CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01876238Updated Nov 26, 2015

Feasibility of a Team Approach for Discussing Prognosis and Treatment Goals in Breast Cancer

An interventional study of T-PAT and Surveys in Advanced Breast Cancer, Stage 4 Breast Cancer and Recurrent Breast Cancer, sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-26.

Sponsored by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This research study will examine how patients with advanced breast cancer and their oncology team communicate and plan ongoing care.The purpose of this study is to find out more about care planning during advanced breast cancer. The study will see if certain aspects of communication make a difference in how patients understand their illness.

Read the detailed description

The new communication practice (T-PAT) is a team approach for discussing prognosis and treatment goals. T-PAT is specifically designed to a) increase understanding of the prognosis and treatment goal, b) decrease illness uncertainty, and c) help the patient preserve hope for the future.This dedicated clinical visit features a structured discussion of prognosis, treatment goals and options, and end of life concerns. The planned team discussion will include information contributions for the treating medical oncologist, an oncology nurse and social worker who currently work together to provide breast cancer care.

Primary Objectives:

  1. Assess the feasibility of implementing the T-PAT prognosis discussion intervention.
  2. Compare the effects of T-PAT vs. usual care on pertinent patient reported outcomes including: a) understanding of the prognosis and treatment goal, b) illness uncertainty, and c) hope.

    • First, a survey will be administered to patients in the waiting room before the next office visit. This should take 15-20 minutes.
    • The second part involves participating in a scheduled appointment that will be audio-recorded and focus on sharing information about the patient's illness. Patients will be randomized to either participate in an appointment featuring new communication practices (T-PAT)or a regular care appointment.
    • The third part involves a 20 minute survey, after the appointment, with a member of the study staff. This will take place over the telephone one or two days after the appointment.
    • The fourth part is completion of a written reflection on the patients participation in the study, which will be returned in a pre-addressed, stamped envelope. Generally, this should take about 15 minutes.
02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Breast Cancer
  • Stage 4 Breast Cancer
  • Recurrent Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Patient-Doctor Communication
  • Supportive Care
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 484 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Of its 74 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women newly or currently diagnosed with stage 4 or recurrent breast cancer
  • Patients of Dr. Paula Silverman at Seidman Cancer Center
  • Ambulatory
  • Able to understand and participate in a discussion about their disease progression

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized
  • Unable to speak English
  • Unable to attend an office visit
  • ECOG performance score of >3
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    T-PAT Intervention

    Prognosis discussion intervention with study team.

    Other: T-PAT · Other: Surveys

  • Active comparator
    Control: Standard Care

    Usual care appointment

    Other: Surveys

Interventions

  • OtherT-PAT
  • OtherSurveys

    Pre-test and posttest surveys and questionnaires

    Also known as: State Hope Scale, Tolerate Adverse States Survey, Physical Functioning Measure (MOS-PF), Beleif in CUrability (BIC), Illness Uncertainty Survey, Treatment Goal Preference Questionnaire

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Implementing the T-PAT Prognosis Discussion Intervention

    Accuracy and completion rate of the planned intervention components will be observed.

    Time frame: 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Recorded Measures: Hope

    Using the Snyder et al.'s State Hope Scale

    Time frame: 8 months

  2. Patient Recorded Measures: Willingness to Tolerate Adverse States

    Six-Item scale that measures motivation to endure burden associated with aggressive care. Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to tolerate adverse states.

    Time frame: 8 months

  3. Patient Recorded Measures: Medical Outcomes Study-Physical Functioning Measure (MOS-PF)

    Assess patient physical function

    Time frame: 8 months

  4. Patient Recorded Measures: Belief in Curability (BIC)

    Assess patients perceptions about prognosis independent of what they recall being told by their doctor.

    Time frame: 8 months

  5. Patient Recorded Measures: Illness Uncertainty

    16-item scale tapping patient uncertainty about symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and future plans.

    Time frame: 8 months

  6. Patient Recorded Measures: Treatment Goal Preference

    Patients will be asked to report their preference for aggressive care.

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01876238
Lead sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 12, 2013
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2014
Completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Nov 26, 2015

Study contacts

Mary Step, PhD
principal investigator · Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion