CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01778127Updated May 21, 2015Results posted

A Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention in Adolescent Survivors of Childhood Cancer

An interventional study of Activity Monitor and Interactive Website in Cancer, sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-21.

Sponsored by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
11 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Five year survival following a diagnosis of childhood cancer has reached 83%, making long term health outcomes among survivors an important concern. The growing population of survivors is at an increased risk of physical inactivity and associated adverse health outcomes. Regular physical activity is associated with better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Despite the known benefits of physical activity, nearly half of all childhood cancer survivors do not meet recommended guidelines for physical activity.

Researchers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH) want to determine if a rewards-based physical activity intervention delivered via an interactive website among young adolescent childhood cancer survivors, aged 11 through 14 years, will increase physical activity levels and improve cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. The investigators also want to learn if this rewards-based intervention is effective. To achieve this goal the investigators have designed a three-arm prospective, randomized study with two reward-based intervention groups and a control group.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  • To compare changes in levels of moderate and vigorous physical activity over 24 weeks.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

  • To compare changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength and flexibility over 24 weeks.

Participants will be randomized to one of three groups. Participants in the control group will receive an activity monitor and educational materials, but will not have access to the interactive website. Participants randomized to the two intervention groups will be given access to a rewards program delivered via an interactive website, an activity monitor, and educational materials. Individual physical activity data can be viewed by study participants after uploading information from their monitors to the interactive website. One intervention group will receive minimal rewards, while the other group will receive immediate incentives as well as the minimal rewards as they move from one level to the other on the website.

After 24 weeks, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, flexibility, and physical function will be compared between the two intervention groups and the control group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Keywords

  • Cancer Survivor
  • Physical Activity
  • Health Outcomes
  • Rewards-Based Intervention
  • Cardiovascular Health
  • Musculoskeletal Health
  • Exercise
03

In context

Lead sponsor

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 35 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Previously treated for childhood cancer at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH)
  • 11 through 14 years of age
  • Not undergoing active treatment for cancer
  • Medical clearance from participant's attending physician via email
  • Does not meet the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) physical activity guidelines. CDC guidelines for children age 11 to 14 are defined as 60 minutes or more per day of physical activity, seven days a week
  • Internet access and a computer that has software that is compatible with the study device (Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Mac OSX 10.5 and Mac OSX 10.6)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Global cognitive impairment (Full Scale Intelligence Quotient \< 70) that prevents use of the interactive website
  • Pregnant female
  • Inability to read and write English
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Minimal Rewards

    Participants use an activity monitor and the interactive website. They will receive minimal rewards based on their physical activity levels.

    Behavioral: Activity Monitor · Behavioral: Interactive Website · Behavioral: Educational Materials

  • Experimental
    Group B: Immediate Incentives

    Participants use an activity monitor and the interactive website. In addition to minimal rewards, participants will receive immediate incentives as they move from one level to the other on the website.

    Behavioral: Activity Monitor · Behavioral: Interactive Website · Behavioral: Educational Materials

  • Experimental
    Group C: Control

    Participants in the control group will receive an activity monitor and educational materials, but will not have access to the interactive website. No rewards will be offered for their participation.

    Behavioral: Activity Monitor · Behavioral: Educational Materials

Interventions

  • BehavioralActivity Monitor

    Measurement of physical activity.

    Also known as: Tri-Axial Accelerometer, Zamzee

  • BehavioralInteractive Website

    Zamzee is a meter that measures activity and a website that makes moving fun. Parents of participants can set activity goals. Activity is uploaded to the website where participants track progress and earn rewards by increasing their level of activity. Participants can view leaderboards and check how other participants are doing.

    Also known as: Zamzee Website

  • BehavioralEducational Materials

    All participants will receive educational handouts about physical activity. Participants will receive the educational handouts again via mail three and five months into the study to reinforce the importance of physical activity and maintain compliance.

    Also known as: Educational Brochure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in Change in Daily Average of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) Levels Between Groups

    The impact of the intervention was assessed at the end of 24 weeks by comparing the mean difference in physical activity levels from baseline to 24-weeks between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences in Change in Cardiovascular Function Between Groups Over 24 Weeks

    The difference in mean change in peak oxygen uptake from baseline to 24-weeks was compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  2. Differences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit and Reach

    The difference in mean changes of sit and reach from baseline to 24-weeks was compared between groups

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  3. Differences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Active Dorsiflexion

    The difference between mean changes from baseline to 24-weeks in active dorsiflexion was compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  4. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Hand Grip

    The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in grip strength (kilograms) was compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  5. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit-up

    The number of sit-ups completed in 30 seconds was assessed, and the differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes on the strength subtests of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency were compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  6. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Pushup

    The number of push-ups completed in 30 seconds was assessed, and the differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes on the strength subtests of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency were compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  7. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 60 Degrees/Second

    The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in knee extension strength 60 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  8. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 120 Degrees/Second

    The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in knee extension strength 120 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  9. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 180 Degrees/Second

    The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in knee extension strength at 180 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  10. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 30 Degrees/Second

    The differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in ankle dorsiflexion strength 30 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

  11. Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 60 Degrees/Second

    The differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in ankle dorsiflexion strength at 60 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 21, 2015

Participant flow

This protocol enrolled 105 participants at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital from 9/2013 through 4/2014. Of the 105, 5 were determined to be ineligible after baseline screening (4 too active; 1 did not meet IQ criteria), and 2 withdrew prior to randomization but after baseline testing. The remaining 98 were randomized.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Started333332
Completed253126
Not completed826
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up512
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject314

Outcome measures

PrimaryDifferences in Change in Daily Average of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) Levels Between Groups

The impact of the intervention was assessed at the end of 24 weeks by comparing the mean difference in physical activity levels from baseline to 24-weeks between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Differences in Change in Daily Average of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) Levels Between Groups
minutesGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Daily Average of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) Levels Between Groups-2.58 ± 13.70-2.12 ± 12.95-7.78 ± 13.70
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.90
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.18
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.14
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Cardiovascular Function Between Groups Over 24 Weeks

The difference in mean change in peak oxygen uptake from baseline to 24-weeks was compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ml/kg/min
Differences in Change in Cardiovascular Function Between Groups Over 24 Weeks
ml/kg/minGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Cardiovascular Function Between Groups Over 24 Weeks-0.21 ± 5.15-1.19 ± 4.700.09 ± 5.25
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.49
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.84
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.37
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit and Reach

The difference in mean changes of sit and reach from baseline to 24-weeks was compared between groups

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Differences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit and Reach
cmGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit and Reach-0.71 ± 4.852.25 ± 4.50-0.02 ± 4.85
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.03
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.63
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.09
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Active Dorsiflexion

The difference between mean changes from baseline to 24-weeks in active dorsiflexion was compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Differences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Active Dorsiflexion
degreesGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Flexibility Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Active Dorsiflexion-1.72 ± 6.40-0.55 ± 5.70-0.32 ± 6.25
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.49
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.43
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.89
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Hand Grip

The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in grip strength (kilograms) was compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Hand Grip
kgGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Hand Grip1.47 ± 3.500.98 ± 3.201.00 ± 3.45
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.61
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.64
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.99
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit-up

The number of sit-ups completed in 30 seconds was assessed, and the differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes on the strength subtests of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency were compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Sit-ups
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit-up
Sit-upsGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Sit-up2.67 ± 5.653.29 ± 5.252.43 ± 5.80
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.69
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.89
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.59
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Pushup

The number of push-ups completed in 30 seconds was assessed, and the differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes on the strength subtests of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency were compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Pushups
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Pushup
PushupsGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Pushup2.37 ± 5.701.93 ± 5.402.27 ± 5.95
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.78
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.95
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.83
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 60 Degrees/Second

The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in knee extension strength 60 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Newton meters (Nm)/kg
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 60 Degrees/Second
Newton meters (Nm)/kgGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 60 Degrees/Second-4.10 ± 34.80-2.05 ± 31.55-1.91 ± 34.80
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.83
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.83
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.99
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 120 Degrees/Second

The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in knee extension strength 120 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Nm/kg
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 120 Degrees/Second
Nm/kgGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 120 Degrees/Second-6.62 ± 28.95-0.59 ± 25.704.16 ± 28.35
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.44
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.19
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.54
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 180 Degrees/Second

The difference from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in knee extension strength at 180 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Nm/kg
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 180 Degrees/Second
Nm/kgGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Quadriceps at 180 Degrees/Second-0.64 ± 28.100.78 ± 25.502.55 ± 28.10
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.17
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.13
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.81
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 30 Degrees/Second

The differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in ankle dorsiflexion strength 30 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Nm/kg
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 30 Degrees/Second
Nm/kgGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 30 Degrees/Second3.94 ± 16.25-3.74 ± 14.75-2.81 ± 16.65
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.08
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.15
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.83
SecondaryDifferences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 60 Degrees/Second

The differences from baseline to 24-weeks in mean changes in ankle dorsiflexion strength at 60 degrees per second (Newton meters) was compared between groups.

Time frame:
Baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Nm/kg
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 60 Degrees/Second
Nm/kgGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Differences in Change in Muscular Strength Between Groups Over 24 Weeks: Dorsiflexion at 60 Degrees/Second3.82 ± 12.85-3.00 ± 11.65-2.14 ± 13.15
Statistical analysis
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group B: Immediate Incentives · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.05
  • Group A: Minimal Rewards vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.11
  • Group B: Immediate Incentives vs Group C: Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.81

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the on-study date until the completion of the intervention up to 24 weeks later.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group A: Minimal Rewards—0/25 (0%)2/25 (8%)
Group B: Immediate Incentives—0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)
Group C: Control—0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGroup A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: Control
Abnormal ECGCardiac disorders2/250/310/26

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Mean13.0 ± 1.212.8 ± 0.912.6 ± 1.212.8 ± 1.1
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Age at diagnosis3.0 ± 3.14.2 ± 3.03.6 ± 2.53.6 ± 2.9
Time since diagnosis10.0 ± 3.08.6 ± 3.19.0 ± 2.79.2 ± 2.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Female14161444
Male11151238
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Non-White36817
White22251865
Diagnosis
Diagnosis(participants)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Leukemia57719
Central Nervous System Tumor77418
Lymphoma2248
Retinoblastoma65213
Other Solid Tumor510924
Daily Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)
Daily Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)(minutes)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Mean26.8 ± 15.728.0 ± 16.632.3 ± 22.629.0 ± 18.2
Body mass index (BMI)
Body mass index (BMI)(kg/m^2)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Mean25.0 ± 6.622.6 ± 6.322.8 ± 5.523.4 ± 6.1
Resting heart rate (HR)
Resting heart rate (HR)(beats/minute)Group A: Minimal RewardsGroup B: Immediate IncentivesGroup C: ControlTotal
Mean82.8 ± 11.280.4 ± 14.581.5 ± 14.981.5 ± 13.6

10 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01778127
Lead sponsor
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 29, 2013
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Apr 2014
Results posted
May 21, 2015
Last update
May 21, 2015

Study contacts

Kirsten K. Ness, PT, PhD
principal investigator · St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion