ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01751178Updated Jul 28, 2014Results posted

An Efficacy Study of Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes

A Phase 4 interventional study of Chlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash with Alcohol and Chlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash without Alcohol in Gingivitis, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 3 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-28.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
324
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare subject gingival health after 6 weeks of twice daily use of a non-alcohol or alcohol containing mouthrinse and brushing compared to brushing only.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gingivitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Gingivitis

609 studies on the registry are indexed under Gingivitis; 107 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 324 is above the median of 63 across 494 interventional studies indexed under Gingivitis.

Browse Gingivitis studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,647 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 264 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history or oral/ dental examination.

    5. a) Good oral health in the opinion of the investigator (allowing mild to moderate gingivitis to meet entry criteria).

    b) A minimum of 20 permanent gradable teeth at screening. (Gradable teeth are those where restorative materials cover less than 25% of the tooth surface graded).

    c) Mild to moderate gingivitis present at the screening visit in the opinion of the investigator.

    d) Positive response to bleeding on brushing exercise at screening visit. e) A total of 20 bleeding sites or greater at baseline visit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to Chlorhexidine or other study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients.
  • 5. a) Current or relevant history of any serious, severe or unstable physical or psychiatric illness or any other medical condition (e.g. Diabetes Mellitus) that would make the subject unlikely to fully complete the study or any that increases the risk to the subject or undermines the data validity.

    b) Subjects requiring prophylactic antibiotic treatment prior to dental therapy.

    c) Use of concomitant medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the outcome of the study or increases the risk to the subject (eg: phenytoin, calcium antagonists, cyclosporine, warfarin, antibiotics, immuno-suppressants).

    d) Use of antibiotics within two weeks prior to the screening visit or throughout the study.

    e) Use of any systemic medication which would have an effect on gingival conditions within 14 days of gingival examinations (eg: ibuprofen or aspirin therapy) 6. a) Have current active caries b) More than 3 pockets with 5mm or over. c) Excessive calculus present that interferes with the probing examination for Gingival Index.

    d) Other severe oral/ gingival conditions (e.g. Acute Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis) that may compromise the study or the subjects in the opinion of the investigator or gingivitis examiner.

    e) Medical conditions which may directly influence gingival bleeding. f) Restorations in a poor state of repair. g) Orthodontic appliances anterior cosmetic restorations and veneers. h) Enamel pitting/irregularities. 7. Subjects using chewing tobacco, pan, pan-masala, gutkha or other chewing tobacco products or subjects who have quit using any of those within the past six months prior to screening.

    8. b) An employee of any toothpaste manufacturer or their immediate family.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
324 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Mouthwash with Alcohol

    rinse with 10ml 0.2% w/v Chlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash with alcohol for 1 timed minute twice daily for 6 weeks following brushing with a full brush head of standard toothpaste for 1 timed minute.

    Drug: Chlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash with Alcohol

  • Active comparator
    Mouthwash without Alcohol

    rinse with 10ml 0.2% w/v Chlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash without alcohol for 1 timed minute twice daily for 6 weeks following brushing with a full brush head of standard toothpaste for 1 timed minute.

    Drug: Chlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash without Alcohol

Interventions

  • DrugChlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash with Alcohol

    Drug pages: Chlorhexidine gluconate · Ethanol

    0.2% w/v Chlorhexidine Digluconate, alcohol containing - UK Marketed Mouthwash

  • DrugChlorhexidine Digluconate Mouthwash without Alcohol

    0.2% w/v Chlorhexidine Digluconate, without alcohol - UK Marketed Mouthwash

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gingival Severity Index (GSI) Based on the Gingival Index (GI)

    Measure of gingival severity averaged across whole mouth site; each site scored 0, 1, 2, 3 based on GI and, 1. GSI = 0 if GI is 0 or 1 (no bleeding) 2. GSI = 1 if GI is 1 or 2 (bleeding)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gingival Index

    The GI was assessed on the facial and lingual surfaces at six sites on each tooth (facial and lingual - distal papillae, margin and mesial papillae). These assessments were performed on all evaluable teeth using moderate pressure sweeping a blunt ended probe, which was engaged in approximately 1 millimetre (mm) into the gingival crevice. The scores could range from 0-3 (0=Absence of inflammation; 1=Mild Inflammation-Slight change in color slight change in texture, no bleeding on probing; 2=Moderate Inflammation -glazing, redness edema and hypertrophy, bleeding on probing; 3= Severe inflammation-marked redness and hypertrophy, tendency for spontaneous bleeding)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  2. Turesky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Overall Plaque Scores

    Overall plaque scores were calculated taking the average over all tooth sites for a participant. The scores could range from 0-5 (0=No plaque; 1=Slight flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth; 2= A thin continuous band of plaque (1 mm or smaller) at the cervical margin of the tooth; 3=A band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than 1/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 4=Plaque covering at least 1/3 but less than 2/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 5=Plaque covering 2/3 or more of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

  3. Turesky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Interproximal Plaque Scores

    Interproximal plaque scores were analyzed on the mesiofacial, distofacial, mesiolingual and distolingual surfaces, and calculated taking the average over all tooth sites for a participant. The scores could range from 0-5 (0=No plaque; 1=Slight flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth; 2= A thin continuous band of plaque (1 mm or smaller) at the cervical margin of the tooth; 3=A band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than 1/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 4=Plaque covering at least 1/3 but less than 2/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 5=Plaque covering 2/3 or more of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 28, 2014

Participant flow

Participants were recruited at the clinical site.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReference
Started108109107
Completed105109105
Not completed302
Withdrew: Adverse event200
Withdrew: Other reason (unknown)102

Outcome measures

PrimaryGingival Severity Index (GSI) Based on the Gingival Index (GI)

Measure of gingival severity averaged across whole mouth site; each site scored 0, 1, 2, 3 based on GI and, 1. GSI = 0 if GI is 0 or 1 (no bleeding) 2. GSI = 1 if GI is 1 or 2 (bleeding)

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Gingival Severity Index (GSI) Based on the Gingival Index (GI)
Units on a scaleMouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReference
Gingival Severity Index (GSI) Based on the Gingival Index (GI)0.152 ± 0.00850.143 ± 0.00720.212 ± 0.0121
Statistical analysis
  • Mouthwash With Alcohol vs Reference · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline GSI as a covariate.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.061 · 95% CI -0.081 to -0.041Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.
  • Mouthwash Without Alcohol vs Reference · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline GSI as a covariate.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.070 · 95% CI -0.090 to -0.050Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.
SecondaryGingival Index

The GI was assessed on the facial and lingual surfaces at six sites on each tooth (facial and lingual - distal papillae, margin and mesial papillae). These assessments were performed on all evaluable teeth using moderate pressure sweeping a blunt ended probe, which was engaged in approximately 1 millimetre (mm) into the gingival crevice. The scores could range from 0-3 (0=Absence of inflammation; 1=Mild Inflammation-Slight change in color slight change in texture, no bleeding on probing; 2=Moderate Inflammation -glazing, redness edema and hypertrophy, bleeding on probing; 3= Severe inflammation-marked redness and hypertrophy, tendency for spontaneous bleeding)

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Gingival Index
Units on a scaleMouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReference
Gingival Index1.12 ± 0.0121.11 ± 0.0101.19 ± 0.014
Statistical analysis
  • Mouthwash With Alcohol vs Reference · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline GI as a covariate.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.10 to -0.05Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.
  • Mouthwash Without Alcohol vs Reference · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline GI as a covariate.) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.11 to -0.06Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.
SecondaryTuresky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Overall Plaque Scores

Overall plaque scores were calculated taking the average over all tooth sites for a participant. The scores could range from 0-5 (0=No plaque; 1=Slight flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth; 2= A thin continuous band of plaque (1 mm or smaller) at the cervical margin of the tooth; 3=A band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than 1/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 4=Plaque covering at least 1/3 but less than 2/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 5=Plaque covering 2/3 or more of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth)

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Turesky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Overall Plaque Scores
Units on a scaleMouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReference
Turesky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Overall Plaque Scores2.50 ± 0.0822.40 ± 0.0843.34 ± 0.062
Statistical analysis
  • Mouthwash With Alcohol vs Reference · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline Plaque as a covariate) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.80 · 95% CI -0.98 to -0.62Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.
  • Mouthwash Without Alcohol vs Reference · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline Plaque as a covariate) · Adusted mean difference: -0.86 · 95% CI -1.04 to -0.68Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.
SecondaryTuresky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Interproximal Plaque Scores

Interproximal plaque scores were analyzed on the mesiofacial, distofacial, mesiolingual and distolingual surfaces, and calculated taking the average over all tooth sites for a participant. The scores could range from 0-5 (0=No plaque; 1=Slight flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth; 2= A thin continuous band of plaque (1 mm or smaller) at the cervical margin of the tooth; 3=A band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than 1/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 4=Plaque covering at least 1/3 but less than 2/3 of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth; 5=Plaque covering 2/3 or more of the area to be graded of the crown of the tooth)

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Turesky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Interproximal Plaque Scores
Units on a scaleMouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReference
Turesky Modification of Quigley & Hein Plaque Index for Interproximal Plaque Scores2.77 ± 0.0902.63 ± 0.0913.69 ± 0.065
Statistical analysis
  • Mouthwash With Alcohol vs Reference · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline Plaque as a covariate) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.88 · 95% CI -1.07 to -0.69Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.
  • Mouthwash With Alcohol vs Mouthwash Without Alcohol · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (From ANCOVA with factors for treatment group, site, smoking status, number of bleeding sites strata and the baseline Plaque as a covariate) · Adjusted mean difference: -0.97 · 95% CI -1.16 to -0.78Difference is first named treatment minus second named treatment such that a negative difference favours the first named treatment.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) and serious AEs were collected from the start of the washout product at visit 1, and until five days following last administration of the investigational product.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Mouthwash With Alcohol—0/108 (0%)67/108 (62%)
Mouthwash Without Alcohol—1/109 (0.9%)60/109 (55%)
Reference—0/107 (0%)47/107 (43.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReference
Cellulitis left thighInfections and infestations0/1081/1090/107
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 72
Most frequent other events
EventMouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReference
HeadacheNervous system disorders19/10814/10913/107
Tongue coatedGastrointestinal disorders13/1088/1092/107
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations11/1089/1099/107
GlossodyniaGastrointestinal disorders5/1089/1090/107
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders6/1081/1090/107
Paraesthesia oralGastrointestinal disorders5/1086/1090/107
AgeusiaNervous system disorders3/1086/1090/107
Oral herpesInfections and infestations1/1082/1095/107
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders4/1085/1090/107
Hypoaesthesia oralGastrointestinal disorders2/1085/1090/107

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Mouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReferenceTotal
Mean37.8 ± 10.8936.2 ± 11.3136.5 ± 10.4836.8 ± 10.89
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Mouthwash With AlcoholMouthwash Without AlcoholReferenceTotal
Female857975239
Male23303285
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Intertek 4-Front Research - Widnes
    Widnes, Cheshire WA8 6PG, United Kingdom
  • 4Front, Ellesmere Port
    Cheshire, CH65 4BW, United Kingdom
  • Intertek - Manchester Science Park
    Manchester, M15 6SE, United Kingdom
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2012, a primary completion of Mar 2013 and a completion of Mar 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jul 2014, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 13, 2012
First posted
Dec 17, 2012
Start
Oct 2012
Primary completionActual
Mar 2013
CompletionActual
Mar 2013
Results first posted
Jul 28, 2014
Last update
Jul 28, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01751178
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 17, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Results posted
Jul 28, 2014
Last update
Jul 28, 2014

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Chlorhexidine gluconate · Ethanol

Start the discussion