CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01880710Updated Sep 25, 2014

Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy

An interventional study of Subtotal hysterectomy and Total Hysterectomy in Benign Uterine Disease, sponsored by Nykøbing Falster County Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-25.

Sponsored by Nykøbing Falster County Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
319
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

319 Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign (not cancer) indications were randomly allocated to 2 types of surgery (Total (TAH) and Subtotal (SAH)) abdominal hysterectomy 15 years ago. They were followed by questionnaire at time of surgery and up to 5 years (not yet published) after the surgery and evaluated regarding following outcomes: Urinary incontinence, pain, bowel problems, per and postoperative complications, sexuality, quality of life, pelvic organ prolapse and vaginal bleeding. Now the investigators are conducting a 15 year follow up with the same out-come measures but also including physical examinations regarding Urinary incontinence, voiding difficulties, pelvic organ prolapse and problems with the cervix. The investigators' hypothesis is that several of the out-come measures will be present in more cases than earlier due to age and menopausal changes. The investigators expect more urinary incontinence in the subtotal group as this was seen at earlier follow ups. The investigators expect to find more women with pelvic organ prolapse with the physical examination than by questionnaire alone, possibly with a higher incidence in the subtotal group.

Read the detailed description

The study included women who were offered a hysterectomy for benign uterine disease such as: metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, fibroids, endometriosis,and pelvic pain. Women in need of hysterectomy for malignant disease or because of prolapse of the uterus were not included. They were followed up by a questionnaire covering all outcome measures as described above. Background information was registered in a second questionnaire prior to surgery. All gynaecological departments in Denmark were invited to join the trial. 11 departments contributed randomized patients to the trial.

the results up to 1 year after surgery have been published, links can be found in the citation list. The results from the 5 year follow up have not yet been published.

The questionnaire used in this trial consists of the validated SF-36 (Short Form 36) quality of life questionnaire as well as a thorough questionnaire regarding the outcome measures described elsewhere. The entire questionnaire was validated prior to the beginning of the trial.

A second questionnaire has been added in the 15 year follow up: PFDI-20(Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20). The investigators included this, as it is more thorough regarding pelvic organ prolapse and in particular a "bother" measure than the original questionnaire.

The 20 min. pad-weighing test has been tested against the 1 hour gold-standard used by the ICS (International Continence Society) and has been found to give comparable results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Uterine Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • long term follow-up
  • urinary incontinence
  • pelvic organ prolapse
  • total versus subtotal hysterectomy
03

In context

Uterine Diseases

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Diseases; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 319 is above the median of 98 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Diseases.

Browse Uterine Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Nykøbing Falster County Hospital is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine disease at a gynaecological department in Denmark (15 years ago)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malignant disease
  • mental disease
  • diabetes
  • neurological disease
  • not able to read and write Danish
  • pelvic organ prolapse as the reason for hysterectomy
  • prior surgery for urinary incontinence
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
319 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Total hysterectomy

    removal of the entire uterus including the cervix. open abdominal surgery. No specific procedures were asked of the surgeon. They were free to do the procedure the way they were used to doing it.

    Procedure: Total Hysterectomy

  • Experimental
    Subtotal Hysterectomy

    removal of the uterine body only leaving the cervix in situ. The surgeon was free to do the procedure as he was used to. The only direction was that the cervical canal should be electrocoagulated.

    Procedure: Subtotal hysterectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureSubtotal hysterectomy

    Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy where the body of the uterus is removed but the cervix is spared.

  • ProcedureTotal Hysterectomy

    total abdominal hysterectomy where the body as well as the cervix of the uterus are removed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in Urinary incontinence from baseline (preoperatively)

    urinary incontinence measured by questionnaire filled out by the participants at each time point as well as a more objective measure: pad weighing test and voiding diary at 15 years

    Time frame: 2 months, 6months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. pelvic organ prolapse

    subjective measure by questionnaire at each time point as well as objective measure by POP-Q measurement at 15 years

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

  2. cervical problems in the SAH group

    questionnaire regarding bleeding at each time point, pap-smear regarding dysplasia at 15 years discharge summaries from hospital admissions/contacts regarding cervical problems.

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

  3. voiding difficulties and LUTS (Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms)

    covered by the questionnaire at each time point regarding urinary tract infections and problems emptying the bladder. In addition the 15 year follow up consists of uroflow, dip-stick for urinary infection as well as post-voiding ultrasound of the bladder to detect urinary retention.

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6 months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

Other outcomes

  1. quality of life

    SF-36 questionnaire at each time point

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6months, 1 and 15 years postoperatively

  2. sexuality

    questionnaire at each time point

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

  3. pelvic pain

    questionnaire at each time point

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

  4. bowel problems

    questionnaire at each time point

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

  5. per- and postoperative complications

    questionnaire at each time points and case records regarding related surgery (hernia, bowel obstruction, removal of the cervix, surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse)looked up in the clinical registry

    Time frame: preoperatively, 2 months, 6months, 1, 5 and 15 years postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nykoebing Falster County Hospital
    Nykoebing Falster, Region Sjaelland 4800, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Ottesen BS, Tabor A. Randomized clinical trial of total vs. subtotal hysterectomy: validity of the trial questionnaire. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Oct;81(10):968-74. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811012.x. PubMed 12366489 ↗
  • Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BJ, Sorensen HC, Toftager-Larsen K, Sidenius K, Moller N, Madsen EM, Vejtorp M, Clausen H, Rosgaard A, Villumsen J, Gluud C, Ottesen BS, Tabor A. Lower urinary tract symptoms after total and subtotal hysterectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):257-62. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1291-8. PubMed 16220584 ↗
  • Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Gluud C, Tabor A. Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results. BJOG. 2003 Dec;110(12):1088-98. PubMed 14664880 ↗
  • Zobbe V, Gimbel H, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sorensen HC, Toftager-Larsen K, Sidenius K, Moller N, Madsen EM, Vejtorp M, Clausen H, Rosgaard A, Gluud C, Ottesen BS, Tabor A. Sexuality after total vs. subtotal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Feb;83(2):191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00311.x. PubMed 14756739 ↗
  • Andersen LL, Moller LM, Gimbel HM. Low adherence to cervical cancer screening after subtotal hysterectomy. Dan Med J. 2015 Dec;62(12):A5165. PubMed 26621394 ↗
  • Andersen LL, Alling Moller LM, Gimbel HM. Objective comparison of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy regarding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial with 14-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.033. Epub 2015 Jul 9. PubMed 26231437 ↗
  • Andersen LL, Moller LM, Gimbel H; Danish Hysterectomy Trial Group. Lower urinary tract symptoms after subtotal versus total abdominal hysterectomy: exploratory analyses from a randomized clinical trial with a 14-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1767-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2778-6. Epub 2015 Jul 28. PubMed 26215904 ↗
  • Andersen LL, Zobbe V, Ottesen B, Gluud C, Tabor A, Gimbel H; Danish Hysterectomy Trial Group. Five-year follow up of a randomised controlled trial comparing subtotal with total abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG. 2015 May;122(6):851-857. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12914. Epub 2014 Jun 11. PubMed 24917531 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01880710
Lead sponsor
Nykøbing Falster County Hospital
Collaborators
University of Southern Denmark, Zealand University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Responsible party
Lea Laird Andersen (MD, PhD.-student, Nykøbing Falster County Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 19, 2013
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Feb 2014
Last update
Sep 25, 2014

Study contacts

Lea L Andersen, MD
principal investigator · Nykoebing Falster County Hospital
Helga ME Gimbel, Dr.med.sci.
study director · University of Southern Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion