CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01848990Updated Nov 7, 2018Results posted

CONSISTENT 1: Metabolic and Safety Outcomes of Hylenex Recombinant (Hyaluronidase Human Injection) Preadministered at CSII Infusion Site in Participants With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Commercial Hylenex® recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection) and Precommercial Hylenex recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection) in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Halozyme Therapeutics. Completed at 39 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-07.

Sponsored by Halozyme Therapeutics · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
456
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objectives of this study are to compare the difference in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to Month 6 using Hylenex recombinant preadministration in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus standard CSII and to evaluate the safety of Hylenex recombinant preadministration, including local tolerability, adverse events, and hypo- and hyperglycemia rates.

Read the detailed description

This Phase 4 study is designed to demonstrate noninferiority of pretreatment with Hylenex recombinant in the CSII setting to rapid-acting analog insulin alone with respect to glycemic control as assessed by changes in HbA1c in participants with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Total duration of study treatment is 24 months. However, according to the study design, the primary outcome measure is to be assessed at 6 months and an interim analysis is to be completed at 6 months for the secondary outcome measures and adverse events. Therefore, data reported in this clinical trials record is for the 6-month interim analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Sub Cutaneous Insulin Infusion
  • Rapid Acting Analog Insulin
  • Hylenex
  • Halozyme
  • Phase 4
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 456 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Halozyme Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female of age 18 years or older with a history of T1DM for at least 12 months
  2. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5% to 9.5% (inclusive) based on central laboratory results
  3. Fasting C-peptide \<0.6 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
  4. Current use of an insulin pump compatible with available tubing for Hylenex recombinant infusion and use of an infusion set compatible with the tubing available or willingness to switch to an infusion set compatible with tubing available for infusion of Hylenex recombinant
  5. Current treatment at the time of screening with insulin \<300 units per day (U/day)
  6. Participants who routinely use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (defined as average CGM use 5 or more days per week over the preceding 3 months) and those who do not routinely used CGM are both eligible for inclusion in the study. Intermittent use of CGM is also acceptable but will not be a criterion use for stratified randomization.
  7. Participants should be in good general health based on medical history and physical examination, without medical conditions that might prevent the completion of study drug infusions and assessments required in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Type 2 diabetes
  2. Known or suspected allergy to any component of any of the study drugs in this study
  3. Severe proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy, and/or gastroparesis, and/or severe neuropathy, in particular autonomic neuropathy, of such severity as to impede the participant's ability to comply with protocol procedures, as judged by the Investigator
  4. History of transmural myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [BP] consistently >100 millimeters of mercury [mmHg]) are exclusionary
  5. As judged by the Investigator, clinically significant active disease of the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular (including history of stroke, history of arrhythmia, or conduction delays on electrocardiogram [ECG]), hepatic, neurological, renal, genitourinary, pulmonary, or hematological systems of such severity as to impede the participant's ability to comply with protocol procedures
  6. History of any illness or disease that in the opinion of the Investigator might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk in administering the study drugs to the participant
  7. As judged by the Investigator, clinically significant findings in routine laboratory data at screening
  8. Use of drugs that may interfere with the interpretation of study results or are known to cause clinically relevant interference with hyaluronidase action, insulin action, glucose utilization, or recovery from hypoglycemia (including systemic pharmacologic corticosteroid). Use of pramlintide or a glucagon-like peptide [GLP]-1 receptor agonist is not exclusionary but participants using these agents will be subjected to stratified randomization. Use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) up to 325 milligrams (mg)/day is not exclusionary but should be noted for analysis.
  9. Hypoglycemic unawareness of such severity as to impede the participant's ability to comply with protocol procedures, as judged by the Investigator.
  10. Current addiction to alcohol or substance abuse as determined by the Investigator.
  11. Pregnancy, breast-feeding, the intention of becoming pregnant, or not using adequate contraceptive measures (adequate contraceptive measures consist of sterilization, intra-uterine device [IUD], oral or injectable contraceptives, and/or barrier methods). Abstinence alone is not considered an adequate contraceptive measure for the purposes of this study.
  12. Mental incapacity, unwillingness, or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or cooperation in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
456 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)

    Hylenex Formulation 1: For 6 months, participants received their regular treatment of rapid-acting continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) (for example, insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine). Additionally, during this 6-month treatment period, the participants received a pretreatment dose of the commercial form of Hylenex recombinant, delivered at 150 units (U) through their insulin infusion cannula each time they changed infusion sets (every 2 to 3 days).

    Drug: Commercial Hylenex® recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection) · Drug: Insulin lispro · Drug: Insulin aspart · Drug: Insulin glulisine

  • Experimental
    Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)

    Hylenex Formulation 2: For 6 months, participants received their regular treatment of rapid-acting CSII (for example, insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine). Additionally, during this 6-month treatment period, the participants received a pretreatment dose of the precommercial form of Hylenex recombinant, delivered at 150 units (U) through their insulin infusion cannula each time they changed infusion sets (every 2 to 3 days).

    Drug: Precommercial Hylenex recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection) · Drug: Insulin lispro · Drug: Insulin aspart · Drug: Insulin glulisine

  • Active comparator
    Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII

    Participants received their regular treatment of rapid-acting CSII (for example, insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine) for 6 months.

    Drug: Insulin lispro · Drug: Insulin aspart · Drug: Insulin glulisine

Interventions

  • DrugCommercial Hylenex® recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection)

    Also known as: Formulation 1, Hylenex, Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)

  • DrugPrecommercial Hylenex recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection)

    Also known as: Formulation 2, Hylenex, rHuPH20

  • DrugInsulin lispro

    Also known as: Humalog, Lispro

  • DrugInsulin aspart

    Also known as: Novolog, Aspart

  • DrugInsulin glulisine

    Also known as: Apidra, Glulisine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; 6 Months

  2. Change From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1c

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; 12 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6

    Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

  2. Rates of HEs to Month 12

    Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

  3. Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6

    Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

  4. Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12

    Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

  5. Mean Glucose Excursions at 6 Months

    A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 6 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

  6. Mean Glucose Excursions at 12 Months

    A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 12 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

  7. Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 Months

    Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 6 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

  8. Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 Months

    Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 12 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

    Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

  9. Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12

    The number of participants achieving HbA1c goals of \<7% and ≤6.5% was calculated.

    Time frame: Month 12

  10. Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12

    Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 2; Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12

  11. Average of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)

    The daily bolus insulin dose is calculated as the daily prandial (occurring before a meal) insulin dose plus the daily corrective insulin dose. Cumulative basal dosage is to generally be within 40% to 60% of the total daily dose.

    Time frame: from Randomization up to Month 12

  12. Average Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) Values

    CarbF is calculated as 2.6 \* weight (pounds) / total daily dose of insulin (grams per unit).

    Time frame: Month 1 to Month 12

  13. Average Correction Factor (CorrF) Values

    CorrF is calculated as 1960 / total daily dose of insulin (milligrams/\[deciliter\*unit\]).

    Time frame: Month 1 to Month 12

  14. Average of Bolus Times Relative to Meal Times

    The average meal bolus timing relative to meal time is defined as the minutes between the start time of a meal bolus and the start time of a meal.

    Time frame: Month 1 to Month 12

  15. Average Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard Deviation

    For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: average glucose, median glucose, and average daily standard deviation.

    Time frame: Randomization to Month 12

  16. Time Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL

    For each participant, the following CGM parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: time per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes.

    Time frame: Randomization to Month 12

  17. Area Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL

    For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: area per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes. The area per day for a specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL) is the sum of the area under the curve with glucose concentration falling in the specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL). For example, if the glucose stays constant at 50 mg/dL for the whole day (1,440 minutes), the area per day for glucose \< 56 mg/dL equals: 50\*1440 = 72,000 mg\*minutes/dL.

    Time frame: Randomization to Month 12

  18. Change From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12

    The Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of quality of life (QoL). Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact).

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 12

  19. Change From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12

    The ADDQoL is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of QoL. Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact). Weighted impact scores were summed and divided by the number of applicable domains to give an overall Average Weighted Impact (AWI) score (higher values represent more positive impact). If there were less than 13 non-missing weighted-impact values, AWI was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 12

  20. Change From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12

    The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-status version (DTSQs) and DTSQ-change version (DTSQc) are validated tools to assess treatment satisfaction and change in treatment satisfaction after therapy changes have occurred. The scale total was computed by adding the 6 items (1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) to produce the Treatment Satisfaction scale total, which has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 36 on the DTSQs and a minimum of -18 and a maximum of 18 on the DTSQc. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. If any of the 6 item scores were missing and the numbers of missing scores were less than the number of non-missing scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was to be computed by taking the average of the existing scores and multiplying the average by 6. If there were less than 4 non-missing item scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 12

  21. Mean Time to Change Infusion Site

    Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

    Time frame: Month 12

  22. Mean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administration

    Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

    Time frame: Month 12

  23. Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site Change

    Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

    Time frame: Month 12

  24. Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling Questions

    Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program. Question 1: Achieve excellent post meal glucose control; Question 2: Insulin responds quickly when basal rate is changed; Question 3: Insulin responds quickly when correction bolus is given.

    Time frame: Month 12

  25. Mean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin Action

    Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

    Time frame: Month 12

07

Results

Posted Oct 29, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Started227115114
Received at least 1 dose of study drug227115113
Completed month 6194106103
Completed1819598
Not completed462016
Withdrew: Adverse event620
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up622
Withdrew: Protocol violation110
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject291011
Withdrew: Physician decision110
Withdrew: Non compliance100
Withdrew: Death101
Withdrew: Other142

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; 6 Months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of HbA1c
Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
percentage of HbA1cHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.14 ± 0.521-0.18 ± 0.687
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4516 · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.05 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.18Hylenex minus Standard CSII
PrimaryChange From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1c

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of HbA1c
Change From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1c
percentage of HbA1cHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Change From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1c-0.13 ± 0.590-0.26 ± 0.718
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.0711 · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.14 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.28Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6

Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 6
Reported as:
Number · events per participant per month
Rates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6
events per participant per monthHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
<56 mg/dL2.91034.1970
≤70 mg/dL11.621914.7112
Nocturnal HEs1.62242.0727
Severe HEs0.00550.0160
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.0105 (SMBG \<56 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 0.69Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.0130 (SMBG \<=70 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 0.79Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.0511 (Nocturnal HEs) · Rate ratio: 0.78Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.1176 (Severe HEs) · Rate ratio: 0.34Hylenex/Standard CSII
SecondaryRates of HEs to Month 12

Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 12
Reported as:
Number · events per participant per month
Rates of HEs to Month 12
events per participant per monthHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
<56 mg/dL2.67923.3022
≤70 mg/dL11.380312.3591
Nocturnal HEs1.67541.9203
Severe HEs0.00910.0085
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.0456 (SMBG \<56 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 0.81Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.2322 (SMBG \<=70 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 0.92Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.1365 (Nocturnal HEs) · Rate ratio: 0.87Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.8909 (Severe HEs) · Rate ratio: 1.07Hylenex/Standard CSII
SecondaryRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6

Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 6
Reported as:
Number · events per participant per month
Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6
events per participant per monthHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
>240 mg/dL18.042218.4696
>300 mg/dL6.47686.8155
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.7292 (SMBG \>240 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 0.98Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.5895 (SMBG \>300 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 0.95Hylenex/Standard CSII
SecondaryRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12

Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 12
Reported as:
Number · events per participant per month
Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12
events per participant per monthHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
>240 mg/dL18.978418.2785
>300 mg/dL7.11386.8900
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.5414 (SMBG \>240 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 1.04Hylenex/Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · negative binomial model · p = 0.7110 (SMBG \>300 mg/dL) · Rate ratio: 1.03Hylenex/Standard CSII
SecondaryMean Glucose Excursions at 6 Months

A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 6 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Mean Glucose Excursions at 6 Months
milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Hylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
Breakfast17.3 ± 2.7720.7 ± 4.76
Lunch22.2 ± 2.6717.9 ± 4.58
Dinner12.6 ± 2.4512.5 ± 4.18
Overall17.1 ± 1.7016.9 ± 2.91
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5394 (Breakfast) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -3.4 · 95% CI -14.2 to 7.5Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4151 (Lunch) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 4.3 · 95% CI -6.1 to 14.8Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9930 (Dinner) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -9.5 to 9.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9410 (Overall) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.2 · 95% CI -6.4 to 6.9Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryMean Glucose Excursions at 12 Months

A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 12 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Mean Glucose Excursions at 12 Months
milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Hylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
Breakfast20.1 ± 2.3624.9 ± 4.21
Lunch22.4 ± 2.1721.0 ± 3.89
Dinner12.7 ± 2.0813.8 ± 3.69
Overall17.1 ± 1.4919.7 ± 2.65
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.3239 (Breakfast) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -4.8 · 95% CI -14.3 to 4.7Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.7540 (Lunch) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 1.4 · 95% CI -7.4 to 10.2Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.7904 (Dinner) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -9.5 to 7.2Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4016 (Overall) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -2.6 · 95% CI -8.5 to 3.4Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryStandard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 Months

Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 6 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 Months
mg/dLHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 Months70.9 ± 1.0972.2 ± 1.86
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5260 · Least squares mean treatment difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -5.6 to 2.9Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryStandard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 Months

Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 12 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame:
After Month 1 up to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 Months
mg/dLHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII
Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 Months72.9 ± 1.0472.4 ± 1.85
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.8049 · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.5 · 95% CI -3.7 to 4.7Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12

The number of participants achieving HbA1c goals of \<7% and ≤6.5% was calculated.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12
ParticipantsHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
HbA1c <7.0%6121
HbA1c ≤6.5%186
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · Chi-squared · p = 0.8955 (HbA1c \<7.0%)
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · Chi-squared · p = 0.8926 (HbA1c ≤6.5%)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12

Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 2; Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · kilograms
Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12
kilogramsHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Week 2-0.10 ± 1.2720.19 ± 1.257
Month 1-0.11 ± 1.5830.20 ± 1.696
Month 2-0.03 ± 2.0020.48 ± 1.672
Month 30.16 ± 2.5620.37 ± 1.858
Month 40.04 ± 2.6800.37 ± 2.230
Month 60.60 ± 3.0350.83 ± 2.287
Month 90.91 ± 3.3550.92 ± 3.033
Month 120.61 ± 3.7960.48 ± 4.078
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.7735 · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.13 · 95% CI -0.76 to 1.03Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryAverage of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)

The daily bolus insulin dose is calculated as the daily prandial (occurring before a meal) insulin dose plus the daily corrective insulin dose. Cumulative basal dosage is to generally be within 40% to 60% of the total daily dose.

Time frame:
from Randomization up to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · International units
Average of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)
International unitsHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Daily bolus dose21.9 ± 0.7822.9 ± 1.33
Daily basal dose28.0 ± 0.7325.7 ± 1.26
Daily total dose49.9 ± 1.3248.5 ± 2.27
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4948 (Daily bolus dose) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -4.1 to 2.0Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.1099 (Daily basal dose) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 2.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to 5.2Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5830 (Daily total dose) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 1.4 · 95% CI -3.7 to 6.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryAverage Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) Values

CarbF is calculated as 2.6 \* weight (pounds) / total daily dose of insulin (grams per unit).

Time frame:
Month 1 to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · grams per unit
Average Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) Values
grams per unitHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Average Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) Values11.1 ± 0.2611.0 ± 0.46
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.8778 · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -1.0 to 1.1Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryAverage Correction Factor (CorrF) Values

CorrF is calculated as 1960 / total daily dose of insulin (milligrams/\[deciliter\*unit\]).

Time frame:
Month 1 to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milligrams/(deciliter*unit)
Average Correction Factor (CorrF) Values
milligrams/(deciliter*unit)Hylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Average Correction Factor (CorrF) Values43.2 ± 1.0645.3 ± 1.83
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.3233 · Least squares mean treatment difference: -2.1 · 95% CI -6.3 to 2.1Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal Times

The average meal bolus timing relative to meal time is defined as the minutes between the start time of a meal bolus and the start time of a meal.

Time frame:
Month 1 to Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Average of Bolus Times Relative to Meal Times
minutesHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Breakfast-2.3 ± 8.17-3.9 ± 7.83
Lunch-1.8 ± 6.75-1.6 ± 8.61
Dinner-1.7 ± 7.48-1.7 ± 9.19
Overall-1.9 ± 6.51-2.4 ± 7.86
SecondaryAverage Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard Deviation

For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: average glucose, median glucose, and average daily standard deviation.

Time frame:
Randomization to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milliliters per deciliter
Average Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard Deviation
milliliters per deciliterHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Average glucose152.9 ± 1.79151.9 ± 2.93
Median glucose145.2 ± 1.80143.4 ± 2.94
Average daily standard deviation48.9 ± 0.8549.7 ± 1.39
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.7708 (Average glucose) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 1.0 · 95% CI -5.8 to 7.8Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.6058 (Median glucose) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 1.8 · 95% CI -5.0 to 8.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.6571 (Average daily standard deviation) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -4.0 to 2.5Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL

For each participant, the following CGM parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: time per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes.

Time frame:
Randomization to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · minutes
Time Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL
minutesHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Time per day <56 mg/dL18.1 ± 2.4020.3 ± 3.91
Time per day ≤70 mg/dL63.0 ± 5.3768.5 ± 8.77
Time per day >70 mg/dL1358.8 ± 5.621351.9 ± 9.18
Time per day <140 mg/dL660.3 ± 16.99683.7 ± 27.74
Time per day ≥140 mg/dL756.4 ± 17.02732.5 ± 27.80
Time per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL464.4 ± 15.02461.7 ± 24.54
Time per day outside of 71 to139 mg/dL819.4 ± 14.74801.0 ± 24.07
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.6252 (Time per day \<56 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -2.2 · 95% CI -11.3 to 6.9Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5929 (Time per day ≤70 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -5.5 · 95% CI -25.9 to 14.9Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5207 (Time per day \>70 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 6.9 · 95% CI -14.4 to 28.3Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4754 (Time per day \<140 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -23.3 · 95% CI -87.8 to 41.2Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4644 (Time per day ≥140 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 23.9 · 95% CI -40.7 to 88.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9232 (Time per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 2.8 · 95% CI -54.2 to 59.8Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5151 (Time per day outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 18.4 · 95% CI -37.5 to 74.4Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL

For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: area per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes. The area per day for a specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL) is the sum of the area under the curve with glucose concentration falling in the specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL). For example, if the glucose stays constant at 50 mg/dL for the whole day (1,440 minutes), the area per day for glucose \< 56 mg/dL equals: 50\*1440 = 72,000 mg\*minutes/dL.

Time frame:
Randomization to Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg*minutes/deciliter
Area Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL
mg*minutes/deciliterHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Area per day <56 mg/dL129.7 ± 21.71163.2 ± 35.45
Area per day ≤70 mg/dL687.0 ± 77.58771.7 ± 126.69
Area per day ≥140 mg/dL42660.2 ± 1874.6242317.2 ± 3061.24
Area per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL20033.8 ± 1232.6020411.2 ± 2012.83
Area per day outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL43347.2 ± 1857.5443089.0 ± 3033.35
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4216 (Area per day \<56 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -33.5 · 95% CI -115.9 to 48.9Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5697 (Area per day ≤70 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -84.7 · 95% CI -379.2 to 209.8Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9241 (Area per day ≥140 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 342.9 · 95% CI -6772.3 to 7458.2Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9232 (Area per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 2.8 · 95% CI -54.2 to 59.8Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9423 (Area per day outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL) · Mean difference (final values): 258.2 · 95% CI -6792.2 to 7308.7Least squares mean treatment difference (Hylenex minus Standard CSII)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12

The Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of quality of life (QoL). Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact).

Time frame:
Baseline; Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12
score on a scaleHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Leisure activities-0.2 ± 0.140.0 ± 0.24
Work life-0.1 ± 0.150.0 ± 0.27
Local or long distance travel-0.4 ± 0.15-0.2 ± 0.25
Vacations0.0 ± 0.150.2 ± 0.25
Do physically-0.1 ± 0.14-0.2 ± 0.23
Family life0.2 ± 0.140.1 ± 0.23
Friendships and social life0.3 ± 0.130.1 ± 0.22
Close personal relationship0.1 ± 0.160.1 ± 0.27
Sex life0.0 ± 0.14-0.3 ± 0.24
Physical appearance0.1 ± 0.11-0.2 ± 0.19
Self-confidence0.0 ± 0.12-0.1 ± 0.21
Motivation0.0 ± 0.140.3 ± 0.24
The way people in general react0.2 ± 0.10-0.1 ± 0.17
Feelings about the future-0.1 ± 0.160.3 ± 0.26
Financial situation0.1 ± 0.140.0 ± 0.23
Living situation and conditions0.0 ± 0.13-0.1 ± 0.22
Depend on others-0.1 ± 0.170.4 ± 0.28
Freedom to eat0.0 ± 0.15-0.3 ± 0.25
Freedom to drink-0.2 ± 0.14-0.3 ± 0.23
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5246 (Leisure activities) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.4Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.6380 (Work life) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.5Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.5719 (Local or long distance travel) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.4Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.4052 (Vacations) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.3Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.7240 (Do physically) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.6876 (Family life) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.6478 (Friendships and social life) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9744 (Close personal relationship) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.3177 (Sex life) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.8Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.2087 (Physical appearance) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.7Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.7907 (Self-confidence) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.5Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.3444 (Motivation) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.3Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.2175 (The way people in general react) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.2 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.2062 (Feelings about the future) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.0 to 0.2Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.8762 (Financial situation) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.8900 (Living situation and conditions) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.1367 (Depend on others) · Least squares mean treatment difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.2Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.3144 (Freedom to eat) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.9Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.6869 (Freedom to drink) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12

The ADDQoL is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of QoL. Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact). Weighted impact scores were summed and divided by the number of applicable domains to give an overall Average Weighted Impact (AWI) score (higher values represent more positive impact). If there were less than 13 non-missing weighted-impact values, AWI was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame:
Baseline; Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12
score on a scaleHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Change From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 120.0 ± 0.070.0 ± 0.12
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9901 · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.3Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryChange From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-status version (DTSQs) and DTSQ-change version (DTSQc) are validated tools to assess treatment satisfaction and change in treatment satisfaction after therapy changes have occurred. The scale total was computed by adding the 6 items (1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) to produce the Treatment Satisfaction scale total, which has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 36 on the DTSQs and a minimum of -18 and a maximum of 18 on the DTSQc. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. If any of the 6 item scores were missing and the numbers of missing scores were less than the number of non-missing scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was to be computed by taking the average of the existing scores and multiplying the average by 6. If there were less than 4 non-missing item scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame:
Baseline; Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12
score on a scaleHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
DTSQs0.0 ± 0.320.0 ± 0.53
DTSQc9.4 ± 0.409.4 ± 0.68
Statistical analysis
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9081 (DTSQs) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -1.1 to 1.3Hylenex minus Standard CSII
  • Hylenex Recombinant vs Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII · ANOVA · p = 0.9840 (DTSQc) · Least squares mean treatment difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -1.5 to 1.6Hylenex minus Standard CSII
SecondaryMean Time to Change Infusion Site

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Mean Time to Change Infusion Site
minutesHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Mean Time to Change Infusion Site5.7 ± 4.454.7 ± 3.68
SecondaryMean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administration

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Mean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administration
minutesHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Mean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administration2.9 ± 3.963.8 ± 2.84
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site Change

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site Change
ParticipantsHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Very easy14349
Easy13046
Difficult31
Very difficult01
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling Questions

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program. Question 1: Achieve excellent post meal glucose control; Question 2: Insulin responds quickly when basal rate is changed; Question 3: Insulin responds quickly when correction bolus is given.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling Questions
ParticipantsHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Question 1 — Completely agree50
Question 1 — Agree11028
Question 1 — Neither agree or disagree9744
Question 1 — Disagree5922
Question 1 — Completely disagree53
Question 2 — Completely agree318
Question 2 — Agree14648
Question 2 — Neither agree or disagree7128
Question 2 — Disagree2512
Question 2 — Completely disagree31
Question 3 — Completely agree3614
Question 3 — Agree16539
Question 3 — Neither agree or disagree3422
Question 3 — Disagree3820
Question 3 — Completely disagree32
SecondaryMean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin Action

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · occurrences per week
Mean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin Action
occurrences per weekHylenex RecombinantStandard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Mean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin Action2.1 ± 2.192.5 ± 2.37

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)—11/227 (4.8%)174/227 (76.7%)
Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)—10/115 (8.7%)84/115 (73%)
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII—13/113 (11.5%)76/113 (67.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent serious events
EventCommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders0/2270/1153/113
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/2271/1152/113
Diabetic ketoacidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/2272/1151/113
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders0/2272/1150/113
MenometrorrhagiaReproductive system and breast disorders0/1220/531/64
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/2270/1151/113
Vertigo positionalEar and labyrinth disorders0/2270/1151/113
Retinal detachmentEye disorders0/2270/1151/113
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/2271/1151/113
HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/2270/1151/113
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 340
Most frequent other events
EventCommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Infusion site painGeneral disorders40/22717/1157/113
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations31/22715/11513/113
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations26/2279/1154/113
SinusitisInfections and infestations12/2277/1158/113
Infusion site erythemaGeneral disorders12/2274/1151/113
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders9/2276/1152/113
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations10/2273/1153/113
DepressionPsychiatric disorders10/2272/1151/113
BronchitisInfections and infestations5/2275/1153/113
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations2/2275/1150/113

Baseline characteristics

All participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITotal
Mean47.5 ± 12.9045.9 ± 13.1449.7 ± 14.7347.6 ± 13.47
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITotal
Female1225364239
Male1056249216
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITotal
Hispanic or Latino107522
Not Hispanic or Latino217108108433
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0011
Asian3025
Black or African American83213
White216112107435
Asian Indian0011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITotal
United States227115113455
08

Study locations

39 sites
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Concord, California 94520, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Encino, California 91436, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Escondido, California 92026, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Greenbrae, California 94904, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    San Mateo, California 94401, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Miami, Florida 33156, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Roswell, Georgia 30076, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Des Moines, Iowa 50314, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Wichita, Kansas 67226, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Butte, Montana 59701, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89148, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    New Hyde Park, New York 11042, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Asheville, North Carolina 28803, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Durham, North Carolina 27713, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Bartlett, Tennessee 38133, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37411, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Round Rock, Texas 78681, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    San Antonio, Texas 78258, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Olympia, Washington 98502, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Renton, Washington 98057, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
  • For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, call (858) 794-8889 8 AM to 5 PM Mon-Fri Pacific Standard Time
    Madison, Wisconsin 53717, United States
09

References and documents

Related links

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01848990
Lead sponsor
Halozyme Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 8, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Results posted
Oct 29, 2014
Last update
Nov 7, 2018

Study contacts

Douglas Muchmore, MD
study director · Halozyme Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion