CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01777438Updated Dec 17, 2013Results posted

Evaluating Symptom Control in in Allergic Rhinitis at Three Years After Starting Immunotherapy

An observational study in Allergic Rhinitis, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Completed at 2 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 59 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-17.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
434
Ages
19 Years to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is defined as inflammation of the nasal mucosa after exposition to an allergen in sensitized patients. AR causes not only nasal symptoms such as sneezing, itchy nose, rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction, but also has a significant impact on quality of life. Symptom control and overall satisfaction in patients undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) on the long term has not yet been investigated so far.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergic Rhinitis
03

In context

Rhinitis

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 434 is above the median of 141 across 172 observational studies indexed under Rhinitis.

Browse Rhinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 928 studies on the registry; 261 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients who started immunotherapy

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with at least 2 AR symptoms and a positive skin prick test for the 20 most prevalent inhalant allergens (house dust mites, grass pollen, tree pollen, animal dander, Alternaria, Penicillium and Cladosporium) in Belgium.
  2. Moderate/severe and/or persistent AR according to ARIA guidelines
  3. Age > 18 and \< 60 years.
  4. Written informed consent
  5. Dutch, French or English speaking patients

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria

  1. Age \< 18 and > 60 years
  2. Patients with mild AR
  3. Patients not being able to give an informed consent
  4. Patients being enrolled in other clinical trials
  5. No knowledge of Dutch, French or English
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
434 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • control group

    a control group of AR patients who visited the ear nose and throat (ENT) department of the University Hospitals Leuven in the same time period

  • patients having SCIT

    patients who started immunotherapy at the Department of Allergology of the University Hospitals Leuven between November 2007 and February 2010.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Current Medication Use Three Years After Diagnosis of AR

    Percentage patients in both groups that still use medication for their allergic rhinitis symptoms, 3 years after starting their therapy (non IT-group vs IT-group)

    Time frame: 3 years after starting SCIT

  2. Degree of Symptom Control 3 Years After IT or 3 Years After Medical Treatment With VAS of Total Nasal Symptom < 5/10 Defined as a Controlled Situation.

    Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for TNS experienced during the last 4 weeks. Visual analog scales (VAS) have been used to rate the presence of symptoms or impairment of the daily activities. Patients had to answer each question by indicating a position with a vertical line between two endpoints, 0 cm for not bothersome versus 10 cm for extremely bothersome. In this way each question is scored between 0 and 10 points.

    Time frame: 3 years after diagnosis

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Having Controlled Allergic Rhinosinusitis (AR) Symptoms 3 Years After Starting Treatment

    Based on the proposed cut-off value of VAS \< 5/10 for total nasal symptoms (TNS), rhinitis was considered as being controlled in 69 IT patients (84%) versus 223 (63%) non-IT patients

    Time frame: 3 years after starting SCIT

  2. Percentage of Patients That Met ARIA Criteria for Mild AR Symtoms at a Mean Interval of 3 Years After Diagnosis

    ARIA classification of AR is made by duration and severity of AR symptoms. Here are calculated the number of patients having mild acute rhinitis. Clinical practice guidelines such as the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) document focus on the quality of life as a principal consideration in assessment and treatment of AR

    Time frame: 3 years after diagnosis

07

Results

Posted Dec 17, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl GroupPatients Having SCIT
Started35282
Completed35282
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryCurrent Medication Use Three Years After Diagnosis of AR

Percentage patients in both groups that still use medication for their allergic rhinitis symptoms, 3 years after starting their therapy (non IT-group vs IT-group)

Time frame:
3 years after starting SCIT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Current Medication Use Three Years After Diagnosis of AR
percentage of participantsControl GroupPatients Having SCIT
Current Medication Use Three Years After Diagnosis of AR6129
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Having Controlled Allergic Rhinosinusitis (AR) Symptoms 3 Years After Starting Treatment

Based on the proposed cut-off value of VAS \< 5/10 for total nasal symptoms (TNS), rhinitis was considered as being controlled in 69 IT patients (84%) versus 223 (63%) non-IT patients

Time frame:
3 years after starting SCIT
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Having Controlled Allergic Rhinosinusitis (AR) Symptoms 3 Years After Starting Treatment
percentage of participantsControl GroupPatients Having SCIT
Percentage of Patients Having Controlled Allergic Rhinosinusitis (AR) Symptoms 3 Years After Starting Treatment6384
PrimaryDegree of Symptom Control 3 Years After IT or 3 Years After Medical Treatment With VAS of Total Nasal Symptom < 5/10 Defined as a Controlled Situation.

Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for TNS experienced during the last 4 weeks. Visual analog scales (VAS) have been used to rate the presence of symptoms or impairment of the daily activities. Patients had to answer each question by indicating a position with a vertical line between two endpoints, 0 cm for not bothersome versus 10 cm for extremely bothersome. In this way each question is scored between 0 and 10 points.

Time frame:
3 years after diagnosis
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Degree of Symptom Control 3 Years After IT or 3 Years After Medical Treatment With VAS of Total Nasal Symptom < 5/10 Defined as a Controlled Situation.
Score on a scaleControl GroupPatients Having SCIT
Degree of Symptom Control 3 Years After IT or 3 Years After Medical Treatment With VAS of Total Nasal Symptom < 5/10 Defined as a Controlled Situation.3.7 ± 2.82.5 ± 2.3
SecondaryPercentage of Patients That Met ARIA Criteria for Mild AR Symtoms at a Mean Interval of 3 Years After Diagnosis

ARIA classification of AR is made by duration and severity of AR symptoms. Here are calculated the number of patients having mild acute rhinitis. Clinical practice guidelines such as the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) document focus on the quality of life as a principal consideration in assessment and treatment of AR

Time frame:
3 years after diagnosis
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients That Met ARIA Criteria for Mild AR Symtoms at a Mean Interval of 3 Years After Diagnosis
percentage of participantsControl GroupPatients Having SCIT
Percentage of Patients That Met ARIA Criteria for Mild AR Symtoms at a Mean Interval of 3 Years After Diagnosis3278

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group—0/352 (0%)0/352 (0%)
Patients Having SCIT—0/82 (0%)0/82 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control GroupPatients Having SCITTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years35282434
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control GroupPatients Having SCITTotal
Female20148249
Male15134185
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control GroupPatients Having SCITTotal
Belgium35282434
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • ORL
    Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant 3000, Belgium
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, Vlaams-brabant 3000, Belgium
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01777438
Lead sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2013
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Dec 17, 2013
Last update
Dec 17, 2013

Study contacts

Peter Hellings, MD
principal investigator · UZ Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion