CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01789853VIEWSUpdated Sep 9, 2015

Very Intensive Early Walking in Stroke

An interventional study of Intensive Walking and Conventional Physical Therapy in Stroke, sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-09.

Sponsored by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of intensive locomotor interventions early post stroke. An intensive locomotor training (LT) program will be compared to an active control, conventional physical therapy. It is proposed that an early and intensive stepping paradigm that is not typically employed early in physical therapy will lead to superior outcomes and improved community mobility. A randomized, blinded, controlled trial will test subjects with moderate to severe locomotor dysfunction in individuals post-stroke to compare walking-related outcomes after intensive gait training (including treadmill, overground, stair training, and skilled walking training) to outcomes after conventional physical therapy.

Read the detailed description

In Aim 2, intensive gait training overground and on the treadmill using the device as appropriate will be provided using a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) design. Determination of optimal swing phase and propulsive assistance provided to subjects to maximize treadmill walking velocity (in Aim 1) will be necessary to assess the efficacy of this technique to improve walking function over prolonged LT sessions. Consistent with work from the previous grant cycle12, we will compare the relative improvements in impairments, activity and participation following 1 of 2, 8 -week interventions to improve walking ability post-stroke. Fifty-six (56) subjects will be recruited, stratified based on walking 10 meters [requiring moderate assistance (subject performing 50-74%), minimal assistance (subject performing greater than 75% of gait but still needing assist), with a gait speed \<0.5m/s without assist, or with gait speed of >0.5-0.9m/s without assist. Subjects will be randomized to experimental (intensive gait training using aforementioned gait training principles) or control conditions (conventional physical therapy). The test group will receive 40, 40-minute LT sessions during a 60 minute time period over 8 weeks with subjects ambulating on the treadmill, overground, and on stairs. During the first 5 training sessions, LT will take place solely on the treadmill. After that time, half of the sessions will be walking overground and stairs and half on the treadmill. Training will be performed with a target heart rate of 70-80% of heart rate reserve (HRR) and subjective ratings of perceived exertion of 14-17 when patients are on medications to limit heart rate kinetics. Kinematics during LT will be monitored visually to ensure proper foot placement necessary for continuous stepping while maintaining the appropriate intensity, using the device as necessary. The control group will receive conventional physical therapy (receiving at least 3 sessions of physical therapy per week) at the subject's and medical teams' discretion (day rehabilitation, outpatient, or home health). If the subject is not receiving at least 3 sessions of physical therapy per week, control therapy treatments will be provided consistent with recent data detailing the amount of specific physical therapy activities provided during single-session outpatient visits19and published data21 as well as unpublished data from Moore that delineates the number of steps taken per conventional therapy session based on the gait speed of individual (number of steps during training=1500*gait speed+200). The additional 200 steps were added to this algorithm to allow for individuals who require assist to receive gait training during the sessions. Clinical and quantitative assessment of neuromuscular and cardiopulmonary impairments, limitations in activity and participation, assessment of corticospinal tract (CST) excitability and integrity will be performed prior to training, mid-training, end of 8 week training, and with a 2-6 month follow-up examination. Control group participants will have the option of participating in 4 weeks of intensive gait training (experimental protocol) at the end of the follow up testing and complete one more testing session at the end of those 4 weeks. Primary outcome measures include laboratory and community measures of ambulatory function, including gait speed over short distances, distance walked and gait efficiency during the 6 min walk, and the amount of daily community stepping (using Step Activity Monitors [SAM]20), CST excitability measures using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (optional) and assessment of white matter tract integrity using MRI (optional).

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke, rehabilitation, gait training
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 43 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subacute (\<6 months) stroke
  • 18-75 years old
  • history of history of unilateral, supratentorial, ischemic or hemorrhage stroke
  • able to walk 10m without physical assistance
  • gait speed less than or equal to .8m/s
  • medical clearance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant cardiorespiratory or metabolic disease that may limit exercise participation
  • weight limit > 250 lbs (limit of most counter-weight safety systems)
  • history of previous orthopedic or neurological conditions which may impair walking.
  • women of childbearing potential will not be excluded, although women who are pregnant will be excluded due to potential forces at trunk from the harness applied at the waist.
  • subjects with scores \< 23 on the Mini Mental Status Exam

    • Exclusion for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS):
  • pacemaker
  • metal implants in the head region
  • history of epilepsy or seizures
  • skull fractures or skull deficits
  • concussion within the last 6 months
  • unexplained recurring headaches
  • medications that lower seizure threshold
  • pregnancy

    • Exclusion for the MRI:
  • aneurysm clip or coil
  • metal or wire implants
  • heart valve prosthesis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intensive Walking

    High intensity walking training in variable context for 8 weeks

    Behavioral: Intensive Walking

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Physical Therapy

    Regular physical therapy for 8 weeks

    Behavioral: Conventional Physical Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntensive Walking

    8 weeks high intensity walking training over multiple stepping tasks

  • BehavioralConventional Physical Therapy

    Regular physical therapy for 8 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in 10 meter walk test

    Gait speed

    Time frame: Pre Test, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 month follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in 6 min walk test

    Timed walking distance over 6 min at self-selected speed

    Time frame: 0, 4, 8 weeks post-training and 2 month follow-up

  2. Change in Berg Balance Scale

    Standardized balance assessment

    Time frame: 0. 4. 8 weeks post-training and 2 month follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hornby TG, Rafferty MR, Pinto D, French D, Jordan N. Cost-Effectiveness of High-intensity Training vs Conventional Therapy for Individuals With Subacute Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul;103(7S):S197-S204. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Jul 3. PubMed 34228956 ↗
  • Hornby TG, Henderson CE, Holleran CL, Lovell L, Roth EJ, Jang JH. Stepwise Regression and Latent Profile Analyses of Locomotor Outcomes Poststroke. Stroke. 2020 Oct;51(10):3074-3082. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031065. Epub 2020 Sep 4. PubMed 32883192 ↗
  • Hornby TG, Holleran CL, Hennessy PW, Leddy AL, Connolly M, Camardo J, Woodward J, Mahtani G, Lovell L, Roth EJ. Variable Intensive Early Walking Poststroke (VIEWS): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jun;30(5):440-50. doi: 10.1177/1545968315604396. Epub 2015 Sep 3. PubMed 26338433 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01789853
Lead sponsor
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Responsible party
T. George Hornby (T. George Hornby, PT, PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2013
Start date
Oct 2008
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Aug 2015
Last update
Sep 9, 2015

Study contacts

George T Hornby, PT, PhD
principal investigator · Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion