CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01844778Updated Jul 27, 2016Results posted

Ease of Use and Microbial Contamination of Tobramycin Inhalation Powder (TIP) Versus Nebulised Tobramycin Inhalation Solution (TIS) and Nebulised Colistimethate (COLI)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tobramycin Inhalation Powder and Tobramycin inhalation solution in Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 21 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 6 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-27.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this interventional Phase IV study was to explore the ease of use of TIP and prevalence of microbial contamination of the T-326 Inhaler compared with TIS and colistimethate administered via nebuliser for the treatment of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients chronically infected with P. aeruginosa.

It was anticipated that the data from this study would provide clinicians with further guidance on the relative differences between the speed and ease of use of these treatments as well as useful information on the prevalence of microbial contamination of the inhalation devices in "real world" use.

Read the detailed description

Patients who were on colistimethate (COLI), Tobramycin Inhalation Powder (TIP) or Tobramycin Inhalation Solution (TIS) were recruited for the study. They went through one treatment cycle on their usual inhaled antibiotic treatment, and were all transferred to TIP for the second treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was the total administration time of TIP vs TIS vs colistimethate, defined as the total time taken to prepare the delivery device and drug, administer the drug, and clean and disinfect the delivery device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

  • Cystic Fibrosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, FEV1, tobramycin inhalation powder, TOBI,
  • colistimethate
  • Cystic Fibrosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, FEV1, tobramycin inhalation powder, TOBI, colistimethate
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 36 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide written informed consent, HIPAA authorization, and assent (as appropriate for minors) prior to the performance of any study-related procedure
  • Confirmed diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
  • Male and female patients 6 years of age or older at screening
  • Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at screening (Visit 1) must be at least 25% and less than or equal to 90% of normal predicted values for age, sex, and height based on the NHANES III values (Hankinson, 1999) for patients 18 years of age or greater, and based on values from Wang (Wang 1993) for patients less than 18 years of age.
  • Documented use of any of the nebulized antibiotics based on local practice:
  • Tobramycin Inhalation Solution, colistimethate, or Tobramycin Inhalation Powder for at least 1 cycle within the last 6 months or
  • Colistimethate continuous use for at least 8 weeks within the last 6 months This cycle of treatment (or continuous colistimethate treatment period) is in addition to the treatment cycle during which the subject is being screened.
  • P. aeruginosa must be present in a sputum or deep cough throat swab culture or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (only for BAL a threshold level of 10\^3 CFU/mL is required) within 6 months prior to screening, and in the sputum or deep cough throat swab culture at screening or rescreening (Visit 1);

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of sputum culture or deep cough throat swab (or BAL) culture yielding Burkholderia cenocepacia complex within 2 years prior to prescreening or sputum culture yielding B. cenocepacia complex at screening (Visit 1)
  • History of hearing loss or chronic tinnitus deemed clinically significant by the investigator
  • Serum creatinine 176.8 μmol/L (2 mg/dL) or greater, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 14.28 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) or greater, or an abnormal urinalysis defined as 2+ or greater proteinuria at screening
  • Known local or systemic hypersensitivity to aminoglycosides
  • Regularly receiving more than 1 class of inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotic
  • Use of any investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening
  • Signs and symptoms of acute pulmonary disease, e.g., pneumonia, pneumothorax
  • Body mass index less than 12 kg/m2
  • History of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated
  • Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities (not associated with the study indication) at screening (Visit 1)
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test
  • Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using effective methods of contraception during study treatment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TIS/TIP

    During the first cycle of treatment, participants received nebulized TIS, 300 mg twice per day for 28 days followed by 28 days off-treatment. During the second cycle, participants received 112 mg (four 28 mg capsules) twice per day for 28 days followed by 28 days off-treatment.

    Drug: Tobramycin Inhalation Powder · Drug: Tobramycin inhalation solution

  • Active comparator
    COLI/TIP

    During the first cycle, participants received nebulized COLI, 1 million or 2 million units twice or thrice per day (or the participant's usual dose and regimen) for 56 days (no off-treatment period) or 28 days on-treatment followed by 28 days off-treatment (cycling regimen), depending on local treatment guidelines. During the second cycle, participants received TIP, 112 mg (four 28 mg capsules) twice per day for 28 days followed by 28 days off-treatment.

    Drug: Tobramycin Inhalation Powder · Drug: Colistimethate

  • Active comparator
    TIP/TIP

    During the first and second cycles, participants received TIP, 112 mg (four 28 mg capsules) twice per day for 28 days followed by 28 days off-treatment.

    Drug: Tobramycin Inhalation Powder

Interventions

  • DrugTobramycin Inhalation Powder

    Tobramycin Inhalation Powder was administered via TOBI® Podhaler (T-326 inhaler).

    Also known as: TIP

  • DrugTobramycin inhalation solution

    Tobramycin inhalation solution was administered via nebuliser

    Also known as: TIS

  • DrugColistimethate

    Colistimethate was administered via nebuliser.

    Also known as: COLI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Total Administration Time

    The mean total time for administration of TIP via T-326 inhaler versus the total time for administration of COLI or TIS was assessed from information entered by participants into an ediary during the last 7 days prior to the last dose of a cycle. The total time included the setup, preparation, administration and cleaning/disinfection time.

    Time frame: days 22 through 28 (cycle 1), days 78 through 84 (cycle 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in P. Aeruginosa Sputum Density

    Sputum samples were sent to a central laboratory at the start and end of 2 treatment periods. The absolute change in the number of colony forming units (CFU) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum = the value of end of on/off treatment period of the cycle minus the pre-dose value at the start of that cycle. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: days 1, 28 (cycle 1); 57, 84, 112 (cycle 2)

  2. Number of Participants With Any Contaminated Delivery Device

    Devices used to administer the drugs (the T-326 inhaler and nebulisers) were swabbed for contamination testing at the start and end of each treatment cycle (or discontinuation visit if the participant withdrew). No assessments were required from the T-326 inhaler when participants started the treatment period (days 1 and 57). Microbial contamination was measured according to device type and the frequency of organism growth (light/ moderate/ heavy). All nebulisers (neb) used by the participants were analyzed, including those for inhaling other medications, like mucolytics.

    Time frame: days (d) 1, 28, 57, 84

  3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) - MIC50 and MIC90 Tobramycin Values

    MIC50/90 is the lowest concentration required to inhibit 50%/90% of the isolates tested. The MIC50/90 of a range of antibiotics for P.aeruginosa was determined at the start and end of each treatment cycle, and at the end of the off-treatment period of the second cycle.

    Time frame: days 1, 28, 57, 84, 112

  4. Number of Participants With Post-inhalation Bronchospasm

    Bronchospasm was defined as the relative decrease of 20% or more in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted from pre-dose to 15 to 45 minutes post-dose.

    Time frame: days 1, 28, 57, 84

07

Results

Posted May 24, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIP
Started142818
Safety set 1 (at least 1 dose, cycle 1)142818
Safety set 2 (at least 1 dose, cycle 2)122515
Completed122514
Not completed234
Withdrew: Protocol deviation012
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject200
Withdrew: Adverse event022

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Total Administration Time

The mean total time for administration of TIP via T-326 inhaler versus the total time for administration of COLI or TIS was assessed from information entered by participants into an ediary during the last 7 days prior to the last dose of a cycle. The total time included the setup, preparation, administration and cleaning/disinfection time.

Time frame:
days 22 through 28 (cycle 1), days 78 through 84 (cycle 2)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Mean Total Administration Time
minutesTIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIP
Cycle 1 (n=8,17,14)37.0 ± 22.0616.4 ± 9.544.2 ± 2.02
Cycle 2 (n=10,16,11)5.0 ± 2.043.8 ± 1.703.4 ± 2.06
SecondaryChange in P. Aeruginosa Sputum Density

Sputum samples were sent to a central laboratory at the start and end of 2 treatment periods. The absolute change in the number of colony forming units (CFU) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum = the value of end of on/off treatment period of the cycle minus the pre-dose value at the start of that cycle. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
days 1, 28 (cycle 1); 57, 84, 112 (cycle 2)
Reported as:
Mean · log10 CFU/mL
Change in P. Aeruginosa Sputum Density
log10 CFU/mLTIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIP
Cycle 1, on-treatment change (n=11,22,9)-1.4 ± 1.85-0.6 ± 1.88-1.7 ± 2.87
Cycle 1, off-treatment change (n=10,20,8)0.2 ± 1.98-0.6 ± 2.36-0.2 ± 1.56
Cycle 2, on-treatment (n=9,16,5)-0.9 ± 1.66-0.5 ± 1.65-1.6 ± 1.53
Cycle 2, off-treatment (n=9,18,5)0.0 ± 0.950.5 ± 2.550.0 ± 0.91
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Contaminated Delivery Device

Devices used to administer the drugs (the T-326 inhaler and nebulisers) were swabbed for contamination testing at the start and end of each treatment cycle (or discontinuation visit if the participant withdrew). No assessments were required from the T-326 inhaler when participants started the treatment period (days 1 and 57). Microbial contamination was measured according to device type and the frequency of organism growth (light/ moderate/ heavy). All nebulisers (neb) used by the participants were analyzed, including those for inhaling other medications, like mucolytics.

Time frame:
days (d) 1, 28, 57, 84
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Any Contaminated Delivery Device
ParticipantsTIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIP
P. a biotype 2 - dry,d1,neb, moderate,(n=0,0,1)NANA1
A. baumannii,d1,neb,heavy,n=0,7,0NA1NA
A. junii,d1,neb,moderate,n=0,7,0NA1NA
A.lwoffi,d1,neb,light,n=0,7,0NA2NA
H. parainfluenza,d1,neb,light,n=0,7,0NA1NA
O. anthropic,d1,neb,heavy,n=0,7,0NA1NA
P. fluorescens,d1,neb,light,n=0,7,0NA1NA
P. putida,d1,neb,light,n=0,7,0NA1NA
P. stutzeri,d1,neb,moderate,n=0,7,0NA1NA
S.liquefaciens,d1,neb,light,n=0,7,0NA1NA
S. multivorum,d1,neb,light,n=0,7,0NA1NA
S. maltophilia,d1,neb,light,n=0,7,0NA1NA
Acinetobacter species,d28,neb,light,n=0,6,0NA1NA
C. indologenes,d28,neb,moderate,n=0,6,0NA1NA
D. acidovorans,d 28,neb,light,n=0,6,0NA1NA
P. fluorescens,d28,neb,light,n=0,6,0NA2NA
S. paucimobilis,d28,neb,heavy,n=0,6,0NA1NA
S. aureus,d28,neb,light,n=0,6,0NA1NA
P. a biotype 2 - dry,d57,neb,light,n=1,0,01NANA
S. aureus,d84,T-326,light,n=1,0,01NANA
SecondaryMinimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) - MIC50 and MIC90 Tobramycin Values

MIC50/90 is the lowest concentration required to inhibit 50%/90% of the isolates tested. The MIC50/90 of a range of antibiotics for P.aeruginosa was determined at the start and end of each treatment cycle, and at the end of the off-treatment period of the second cycle.

Time frame:
days 1, 28, 57, 84, 112
Reported as:
Number · ug/mL
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) - MIC50 and MIC90 Tobramycin Values
ug/mLTIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIP
MIC50: Day 1, n=14,27,18; m=27,51,29222
MIC50: Day 28, n=13,23,13; m=25,46,21222
MIC50: Day 57, n=11,19,15; m=23,34,24442
MIC50: Day 84, n=12,17,11; m=25,29,18442
MIC50: Day 112, n=12,19,12; m=24,33,19221
MIC90: Day 1, n=14,27,18; m=27,51,292561664
MIC90: Day 28, n=13,23,13; m=25,46,212561664
MIC90: Day 57, n=11,19,15; m=23,34,24641664
MIC90: Day 84, n=12,17,11; m=25,29,185123264
MIC90: Day 112, n=12,19,12; m=24,33,19323232
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Post-inhalation Bronchospasm

Bronchospasm was defined as the relative decrease of 20% or more in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted from pre-dose to 15 to 45 minutes post-dose.

Time frame:
days 1, 28, 57, 84
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Post-inhalation Bronchospasm
ParticipantsTIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIP
Day 1, n=8,17,14010
Day 28, n=6,19,14010
Day 57, n=10,22,13001
Day 84, n=8,14,10000

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TIS/TIP - Cycle 1—3/14 (21.4%)5/14 (35.7%)
TIS/TIP - Cycle 2—3/12 (25%)6/12 (50%)
COLI/TIP - Cycle 1—9/28 (32.1%)13/28 (46.4%)
COLI/TIP - Cycle 2—3/25 (12%)12/25 (48%)
TIP/TIP - Cycle 1—3/18 (16.7%)10/18 (55.6%)
TIP/TIP - Cycle 2—2/15 (13.3%)10/15 (66.7%)
Overall TIP Cycle 2—8/52 (15.4%)28/52 (53.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventTIS/TIP - Cycle 1TIS/TIP - Cycle 2COLI/TIP - Cycle 1COLI/TIP - Cycle 2TIP/TIP - Cycle 1TIP/TIP - Cycle 2Overall TIP Cycle 2
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosisInfections and infestations3/143/126/283/252/180/156/52
SinusitisInfections and infestations0/141/120/280/250/180/151/52
TinnitusEar and labyrinth disorders0/140/120/280/250/181/151/52
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/140/120/280/250/181/151/52
Acoustic stimulation tests abnormalInvestigations0/140/120/280/250/181/151/52
Sputum increasedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/140/120/280/250/181/151/52
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/140/120/280/251/180/150/52
Pulmonary function test decreasedInvestigations0/140/121/280/251/180/150/52
HaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/140/120/280/251/180/150/52
Fungal infectionInfections and infestations0/140/120/281/250/180/151/52
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 60
Most frequent other events
EventTIS/TIP - Cycle 1TIS/TIP - Cycle 2COLI/TIP - Cycle 1COLI/TIP - Cycle 2TIP/TIP - Cycle 1TIP/TIP - Cycle 2Overall TIP Cycle 2
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosisInfections and infestations2/141/125/286/250/181/158/52
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/140/123/280/252/183/153/52
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/140/120/280/253/183/153/52
Sputum increasedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/140/120/280/253/182/152/52
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/141/122/280/252/182/153/52
HaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/141/120/282/252/180/153/52
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders0/141/121/280/250/181/152/52
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders0/141/120/281/250/180/152/52
Glucose urine presentInvestigations0/141/120/280/250/180/151/52
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/141/120/280/251/180/151/52

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)TIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIPTotal
Mean27.4 ± 6.8228.4 ± 9.8626.6 ± 7.2527.6 ± 8.40
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TIS/TIPCOLI/TIPTIP/TIPTotal
Female410721
Male10181139
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    München, 81241, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Galway, Ireland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sevilla, Andalucia 41013, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barcelona, Catalunya 08035, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana 46026, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Palma De Mallorca, Islas Baleares 07120, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Basel, 4031, Switzerland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St. Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Zürich, 8032, Switzerland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Penarth, Vale of Glamorgan CF64 2XX, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Birmingham, West Midlands b9 5ss, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bristol, BS1 3NU, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    East Yorkshire, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Exeter, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Liverpool, L14 3PE, United Kingdom
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Greenwood J, Schwarz C, Sommerwerck U, Nash EF, Tamm M, Cao W, Mastoridis P, Debonnett L, Hamed K. Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2017 Jul;11(7):249-260. doi: 10.1177/1753465817710596. PubMed 28614995 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01844778
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2013
Start date
Aug 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2015
Completion
Oct 2015
Results posted
May 24, 2016
Last update
Jul 27, 2016

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion