ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01896076Updated Jul 28, 2014

The Caudal Space in Children: Ultrasound Evaluation

An observational study in Hydrocele, Inguinal Hernia and Hypospadia, sponsored by Yonsei University. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged Up to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-28.

Sponsored by Yonsei University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
300
Ages
Up to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Caudal anesthesia is commonly employed in pediatrics to produce postoperative analgesia in low abdominal or urologic surgery.

An exact understanding of the anatomy of the sacral area including sacral hiatus and surrounding structures is crucial to the success of caudal block.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the anatomy of the caudal space in pediatrics by ultrasound evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hydrocele
  • Inguinal Hernia
  • Hypospadia
  • Cryptorchidism
  • Genitourinary Disease

Keywords

  • caudal space
  • children
  • ultrasound evaluation
03

In context

Testicular Hydrocele

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Testicular Hydrocele; 2 are open to participants now.

Browse Testicular Hydrocele studies →

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University is the lead sponsor of 1,418 studies on the registry; 241 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients aged 0 - 84 months who were scheduled to undergo elective urological surgery. This investigation was conducted at a single tertiary medical center (Severance Hospital), Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 0 - 84 months who were scheduled to undergo elective urological surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any to caudal epidural block were excluded.

    • coagulopathy
    • allergy to local anesthetics
    • infection at the puncture site
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pediatric patients in urologic surgery

    Pediatric patients undergoing caudal block for urologic surgery were included in this study.

    Other: ultrasound evaluation of caudal space

Interventions

  • Otherultrasound evaluation of caudal space

    After induction of general anesthesia, the patients were placed in the lateral position. The ultrasound evaluation include transverse and longitudinal view. First, investigators place the transducer at the sacral cornua to obtain a transverse view. In the transverse view, the distance between two cornua and the depth of caudal space at the sacral hiatus were measured. In the longitudinal view, the distance from the skin to the sacrococcygeal membrane and the optimal angles and the safety distance for needle insertion depending on the points of insertions were measured. From the end of dura sac to the sacral hiatus were regarded as safety distance for the needle insertion during caudal block.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ultrasound evaluation of caudal space

    First, investigators place the transducer at the sacral cornua to obtain a transverse view. In the transverse view, the distance between two cornua and the depth of caudal space at the sacral hiatus were measured. In the longitudinal view, the distance from the skin to the sacrococcygeal membrane and the optimal angles and the safety distance for needle insertion depending on the points of insertions were measured. From the end of dura sac to the sacral hiatus were regarded as safety distance for the needle insertion during caudal block.

    Time frame: Right after induction of general anesthesia, the patients were placed in the lateral position. The ultrasound evaluation include transverse and longitudinal view.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Seoul, 120-752, Korea, Republic of
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01896076
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2013
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Mar 2014
Last update
Jul 28, 2014

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion