ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01772875Updated Aug 5, 2020

Bladder Lavage as Decontamination Method for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria With Uropathogens in Catheterized Patients

An interventional study of bladder lavage in Catheter Related Infections, sponsored by National Multiple Sclerosis Center. Withdrawn at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-05.

Sponsored by National Multiple Sclerosis Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was withdrawn
no clinical investigator present

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In patients with advanced multiple sclerosis, permanent urinary catheters are often used to manage the urinary incontinence and bladder emptying problems. These catheters will lead to urinary tract infection, blocking of the catheter etc.. Especially infections with certain bacteria such as proteus, enterobacteriaceae and ESBL producing enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonas can pose a problem for the hospital infection control and for the patient.

This study wants to evaluate the potential role of regular bladder lavage with saline, a solution of betadine, an acid solution of acetic acid and of URotainer Twin Suby G ( Braun)in the decontamination of these bladders and the prevention of clinically relevant urinary tract infections.

Read the detailed description

PAtients will be selected from the catheterised patient population of the National MS Center in Belgium for this prospective randomised comparative pilot studyon bladder lavage.

The potential benefit for the patient is a reduction in number of clinical urinary tract infections and a reduction of antibiotic use.

According to the type of bacteria that is cultured from the urine, patients will be allocated to one of 4 subgroups:

  • 30 patients will recieve bladder lavage with a Isobetadine Dermicum Solution
  • 20 patients will revieve bladder lavage with acetic acid solutions
  • 10 patients will recieve bladder lavage with saline
  • 10 patients will receive bladder lavage with Urotainer Suby G

The effect will be measured by two repeat urine cultures after the bladder lavage( 2days and 5 days).

From a safety perspective and to assess the irritation caused by the lavage, white blood cell counts in the urine will be done.

Adverse events will be monitored according to GCP regulations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Catheter Related Infections

Keywords

  • urinary catheter
  • UTI
  • bladder lavage
03

In context

Catheter-Related Infections

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Catheter-Related Infections; 18 are open to participants now.

Browse Catheter-Related Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

National Multiple Sclerosis Center is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with an indwelling catheter
  • catheter associated bacteriuria with proteus, enterobacteriaceae or pseudomonas
  • willing and able to give to the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with a UTI ( fever, pain or cloudy urine)
  • cognitively impaired patients
  • patients not able or willing to give
  • patients with allergies for ISobetadine dermicum or other substances used in the protocol
  • patients who only have a catheter for less than 1 month
  • patients taking systemic antibiotics during the last 48h
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    lavage Isobetadine Dermicum solution

    Patient will receive 1 bladder lavage daily with a solution of 5ml Isobetadine Dermicum in 100cc saline

    Procedure: bladder lavage

  • Active comparator
    lavage Acetic Acid solution

    Patients will receive a daily bladder lavage during 5 consecutive days with a solution of 0.5% acetic acid in 100cc of saline

    Procedure: bladder lavage

  • Sham comparator
    lavage with saline

    patients will receive during 5 consecutive days a bladder lavage with 100cc saline

    Procedure: bladder lavage

  • Active comparator
    lavage Urotainer Suby G

    patients will receive during 5 consecutive days a bladder lavage with 100cc of Urotainer Suby G

    Procedure: bladder lavage

Interventions

  • Procedurebladder lavage

    the bladder is rinced through the urinary catheter with the lavage solution

    Also known as: bladder rincing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. urinary culture

    After 5 consecutive days of bladder lavage, a urine culture will be taken at day 2 and 5. A count of \<100.000 CFU/ml and is considered a positive result. The outcome will be considered positive if this positive result is found in more than 30% of subjects.

    Time frame: day 2 and day 5 after last bladder lavage

Secondary outcomes

  1. pyuria

    changes in white blood cell count are monitored at day 2 and 5 afte 5 consecutive days of bladder lavage. This is an assessment of bladder irritation.

    Time frame: day 2 and day 5 after the last bladder lavage

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National MS Center
    Steenokkerzeel, Vlaams-Brabant 1820, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jaggi N, Sissodia P. Multimodal supervision programme to reduce catheter associated urinary tract infections and its analysis to enable focus on labour and cost effective infection control measures in a tertiary care hospital in India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012 Oct;6(8):1372-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4229.2362. PubMed 23205350 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2013; primary completion for Dec 2013, 11 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2013
First posted
Jan 21, 2013
StartEst.
Jan 2013
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2013
CompletionActual
Jan 20, 2014
Last update
Aug 5, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01772875
Lead sponsor
National Multiple Sclerosis Center
Responsible party
Daphne Kos (Scientific Research, National Multiple Sclerosis Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 21, 2013
Start date
Jan 2013 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2013 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 20, 2014
Last update
Aug 5, 2020

Study contacts

Dirk De Ridder, Prof.
principal investigator · National MS Center Belgium & University Hospitals KU Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion