CClinicalTrials.gg
No longer availableNCT01777061Updated May 16, 2018

Clinical Management Decisions for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Patients Based on [11C]Acetate PET Scan

An expanded access record providing [11C]Acetate in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Wendell Yap, MD. No longer available at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-16.

Sponsored by Wendell Yap, MD · Expanded access

Study type
Expanded access
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

When evaluating prostate cancer patients for recurrent disease, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are both highly sensitive methods for detecting lymph nodes, but are not specific as to whether the lymph nodes are malignant or benign.

While positron emission tomography (PET) utilizing radioactive glucose (FDG) has revolutionized staging, restaging, and monitoring response to therapy in many prevalent cancers such as breast, colorectal, esophageal, head and neck, lung, lymphoma, and melanoma, findings with prostate cancer have proven less sensitive because prostate cancer has a lower avidity for glucose. A newer PET isotope, utilizing acetate that is incorporated into the cell membrane of rapidly proliferating cells, has shown greater sensitivity than FDG in detecting prostate cancer.

This study will assess the clinical effectiveness of utilizing [11C]Acetate PET scans in identifying recurrent prostate cancer.

Read the detailed description

FDG-PET imaging uses a form of radioactive glucose (18-fluoro-deoxyglucose or FDG), which allows the measurement of glucose metabolic rate of any tissue in the body. The most prevalent tumors have a glucose avidity that is typically greater than 2.5 times the avidity of benign tissue. Therefore, FDG-PET is able to discriminate between benign lymph nodes and those containing metastases, and similarly between scar tissue and recurrence of tumor.

Unfortunately, prostate cancer is only minimally glucose avid, and therefore, FDG-PET is much less effective in staging prostate cancer. The current FDA-approved imaging agent for prostate cancer is a monoclonal antibody specific for prostate cancer cells, capromab pendetide, labeled with a long-lived radionuclide [111]Indium that is used to image the patient over a six day period. However, recent data show that another PET radiopharmaceutical, [11C]Acetate (which has been FDA approved for years for cardiac imaging), is avidly taken up by prostate metastasis and is more sensitive than either [111]Indium capromab pendetide or FDG-PET.

This study will assess the clinical effectiveness of utilizing [11C]Acetate PET scans in identifying recurrent prostate cancer and aim to find at what PSA levels it is most effective.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • PET Scan
  • FDG-PET
  • [11C]Acetate
  • C11-Acetate
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Wendell Yap, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Positive for recurrent prostate cancer by PSA criteria
  • Recurrence definition:
  • Status post-operative radical prostatectomy, recurrence is defined by a PSA of greater than or equal to 0.2 ng/ml
  • Patients who have failed external beam radiation, or status post-brachytherapy, have recurrence as defined as PSA above 2.0 ng/ml the nadir PSA after treatment
  • Subject is able to comprehend the study objectives and provide written informed consent before the initiation of any study-related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of ≥ 2
  • Any other concurrent malignancy
  • Patients without remission of disease (no PSA decrease)
  • Patients without recurrence of disease (PSA remains low)
05

Access details

Study type
Expanded access

Available treatment

  • Drug[11C]Acetate

    intravenous injection of an average of 40 mCi of \[11C\]Acetate

    Also known as: carbon-11 acetate [[11C]acetate], sodium acetate [11C]Acetate injection

06

Where to request access

1 site
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01777061
Lead sponsor
Wendell Yap, MD
Collaborators
University of Kansas Medical Center
Responsible party
Wendell Yap, MD (Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Kansas Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2013
Last update
May 16, 2018

Study contacts

Wendell Yap, MD
principal investigator · University of Kansas Medical Center
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Requesting access

Expanded access is arranged between your doctor and the company. Ask your care team to contact the provider listed on this record.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion