CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01799044IREUpdated Dec 20, 2022

Pilot-study: Non-thermal Ablation Using Irreversible Electroporation to Treat Colorectal Liver Metastases

A Phase 1 interventional study of Irreversible electroporation (IRE) in Colorectal Liver Metastases and Metastatic Liver Disease, sponsored by Dr. M.R. Meijerink. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-20.

Sponsored by Dr. M.R. Meijerink · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Irreversible electroporation is a new, minimal-invasive image-guided treatment to treat tumors near or around vulnerable structures, such as central liver tumors.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of IRE in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases, patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases undergo IRE and resection of the metastases in the same session. After resection, the specimen is examined macroscopically to determine vitality using a specific vitality staining (triphenyl-tetrazoliumchloride) and to visualize the exact ablation zone. Subsequently, histopathologic examination is used to determine type of cell death and the microscopic ablation zone.

The investigators hypothesize that IRE is a safe effective method to treat colorectal liver metastasis and that cell damage and cell death is demonstrated as soon as 1 hour after the procedure.

Read the detailed description

This pilot-study is designed to determine the safety of IRE using the NanoKnife on colorectal liver metastases. Secondary, feasibility, histological effect on the ablated cells and exact shape and size of the ablated area will be determined.

Study design:

Patients with resectable CRLM (1 lesion or more) undergoing surgical resection of the metastases will receive study information to participate in this pilot-study. Limited extrahepatic disease is not contra-indicated.

Patients will undergo a general pre-procedural work-up: total body FDG PET-CT, ceCT of the abdomen, anesthetic review with special attention to cardiac history, baseline full blood examination, urea and electrolytes, renal function tests, liver enzymes and coagulation profile test.

The procedure is conducted under general anaesthesia with muscle relaxants to prevent patient motion and epidural analgesia. A laparotomy will be performed at the surgeon's discretion for optimal liver exposure. Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) will be carried out by an experienced interventional radiologist for exact evaluation of maximum diameter, number and location of all lesions and to confirm resectability (if lesions prove not to be resectable, only RFA will be performed according to standard of care). All lesions will be biopsied. The electrodes will be placed under ultrasound guidance according to manufacturer's guidelines in the lesions that are eligible for resection. After correct placement of the electrodes the lesions will be ablated according to protocol with ECG synchronization and the ablation zone is determined by US.

During the procedure the cardiac rhythm will be closely monitored and a defibrillator will be present at all times.

After IOUS confirmation of complete ablation (at least 30 minutes after ablation of the lesion) the surgeon will perform a partial liver resection / metastasectomy including the ablated lesions and the surgical procedure is ended as usual. After the treatment of all lesions with the NanoKnife and before resection (and RFA of unresectable CRLM if indicated), blood samples will be drawn to determine renal function and liver enzymes since cell destruction may cause biochemical abnormalities.

The resected specimen will be transported to the department of pathology. After sectioning, the specimen will be photographed extensively to determine exact shape and size of the ablated area. One slice is stained in vitality-staining (TTC), to macroscopically distinguish viable from nonviable tissue.

After formalin fixation, the specimen is stained and examined under light microscopy according to standard protocol to determine radicality of the resection margins. Additionally, special attention will be given to indications for cellular damage, vessel wall damage and size and shape of the ablation zone. Caspase-3 and BAX/BCL-2 analysis will be performed to investigate the induction of apoptosis. The results will be compared to the result of the biopsy taken prior to ablation.

On day one and day three post-operatively regular blood samples will be drawn, including liver enzymes and renal function tests. After discharge, out of hospital follow-up will be according to liver surgery protocol. The investigators aim to include 10 patients in this pilot study.

Monitoring:

An independent monitor (quality officer) will monitor all study data according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The informed consent of selected individual participants will be checked. Source Data verification will be performed during onsite monitoring (to verify if all data on the Case Report Form are in accordance with the source data). The intensity of this verification is in relation to the risk associated with the intervention investigated. Data that by all means will be checked are the informed consent form, in- and exclusion criteria and the primary outcome. The monitor will also verify if all (S)AE's and SUSAR's are reported adequately and within the time that is determined by legal rules and regulations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Liver Metastases
  • Metastatic Liver Disease

Keywords

  • Irreversible electroporation
  • IRE
  • Electroporation
  • Colorectal liver metastases
  • CRLM
  • Safety
  • Feasibility
  • Efficacy
  • Single-center
  • Low Energy Direct Current
  • Ablate-and-resect
  • Nonthermal ablation
  • Ablation
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,517 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 883 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 54 across 2,765 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dr. M.R. Meijerink as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Histological or cytological documentation of primary colorectal tumor
  • Liver metastases visible on FDG PET-CT or ceCT, size ≤ 3,5 cm and eligible for resection
  • Resectability re-confirmed per-operatively by US
  • Age > 18 years
  • WHO performance status 0 - 2
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to definite inclusion:

    • Hemoglobin ≥ 5.6 mmol/L;
    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3;
    • Platelet count ≥ 100*109/l;
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN);
    • ALT and AST ≤ 2.5 x ULN
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN or a calculated creatinine clearance ³ 50 ml/min;
    • Prothrombin time or INR \< 1.5 x ULN;
    • Activated partial thromboplastin time \< 1.25 x ULN (therapeutic anticoagulation therapy is allowed if this treatment can be interrupted as judged by the treating physician).
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesion > 3,5 cm size
  • History of epilepsy
  • History of cardiac disease:

    • Congestive heart failure >NYHA class 2;
    • Active Coronary Artery Disease (defined as myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to screening);
    • Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy or pacemaker (beta blockers are permitted).
  • Uncontrolled hypertension. Blood pressure must be ≤160/95 mmHg at the time of screening on a stable antihypertensive regimen.
  • Compromised liver function (e.g. signs of portal hypertension, INR > 1,5 without use of anticoagulants, ascites)
  • Uncontrolled infections (> grade 2 NCI-CTC version 3.0).
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days of the start of treatment.
  • Immunotherapy ≤ 6 weeks prior to the procedure
  • Chemotherapy ≤ 12 weeks prior to the procedure
  • Radiotherapy, RFA or MWA treatment of target lesions prior to resection
  • Concomitant use of anti-convulsive and anti-arrhythmic drugs other than beta blockers.
  • Allergy to contrast media
  • Any implanted stimulation device
  • Any condition that is unstable or that could jeopardize the safety of the subject and their compliance in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Irreversible electroporation

    Single arm study: Irreversible electroporation of colorectal liver metastasis

    Device: Irreversible electroporation (IRE)

Interventions

  • DeviceIrreversible electroporation (IRE)

    Tumor ablation with irreversible electroporation with the NanoKnife

    Also known as: IRE, NanoKnife

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety

    Safety using Common terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Since the ablated tissue will be resected we expect procedure-related complications to occur mainly during the procedure.

    Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy

    Cell death of CRLM after IRE is demonstrated macroscopically by using vitality-staining with triphenyl-tetrazoliumchloride (TTC). Since and shape of the ablation zone is assessed. Immunohistologic examination is used to more specifically assess microscopic cell damage and vessel wall damage. Apoptotic markers are used.

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility

    The investigators hypothesize that it will initially take several replacements before adequate positioning is obtained. It is suspected that placement of the electrodes will become easier in the course of the study and that procedure time will decrease (expressed in learning curve).

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VU University Medical Center
    Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081HV, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01799044
Lead sponsor
Dr. M.R. Meijerink
Collaborators
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Responsible party
Dr. M.R. Meijerink (Dr., Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2013
Start date
Nov 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Sep 2013
Last update
Dec 20, 2022

Study contacts

Martijn R Meijerink, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Petrousjka M van den Tol, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
C van Kuijk, Prof. Dr.
study director · VU University Medical Center, head of department of radiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion