CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01804309Updated Oct 6, 2015

Functional Anatomical Examination of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Node Drainage in the Axillary Subregions in Early Breast Cancer

An observational study in Breast Cancer, sponsored by National Institute of Oncology, Hungary. Completed at 1 site in Hungary. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-06.

Sponsored by National Institute of Oncology, Hungary · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
350
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Regional lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer. Accurate nodal staging can be achieved only by surgery. Today, in early-stage invasive breast cancers with clinically negative lymph nodes, minimally invasive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered the gold standard of regional lymph node staging. To optimize the effectiveness of SLNB, precise pre-and intraoperative mapping of lymphatic drainage is important. The (SLNB) technique is not standardized. The most common and most accurate way of lymphatic mapping is performed with the combined application of a gamma-emitting isotope labeled substance and blue dye, the so-called double labeling technique. Functional lymphatic drainage of SLNB double staining in the mammary gland, skin and axilla present a number of uncertainties.

According to the axillary, lateral thoracic and thoracodorsal veins, Ibusuki et al. divided the axillary region into four subregions: brachial (lateral), pectoral (anterior), central and subscapular (posterior) zones. They revealed clear relationship between the anatomic location and status of the SLN, also confirmed by Gallowitsch et al. SLN was detected in Level I in 96% and in Level II in 4% by SPECT/CT.

Knowedge of relationships between the drainage of sentinel lymph node staining into the axillary subregions, location of the primary tumor, tumor size, SLN positivity and its location within the subregion are of particular importance in the decision making whether or not axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) needs to be performed.

In the prospective randomized phase 3 trial by Giuliano et al. (ACOSOG Z-11) ALND was not performed in early breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla and breast-conserving surgery, for 1-2 macroscopically positive SLNs (10). After an average follow-up of 6.3 years, data were compared to the traditional ALND group and no difference was detected in 5-year overall survival or disease-free survival at 5 years.

Aims of the investigation:

To examine the location of SLN in the axillary subregion (anterior, posterior, central, lateral, apical) in patients with early breast cancer (T \<5 cm).

To statistically assess correlations between the location, size, histological parameters of primary breast tumor and the subregion of the SLN.

To statistically assess SLN positivity and its location within the sbregion.

To statistically assess subregional localisation of positive SLN and the number of all positive regional lymph nodes, to predict a limited number of cases with lymph node metastasis, based on the test results of the ACOSOG Z-11 trial, by which ALND could be omitted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • axyllary lymph node
  • sentinel lymph node
  • lymphatic drainage
  • early breast cancer
  • axillary lymph node dissection
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 350 is above the median of 184 across 2,642 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Oncology, Hungary is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Clinical stage T1-2(≤ 5cm)N0M0 primary unilateral invasive breast cancer patients

Inclusion criteria

  • women with clinically node negative invasive or microinvasive breast cancer: T1-2(≤ 5cm)N0M0
  • 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous ALND
  • clinically positive axillary SLNB
  • pregnant or lactating
  • neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment based on surgeon's discretion (ASCO)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
350 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Early breast cancer patients

    Clinical stage T1-2 N0M0 primary unilateral invasive breast cancer patients

    Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)

Interventions

  • ProcedureSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)

    The intervention (SLNB) is no different in the care of patients' in the study then in those who were not included in the past or will not be included after the trial terminates. SLNB is performed according to strict professional guidelines adopted by the National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The assessment of any correlations between the subregional location of SLNs within the axillary trench and the clinical-pathological parameters of the tumor.

    Time frame: Specimen is processed within 2-4 weeks in pathology. Average time frame maximum: 3 weeks following surgical intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The assessment of any correlations between the subregional location of positive SLNs within the axillary trench and the number of all positive axillary lymph nodes.

    Time frame: Same as for primary outcome measure.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institute of Oncology
    Budapest, 1122, Hungary
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Giuliano AE, Haigh PI, Brennan MB, Hansen NM, Kelley MC, Ye W, Glass EC, Turner RR. Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2553-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2553. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol 2000 Nov 15;18(22):3877. PubMed 10893286 ↗
  • Matrai Z, Toth L, Saeki T, Sinkovics I, Godeny M, Takeuchi H, Bidlek M, Bartal A, Savolt A, Dorogi B, Kasler M. [The potential role of SPECT/CT in the preoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer]. Orv Hetil. 2011 Apr 24;152(17):678-88. doi: 10.1556/OH.2011.29077. Hungarian. PubMed 21464026 ↗
  • Ibusuki M, Yamamoto Y, Kawasoe T, Shiraishi S, Tomiguchi S, Yamashita Y, Honda Y, Iyama K, Iwase H. Potential advantage of preoperative three-dimensional mapping of sentinel nodes in breast cancer by a hybrid single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT system. Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;19(2):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 12. PubMed 19442515 ↗
  • Gallowitsch HJ, Kraschl P, Igerc I, Hussein T, Kresnik E, Mikosch P, Kohlfuerst S, Hausegger K, Lind P. Sentinel node SPECT-CT in breast cancer. Can we expect any additional and clinically relevant information? Nuklearmedizin. 2007;46(6):252-6. PubMed 18084680 ↗
  • Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):569-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90. PubMed 21304082 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01804309
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Oncology, Hungary
Responsible party
Dr. Zoltan Matrai (head of the Dept. of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Hungary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2013
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Completion
Feb 2015
Last update
Oct 6, 2015

Study contacts

Zoltán Mátrai, MD, PhD, FEBS
principal investigator · National Institute of Oncology
Bence Dorogi, MD
study director · National Institute of Oncology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion