CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01813890Updated Jan 9, 2015Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol (CG5503) in the Treatment of Acute Pain From Bunionectomy Compared With Placebo

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tapentadol IR 50 mg and Tapentadol IR 75 mg in Hallux Valgus, sponsored by Janssen-Cilag International NV. Completed at 3 sites in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-01-09.

Sponsored by Janssen-Cilag International NV · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tapentadol immediate-release (IR [CG5503]) for use in the relief of moderate to severe acute pain, compared with placebo, in adult Taiwanese patients with acute pain following bunionectomy.

Read the detailed description

Patients undergoing bunionectomy (a surgical procedure to remove a bunion, an enlargement of the joint at the base of the big toe comprised of bone and soft tissue) often experience moderate to severe acute pain post-surgery. Normally such pain is controlled when patients receive repeated doses of opioid analgesics. Tapentadol (CG5503) is a newly synthesized opioid drug acting as a centrally acting analgesic like opioid analgesics but has a different mode of action. This study, a randomized (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), double-blind (neither investigator nor patient knows which treatment the patient receives), placebo-controlled (placebo is an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial), parallel-group (each group of patients will be treated at the same time), multicenter study (the study is performed at more than one clinic) is designed to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety (side effects) of tapentadol immediate-release (IR) 50 mg or 75 mg versus placebo. The study will consist of a screening phase, during which the patients will be evaluated for study entry (Days -28 to -2) followed by the surgical period (Day -1) during which the bunionectomy will be performed and which will start with the first surgical incision and continues until termination of the popliteal sciatic block (PSB) infusion. During the qualification period (Day 1) which starts after termination of the post-operative continuous PSB infusion, patients will be evaluated for entry in the double blind treatment phase. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups to receive either 50 mg tapentadol IR, 75 mg tapentadol IR or a placebo if their PI is equal to or greater than 4 on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. The inpatient double-blind treatment period will be 72 hours in duration and will include a final end-of-double-blind evaluation (on Day 4, i.e., 72 hours after the administration of the first dose) for all patients. Any patient requiring analgesia for pain relief in addition to study drug during the double-blind treatment period will be discontinued from the study due to lack of efficacy. All patients who discontinue for lack of efficacy will complete pain assessments and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) before receiving rescue medication. Pain intensity and pain relief will be periodically assessed during the treatment period using rating scales. Safety evaluations include monitoring of adverse events, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests. The study length, including the screening period, will be up to a maximum duration of 32 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hallux Valgus

Keywords

  • Bunionectomy
  • Acute pain
  • Post-operative pain
  • Tapentadol IR
  • Analgesia
  • Hallux valgus
03

In context

Hallux Valgus

144 studies on the registry are indexed under Hallux Valgus; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 56 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Hallux Valgus.

Browse Hallux Valgus studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen-Cilag International NV is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be undergoing primary unilateral first metatarsal bunionectomy that includes a distal Chevron osteotomy only, with or without the Akin procedure
  • Patients must be healthy or medically stable on the basis of clinical laboratory tests performed at screening
  • Women must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or practicing or agree to practice an effective method of birth control and have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test before surgery
  • If a male, must use an approved method of birth control and does not donate sperm from the day of study drug administration until 3 months afterwards
  • Qualifying baseline Pain Intensity must be rated as greater than or equal to 4 on an 11-point (0 to 10) PI NRS, recorded within 30 minutes before randomization, no earlier than 10 hours after the first surgical incision and within 9 hours after termination of the continuous Popliteal Sciatic Block (PSB) infusion Exclusion Criteria: - History of seizure disorder or epilepsy, severe traumatic brain injury, episode(s) of unconsciousness of more than 24 hours duration, malignancy in the past 2 years with the exception of successfully treated basal cell carcinoma
  • Mild or moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm within 1 year of screening
  • Renal insufficiency, impaired hepatic function
  • Use of anticonvulsants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), neuroleptics, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or triptans
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tapentadol IR 50 mg

    Drug: Tapentadol IR 50 mg

  • Experimental
    Tapentadol IR 75 mg

    Drug: Tapentadol IR 75 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugTapentadol IR 50 mg

    Tapentadol IR 50 mg will be administered as a single oral dose once every 4 to 6 hours, during the double blind treatment period.

  • DrugTapentadol IR 75 mg

    Tapentadol IR 75 mg will be administered as a single oral dose once every 4 to 6 hours, during the double blind treatment period.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be administered as a single oral dose once every 4 to 6 hours, during the double blind treatment period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over 48 Hours

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment. SPID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PID scores over 48 hours. Total score ranges from -480 (worst) to 480 (best) for SPID48. A higher value of SPID indicates greater pain relief.

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Rescue Medication Use

    Rescue medication was defined as any analgesic medication used for participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy (including those started at time of discontinuation) or analgesic medication used during the double-blind period for completed participants.

    Time frame: up to 48 hours

  2. Response Rate for 30 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours

    Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a 30 percent or greater reduction in pain intensity from baseline to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Pain intensity was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Participants with no assessment at the given time point, who used an analgesic medication prior to the time point, or who had worse pain intensity at the time point compared to baseline were assigned a percent reduction of 0 percent.

    Time frame: 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours

  3. Response Rate for 50 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours

    Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a 50 percent or greater reduction in pain intensity from baseline to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Pain intensity was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Participants with no assessment at the given time point, who used an analgesic medication prior to the time point, or who had worse pain intensity at the time point compared to baseline were assigned a percent reduction of 0 percent.

    Time frame: 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours

  4. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 12, 24 and 72 Hours

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment. SPID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PID scores over 12, 24, and 72 hours. Total score ranges from -120 (worst) to 120 (best) for SPID12, -240 (worst) to 240 (best) for SPID24, -720 (worst) to 720 (best) for SPID72. A higher value of SPID indicates greater pain relief.

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 72 hours

  5. Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours

    Participants rated pain relief on 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=A little, 2=Some, 3=A lot, 4=Complete). Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) was calculated as the time-weighted sum of pain relief scores up to Hour 12, 24, 48, and 72. Total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 48 (best) for TOTPAR12, 0 (worst) to 96 (best) for TOTPAR24, 0 (worst) to 192 (best) for TOTPAR48, and 0 (worst) to 288 (best) for TOTPAR72. A higher value of TOTPAR indicated greater pain relief.

    Time frame: 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours

  6. Sum of Pain Relief and Pain Intensity Differences (SPRID) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours

    Participants rated pain relief on 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=A little, 2=Some, 3=A lot, 4=Complete). Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment. PRID is the sum of pain relief and PID at the same assessment time. SPRID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PRID scores over 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Total score ranges from -120 (worst) to 168 (best) for SPRID12, -240 (worst) to 336 (best) for SPRID24, -480 (worst) to 672 (best) for SPRID48, and -720 (worst) to 1008 (best) for SPRID72. A higher value of SPRID indicates greater pain relief.

    Time frame: 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours

  7. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at 72 Hours

    The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that requires the participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The response options are: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; and 7=very much worse. Higher scores indicate worsening.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and 72 hours

07

Results

Posted Jan 9, 2015

Participant flow

The study was conducted from 11 January 2013 to 12 January 2014. Participants were recruited at 3 study centers in Taiwan.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
Started202119
Completed111713
Not completed946
Withdrew: Adverse event034
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy912

Outcome measures

PrimarySum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over 48 Hours

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment. SPID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PID scores over 48 hours. Total score ranges from -480 (worst) to 480 (best) for SPID48. A higher value of SPID indicates greater pain relief.

Time frame:
48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over 48 Hours
units on a scalePlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over 48 Hours50.8 ± 158.52168.4 ± 84.50194.9 ± 131.13
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Tapentadol IR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.006 (P-value adjusted for multiple treatment group comparisons using the Hochberg method.) · Mean difference (net): 105.61 · 95% CI 32.0 to 179.2Difference is SPID48 in tapentadol IR group minus SPID48 in placebo group
  • Placebo vs Tapentadol IR 75 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.004 (P-value adjusted for multiple treatment group comparisons using the Hochberg method.) · Median difference (net): 126.58 · 95% CI 49.5 to 203.7Difference is SPID48 in tapentadol IR group minus SPID48 in placebo group.
SecondaryTime to First Rescue Medication Use

Rescue medication was defined as any analgesic medication used for participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy (including those started at time of discontinuation) or analgesic medication used during the double-blind period for completed participants.

Time frame:
up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time to First Rescue Medication Use
HoursPlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
Time to First Rescue Medication UseNA ± 84.50NA ± 131.13NA ± 158.52
SecondaryResponse Rate for 30 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a 30 percent or greater reduction in pain intensity from baseline to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Pain intensity was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Participants with no assessment at the given time point, who used an analgesic medication prior to the time point, or who had worse pain intensity at the time point compared to baseline were assigned a percent reduction of 0 percent.

Time frame:
12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Response Rate for 30 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours
Percentage of ParticipantsPlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
12 hours35.066.773.7
24 hours40.066.773.7
48 hours45.081.068.4
72 hours45.081.068.4
SecondaryResponse Rate for 50 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a 50 percent or greater reduction in pain intensity from baseline to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Pain intensity was assessed on a 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Participants with no assessment at the given time point, who used an analgesic medication prior to the time point, or who had worse pain intensity at the time point compared to baseline were assigned a percent reduction of 0 percent.

Time frame:
12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Response Rate for 50 Percent or Greater Reduction in Pain Intensity at 12, 24, 48 and 72 Hours
Percentage of ParticipantsPlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
12 hours20.042.957.9
24 hours35.061.973.7
48 hours40.076.268.4
72 hours45.081.068.4
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 12, 24 and 72 Hours

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment. SPID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PID scores over 12, 24, and 72 hours. Total score ranges from -120 (worst) to 120 (best) for SPID12, -240 (worst) to 240 (best) for SPID24, -720 (worst) to 720 (best) for SPID72. A higher value of SPID indicates greater pain relief.

Time frame:
12, 24 and 72 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) Over 12, 24 and 72 Hours
units on a scalePlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
12 hours7.6 ± 32.2230.3 ± 17.2434.7 ± 25.70
24 hours16.7 ± 69.3767.5 ± 40.9082.0 ± 57.65
72 hours91.6 ± 252.89281.3 ± 129.48316.1 ± 206.81
SecondaryTotal Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours

Participants rated pain relief on 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=A little, 2=Some, 3=A lot, 4=Complete). Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) was calculated as the time-weighted sum of pain relief scores up to Hour 12, 24, 48, and 72. Total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 48 (best) for TOTPAR12, 0 (worst) to 96 (best) for TOTPAR24, 0 (worst) to 192 (best) for TOTPAR48, and 0 (worst) to 288 (best) for TOTPAR72. A higher value of TOTPAR indicated greater pain relief.

Time frame:
12, 24, 48, and 72 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours
units on a scalePlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
12 hours13.0 ± 11.2922.5 ± 10.2724.4 ± 10.33
24 hours28.0 ± 24.5048.2 ± 22.0754.1 ± 20.47
48 hours68.2 ± 62.26115.6 ± 45.06123.5 ± 49.99
72 hours112.6 ± 103.19187.3 ± 68.03194.1 ± 74.63
SecondarySum of Pain Relief and Pain Intensity Differences (SPRID) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours

Participants rated pain relief on 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=A little, 2=Some, 3=A lot, 4=Complete). Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. PID was the difference between baseline PI (prior to the first dose) and current PI at assessment. PRID is the sum of pain relief and PID at the same assessment time. SPRID was calculated as the time-weighted Sum of PRID scores over 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Total score ranges from -120 (worst) to 168 (best) for SPRID12, -240 (worst) to 336 (best) for SPRID24, -480 (worst) to 672 (best) for SPRID48, and -720 (worst) to 1008 (best) for SPRID72. A higher value of SPRID indicates greater pain relief.

Time frame:
12, 24, 48 and 72 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Relief and Pain Intensity Differences (SPRID) Over 12, 24, 48, and 72 Hours
units on a scalePlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
12 hours20.7 ± 41.5152.8 ± 25.6659.1 ± 33.20
24 hours44.7 ± 90.14115.7 ± 59.74136.0 ± 72.59
48 hours119.1 ± 214.14284.0 ± 122.07318.4 ± 171.50
72 hours204.3 ± 346.52468.6 ± 185.43510.2 ± 268.96
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at 72 Hours

The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that requires the participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The response options are: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; and 7=very much worse. Higher scores indicate worsening.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and 72 hours
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score at 72 Hours
Percentage of participantsPlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
Very Much Improved40.071.473.7
Much Improved10.014.35.3
Minimally Improved5.09.510.5
No Change20.04.80.0
Minimally Worse0.00.00.0
Much Worse0.00.00.0
Very Much Worse25.00.010.5

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—0/20 (0%)3/20 (15%)
Tapentadol IR 50 mg—0/21 (0%)19/21 (90.5%)
Tapentadol IR 75 mg—0/19 (0%)18/19 (94.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mg
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/2014/2116/19
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/204/2110/19
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/207/218/19
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/203/212/19
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/203/212/19
SomnolenceNervous system disorders0/203/212/19
Wound complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/202/210/19
Chest discomfortGeneral disorders0/200/211/19
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/200/211/19
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/200/211/19

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mgTotal
Mean44.4 ± 14.9842.3 ± 14.2743.3 ± 11.8143.3 ± 13.59
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mgTotal
Female19211858
Male1012
Age Customized
Age Customized(participants)PlaceboTapentadol IR 50 mgTapentadol IR 75 mgTotal
Less than (<) 65 years18201856
Greater than or equal (>=) to 65 years2114
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • Taipei, Taiwan
  • Taoyuan, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen YJ, Chiang CC, Huang PJ, Huang J, Karcher K, Li H. Tapentadol immediate-release for acute postbunionectomy pain: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in Taiwan. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Nov;31(11):2001-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1082992. Epub 2015 Sep 21. PubMed 26293513 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01813890
Lead sponsor
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Collaborators
Grünenthal GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 19, 2013
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Jan 2014
Completion
Jan 2014
Results posted
Jan 9, 2015
Last update
Jan 9, 2015

Study contacts

Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen-Cilag International NV

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion