CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01837030Updated Jun 14, 2018

Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conservative Therapy for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

An interventional study of Ferrous sulfate and Capsule Endoscopy in Hemorrhage and Anemia, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-14.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Why this study was withdrawn
not feasible due to funding
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a single center prospective randomized control trial comparing the utility of performing capsule endoscopy compared to conservative management with oral iron therapy as the initial course of action in patients with non-severe obscure occult or obscure overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The investigators hypothesize that outcomes in patients with non-severe obscure GI bleeding who receive conservative therapy with oral iron will not differ to those on oral iron who undergo capsule endoscopy.

Read the detailed description

Although the American Gastroenterological Association suggests that patients with obscure GI bleeding undergo a capsule endoscopy after a negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy, current recommendations from the British Society of Gastroenterology argue that unless there is an inadequate response to iron therapy, further imaging of the small bowel is probably not necessary. Several studies have demonstrated that this approach is reasonably safe. Furthermore, Laine et al demonstrated that when patients with obscure GI bleeding were randomized to either capsule endoscopy or dedicated small bowel contrast radiography, the rates of further bleeding, measured by subsequent hospitalization and blood transfusion events, were similar between the two groups. No study has randomized patients with obscure GI bleeding to receive capsule endoscopy vs. conservative therapy with oral iron.

This study is a single center prospective randomized control trial comparing the utility of performing capsule endoscopy compared to conservative management with oral iron therapy as the initial course of action in patients with non-severe obscure occult or obscure overt gastrointestinal bleeding. All patients will be recruited in the G.I. clinic, the endoscopy unit, or during inpatient consults after negative upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. The study will be explained to patients who qualify at that time. During this visit, patients will be questioned with regard to lower or upper G.I. symptoms, including abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, diarrhea, change in stool character, melena and intermittent hematochezia. All patients will be started on standard dose oral iron therapy after informed consent. If the patient is already taking iron supplements, their dose with be adjusted to the standard regimen after informed consent. Patients will then be randomized to undergo capsule endoscopy or not. For patients randomized to undergo capsule endoscopy, all subsequent evaluation and treatment will be determined by capsule findings (i.e. capsule directed management) and standard of care at our institution.

Patients will be followed for 1 year. Follow up lab draws will occur at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. They will consist of a complete blood count (CBC) and ferritin and can be performed at either the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) or an outside facility or office. If performed outside of MUSC, a standard medical records release form will be utilized to obtain the lab information. Patients will be provided with a paper card indicating their date of enrollment in the study. This card will be kept by the patient for the entire 12 month follow up period and will be collected at the end of the follow up period. The card will have an area where the patient can write the date of their first blood transfusion after enrollment. There will also be numerical checkboxes that the patient will check off for each unit of packed red blood cells (RBCs) they receive during the 12 month follow up period. Telephone calls will be made to each patient every 3 months after enrollment to inquire about hospitalizations and bleeding related procedures (including endoscopy, capsule, small bowel radiology, interventional radiology and surgery). Records of these hospitalizations and procedures will be obtained using a standard medical records release form.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemorrhage
  • Anemia
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; 79 are open to participants now.

Browse Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult men and post-menopausal women with iron deficiency anemia and pre-menopausal women with iron deficiency anemia and a negative gynecologic workup or adults with overt GI bleeding as defined by melena or hematochezia with a ≥2 gram drop in hemoglobin after stabilization (Iron deficiency is defined as hemoglobin \<13.7 g/dL in men and \<12 g/dL in women with serum ferritin level \<50 ng/mL). Also, patients with an otherwise unexplained drop in hemoglobin of ≥ 2 g/dL in the setting of hemoccult positive stool
  • Negative EGD and colonoscopy for source of GI bleeding within six months of enrollment into the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing overt gastrointestinal bleeding requiring ≥4 units of packed RBC's on any given day in the setting of overt bleeding, blood transfusions on separate days (separated by ≥12 hours), or ≥6 units of packed RBC's over the previous 7-day period prior to presentation, in the setting of overt bleeding.
  • Myocardial infarct, acute neurologic event, sepsis, or respiratory failure within the previous 1 week
  • History of small bowel obstruction
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Age less than 18
  • Known GI or hematologic malignancy
  • Achalasia
  • Contraindications to capsule endoscopy (inability to take prep), or felt unsafe to undergo capsule as per study investigators
  • Esophageal stricture that precludes even endoscopic capsule placement
  • History of upper GI or small bowel surgery
  • Inability to take oral iron.
  • Active IV iron use.
  • Alternate source of blood loss (e.g., menorrhagia)
  • Hematemesis sufficient to be the cause of the hemoglobin decline
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Oral Iron

    Dietary Supplement: Ferrous sulfate

  • Other
    Oral Iron and Capsule Endoscopy

    Dietary Supplement: Ferrous sulfate · Device: Capsule Endoscopy

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementFerrous sulfate

    Ferrous sulfate 325mg by mouth twice daily for the duration of the 12 month follow up period

  • DeviceCapsule Endoscopy

    GIVEN capsule

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to first blood transfusion after randomization

    Time-to-event analysis. Patients will be provided an index card on which they will record the date of their first blood transfusion after randomization

    Time frame: 12 month follow up period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total number of blood transfusions

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  2. Total number of hospitalizations

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  3. Persistent Iron Deficiency Anemia as measured by ferritin and hemoglobin

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

  4. Total number of bleeding-related procedures performed after randomization

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  5. Mortality

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Goddard AF, James MW, McIntyre AS, Scott BB; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. Gut. 2011 Oct;60(10):1309-16. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.228874. Epub 2011 May 11. PubMed 21561874 ↗
  • Gordon S, Bensen S, Smith R. Long-term follow-up of older patients with iron deficiency anemia after a negative GI evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 May;91(5):885-9. PubMed 8633576 ↗
  • McLoughlin MT, Tham TC. Long-term follow-up of patients with iron deficiency anaemia after a negative gastrointestinal evaluation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Aug;21(8):872-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328321836c. PubMed 19282769 ↗
  • Laine L, Sahota A, Shah A. Does capsule endoscopy improve outcomes in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding? Randomized trial versus dedicated small bowel radiography. Gastroenterology. 2010 May;138(5):1673-1680.e1; quiz e11-2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.047. Epub 2010 Feb 2. PubMed 20138043 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01837030
Lead sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 22, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Last update
Jun 14, 2018

Study contacts

Andrew Brock, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion