ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01827787Updated Nov 6, 2024Results posted

Eribulin in HER2 Negative Metastatic BrCa

A Phase 2 interventional study of Eribulin in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-06.

Sponsored by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Improvements in outcomes with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have been observed in the last 30 years, however, overall prognosis remains poor with median survival of 2 to 3 years. Long term complete responses are observed only for a minority of MBC patients (2-5%) and MBC remains an incurable disease for most patients. Eribulin is a chemotherapy approved by the US FDA in November of 2010 to treat patients with MBC who have received at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. In this research study, the investigators are looking to see how well eribulin helps participants with MBC in an earlier-line setting. Eribulin works by interfering with cancer cell division, growth and spread.

Read the detailed description

Based on positive results in heavily pre-treated MBC patients, eribulin is being studied as first-line or second-line chemotherapy treatment. This is a non-randomized, open label study with participants enrolled in one of two cohorts: Cohort 1. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) or Cohort 2: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) meaning HR-negative/HER2-negative (HR-/HER2-). HR- means progesterone receptor-negative (PR-) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-). Beyond efficacy as measured primarily by response to treatment, investigators will evaluate safety, tolerability and quality of life. In particular, it is hypothesized that eribulin may have lower rates of neuropathy, a common side effect of many of the major chemotherapeutics with activity in MBC. The investigators will study the effect eribulin has on the nerves through regular questionnaires that ask about any nerve-related symptoms. The investigators also plan to send blood samples to explore if gene markers may indicate increased sensitivity to the nerve effects of eribulin.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • metastatic breast cancer
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,815 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,920 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is above the median of 72 across 9,494 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 832 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Of its 113 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologically or cytologically proven invasive breast cancer, locally recurrent or metastatic, with at least one measureable lesion according to RECIST v1.1
  • Hormone receptor positive or hormone receptor negative HER2-negative disease
  • Up to one prior line of chemotherapy for advanced disease is allowed (discontinued at least 14 days prior to initiation of protocol therapy)
  • Prior bevacizumab in the neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting is acceptable
  • No limit on prior lines of endocrine therapy, but must be discontinued at least 7 days prior to initiation of protocol therapy
  • Must have completed any prior radiotherapy at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of protocol therapy
  • Must have recovered from reversible effects of prior therapies to no more than grade 1 toxicity, with the exception of alopecia
  • Agree to use adequate contraception for the duration of study participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Prior treatment with eribulin
  • Prior malignancy other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or nonmelanoma skin cancer unless diagnosed and definitively treated at least 3 years before enrollment in this study
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular impairment
  • Active brain metastases or unevaluated neurologic symptoms suggestive of brain metastases
  • Pulmonary dysfunction requiring the use of oxygen
  • Prior organ allograft requiring immunosuppression
  • HIV positive on combination antiretroviral therapy
  • Pre-existing grade 3 or 4 neuropathy
  • Hypersensitivity to halichondrin B or halichondrin B chemical derivative
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
  • Inability to read in English
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-

    Eribulin: 1.4 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 2-5 minutes on days 1 and 8 of each 21 day cycle Participants remained on single agent eribulin until disease progression or withdrawal for other reasons.

    Drug: Eribulin

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2: TNBC

    Eribulin: 1.4 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 2-5 minutes on days 1 and 8 of each 21 day cycle Participants remained on single agent eribulin until disease progression or withdrawal for other reasons.

    Drug: Eribulin

Interventions

  • Also known as: E7389, Halaven, ER-086526, NSC-707389

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on treatment; Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Participants alive without PD are censored at date of last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: PD is at least a 20% increase in sum longest diameter (LD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study with at least 5 mm absolute increase or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on and off treatment; Median (maximum) PFS follow-up was 12.6 (27.1) months in Cohort 1 and 12.4 (14.3) months in Cohort 2.

  2. Time to First Response (TTR)

    TTR is defined as the time from first dose of study treatment until the earliest date that complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria is objectively documented. Non-CR, non-PR participants are censored at date of last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PR or better overall response requires 4 week or later confirmation and assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on treatment; Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2).

  3. Duration of Overall Response (DOR)

    DOR is defined as the that response criteria for CR or PR (whichever is recorded first) are first met until the date that PD or death from any cause is first objectively documented. Participants who do not have PD will be censored on date of last disease assessment.

    Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on and off treatment; Median (maximum) DOR follow-up was 12.6 (27.1) months in Cohort 1 and 12.4 (14.3) months in Cohort 2.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy

    The percentage of treated participants experiencing grade 1-3 peripheral sensory neuropathy with treatment attribution of possible, probable or definite based on Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAEv4) as reported on case report forms.

    Time frame: Adverse events were assessed every cycle throughout treatment. Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Motor Neuropathy

    TThe percentage of treated participants experiencing grade 1-3 peripheral motor neuropathy with treatment attribution of possible, probable or definite based on Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAEv4) as reported on case report forms.

    Time frame: Adverse events were assessed every cycle throughout treatment. Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2)

  6. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Subscale (FACT-BCS) Change Score From Baseline

    The FACT-BCS is a validated, self-administered questionnaire which captures quality of life (QOL) concerns specific to breast cancer patients. (Brady MJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. JCO 1997; 15:974-86). The FACT-BCS has 9-items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (Not at all, A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much) with a maximum score of 36. A higher score indicates better QOL. A minimal clinically important difference is 3-5 points.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and on treatment day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11

  7. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity Subscale (FACT-Ntx) Change Score From Baseline

    The FACT-Ntx is a validated, self-administered questionnaire which captures quality of life (QOL) concerns specific to patients suffering from neurotoxicity. (Calhoun EA, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (Fact/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13:741-8). The FACT-Ntx has 11-items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (Not at all, A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much) with a maximum score of 44. A higher score indicates better QOL. A minimal clinically important difference is 3-5 points.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and on treatment day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11

07

Results

Posted Feb 6, 2019
Limitations and caveats
The study terminated early with cohort 2: TNBC not meeting target accrual of 45 patients.

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled between May 2013 and March 2016.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
Started4538
Completed4538
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on treatment; Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
Overall Response Rate (ORR)35.6 (24 to 49)13.2 (5 to 26)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: HR+/HER2- · Fisher Exact · p = 0.42
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Participants alive without PD are censored at date of last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: PD is at least a 20% increase in sum longest diameter (LD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study with at least 5 mm absolute increase or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD is appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on and off treatment; Median (maximum) PFS follow-up was 12.6 (27.1) months in Cohort 1 and 12.4 (14.3) months in Cohort 2.
Reported as:
Mean · months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
monthsCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)6.2 (5.9 to 8.7)4.0 (3.5 to 4.8)
SecondaryTime to First Response (TTR)

TTR is defined as the time from first dose of study treatment until the earliest date that complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria is objectively documented. Non-CR, non-PR participants are censored at date of last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PR or better overall response requires 4 week or later confirmation and assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on treatment; Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2).
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to First Response (TTR)
monthsCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
Time to First Response (TTR)10.6 (1.7 to 14.9)NA (1.9 to 4.3)
SecondaryDuration of Overall Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the that response criteria for CR or PR (whichever is recorded first) are first met until the date that PD or death from any cause is first objectively documented. Participants who do not have PD will be censored on date of last disease assessment.

Time frame:
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 9 weeks on and off treatment; Median (maximum) DOR follow-up was 12.6 (27.1) months in Cohort 1 and 12.4 (14.3) months in Cohort 2.
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Overall Response (DOR)
monthsCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
Duration of Overall Response (DOR)6.5 (1.8 to 12.3)1.9 (1.3 to 4.1)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy

The percentage of treated participants experiencing grade 1-3 peripheral sensory neuropathy with treatment attribution of possible, probable or definite based on Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAEv4) as reported on case report forms.

Time frame:
Adverse events were assessed every cycle throughout treatment. Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
percentage of participantsCombined Cohort 1: HR+/HER2- and Cohort 2: TNBC
Percentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy36.1 (27.4 to 45.7)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Motor Neuropathy

TThe percentage of treated participants experiencing grade 1-3 peripheral motor neuropathy with treatment attribution of possible, probable or definite based on Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAEv4) as reported on case report forms.

Time frame:
Adverse events were assessed every cycle throughout treatment. Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Motor Neuropathy
percentage of participantsCombined Cohort 1: HR+/HER2- and Cohort 2: TNBC
Percentage of Participants With Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Peripheral Motor Neuropathy22.9 (15.5 to 31.7)
SecondaryFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Subscale (FACT-BCS) Change Score From Baseline

The FACT-BCS is a validated, self-administered questionnaire which captures quality of life (QOL) concerns specific to breast cancer patients. (Brady MJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. JCO 1997; 15:974-86). The FACT-BCS has 9-items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (Not at all, A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much) with a maximum score of 36. A higher score indicates better QOL. A minimal clinically important difference is 3-5 points.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and on treatment day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Subscale (FACT-BCS) Change Score From Baseline
units on a scaleCombined Group (Hormone Receptor Positive and Triple Negative)
Cycle 2 Change from Baseline1.0 ± 4.6
Cycle 3 Change from Baseline0.6 ± 5.1
Cycle 5 Change from Baseline0.1 ± 4.4
Cycle 7 Change from Baseline0.6 ± 3.2
Cycle 9 Change from Baseline1.8 ± 5.0
Cycle 11 Change from Baseline1.1 ± 2.9
SecondaryFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity Subscale (FACT-Ntx) Change Score From Baseline

The FACT-Ntx is a validated, self-administered questionnaire which captures quality of life (QOL) concerns specific to patients suffering from neurotoxicity. (Calhoun EA, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (Fact/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13:741-8). The FACT-Ntx has 11-items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (Not at all, A little bit, Somewhat, Quite a bit, Very much) with a maximum score of 44. A higher score indicates better QOL. A minimal clinically important difference is 3-5 points.

Time frame:
Assessed at baseline and on treatment day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity Subscale (FACT-Ntx) Change Score From Baseline
units on a scaleCombine Cohort 1: HR+/HER2- and Cohort 2: TNBC
Cycle 2 Change from Baseline-0.1 ± 3.0
Cycle 3 Change from Baseline-0.3 ± 4.7
Cycle 5 Change from Baseline-1.6 ± 5.5
Cycle 7 Change from Baseline-4.5 ± 6.4
Cycle 9 Change from Baseline-1.8 ± 5.9
Cycle 11 Change from Baseline-1.6 ± 4.7
Post-hocOverall Survival

OS based on Kaplan-Meier is defined as the time from study entry to death or censored at date last known alive.

Time frame:
Overall median survival follow-up was 5.9 months including a maximum of 27 months for Cohort 1 and 15 months for Cohort 2.
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival
monthsCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
Overall Survival20 (20 to NA)11.3 (9.1 to NA)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) were assessed every cycle on treatment. Maximum treatment duration was 38 cycles/26 months (Cohort 1) and 17 cycles/12 months (Cohort 2).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-4/45 (8.9%)22/45 (48.9%)45/45 (100%)
Cohort 2: TNBC9/38 (23.7%)13/38 (34.2%)37/38 (97.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations16/454/38
Peripheral motor neuropathyNervous system disorders3/450/38
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/452/38
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/452/38
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders2/452/38
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/452/38
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/450/38
White blood cell decreasedInvestigations2/451/38
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/451/38
Lip infectionInfections and infestations0/451/38
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 134
Most frequent other events
EventCohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBC
FatigueGeneral disorders29/4525/38
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders26/4515/38
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders17/4517/38
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders17/459/38
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders9/4512/38
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders14/455/38
Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders12/455/38
PainGeneral disorders12/456/38
Peripheral motor neuropathyNervous system disorders12/455/38
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders11/456/38

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBCTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years353368
>=65 years10515
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBCTotal
Median59 (34 to 87)53 (38 to 76)56 (34 to 87)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBCTotal
Female453883
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBCTotal
Hispanic or Latino413576
Not Hispanic or Latino112
Unknown or Not Reported325
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBCTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American033
White423476
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported213
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBCTotal
United States453883
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS)
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS)(Participants)Cohort 1: HR+/HER2-Cohort 2: TNBCTotal
ECOG PS0332659
ECOG PS1111223
ECOG PS2101
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Eastern Maine Medical Center
    Bangor, Maine 04402, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at Faulkner Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02130, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • DF/BWCC at Milford Regional Cancer Center
    Milford, Massachusetts 01757, United States
  • South Shore Hospital
    Weymouth, Massachusetts 02190, United States
  • Dana-Farber/New Hampshire Oncology-Hematology
    Londonderry, New Hampshire 03053, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Filho OM, Giobbie-Hurder A, Lin NU, Faggen M, Come S, Openshaw T, Constantine M, Walsh J, Freedman RA, Schneider B, Burstein HJ, Mayer EL. A dynamic portrait of adverse events for breast cancer patients: results from a phase II clinical trial of eribulin in advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;185(1):135-144. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05928-4. Epub 2020 Oct 6. PubMed 33025482 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 23, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2013 to primary completion in May 2016, 36 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2019, 2 years 9 months after primary completion.

Of 983 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 54 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 34 and three quarters within 85. This study's 36 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,201 studies reached it within 49 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 80.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 3, 2013
First posted
Apr 10, 2013
StartActual
May 2013
Primary completionActual
May 2016
CompletionActual
May 2016
Results first posted
Feb 6, 2019
Last update
Nov 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01827787
Responsible party
Erica Mayer, MD, MPH (Principal Investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2013
Start date
May 2013
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Results posted
Feb 6, 2019
Last update
Nov 6, 2024

Study contacts

Erica Mayer, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Eribulin

Start the discussion