CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01763164Updated Mar 22, 2021Results posted

Study Comparing the Efficacy of MEK162 Versus Dacarbazine in Unresectable or Metastatic NRAS Mutation-positive Melanoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of MEK162 and Dacarbazine in Metastatic or Unresectable Cutaneous Melanoma, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 229 sites in 27 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-22.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
402
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Two-arm, randomized, prospective, open-label, multi-center, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of MEK162 (45 mg BID) versus dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced (Stage IIIC) unresectable or metastatic (Stage IV) NRAS Q61 mutation-positive cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma. The mutation analysis will be performed at a central laboratory. Only those patients with Q61 mutation per central laboratory and meet all eligibility criteria will be randomized. A total of 393 patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive either MEK162 or dacarbazine. Patients will be stratified according to AJCC stage (IIIC, IVM1a, and IVM1b versus IVM1c), ECOG Performance status (0 versus 1) and any prior number of lines of immunotherapy (immunotherapies versus none). This study will use an Interactive Response Technology (IRT). The primary end point of the study is progression-free survival. Key secondary end point is overall survival

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic or Unresectable Cutaneous Melanoma

Keywords

  • Melanoma
  • Cutaneous melanoma
  • Skin disease
  • Skin cancer
  • Skin Neoplasms
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
03

In context

Melanoma

3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 402 is above the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic cutaneous or melanoma of unknown primary AJCC Stage IIIC or IV (uveal and mucosal melanoma are excluded)
  • Presence of NRAS Q61 mutation in tumor tissue prior to randomization as determined by a Novartis designated central laboratory
  • Naïve untreated patients or patients who have progressed on or after any number of prior lines of immunotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma
  • Evidence of at least one measurable lesion as detected by radiological or photographic methods
  • Adequate bone marrow, organ function, cardiac and laboratory parameters
  • Normal functioning of daily living activities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any untreated CNS metastases
  • Uveal or mucosal melanoma
  • History of or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or risk factors of RVO
  • Patients with washout period \< 6 weeks from the last dose of ipilimumab or other immunotherapy.
  • Previous systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma.
  • History of Gilbert's syndrome
  • Prior therapy with a MEK- inhibitor
  • Impaired cardiovascular function or clinically significant cardiovascular diseases
  • Uncontrolled arterial hypertension despite medical treatment
  • HIV positive or active Hepatitis A or B
  • Impairment of gastrointestinal function
  • Patients who have undergone major surgery or radiotherapy ≤ 3 weeks prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such procedure;
  • Patients with neuromuscular disorders that are associated with elevated CK.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Medical, psychiatric, cognitive or other conditions that may compromise the patient's ability to understand the patient information, give informed consent, comply with the study protocol or complete the study

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
402 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MEK162

    Drug: MEK162

  • Active comparator
    Dacarbazine

    Drug: Dacarbazine

Interventions

  • DrugMEK162

    MEK162 will be administered as a fixed dose of 45 mg (3 x 15 mg tablets) BID, with a glass of water and taken with or without food.

  • DrugDacarbazine

    Patients randomized to dacarbazine will receive an IV infusion of dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 over the course of 1 hour on day 1 and then every three weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1

    PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. RECIST 1.1, PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of target lesions (TLs) taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), sum must also be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm; unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs; appearance of \>=1 lesion. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs. Partial response (PR): \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, referring baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase in lesions qualified for PD referring smallest sum diameter. With no event at time of analysis cut-off or at start of any new anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment of CR, PR or SD.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, overall survival was censored at the date of last known date participant alive.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death (maximum up to 107 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 88 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR: percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR. BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters. ORR is reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses. Confirmed CR or PR = at least 2 determinations of CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart before PD. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

  3. Time to Response (TTR)

    TTR: time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured TLs taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants who did not achieve PR or CR censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have PFS event (time from date of randomization to date of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occur first) or at maximum follow-up when they had PFS event.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

  4. Duration of Objective Response (DOR)

    DOR: time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. If a participant with a CR or PR had no PD or death due to underlying cancer, participants was censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment.

    Time frame: From the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

  5. Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, SD RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; c) SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; d) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until first documented response of CR, PR, SD or non-CR/non-PD (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was medically significant; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  7. Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03

    Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  8. Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03

    Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  9. Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs

    Abnormalities criteria included: low/high pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]):\<=50bpm with decrease from baseline \>=15bpm/\>=120bpm with increase from baseline \>=15bpm; Low/high systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]): \<=90mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=20mmHg/\>=160mmHg with increase from baseline \>=20mmHg; Low/high diastolic blood pressure \[mmHg\]: \<=50mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=15mmHg/\>=100mmHg with increase from baseline \>=15mmHg; Low/high body weight (kilogram \[kg\]): \>=20% decrease from baseline / \>=10% increase from baseline; Low/high body temperature (degree Celsius \[°C\]): \<=36°C / \>= 37.5°C

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  10. Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

    Criteria for notable ECG values were as follow: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  11. Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  12. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination

    A complete physical examination included the examination of general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), eyes, ears, nose, throat, lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, extremities, vascular and neurological systems. If indicated based on medical history and/or symptoms, rectal, external genitalia, breast, and pelvic examinations were performed. Clinical significance in physical examination was reported as adverse events.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  13. Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately sight threatening; Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Sight-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; blindness (20/200 or worse) in the affected eye. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  14. Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib

    Time frame: Day 1 of Week 1: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 4, 7: Pre-dose, 1.5 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 10, 13: Pre-dose

  15. Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)

    The time to definitive 10% deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which was defined as death due to any cause or at least 10% worsening of the corresponding scale score, relative to baseline, with no later improvement above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. If a participant had no event prior to analysis cut-off or start of another anticancer therapy, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate health related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation. EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

  16. Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

    EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

    Time frame: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

  17. Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

    EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

    Time frame: Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57

  18. Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

    ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5= dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as on treatment death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 73 weeks 3 days for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 57 weeks 3 days for dacarbazine arm

  19. Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

    ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

    Time frame: For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73

  20. Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline

    Number of participants with NRAS mutation status at baseline were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Mar 22, 2021

Participant flow

Participants randomized were with previously untreated, advanced unresectable or metastatic Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutation-positive melanoma as confirmed by central assessment.

Treatment Phase
Participant flow — Treatment Phase
MilestoneBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Started269133
Treated/safety set269114
Full analysis set269133
Completed00
Not completed269133
Withdrew: Participant/guardian decision2614
Withdrew: Protocol violation11
Withdrew: Progressive disease14276
Withdrew: Physician decision2413
Withdrew: Death101
Withdrew: Adverse event668
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated019
Withdrew: Other01
Follow up Phase
Participant flow — Follow up Phase
MilestoneBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Started20078
Completed33
Not completed19775
Withdrew: New therapy for study indication123
Withdrew: Death214
Withdrew: Subject/guardian decision92
Withdrew: Progressive disease12762
Withdrew: Physician decision103
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Adverse event171

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1

PFS: time from randomization to first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. RECIST 1.1, PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of target lesions (TLs) taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), sum must also be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm; unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs; appearance of \>=1 lesion. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs. Partial response (PR): \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, referring baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase in lesions qualified for PD referring smallest sum diameter. With no event at time of analysis cut-off or at start of any new anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment of CR, PR or SD.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
MonthsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.12.83 (2.76 to 3.55)1.51 (1.48 to 1.71)
Statistical analysis
  • Binimetinib (MEK162) vs Dacarbazine · Log Rank · p = < 0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.62 · 95% CI 0.47 to 0.80
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, overall survival was censored at the date of last known date participant alive.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to the date of death (maximum up to 107 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 88 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Overall Survival (OS)10.97 (8.94 to 13.60)10.09 (7.03 to 16.46)
Statistical analysis
  • Binimetinib (MEK162) vs Dacarbazine · Log Rank · p = 0.499 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.33
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR. BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters. ORR is reported for confirmed and unconfirmed responses. Confirmed CR or PR = at least 2 determinations of CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart before PD. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Percentage of ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Confirmed ORR15.2 (11.2 to 20.1)6.8 (3.1 to 12.5)
Confirmed + Unconfirmed: ORR22.7 (17.8 to 28.2)9.8 (5.3 to 16.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Binimetinib (MEK162) vs Dacarbazine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.015
  • Binimetinib (MEK162) vs Dacarbazine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.002
SecondaryTime to Response (TTR)

TTR: time between date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured TLs taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all TLs recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Appearance of \>=1 new lesion. Participants who did not achieve PR or CR censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not have PFS event (time from date of randomization to date of first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occur first) or at maximum follow-up when they had PFS event.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until first documented response of CR or PR (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Response (TTR)
MonthsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Time to Response (TTR)1.45 (1.45 to 1.48)2.79 (1.22 to 3.38)
SecondaryDuration of Objective Response (DOR)

DOR: time from date of first documented response (CR or PR) to first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter (dia) of all TLs, referring baseline sum of dia; c) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion. If a participant with a CR or PR had no PD or death due to underlying cancer, participants was censored at date of last adequate tumor assessment.

Time frame:
From the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the first documented progression or death (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Objective Response (DOR)
MonthsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Duration of Objective Response (DOR)6.87 (4.21 to 11.07)NA (4.14 to NA)
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, SD RECIST V1.1, a) CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (TLs) or non-pathological (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; b) PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; c) SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum diameters; d) PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, sum must also be absolute increase of \>=5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until first documented response of CR, PR, SD or non-CR/non-PD (maximum up to 77 weeks for binimetinib arm; maximum up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Percentage of participantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Disease Control Rate (DCR)58.4 (52.2 to 64.3)24.8 (17.7 to 33.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. SAE was defined as one of the following: was fatal or life-threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; constituted a congenital anomaly/birth defect; was medically significant; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Treatment-emergent AE was defined as an AE with onset date occurring during the on-treatment period. AEs included all SAEs and non-SAEs.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
AEs269104
SAEs9526
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03

Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Hematology Shifts Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Grade, Version 4.03
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged72
Hemoglobin decreased1713
Prothrombin international normalized ratio increased90
Lymphocytes increased200
Lymphocytes decreased3519
Neutrophils decreased821
Platelets decreased317
Leukocytes increased00
Leukocytes decreased626
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03

Clinically notable shifts are defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to \>= grade 3. Severity was graded as Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Clinical Chemistry/Biochemistry Shifts Based on NCI-CTCAE Grade, Version 4.03
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Albumin decreased275
Alkaline phosphatase82
Alanine aminotransferase144
Aspartate aminotransferase201
Bilirubin11
Corrected Calcium increased24
Corrected Calcium decreased20
Creatinine92
Gamma-glutamyl transferase97
Glucose serum fasting increased135
Glucose serum fasting decreased60
Potassium increased133
Potassium decreased141
Magnesium increased10
Magnesium decreased10
Phosphate decreased175
Sodium increased234
Sodium decreased40
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs

Abnormalities criteria included: low/high pulse rate (beats per minute \[bpm\]):\<=50bpm with decrease from baseline \>=15bpm/\>=120bpm with increase from baseline \>=15bpm; Low/high systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]): \<=90mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=20mmHg/\>=160mmHg with increase from baseline \>=20mmHg; Low/high diastolic blood pressure \[mmHg\]: \<=50mmHg with decrease from baseline \>=15mmHg/\>=100mmHg with increase from baseline \>=15mmHg; Low/high body weight (kilogram \[kg\]): \>=20% decrease from baseline / \>=10% increase from baseline; Low/high body temperature (degree Celsius \[°C\]): \<=36°C / \>= 37.5°C

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Signs
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Sitting Pulse Rate - High41
Sitting Pulse Rate - Low31
Sitting systolic blood pressure - High438
Sitting systolic blood pressure -Low24
Sitting diastolic blood pressure - High284
Sitting diastolic blood pressure - Low21
Weight - High161
Weight - Low00
Body temperature - High156
Body temperature - Low9024
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

Criteria for notable ECG values were as follow: QT interval (in millisecond \[msec\]) new (newly occurring post-baseline value) greater than (\>) 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Fredericia formula (QTcF) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; corrected QT interval by Bazett's formula (QTcB) in msec new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \> 450, 480, 500, increase from baseline \>30, increase from baseline \>60; heart rate in bpm new (newly occurring post-baseline value) \<60 and \>100.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
QT - New > 450 msec328
QT - New > 480 msec71
QT - New > 500 msec50
QT - Increase from baseline > 30 msec10933
QT - Increase from baseline > 60 msec285
QTcF - New > 450 msec2915
QTcF - New > 480 msec101
QTcF - New > 500 msec51
QTcF - Increase from baseline > 30 msec5225
QTcF - Increase from baseline > 60 msec95
QTcB - New > 450 msec6526
QTcB - New > 480 msec248
QTcB - New > 500 msec66
QTcB - Increase from baseline > 30 msec7636
QTcB - Increase from baseline > 60 msec119
Heart rate - New < 60 bpm8513
Heart rate - New > 100 bpm1816
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Cardiac Events352
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination

A complete physical examination included the examination of general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), eyes, ears, nose, throat, lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, extremities, vascular and neurological systems. If indicated based on medical history and/or symptoms, rectal, external genitalia, breast, and pelvic examinations were performed. Clinical significance in physical examination was reported as adverse events.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately sight threatening; Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Sight-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; blindness (20/200 or worse) in the affected eye. Here, in this outcome measure data is reported for events falling in any of the grades.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest: Ocular Events60
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of Binimetinib
Time frame:
Day 1 of Week 1: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 10 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 4, 7: Pre-dose, 1.5 hours post-dose; Day 1 of Weeks 10, 13: Pre-dose
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Nanogram per milliliter
Plasma Concentration of Binimetinib
Nanogram per milliliterBinimetinib (MEK162)
Week 1 Day 1, Pre-dose64.4 ± 1132.3
Week 1 Day 1, 1 hour (hr) Post-dose182 ± 237.6
Week 1 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose313 ± 71.6
Week 1 Day 1, 2 hr Post-dose321 ± 64.4
Week 1 Day 1, 10 hr Post-dose153 ± 52.6
Week 4 Day 1, Pre-dose101 ± 100.8
Week 4 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose418 ± 51.9
Week 7 Day 1, Pre-dose101 ± 97.7
Week 7 Day 1, 1.5 hr Post-dose372 ± 63.4
Week 10 Day 1, Pre-dose92.9 ± 60.6
Week 13 Day 1, Pre-dose93.9 ± 89.8
SecondaryTime to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)

The time to definitive 10% deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which was defined as death due to any cause or at least 10% worsening of the corresponding scale score, relative to baseline, with no later improvement above this threshold observed during the course of the study or death due to any cause. If a participant had no event prior to analysis cut-off or start of another anticancer therapy, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate health related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation. EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 77 weeks in binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 61 weeks for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
MonthsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in Global Health Status Score of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30)2.79 (1.64 to 4.24)4.27 (2.86 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Binimetinib (MEK162) vs Dacarbazine · Log Rank · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.43 · 95% CI 0.96 to 2.13
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EORTC QLQ-C30: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), a h global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, pain, fatigue) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single-item measures range =0 to 100. High score for global health status = high quality of life. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

Time frame:
Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score of EORTC QLQ-C30 at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Units on a scaleBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Baseline68.35 ± 23.46370.50 ± 21.823
Week 4 Day 1-5.75 ± 22.285-1.81 ± 17.512
Week 7 Day 1-8.63 ± 22.5620.00 ± 15.691
Week 13 Day 1-8.28 ± 19.659-1.34 ± 16.955
Week 19 Day 1-8.05 ± 21.053-3.26 ± 22.296
Week 25 Day 1-10.58 ± 21.775-3.47 ± 13.036
Week 34 Day 1-6.25 ± 18.7553.57 ± 20.893
Week 43 Day 1-11.36 ± 20.841-6.94 ± 23.224
Week 52 Day 1-1.52 ± 20.006-8.33 ± 11.785
Week 61 Day 1-10.00 ± 18.066—
Week 70 Day 1-20.83 ± 5.893—
End of Treatment-12.20 ± 22.512-6.74 ± 21.536
30-day safety follow-up-8.10 ± 21.361-9.62 ± 14.372
Post treatment follow-up 1-5.95 ± 19.211-8.59 ± 21.218
Post treatment follow-up 20.00 ± NA—
Post treatment follow-up 316.67 ± NA—
Post treatment follow-up 425.00 ± 11.785—
Post treatment follow-up 525.00 ± 11.785—
Post treatment follow-up 633.33 ± NA—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

EQ-5D-5L, is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. EQ-5D-5L contained 1 item for each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Index score: participant responses to the 5 dimensions reflected a specific health state that corresponded to a population preference weight for that state on a continuous scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Higher index scores = better health state. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

Time frame:
Both arms: Baseline, Day 1 Treatment Week (TW) 4,7,13,19,25,34,43,52; Post-treatment follow-up Visit (FUV) 1 to 6; Binimetinib: Day 1 TW61,70; End of treatment (EOT= TW73); Safety FUV=30 days post TW73; Dacarbazine: EOT=TW 57;Safety FUV=30 days post TW57
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score at Weeks 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 34, 43, 52, 61, 70, End of Treatment, Safety Follow-up Visit, Post-treatment Follow-up Visit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Units on a scaleBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Baseline0.7780 ± 0.224640.7657 ± 0.23003
Week 4 Day 1-0.0422 ± 0.182910.0110 ± 0.12135
Week 7 Day 1-0.0397 ± 0.191540.0132 ± 0.14084
Week 13 Day 1-0.0773 ± 0.175430.0198 ± 0.15236
Week 19 Day 1-0.0576 ± 0.225030.0257 ± 0.18052
Week 25 Day 1-0.1563 ± 0.321420.0657 ± 0.16052
Week 34 Day 1-0.0801 ± 0.111410.0617 ± 0.15254
Week 43 Day 1-0.0170 ± 0.229780.1060 ± 0.15033
Week 52 Day 1-0.0389 ± 0.246090.0000 ± 0.00000
Week 61 Day 10.0690 ± 0.21080—
Week 70 Day 10.0120 ± 0.14001—
End of Treatment-0.0978 ± 0.23931-0.0540 ± 0.19164
30-day safety follow-up-0.1165 ± 0.24410-0.0740 ± 0.17682
Post treatment follow-up 1-0.0820 ± 0.11993-0.0438 ± 0.25374
Post treatment follow-up 2-0.2480 ± NA—
Post treatment follow-up 3-0.1210 ± NA—
Post treatment follow-up 40.1115 ± 0.15768—
Post treatment follow-up 50.1730 ± 0.24466—
Post treatment follow-up 60.2230 ± NA—
SecondaryTime to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5= dead. Definitive deterioration is defined as on treatment death due to any cause or decrease in ECOG PS by at least one category from baseline score.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 73 weeks 3 days for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 57 weeks 3 days for dacarbazine arm
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
MonthsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Time to Definitive 1 Point Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)NA (5.62 to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Binimetinib (MEK162) vs Dacarbazine · Log Rank · p = 0.995 · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.20 · 95% CI 1.19 to 4.06
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)

ECOG PS was used to assess the physical health of participants, and ranged from 0 (most active) to 5 (dead). ECOG PS grades: 0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, 1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work, 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4=completely disabled. cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Post-treatment tumor assessments follow up visits occurred at every 9 weeks if participants started new anticancer therapy.

Time frame:
For both arms: Baseline, Weeks 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55 and 30-day Follow-up For binimetinib only: Weeks 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Baseline : Grade 019382
Baseline: Grade 17631
Baseline : Grade 201
Week 4 Day 1: Grade 014666
Week 4 Day 1: Grade 110127
Week 4 Day 1: Grade 264
Week 4 Day 1: Grade 330
Week 7 Day 1: Grade 013851
Week 7 Day 1: Grade 18426
Week 7 Day 1: Grade 2103
Week 7 Day 1: Grade 330
Week 7 Day 1: Grade 410
Week 10 Day 1: Grade 011834
Week 10 Day 1: Grade 17215
Week 10 Day 1: Grade 282
Week 10 Day 1: Grade 330
Week 13 Day 1: Grade 09329
Week 13 Day 1: Grade 16214
Week 13 Day 1: Grade 2110
Week 13 Day 1: Grade 310
Week 16 Day 1: Grade 07024
Week 16 Day 1: Grade 1485
Week 16 Day 1: Grade 251
Week 16 Day 1: Grade 410
Week 19 Day 1: Grade 05319
Week 19 Day 1: Grade 1437
Week 19 Day 1:Grade 242
Week 22 Day 1: Grade 04217
Week 22 Day 1: Grade 1265
Week 22 Day 1: Grade 230
Week 22 Day 1: Grade 310
Week 25 Day 1: Grade 03713
Week 25 Day 1: Grade 1196
Week 25 Day 1: Grade 210
Week 25 Day 1: Grade 310
Week 28 Day 1: Grade 0289
Week 28 Day 1: Grade 1152
Week 28 Day 1: Grade 220
Week 28 Day 1: Grade 510
Week 31 Day 1: Grade 0227
Week 31 Day 1: Grade 1112
Week 31 Day 1: Grade 210
Week 34 Day 1: Grade 0209
Week 34 Day 1: Grade 171
Week 34 Day 1: Grade 220
Week 37 Day 1: Grade 0167
Week 37 Day 1: Grade 141
Week 40 Day 1: Grade 0156
Week 40 Day 1: Grade 101
Week 43 Day 1: Grade 0125
Week 43 Day 1: Grade 110
Week 43 Day 1: Grade 210
Week 46 Day 1: Grade 0114
Week 46 Day 1: Grade 120
Week 46 Day 1: Grade 210
Week 49 Day 1: Grade 091
Week 49 Day 1: Grade 120
Week 52 Day 1: Grade 0102
Week 52 Day 1: Grade 111
Week 55 Day 1: Grade 091
Week 55 Day 1: Grade 111
Week 58 Day 1: Grade 07—
Week 58 Day 1: Grade 11—
Week 61 Day 1: Grade 05—
Week 64 Day 1: Grade 04—
Week 67 Day 1: Grade 03—
Week 70 Day 1: Grade 02—
Week 73 Day 1: Grade 01—
Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 04224
Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 14116
Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 2144
Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 340
Safety Follow up Visit: Grade 440
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline

Number of participants with NRAS mutation status at baseline were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) Mutation Status at Baseline
ParticipantsBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
Wild Type01
Mutant: Q61K10051
Mutant: Q61L3217
Mutant: Q61R13764

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline up to 219.4 weeks for binimetinib arm; From baseline up to 123.9 weeks for dacarbazine arm. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Binimetinib (MEK162)—95/269 (35.3%)266/269 (98.9%)
Dacarbazine—26/114 (22.8%)100/114 (87.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 129
Most frequent serious events
EventBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
GENERAL PHYSICAL HEALTH DETERIORATIONGeneral disorders10/2690/114
PYREXIAGeneral disorders1/2693/114
PANCYTOPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders0/2692/114
DYSPNOEARespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/2692/114
SEPSISInfections and infestations2/2692/114
BACK PAINMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/2692/114
RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSIONEye disorders4/2690/114
PULMONARY EMBOLISMRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/2690/114
VOMITINGGastrointestinal disorders3/2690/114
SKIN INFECTIONInfections and infestations3/2690/114
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 58
Most frequent other events
EventBinimetinib (MEK162)Dacarbazine
BLOOD CREATINE PHOSPHOKINASE INCREASEDInvestigations119/2693/114
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders109/26915/114
DERMATITIS ACNEIFORMSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders106/2691/114
OEDEMA PERIPHERALGeneral disorders97/2695/114
RASHSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders96/2692/114
FATIGUEGeneral disorders68/26938/114
NAUSEAGastrointestinal disorders85/26935/114
VOMITINGGastrointestinal disorders58/26915/114
CONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disorders39/26922/114
NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disorders4/26921/114

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Binimetinib (MEK162)DacarbazineTotal
Mean63.6 ± 12.2860.6 ± 13.3562.6 ± 12.71
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Binimetinib (MEK162)DacarbazineTotal
Female10348151
Male16685251
08

Study locations

229 sites
  • Highlands Oncology Group
    Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703, United States
  • Highlands Oncology Group
    Rogers, Arkansas 72758, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Bonita Springs, Florida 34135, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Bradenton, Florida 34209, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Brandon, Florida 33511, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Cape Coral, Florida 33914, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Clearwater, Florida 33761, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Fort Myers, Florida 33905, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Fort Myers, Florida 33908, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Gainesville, Florida 32605, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Hudson, Florida 34667, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Inverness, Florida 34453, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Largo, Florida 33770, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Largo, Florida 33777, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Naples, Florida 34102, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Naples, Florida 34119, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    New Port Richey, Florida 34655, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Orange City, Florida 32763, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Port Charlotte, Florida 33980, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33705, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33707, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Sarasota, Florida 34232, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Sarasota, Florida 34236, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Spring Hill, Florida 34608, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Tampa, Florida 33607, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Tavares, Florida 32778, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Venice, Florida 34285, United States
  • Florida Cancer Specialists
    Venice, Florida 34292, United States
  • Oncology Specialists, SC
    Niles, Illinois 60714, United States
  • Oncology Specialists, SC
    Park Ridge, Illinois 60068, United States
  • Goshen Center For Cancer Care
    Goshen, Indiana 46526, United States
  • Eastern Maine Medical Center
    Bangor, Maine 04401, United States
  • Harry and Jeannette Weinberg Cancer Institute @Franklin Square
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Kresge Eye Institute
    Bingham Farms, Michigan 48025, United States
  • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Kresge Eye Institute
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute of Farmington Hills
    Farmington Hills, Michigan 48334, United States
  • Nebraska Methodist Hospital
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Cooper University Hospital
    Voorhees, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • The Ohio State University Martha Morehouse Medical Plaza
    Columbus, Ohio 43221, United States
  • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
    Portland, Oregon 97201, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology/Hematology
    Portland, Oregon 97227, United States
  • OHSU Center for Health and Healing
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • OHSU
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Oregon Health and Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Cancer Center Associates - Medical Oncology
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, United States
  • St. Luke's Cancer Center - Allentown Campus
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, United States
  • St. Luke's Hospital - Allentown Campus
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, United States
  • Cancer Center Associates - Medical Oncology
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
  • St. Luke's University Hospital - Bethlehem Campus
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
  • St. Luke's Cancer Center - Anderson Campus
    Easton, Pennsylvania 18045, United States
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson Medical Oncology
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • St. Luke's Hospital - Quakertown Campus
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania 18951, United States
  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Texas Oncology-Austin Central
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Elliot J. Ginchansky, MD, PA
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Dennis B. Kay
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
  • Parkland Memorial Hospital
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • UT Southwestern University Hospital- St. Paul
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • UT Southwestern University Hospital - Zale Lipshy
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • US Oncology
    Fort Worth, Texas 76177-3204, United States
  • US Oncology
    The Woodlands, Texas 77380, United States
  • Sanatorio de La Providencia
    Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma DE Buenosaires C1050AAK, Argentina
  • Centro de Investigación Clínica ? Clínica Viedma
    Viedma, RÍO Negro 08500, Argentina
  • Centro Oncologico de Rosario
    Rosario, Santa FE S2000KZE, Argentina
  • Fundacion CIDEA
    Buenos Aires, C1125ABE, Argentina
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Lake Macquarie Private Hospital
    Gateshead, New South Wales 02290, Australia
  • Melanoma Institute Australia
    North Sydney, New South Wales 2060, Australia
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
    Adelaide, South Australia 05000, Australia
  • LKH-Universitätsklinikum Klinikum Graz
    Graz, Steiermark 08036, Austria
  • Universitätsklinikum Innsbruck
    Innsbruck, Tirol 06020, Austria
  • Salzburger Landeskliniken
    Salzburg, 05020, Austria
  • Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien
    Vienna, 01090, Austria
  • Sint-Augustinuskliniek
    Wilrijk, Antwerpen 2610, Belgium
  • UZ Gasthuisberg
    Leuven, 03000, Belgium
  • CHU Sart Tilman
    Liege, 04000, Belgium
  • Hospital de Clinicas de Passo Fundo
    Passo Fundo, RIO Grande DO SUL 99010-260, Brazil
  • Hospital Moinhos de Vento
    Porto Alegre, RIO Grande DO SUL 90035-903, Brazil
  • Hospital Moinhos de Vento
    Porto Alegre, RIO Grande DO SUL 90560-030, Brazil
  • INCA Instituto Nacional de Cancer
    Rio de Janeiro, 20220410, Brazil
  • Hospital São José
    Sao Paulo, 01321-001, Brazil
  • Alberta Health Services - Cross Cancer Institute
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
  • London Regional Cancer Program
    London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada

Showing the first 100 of 229 sites across 27 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Ascierto PA, Arance A, Dutriaux C, Di Giacomo AM, Rutkowski P, Del Vecchio M, Gutzmer R, Mandala M, Thomas L, Demidov L, Garbe C, Hogg D, Liszkay G, Queirolo P, Wasserman E, Ford J, Weill M, Sirulnik LA, Jehl V, Bozon V, Long GV, Flaherty K. Binimetinib versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma (NEMO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):435-445. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30180-8. Epub 2017 Mar 9. PubMed 28284557 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01763164
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2013
Start date
Jul 12, 2013
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2015
Completion
Jun 4, 2019
Results posted
Mar 22, 2021
Last update
Mar 22, 2021

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion