ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01878786EveredUpdated Apr 26, 2019Results posted

A Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus With Other Medicines in Recipients of ECD/DCD Kidneys

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Everolimus and Tacrolimus in Delayed Graft Function, sponsored by Matthew Cooper. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-26.

Sponsored by Matthew Cooper · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Interim results suggested a concern for patient outcomes and safety
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Given tacrolimus and MMF/MPA is a widely prescribed immunosuppressive regimen in the United States, comparisons of tacrolimus and MMF/MPA regimens to investigational therapies and treatment regimens are needed. Also, considering the fact that ECD/DCD is a fast growing fraction of donors, evaluation of various regimens' effects on rather delicate ECD/DCD kidneys is necessary.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus with low dose tacrolimus compared to early conversion to CNI-free regimen and MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients of ECD/DCD kidneys. Given tacrolimus and MMF/MPA is a widely prescribed immunosuppressive regimen in the United States, comparisons of tacrolimus and MMF/MPA regimens to investigational therapies and treatment regimens are needed. Also, considering the fact that ECD/DCD is a fast growing fraction of donors, evaluation of various regimens' effects on rather delicate ECD/DCD kidneys is necessary.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.

The key secondary objective is to compare renal function of the everolimus treatment arms to the MMF/MPA treatment arm at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. Renal function will be measured by the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), using the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula (20).

02

Conditions studied

  • Delayed Graft Function

Keywords

  • kidney failure
03

In context

Delayed Graft Function

83 studies on the registry are indexed under Delayed Graft Function; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 90 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Delayed Graft Function.

Browse Delayed Graft Function studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Matthew Cooper as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Male or female recipients 18-65 years of age undergoing primary or secondary kidney transplantation

Recipients of primary or secondary cadaveric, ECD/DCD kidney (defined as follows)

Donor whose heart has irreversibly stopped beating, previously referred to as non-heart-beating or asystolic donation

Brain-dead donor > 60 years old

Donor aged 50-59 years old with two of the following criteria:

History of hypertension

Terminal serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL

Death resulting from cerebrovascular accident

Patients who have given written to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Cold ischemic time (CIT) > 30 hours

Patients who are ABO incompatible transplants, or T, or B cell crossmatch positive transplant

Patients with a known to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical class

Non-controlled DCD

Donor age >70

Patients with >32 at baseline before surgery

Pregnant or lactating females

Females of unwilling to use an effective means of or are planning to become pregnant

Patients with count \<100,000/mm3 at the evaluation before randomization.

Patients with an of \< 1,500/mm³ at baseline before surgery or white blood cell count of \< 4,500/mm³

Patients who are recipients of multiple solid organ transplants

Patients who have severe hypercholesterolemia (>350 mg/dL; >9 mmol/L) or hypertriglyceridemia (>500 mg/dL; >5.6 mmol/L). Patients with controlled hyperlipidemia are acceptable

Patients who have an abnormal liver profile such as , AST, Alk Phos or total >3 times the upper normal limit

Patients who are treated with drugs that are strong inducers or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4, such as terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, erythromycin, azithromycin, itraconazole, rifampin or lovastatin

Patients who received an drug or who have been treated with a non-protocol drug or treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to randomization

Patients with a history of of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the past 2 years whether or not there is evidence of local recurrence or , with the exception of localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin

Patients who are -positive or (PCR+ only) or B surface antigen positive

Recipients of organs from donors who test positive for surface antigen or Hepatitis C (PCR+ only) are excluded

Patients with a history of severe diarrhea, active peptic ulcer disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus ( A1c \<7.0 %) at baseline

Patients who have any surgical or medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of study medication, and/or the presence of severe diarrhea or active peptic ulcer

Patients who have cardiac failure (e.g. resting dyspnea, symptoms with less than ordinary activity, marked limitation of activity) at time of screening or any other severe cardiac disease as determined by the investigator

Patients with abnormal physical or laboratory findings of clinical significance within 3 months of randomization which would interfere with the objectives of the study

Patients with any history of coagulopathy or medical condition requiring long-term anticoagulation therapy after transplantation (Low dose aspirin treatment is allowed)

Patients with known history of focal segmental glomeruloscrelosis

Presence of psychiatric illness (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar, major depression) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with study requirements

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ERL & TAC

    Concentration controlled everolimus(ERL) \& Low dose tacrolimus(TAC) + corticosteroid withdraw

    Drug: Everolimus · Drug: Tacrolimus

  • Experimental
    ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA

    Concentration controlled everolimus \& low dose tacrolimus --\> mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at Month 3 + corticosteroid

    Drug: Everolimus · Drug: Tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)

  • Experimental
    Standard dose TAC + MMF/MPA

    Standard dose of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + corticosteroid withdraw

    Drug: Tacrolimus · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)

Interventions

  • One of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus .

    Also known as: Zortress

  • One of the immunosuppressants currently being evaluated to replace CNIs in patients with CNI nephropathy is the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, Sirolimus. Everolimus is a derivative of Sirolimus and belongs to this class of immunosuppressants, therefore, both drugs have similar side effect profile. The half-life of Everolimus is almost half of Sirolimus (Everolimus 30 hours vs Sirolimus 62 hours), which makes its dose adjustment easier although it would require more frequent dosing. In clinical trials, Everolimus has demonstrated its potential role as a safe alternative in minimizing and/or eliminating CNI such as Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus.

    Also known as: Prograf

  • DrugMycophenolate mofetil (MMF/MPA)

    Drug page: Mycophenolic Acid

    Control Drug

    Also known as: CellCept

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate Concentration-controlled Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus Compared to MMF/MPA With Standard Dose Tacrolimus at 24 Months

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compare Renal Function of the Everolimus Treatment Arms to the MMF/MPA Treatment Arm at 12 and 24 Months Post-transplantation

    The key secondary objective is to compare renal function of the everolimus treatment arms to the MMF/MPA treatment arm at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. Renal function will be measured by the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), using the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula (20).

    Time frame: 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (Viremia or Viruria)

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 26, 2019
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated prematurely and analysis was not performed on the incomplete data.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPA
Started997
Completed000
Not completed997

Outcome measures

PrimaryEvaluate Concentration-controlled Everolimus and Low Dose Tacrolimus Compared to MMF/MPA With Standard Dose Tacrolimus at 24 Months

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate concentration-controlled everolimus and low dose tacrolimus compared to MMF/MPA with standard dose tacrolimus at 24 months post-transplant with respect to the composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR), graft loss, death, loss to follow-up) in de novo renal transplant recipients.

Time frame:
24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryCompare Renal Function of the Everolimus Treatment Arms to the MMF/MPA Treatment Arm at 12 and 24 Months Post-transplantation

The key secondary objective is to compare renal function of the everolimus treatment arms to the MMF/MPA treatment arm at 12 and 24 months post-transplantation. Renal function will be measured by the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), using the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula (20).

Time frame:
24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedIncidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (Viremia or Viruria)
Time frame:
24 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were recorded from the time of study drug through the end of the study. The study was terminated prematurely.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ERL & TAC0/9 (0%)7/9 (77.8%)8/9 (88.9%)
ERL & TAC --> MMF/MPA0/9 (0%)2/9 (22.2%)9/9 (100%)
Standard Dose TAC + MMF/MPA0/7 (0%)2/7 (28.6%)7/7 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPA
Sepsis and Multiple Organ FailureInfections and infestations0/90/91/7
ER Admission for Blood TransfusionBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/90/91/7
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/90/90/7
GI SurgerySurgical and medical procedures1/90/90/7
Left Renal Mass/NephrectomyRenal and urinary disorders0/91/90/7
Neck and Facial EdemaGeneral disorders1/90/90/7
AdmissionSurgical and medical procedures1/90/90/7
UTIRenal and urinary disorders1/90/90/7
Hydronephrosis (Possible malrotation of kidney, possible uretropelvic junction obstruction)Renal and urinary disorders1/90/90/7
Fluid Overload and Chest PressureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/91/90/7
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 64
Most frequent other events
EventERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPA
Electrolyte ImbalanceMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/94/95/7
HyperkalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders5/96/90/7
Delayed Graft FunctionRenal and urinary disorders1/94/92/7
BK ViremiaInfections and infestations3/92/92/7
ProteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders1/93/91/7
CMVInfections and infestations1/90/92/7
Elevated Serum CreatinineInvestigations1/92/92/7
Shortness of BreathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/90/92/7
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/92/92/7
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/90/92/7

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPATotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years99624
>=65 years0011
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPATotal
Female3328
Male66517
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPATotal
Hispanic or Latino1102
Not Hispanic or Latino88723
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPATotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American86721
White0202
More than one race1001
Unknown or Not Reported0101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ERL & TACERL & TAC --> MMF/MPAStandard Dose TAC + MMF/MPATotal
United States99725
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Georgetown University Hospital
    Washington, District of Columbia 20007, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 26, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01878786
Lead sponsor
Matthew Cooper
Responsible party
Matthew Cooper (Dr. Matthew Cooper, Georgetown University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 17, 2013
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Nov 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Results posted
Apr 26, 2019
Last update
Apr 26, 2019

Study contacts

Matthew Cooper
principal investigator · Georgetown University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Everolimus

Start the discussion