CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01770405US-nCLEUpdated Aug 29, 2017

Clinical Registry of nCLE in Masses and Cystic Tumors of the Pancreas, Lymph Nodes, Submucosal Lesions of the GI Tract

An observational study in Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreatic Neoplasms and Pancreatic Adenoma, sponsored by Mauna Kea Technologies. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-29.

Sponsored by Mauna Kea Technologies · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study focuses on four different lesions: pancreatic cysts, lymph nodes near the gastrointestinal tract, pancreatic masses and GIST tumors.

On one hand, the results obtained during previous studies are more advanced for the assessment of the diagnostic performance of Cellvizio needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) system for Pancreatic cysts. Safety and technical feasibility have already been performed, and an interpretation criteria classification exists. On the other hand, results for pancreatic masses, Lymph nodes and GIST are less developed.

the objectives of the study are to

  • Assess the diagnostic performance of the Cellvizio needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) system in diagnosing masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract
  • Define/Validate descriptive criteria of nCLE sequences in masses and cystic tu-mors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract
Read the detailed description

The principle of needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) is to image organs within or adjacent to the GI or respiratory tracts by means of a miniprobe inserted through an endoscopic needle. The fundamental technology, as well as the principle of operation of nCLE, is substantially similar to pCLE.

endoscopic fine needles are used during EUS-FNA procedures to puncture solid organs such as the pancreas, in order to get tissue or fluid for diagnostic purposes. There are different calibers of endoscopic nee-dles used. The most commonly used calibers for EUS-FNA procedures are 22G, 19G, and 25G needles. The nCLE Confocal Miniprobe is compatible with the 19G-type needle only. It is expected to help to differentiate the different types of lesions, especially for cysts, leading to better patient management. Microscopic tissue information in real-time in vivo during an EUS-FNA procedure may allow better differentiation between mucinous and non-mucinous cysts for instance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Cyst
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Pancreatic Adenoma
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Pancreatic Islet Cell Tumors
  • Lymph Node Mass
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • GIST

Keywords

  • endomicroscopy
  • needle-based
  • pancreatic
  • cyst
  • mass
  • EUSFNA
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,235 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 898 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 200 across 620 observational studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Mauna Kea Technologies is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Referral patients with a clinical indication for masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract coming in for first EUS-FNA procedure at referral institution will be approached for possible inclusion into this registry

Inclusion criteria

    • Male or female > 18 years of age
  • Patient indicated for a first EUS-FNA for masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submu-cosal lesions of the GI tract
  • Patients who had previous non-diagnostic tissue sampling taken during a previous EUS-FNA for masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract
  • Patient with known masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract
  • For pancreatic cyst patient, suffering chronic calcifying pancreatitis
  • For pancreatic mass patient, any size or location
  • For lymph node patient, any node reachable with EUS-FNA
  • Willing and able to comply with study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the registry

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Subjects for whom EUS-FNA procedures are contraindicated
  • Known allergy to fluorescein contrast
  • If female, breast feeding or pregnant based on a positive hCG serum or an in vitro diagnostic test result
  • Subject with multiple cysts
  • Cysts \<20 mm in diameter
  • Previous EUS-FNA procedure performed less than 3 months ago
  • If several pancreatic masses, only one will be imaged during the nCLE procedure
  • Lymph nodes \<5 mm in diameter
  • If several suspicious lymph nodes, only the most suspect will be imaged during the nCLE proce-dure
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • pancreatic cysts

    Patient indicated for a first endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for a pancreatic cyst,

    Device: Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration

Interventions

  • DeviceEndoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration

    Device: nCLE needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy

    Also known as: ultrasonographic endoscopy, EUS-guided FNA

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. performance evaluation

    * Assess the diagnostic performance of the Cellvizio needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) system in diagnosing masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract (accuracy evaluation) * Define/Validate descriptive criteria for nCLE sequences in the characterization of masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract (image interpretation criteria definition

    Time frame: up to one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety and feasibility evaluation

    * Evaluate the feasibility and safety of nCLE for the characterization of masses and cystic tumors of the pan-creas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract (IE. number of patients with complications, number of adverse events) * Build an atlas of images of nCLE sequences of masses and cystic tumors of the pancreas, lymph nodes, submucosal lesions of the GI tract

    Time frame: up to one month following the procedure

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • North Shore-LIJ Health System
    Manhasset, New York 11030, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Temple University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01770405
Lead sponsor
Mauna Kea Technologies
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2013
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2016
Completion
Dec 21, 2016
Last update
Aug 29, 2017

Study contacts

Divyesh V Sejpal, MD
principal investigator · Northwell Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion