A Phase 3 interventional study of Injection of C3BS-CQR-1 and Sham, no injection in Heart Failure, sponsored by Celyad Oncology SA. Completed at 35 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-01.
Sponsored by Celyad Oncology SA · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Evaluation the safety and efficacy of C3BS-CQR-1 by comparing the overall response to standard of care and C3BS-CQR-1 relative to standard of care and a sham procedure.
5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 315 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.
Browse Heart Failure studies →Celyad Oncology SA is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Eligible patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria (summarized):
Eligible patients must meet none of the following exclusion criteria:
Inability to perform a 6 minute walk test due to physical limitations other than HF including:
Sham, no injection
Biological: Sham, no injection
Injection of C3BS-CQR-1
Biological: Injection of C3BS-CQR-1
Injection of the C3BS-CQR-1 using the C-Cath® injection catheter.
Mimic the injection procedure trough insertion of a sham catheter. No injection actually performed
Efficacy between groups post-index procedure
Change between groups from baseline and 39 weeks in a hierarchical composite outcome comprising, from most to least severe outcome, days to death from any cause, number of worsening of heart failure events, change in score for the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) (10-point deterioration, no meaningful change,10-point improvement), change in six-minute walk distance (40-m deterioration, no meaningful change, 40-m improvement) and change in left ventricular end systolic volume (15-mL deterioration, no meaningful change, 15-mL improvement), and left ventricular ejection fraction (4% absolute deterioration, no meaningful change, 4% absolute improvement).
Time frame: 39 weeks post-index
Efficacy and safety between groups post-index procedure
Safety: Number and cause of deaths and re-admissions, number of cardiac transplantations, number of myocardial infarctions, number of strokes. Incidence of serious adverse events (AE) through week 104 and non-serious AEs (through week 52). Efficacy: Time to all cause mortality, time to worsening of heart failure, and time to aborted sudden death through week 52.
Time frame: 52 and 104 weeks post-index
Efficacy and safety between groups post-index procedure
Time to all cause mortality, time to cardiovascular mortality, and rate of worsening heart failure requiring outpatient IV therapy for heart failure or readmission for heart failure, and others.
Time frame: 39 and 52 weeks post-index
This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Celyad Oncology SA