ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01881659ESTAMPAUpdated Mar 14, 2023

Cervical Cancer Screening With Human Papillomavirus Testing

An observational study in CIN3, CIN2 and Cervical Cancer, sponsored by International Agency for Research on Cancer. Status unknown at 12 sites in 9 countries. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-14.

Sponsored by International Agency for Research on Cancer · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2023), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50,000
Ages
30 Years to 64 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening of women over 30 years of age is likely to become the standard of care in the near future in many areas of the world. Its high sensitivity can significantly improve the effectiveness of screening programs and its prolonged negative predictive value can allow extension of screening intervals. However, a single HPV test has low positive predictive value and can lead to unnecessary workup and over-treatment and generate unnecessary distress. This multi-centric study will screen 50,000 women with HPV testing and compare several triage approaches that can follow HPV testing in order to make an HPV-based screening programme efficient, affordable and sustainable.

Read the detailed description

The study will be conducted in several Latin American countries. Currently, the study has started in one site in Colombia and soon another site in Mexico will start. In each participating center, women aged 30-64 years who are attending clinics for cervical screening will be invited to participate in the study. Women who agree to participate and sign the corresponding Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved consent forms will undergo a pelvic examination, and cervical cells for primary screening and triage will be collected. Recruitment specimens will be used for primary screening with an established HPV DNA test (Food and Drug Administration FDA approved). All women who are HPV-positive by the recruitment test will be referred for a standardized colposcopy examination for diagnosis. At the colposcopy visit, but before colposcopy is performed, a risk factor interview will be administered and participants will undergo visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) and collection of additional cervical cells and a blood specimen. The results of VIA will not be disclosed to the colposcopist. During colposcopy, the colposcopists will obtain (2-4) biopsies from any abnormally-appearing areas to ascertain neoplastic outcomes (CIN3+) and to direct treatment as required. All women who attend colposcopy will have a second round of HPV testing approximately 18 months after recruitment and those who are HPV-positive will be referred to colposcopy for final diagnosis. Data management and study supervision will be the responsibility of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the local Principal Investigators, most of whom are experienced HPV researchers.

The combined number of histologically-confirmed diagnoses of CIN3+, including CIN2 lesions positive for p16, (estimated n=500) will be the outcome of primary interest for evaluation of the performance of the various triage modalities. Our initial analyses will focus on comparisons of triage strategies that employ a single method: VIA, conventional/liquid-based cytology, HPV DNA genotyping, HPV RNA detection, detection of E6 proteins of high risk HPV types, or markers of HPV-induced cell-cycle alterations (e.g., p16, ki67, etc). To the extent possible, molecular testing for HPV triage will be carried out on the recruitment specimens to simulate a 'reflex testing' approach wherein screening and triage are done on the same specimen without additional visits. Subsequent analyses will consider various alternative strategies that employ more than one triage methodology; e.g., HPV DNA genotyping followed by cytology. The effectiveness and costs of each alternative strategy will be assessed under various scenarios of feasibility, cost, and effectiveness.

02

Conditions studied

  • CIN3
  • CIN2
  • Cervical Cancer

Keywords

  • cervical cancer
  • cancer prevention
  • cervical screening
  • HPV testing
  • triage techniques
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50,000 is above the median of 225 across 529 observational studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

International Agency for Research on Cancer is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This is a multicentric study to be carried out in countries across the Latin American region. At each site, a census of all women 28-64 years of age residents of the selected area will be done previously to the start of the study. All women will then be invited using different approaches to the local health centers where screening is to happen.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 30-64 years
  • Mentally competent to be able to understand the consent form
  • Able to communicate with study staff
  • Physically able to have a pelvic exam

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reporting no previous sexual activity
  • History of cervical cancer
  • Previous treatment for cervical pre-cancer in the last six months
  • Hysterectomy
  • Plans to move out of the study area in the next 12 months
  • Screened for cervical cancer in the last 12 months (depending on local regulations)
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Women attending cervical screening

    Women aged 30-64 years who signed informed consent and comply with inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    Other: HPV screening

Interventions

  • OtherHPV screening

    Women who signed informed consent will be screened with HPV testing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or cancer (CIN3+), including CIN2 positive for p16, on reviewed histology

    There will be two HPV screening rounds. Women who test negative for HPV at initial screening will finish their participation. HPV positive women will be: 1) referred to colposcopy, 2) invited for a second HPV screening round if not yet treated, and 3) referred to final colposcopy if HPV positive at second screening. Clinical management will be based on local histology. Histology specimens will be externally reviewed by one highly experience international pathologist. If the local and external results are the same, this will become the final histology. If there is disagreement, the specimen will be sent to a third pathologist (be blinded to previous readings). The final diagnosis will then be that agreed by two pathologists (local and either external or both external). Remaining discrepancies will be solved by adjudication at a multi-headed microscope. Worst histology on review will be used to define outcome measures.

    Time frame: Detected after initial HPV screening or at second screening round 18 months since entry

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with histologically confirmed CIN2, CIN3 or cancer (CIN2+) on reviewed histology

    There will be two HPV screening rounds. Women who test negative for HPV at initial screening will finish their participation. HPV positive women will be: 1) referred to colposcopy, 2) invited for a second HPV screening round if not yet treated, and 3) referred to final colposcopy if HPV positive at second screening. Clinical management will be based on local histology. Histology specimens will be externally reviewed by one highly experience international pathologist. If the local and external results are the same, this will become the final histology. If there is disagreement, the specimen will be sent to a third pathologist (be blinded to previous readings). The final diagnosis will then be that agreed by two pathologists (local and either external or both external). Remaining discrepancies will be solved by adjudication at a multi-headed microscope. Worst histology on review will be used to define outcome measures.

    Time frame: Detected after initial HPV screening or at second screening round 18 months since entry

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • Hopsital de Clinicas
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Insituto Malbran - Hospital Posadas
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Universidad San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca
    Sucre, Bolivia
  • National Cancer Institute of Colombia
    Bogota, Colombia
  • Universidad de Antioquia
    Medellin, Colombia
  • Social Security Institute of Costa Rica
    San Jose, Costa Rica
  • Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Honduras
    Tegucigalpa, Honduras
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica de Mexico
    Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
  • Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion
    Asuncion, Paraguay
  • Laboratorio Central de Salud Publica
    Asuncion, Paraguay
  • Hospital Santa Rosa
    Lima, Peru
  • Comision Honoraria de Lucha contra el Cancer
    Montevideo, 11200, Uruguay
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Almonte M, Murillo R, Sanchez GI, Gonzalez P, Ferrera A, Picconi MA, Wiesner C, Cruz-Valdez A, Lazcano-Ponce E, Jeronimo J, Ferreccio C, Kasamatsu E, Mendoza L, Rodriguez G, Calderon A, Venegas G, Villagra V, Tatti S, Fleider L, Teran C, Baena A, Hernandez ML, Rol ML, Lucas E, Barbier S, Ramirez AT, Arrossi S, Rodriguez MI, Gonzalez E, Celis M, Martinez S, Salgado Y, Ortega M, Beracochea AV, Perez N, Rodriguez de la Pena M, Ramon M, Hernandez-Nevarez P, Arboleda-Naranjo M, Cabrera Y, Salgado B, Garcia L, Retana MA, Colucci MC, Arias-Stella J, Bellido-Fuentes Y, Bobadilla ML, Olmedo G, Brito-Garcia I, Mendez-Herrera A, Cardinal L, Flores B, Penaranda J, Martinez-Better J, Soilan A, Figueroa J, Caserta B, Sosa C, Moreno A, Mural J, Doimi F, Gimenez D, Rodriguez H, Lora O, Luciani S, Broutet N, Darragh T, Herrero R. Multicentric study of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus testing and assessment of triage methods in Latin America: the ESTAMPA screening study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 May 24;10(5):e035796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035796. PubMed 32448795 ↗
  • Robles C, Wiesner C, Martinez S, Salgado Y, Hernandez M, Lucas E, Lineros J, Romero P, Herrero R, Almonte M, Murillo R. Impact of operational factors on HPV positivity rates in an HPV-based screening study in Colombia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143(1):44-51. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12574. Epub 2018 Jul 16. PubMed 29944728 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2013 to primary completion in Aug 2022, 111 months.

Of 189 non-industry observational studies under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 58 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 158. This study's 111 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 213 studies reached it within 58 months; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 158.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 17, 2013
First posted
Jun 19, 2013
StartActual
May 2013
Primary completionActual
Aug 30, 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2023
Last update
Mar 14, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01881659
Lead sponsor
International Agency for Research on Cancer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 19, 2013
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2022
Completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2023

Study contacts

Rolando Herrero, MD, PhD
principal investigator · International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion