CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01837901Updated Mar 18, 2021Results posted

Transcorneal Electrostimulation for Therapy of Retinitis Pigmentosa

An interventional study of Transcorneal electrostimulation in Retinitis Pigmentosa, sponsored by Okuvision GmbH. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-18.

Sponsored by Okuvision GmbH · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term effects of transcorneal electrostimulation (TcES) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). In a prior study (NCT00804102) the results of short-term stimulation showed a positive effect on the visual field and other parameters. In this study, the patients will be stimulated with either 0%, 150% or 200% of the individually determined phosphene threshold.

Read the detailed description

The study was performed at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Germany. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The study was conducted according to the standards of GCP, the European Union Directive for Medical Devices, and the German Medical Product Law.

Patients were seen at 14 visits over a period of 78 weeks: one baseline visit (screening), followed by 12 visits (in week 1-4 weekly, then in weeks 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46 and 52; dates varied a maximum of ± 1 week) including application of TcES for 52 weeks and one follow-up visit (in week 78, dates varied a maximum of ± 1 week).

After inclusion patients were randomly assigned to TcES with 0 mA (sham), 150% or 200% of their individual electrical phosphene threshold (EPT) current at 20 Hz.

Patients and technicians who performed kinetic perimetry, as well as full-field electrophysiology (ERG), multifocal ERG (mfERG) and dark adaptation, were blinded to the treatment group for the entire study period. The physicians who performed all other examinations and TcES were not blinded to study treatment because they were responsible for setting the stimulation parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retinitis Pigmentosa

Keywords

  • Transcorneal electrostimulation
  • TcES
  • TES
03

In context

Retinitis

250 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinitis; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is above the median of 31 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Retinitis.

Browse Retinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Okuvision GmbH is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult subject with RP (rod-cone dystrophy)
  • BCVA 0.02 to 0.9
  • Reliable visual field measurements
  • Reliable ERG measurements
  • Skillful enough to use the device at home
  • Able to give consent and take part during the whole study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • Neovascularisation of any origin
  • After arterial or venous occlusion
  • After retinal detachment
  • Silicone oil tamponade
  • Dry or exudative age-related macular degeneration
  • Macular edema
  • All forms of glaucoma
  • Any form of corneal degeneration that reduces visual acuity
  • Systemic diseases that are difficult to control or manage, that could endanger the normal study schedule
  • Patients in a permanently poor general condition, which could hinder the regular attendance at control examinations in the clinic
  • Forms of mental illness related to the bipolar affective and schizoid-affective disorders, and all forms of dementia
  • Simultaneous participation in another interventional study or history of interventions whose effect may still persist
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham

    OkuStim is used to determine the phosphene threshold, device is turned on but no stimulation is performed.

    Device: Transcorneal electrostimulation

  • Experimental
    150%

    OkuStim is used to determine the phosphene threshold, and then to administer transcorneal electrostimulation with a stimulation strength corresponding to 150% of the patient's phosphene threshold.

    Device: Transcorneal electrostimulation

  • Experimental
    200%

    OkuStim is used to determine the phosphene threshold, and then to administer transcorneal electrostimulation with a stimulation strength corresponding to 200% of the patient's phosphene threshold.

    Device: Transcorneal electrostimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscorneal electrostimulation

    Also known as: OkuStim, TES, TcES

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Field, III4e

    Change in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement

    Time frame: one year

  2. Visual Field, V4e

    Change in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. ERG B-wave

    Time frame: one year

  2. ERG A-wave

    Time frame: one year

  3. BCVA

    Best corrected visual acuity

    Time frame: one year

  4. VFQ-25

    Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)

    Time frame: one year

  5. Dark Adaptation

    Adaptation time, changes in pupil diameter, threshold to fullfield blue and red light is measured with a fullfield stimulus threshold test (FST) on the ESPION ERG machine (Diagnosys).

    Time frame: one year

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2021

Participant flow

Patients were recruited from the hospital's hereditary retinal degeneration clinic (Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany). Of 88 enrolled participants, 63 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to treatment.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSham150%200%
Started222120
Completed201517
Not completed263

Outcome measures

PrimaryVisual Field, III4e

Change in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Mean · deg2
Visual Field, III4e
deg2Sham150%200%
Baseline4835.29 (2723.26 to 6947.32)4988.43 (2799.14 to 7177.73)6234.59 (4226.84 to 8242.34)
1 year4488.39 (2473.83 to 6502.95)4962.76 (2765.44 to 7160.08)5878.75 (3926.21 to 7831.28)
PrimaryVisual Field, V4e

Change in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Mean · deg2
Visual Field, V4e
deg2Sham150%200%
Baseline7135.77 (4771.87 to 9499.66)7599.65 (5004.80 to 10194.50)8303.59 (6217.92 to 10389.27)
1 year6730.20 (4459.71 to 9000.69)7641.55 (4945.26 to 10337.84)8112.18 (6028.01 to 10196.34)
SecondaryERG B-wave
Time frame:
one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryERG A-wave
Time frame:
one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryBCVA

Best corrected visual acuity

Time frame:
one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryVFQ-25

Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)

Time frame:
one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryDark Adaptation

Adaptation time, changes in pupil diameter, threshold to fullfield blue and red light is measured with a fullfield stimulus threshold test (FST) on the ESPION ERG machine (Diagnosys).

Time frame:
one year

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sham0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)13/22 (59.1%)
150%0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)18/21 (85.7%)
200%0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)20/20 (100%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSham150%200%
Dry Eye SymptomEye disorders2/2214/2114/20
Non-Ocular Adverse Events TotalGeneral disorders10/2211/2111/20
Ocular discomfortEye disorders2/222/211/20
Ocular painEye disorders2/222/210/20
Corneal erosionEye disorders0/220/211/20
General and ocular infectionEye disorders0/220/211/20
Skin irritation due to electrodeEye disorders0/221/210/20
Ocular infectionEye disorders0/221/210/20
Macular edemaEye disorders1/220/210/20
Subjective visual decreaseEye disorders1/220/210/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sham150%200%Total
Mean48 ± 1542 ± 1349 ± 1646 ± 15
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sham150%200%Total
Female117725
Male981027
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sham150%200%Total
Germany20151752
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Department für Augenheilkunde, Eberhard-Karls-Universität
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Naycheva L, Schatz A, Rock T, Willmann G, Messias A, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E, Gekeler F. Phosphene thresholds elicited by transcorneal electrical stimulation in healthy subjects and patients with retinal diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 1;53(12):7440-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9612. PubMed 23049087 ↗
  • Gekeler F; Arbeitsgruppe Elektrostimulation des Department fur Augenheilkunde am Universitats-Klinikum Tubingen. [Transcorneal electrostimulation]. Ophthalmologe. 2012 Feb;109(2):129-35. doi: 10.1007/s00347-011-2450-6. German. PubMed 22350549 ↗
  • Schatz A, Rock T, Naycheva L, Willmann G, Wilhelm B, Peters T, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E, Messias A, Gekeler F. Transcorneal electrical stimulation for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled exploratory study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 23;52(7):4485-96. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6932. PubMed 21467183 ↗
  • Schatz A, Arango-Gonzalez B, Fischer D, Enderle H, Bolz S, Rock T, Naycheva L, Grimm C, Messias A, Zrenner E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Willmann G, Gekeler F. Transcorneal electrical stimulation shows neuroprotective effects in retinas of light-exposed rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 15;53(9):5552-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10037. PubMed 22807300 ↗
  • Rock T, Schatz A, Naycheva L, Gosheva M, Pach J, Wilhelm B, Peters T, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E, Willmann G, Gekeler F. [Effects of transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with Stargardt's disease]. Ophthalmologe. 2013 Jan;110(1):68-73. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2749-y. German. PubMed 23329121 ↗
  • Schatz A, Pach J, Gosheva M, Naycheva L, Willmann G, Wilhelm B, Peters T, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Zrenner E, Messias A, Gekeler F. Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation for Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Follow-up Study Over 1 Year. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jan 1;58(1):257-269. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19906. PubMed 28114587 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01837901
Lead sponsor
Okuvision GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2013
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Feb 2014
Results posted
Mar 18, 2021
Last update
Mar 18, 2021

Study contacts

Florian Gekeler, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion