Device Events

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment or the device under study. The definition includes worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal • life threatening • requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • congenital anomaly/birth defect • other medically important serious event. An adverse device effect is any adverse event related to the use of a medical device. Adverse device effects include AEs resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, malfunction of the device, or from use errors (including errors resulting from normal use, reasonably forseeable misuse or from intentional misuse) of the device.

    Time frame: 9 weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 21, 2014

Participant flow

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (psA) currently receiving treatment with etanercept were eligible to enrol in this study. First patient enrolled on 11 June 2013; last patient enrolled on 13 November 2013.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEtanercept / Autoinjector A
Started77
Received etanercept with autoinjector a75
Completed75
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Successful Self-injections to Total Non-missed Injections

The successful self-injection of etanercept using the Autoinjector A, as evaluated by the percentage of successful injections of the total nonmissed injections administered by participants in the non-health care setting during Weeks 1 to 5. Successful self-injection was assessed by Question 1 in the Participant Self-injection Questionnaire, which was completed by each participant after each self-injection. Successful injection is defined as the Autoinjector A signaling a complete injection and no liquid medication pooled on your skin.

Time frame:
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
Reported as:
Number · percentage of successful injections
Percentage of Successful Self-injections to Total Non-missed Injections
percentage of successful injectionsEtanercept / Autoinjector A
Percentage of Successful Self-injections to Total Non-missed Injections97.8 (96.3 to 99.3)
SecondaryPercentage of Autoinjector A System Failures

The autoinjector A and prefilled syringe (PFS)/cassettes used by the participants were examined at the end of the study by device engineers. System failure was defined as the failure of the Autoinjector A or PFS/cassette to meet the device design requirements during Weeks 1 to 5. The percentage of system failures is reported out of the total number of injection attempts during the study, including multiple attempts per week.

Time frame:
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
Reported as:
Number · percentage of system failures
Percentage of Autoinjector A System Failures
percentage of system failuresEtanercept / Autoinjector A
Percentage of Autoinjector A System Failures2.4 (1.0 to 4.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Errors in Each Step of the Self-injection Process

For all the nonmissed injections recorded on the Participant Self-injection Questionnaire, the percentage of the following steps in the self-injection process that were not successfully completed out of the total nonmissed injections during Weeks 1 to 5 are reported. If multiple attempts were recorded, all the recorded attempts were considered, regardless whether it was a successful attempt or not. • Error Icon lit up (Question 2) • Could not load cassette successfully (Question 3) • Could not remove purple cassette cap successfully (Question 4) • Could not press start button to begin self-injection successfully (Question 5).

Time frame:
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
Reported as:
Number · percentage of errors
Percentage of Errors in Each Step of the Self-injection Process
percentage of errorsEtanercept / Autoinjector A
Error icon lit up4.3
Could not load cassette successfully1.9
Could not remove purple cassette cap successfully1.1
Could not press start button to begin injection1.6
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Device Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment or the device under study. The definition includes worsening of a pre-existing medical condition. A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal • life threatening • requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • congenital anomaly/birth defect • other medically important serious event. An adverse device effect is any adverse event related to the use of a medical device. Adverse device effects include AEs resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, malfunction of the device, or from use errors (including errors resulting from normal use, reasonably forseeable misuse or from intentional misuse) of the device.

Time frame:
9 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Device Events
participantsEtanercept / Autoinjector A
All adverse events21
Serious adverse events1
Adverse events associated with device10

Adverse events

Collected over 9 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Autoinjector A/Etanercept—1/75 (1.3%)14/75 (18.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAutoinjector A/Etanercept
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations1/75
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAutoinjector A/Etanercept
Injection site painGeneral disorders12/75
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders4/75

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Etanercept / Autoinjector A
Mean53.8 ± 13.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Etanercept / Autoinjector A
Female56
Male21
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Etanercept / Autoinjector A
Asian1
White74
Other2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Etanercept / Autoinjector A
Hispanic/Latino14
Not Hispanic/Latino63
Disease state
Disease state(participants)Etanercept / Autoinjector A
Rheumatoid arthritis66
Psoriatic arthritis11
08

Study locations

13 sites
  • Research Site
    Huntsville, Alabama 35801, United States
  • Research Site
    Peoria, Arizona 85381, United States
  • Research Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85037, United States
  • Research Site
    Santa Maria, California 93454-6945, United States
  • Research Site
    Upland, California 91786, United States
  • Research Site
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • Research Site
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • Research Site
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Research Site
    Paducah, Kentucky 42003, United States
  • Research Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68516, United States
  • Research Site
    Orchard Park, New York 14127, United States
  • Research Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103, United States
  • Research Site
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01901185
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2013
Start date
Jun 11, 2013
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2013
Completion
Dec 30, 2013
Results posted
Nov 21, 2014
Last update
Sep 4, 2018

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion