An observational study in Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by Direct Flow Medical, Inc.. Status unknown at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 71 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-24.
Sponsored by Direct Flow Medical, Inc. · Observational
The purpose of this postmarket Registry is to assess the standard of care and clinical outcomes of the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System used in clinical routine according to the approved commercial indications. Procedures and assessments required by this registry are generally considered standard of care for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement patients.
Evaluation criteria will be the incidence of mortality/morbidity and adverse events clinical performance, and hemodynamic performance of the DEVICE via ultrasound (echo) and angiographic imaging.
The patient population will include patients who are candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). According to routine practice, the heart team (interventional cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon) makes a choice to use the Direct Flow Medical Aortic Valve System, compared to other available TAVR prostheses, on the basis of clinical and surgical considerations. Therefore, the valve is implanted when the heart team decides that this product is best suited to the specific patient.
In order to be enrolled in this Registry, the patient must be a candidate for the implantation of the Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System, based on the commercial indications as stated in the Instructions for Use.
Therefore, candidates for this study must meet the following criteria (Indications for Use):
Severe aortic valve stenosis determined by echocardiogram and Doppler:
All the Registry clinical evaluations and tests performed are generally considered standard of care for TAVR patients. When these recommendations conflict with the standard of care at the Registry site, the standard of care should prevail. In addition to the standard of care, the Sponsor recommends one brief additional evaluation (the EQ-5D quality of life measure) be conducted. Failure to perform this evaluation shall not be considered a protocol deviation.
Baseline Clinical Evaluation
Aorto-Iliac Angiogram:
All patients will have clinical follow-up at hospital discharge, 30 days, 12 months and annually to 3 years and undergo the following evaluations:
985 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 283 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 200 across 424 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →Direct Flow Medical, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The Direct Flow Medical Transcatheter Aortic Valve System is intended for use in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who require replacement of their native aortic valve but are extreme risk candidates for open surgical replacement. This is in accordance with the product Intended Use in the commercial Instructions for Use.
Candidates for this study must meet all of the Indications criteria and none of the Contraindications.
Inclusion Criteria (Indications):
Severe aortic valve stenosis determined by echocardiogram and Doppler:
Exclusion Criteria (Contraindications):
The Direct Flow Medical device is contraindicated for post implant balloon valvuloplasty.
aortic valve replacement
Device: Aortic Valve Replacement
Transthoracic Echo (TTE),CT Scan (ECG triggered, contrast enhanced),Aorto-Iliac Angiogram,Peripheral Evaluation,Coronary Evaluation,12 lead ECG,Arrhythmia Assessment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status, Modified Rankin Score Assessment (mRS) if symptomatic for stroke, Current Cardiac Medications, Transthoracic echo (TTE)
Also known as: Direct Flow Medical Percutaneous Aortic Valve 18F System, Discover, Transcatheter
Freedom from all-cause mortality at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Device Success (VARC defined)
* Absence of procedural mortality AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomic location AND * Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (no prosthesis-patient mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient \<20mmHg or peak velocity \<3m/s, AND no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)
Time frame: 30 days
Early Safety
* All-cause mortality * All stroke (disabling and non-disabling) * Life-threatening bleeding * Acute Kidney Injury - Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy) * Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention * Major vascular complications * Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVR, or SAVR)
Time frame: 30 days
Clinical efficacy
* All-cause mortality * All stroke (disabling and non-disabling) * Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years
Clinical efficacy
• NYHA Class III or IV
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years
Clinical efficacy
• Prosthetic heart valve dysfunction (mean aortic valve gradient ≥20mm Hg, EOA ≤0.9-1.1cm2 \[depending on body surface area\] and/or DVI \<0.35, AND/OR moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)
Time frame: 30 days through 5 years
Time-related Valve Safety
• Structural valve deterioration: * Valve-related dysfunction (mean aortic valve gradient (mean aortic valve gradient ≥20mmHg, EOA ≤0.9-1.1cm2 \[depending on body surface area\] and/or DVI \<0.35, AND/OR moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation) * Requiring repeat procedure (TAVR or SAVR)
Time frame: 5 years
Time-related Valve Safety
* Prosthetic valve endocarditis * Prosthetic valve thrombosis * Thromboembolic events (e.g., stroke) * VARC bleeding, unless clearly unrelated to valve therapy (e.g., trauma)
Time frame: 5 years
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Direct Flow Medical, Inc.