CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01744496DOLORESUpdated May 1, 2015Results posted

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Rotigotine on Parkinson's Disease-Associated Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Rotigotine and Placebo in Advanced Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH. Completed at 16 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-01.

Sponsored by UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial is being conducted to compare the impact of Rotigotine and Placebo on Chronic Pain associated with Parkinson's Disease among patients with advanced stages of the disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Rotigotine
  • Chronic Pain
  • Nonmotor symptoms
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,487 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,081 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 68 is above the median of 40 across 3,293 interventional studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient has advanced idiopathic Parkinson's Disease associated chronic pain assessed by a Likert Pain Scale
  • Patient is taking Levodopa with a stable daily dose of at least 200 mg for at least 21 days prior to start
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage score of II to IV
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 25
  • If an antidepressant drug is taken, the dose must be stable for at least 21 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Therapy with a Dopamine Agonist within 21 days prior to start
  • Discontinuation from previous Dopamine Agonist Therapy due to lack of efficacy
  • Therapy with Dopamine-modulating substances 21 days prior to start
  • Therapy with analgesics for the treatment for pain, unless the dose has been stable
  • Chronic alcohol or drug abuse
  • Medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the patient's ability to participate in this study
  • Hypersensitivity to any components of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) or comparative drugs
  • Atypical Parkinson's Disease Syndrome due to drugs
  • History of deep brain stimulation
  • Significant skin disease that would make transdermal drug use inappropriate
  • Electroconvulsive therapy within 12 weeks prior to start
  • Evidence of an Impulse Control Disorder
  • Previous diagnosis of severe Restless Legs Syndrome
  • Chronic Migraine
  • Severe Depression
  • Symptomatic Orthostatic Hypotension
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rotigotine

    Rotigotine Transdermal Patches

    Drug: Rotigotine

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo Transdermal Patches

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugRotigotine

    Patches will contain 4 mg / 24 h (20 cm\^2), 6 mg/ 24 h (30 cm\^2), or 8 mg /24 h (40 cm\^2) of Rotigotine. Application of study medication starts at the Baseline Visit. Rotigotine will be administered once daily starting at 4 mg / 24 h. Doses will then be up-titrated in weekly increments of 2 mg / 24 h until optimal or maximum dose (16 mg / 24 h) is reached and the Maintenance Period can be started. The duration of the Titration Period will vary from 1 to 7 weeks ± 3 days. The Maintenance Period will last 12 weeks ± 5 days. Thereafter, during the De-escalation Period, the dose of study medication will be decreased by 2 mg / 24 h every other day. The De-escalation Period may last up to 12 days.

    Also known as: (6S)-6-propyl-[2 (2 thienyl)ethyl]amino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1-naphthalenol

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo patches match the size of active patches 20 cm\^2, 30 cm\^2, or 40 cm\^2 and will contain Placebo. Application of Placebo patches starts at the Baseline Visit. Placebo patches will be administered once daily starting with the equivalent of 4 mg / 24 h. Doses will then be up-titrated in weekly equivalents to 2 mg / 24 h until either optimal dose or maximum dose is reached. The maximum dose is the equivalent to 16 mg / 24 h. The duration of the Titration Period will vary from 1 to 7 weeks. The Maintenance Period will last 12 weeks ± 5 days. During the De-escalation Period, the dose of Placebo will be decreased by the equivalent to 2 mg / 24 h every other day. The De-escalation Period may last up to 12 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in Pain Severity Assessed Using an 11-point Likert Pain Scale

    An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The subject rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The average pain experienced in the last 7 days was calculated by the mean of the daily Likert Pain Scores within the 7 days prior to the respective visit (ie, Likert Pain Scores with a date of assessment before the date of visit and on or after the date of visit - 7 days). A negative value indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after an up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Responders at the End of the Maintenance Period

    Responders are defined as patients experiencing a 2-Point or more Reduction on an 11-Point Likert Pain Scale from Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period. An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The patient rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

  2. Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Sum Score of the 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)

    The 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) (Peto et al, 1998) is a self-administered questionnaire that provides a reliable measure of overall health status. The PDQ-8 contains 8 items of daily living, with 1 item selected from each of the following 8 scales: mobility, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), emotional well being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communication, and bodily discomfort. The total PDQ-8 score is the sum of all the individual items converted to a summary index score between 0 and 100, with lower scores indicating better health. A negative value indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

  3. Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Depression Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

  4. Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Anxiety Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

  5. Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Combined Score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] Subscale) and III (Motor Subscale)

    Part II of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the subject's activities of daily living. Part III assesses motor function. The UPDRS is completed by questioning the subject about his/her general state in conjunction with any observations made by the investigator (or designee) since the previous visit. Part II is subject-rated and Part III is physician-rated. The UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) consists of 13 items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as the sum of these 13 individual scores. The UPDRS Part III (motor subscale) consists of 27 items and sub items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as sum of these 27 individual scores. The sum score of UPDRS Parts II and III is the sum of the corresponding single sum scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

  6. Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7 Domain Scores of Classification of Pain in Parkinson's Disease

    The classification of pain in Parkinson's disease scale classifies pain in the following domains: musculoskeletal pain (item 1), chronic pain (items 2 and 3), fluctuation related pain (items 4, 5 and 6), nocturnal pain (items 7 and 8), oro-facial pain (items 9, 10 and 11), discoloration; edema/swelling (items 12 and 13), and radicular pain (item 14). Severity of the pain is measured on a scale from none (0) to severe (3) and frequency is measured on a scale from never (0) to very frequent (4). A score of a single item was calculated by multiplying severity with frequency. A domain score was calculated as the sum of every individual score related to the respective domain. A negative value indicates an improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

07

Results

Posted Dec 2, 2014

Participant flow

The study was conducted in Europe and USA. Recruitment was planned to continue until approximately 64 patients were randomized in the study. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either Rotigotine or Placebo. To achieve this, approximately 28 investigational sites were planned to participate in this hypothesis-generating pilot study.

Titration Period
Participant flow — Titration Period
MilestonePlaceboRotigotine
Started3335
Completed3133
Not completed22
Withdrew: Adverse event21
Withdrew: Personal reasons01
Maintenance Period
Participant flow — Maintenance Period
MilestonePlaceboRotigotine
Started3133
Completed2729
Not completed44
Withdrew: Adverse event13
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Subject left town10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in Pain Severity Assessed Using an 11-point Likert Pain Scale

An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The subject rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The average pain experienced in the last 7 days was calculated by the mean of the daily Likert Pain Scores within the 7 days prior to the respective visit (ie, Likert Pain Scores with a date of assessment before the date of visit and on or after the date of visit - 7 days). A negative value indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after an up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in Pain Severity Assessed Using an 11-point Likert Pain Scale
scores on a scalePlaceboRotigotine
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in Pain Severity Assessed Using an 11-point Likert Pain Scale-2.2 ± 2.78-2.8 ± 1.84
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Rotigotine · ANCOVA · p = 0.172 · Least square mean: -0.76 · 95% CI -1.87 to 0.34ANCOVA model for the change from Baseline to the End of Treatment containing treatment and region as factors and Baseline value as a covariate.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders at the End of the Maintenance Period

Responders are defined as patients experiencing a 2-Point or more Reduction on an 11-Point Likert Pain Scale from Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period. An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The patient rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders at the End of the Maintenance Period
percentage of respondersPlaceboRotigotine
Percentage of Responders at the End of the Maintenance Period46.760
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Sum Score of the 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)

The 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) (Peto et al, 1998) is a self-administered questionnaire that provides a reliable measure of overall health status. The PDQ-8 contains 8 items of daily living, with 1 item selected from each of the following 8 scales: mobility, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), emotional well being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communication, and bodily discomfort. The total PDQ-8 score is the sum of all the individual items converted to a summary index score between 0 and 100, with lower scores indicating better health. A negative value indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Sum Score of the 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)
scores on a scalePlaceboRotigotine
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Sum Score of the 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)-3.77 ± 13.93-12.40 ± 19.25
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Rotigotine · ANCOVA · p = 0.038 · Least square mean: -8.01 · 95% CI -15.56 to -0.46ANCOVA model for the change from Baseline to the End of Treatment containing treatment and region as factors and Baseline value as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Depression Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Depression Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
scores on a scalePlaceboRotigotine
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Depression Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-1.7 ± 4.3-1.9 ± 4.1
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Rotigotine · ANCOVA · p = 0.247 · Least square mean: -1.02 · 95% CI -2.76 to 0.73ANCOVA model for the change from Baseline to the End of Treatment containing treatment and region as factors and Baseline value as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Anxiety Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Anxiety Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
scores on a scalePlaceboRotigotine
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Anxiety Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-1.0 ± 3.2-1.8 ± 3.7
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Rotigotine · ANCOVA · p = 0.371 · Least square mean: -0.58 · 95% CI -1.85 to 0.70ANCOVA model for the change from Baseline to the End of Treatment containing treatment and region as factors and Baseline value as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Combined Score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] Subscale) and III (Motor Subscale)

Part II of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the subject's activities of daily living. Part III assesses motor function. The UPDRS is completed by questioning the subject about his/her general state in conjunction with any observations made by the investigator (or designee) since the previous visit. Part II is subject-rated and Part III is physician-rated. The UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) consists of 13 items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as the sum of these 13 individual scores. The UPDRS Part III (motor subscale) consists of 27 items and sub items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as sum of these 27 individual scores. The sum score of UPDRS Parts II and III is the sum of the corresponding single sum scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Combined Score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] Subscale) and III (Motor Subscale)
scores on a scalePlaceboRotigotine
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Combined Score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] Subscale) and III (Motor Subscale)-5.1 ± 11.7-8.3 ± 11.2
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Rotigotine · ANCOVA · p = 0.346 · Least square mean: -2.82 · 95% CI -8.76 to 3.13ANCOVA model for the change from Baseline to the End of Treatment containing treatment and region as factors and Baseline value as a covariate.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7 Domain Scores of Classification of Pain in Parkinson's Disease

The classification of pain in Parkinson's disease scale classifies pain in the following domains: musculoskeletal pain (item 1), chronic pain (items 2 and 3), fluctuation related pain (items 4, 5 and 6), nocturnal pain (items 7 and 8), oro-facial pain (items 9, 10 and 11), discoloration; edema/swelling (items 12 and 13), and radicular pain (item 14). Severity of the pain is measured on a scale from none (0) to severe (3) and frequency is measured on a scale from never (0) to very frequent (4). A score of a single item was calculated by multiplying severity with frequency. A domain score was calculated as the sum of every individual score related to the respective domain. A negative value indicates an improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7 Domain Scores of Classification of Pain in Parkinson's Disease
scores on a scalePlaceboRotigotine
Musculoskeletal Pain-1.4 ± 3.6-1.5 ± 4.2
Chronic Pain-3.1 ± 5.6-0.7 ± 2.9
Fluctuation-Related Pain-2.2 ± 4.6-4.2 ± 6.8
Nocturnal Pain-2.9 ± 6.1-2.4 ± 5.3
Oro-Facial Pain-0.4 ± 2.5-0.6 ± 2.3
Discoloration; Edema/Swelling-1.8 ± 4.9-1.7 ± 3.4
Radicular Pain-1.3 ± 3.8-1.1 ± 3.7

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment Emergent Adverse Events were reported from Baseline up to the Safety Follow-up Visit (approximately during 25 weeks).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—1/33 (3%)17/33 (51.5%)
Rotigotine—2/35 (5.7%)20/35 (57.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboRotigotine
Hip fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/330/35
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders0/331/35
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/331/35
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboRotigotine
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/338/35
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/336/35
DizzinessNervous system disorders3/333/35
Application site erythemaGeneral disorders0/333/35
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders1/333/35
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/330/35
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/331/35
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)2/331/35
DyskinesiaNervous system disorders2/332/35
HyperkinesiaNervous system disorders2/330/35

Baseline characteristics

The Baseline Analysis Population refers to the Safety Set (SS). The SS includes all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PlaceboRotigotineTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years151227
>=65 years182341
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboRotigotineTotal
Mean65.3 ± 13.866.5 ± 11.965.9 ± 12.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboRotigotineTotal
Female161632
Male171936
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)PlaceboRotigotineTotal
American Indian / Alaskan native000
Asian101
Black000
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander000
White323567
Other / mixed000
Weight
Weight(kilograms)PlaceboRotigotineTotal
Mean80.15 ± 20.0077.80 ± 13.7178.94 ± 16.97
Height
Height(centimeters)PlaceboRotigotineTotal
Mean167.17 ± 9.92168.63 ± 9.87167.92 ± 9.85
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kilogram per squaremeter)PlaceboRotigotineTotal
Mean28.54 ± 6.2127.42 ± 4.7427.96 ± 5.49
08

Study locations

16 sites
  • 2113
    Gilbert, Arizona, United States
  • 2120
    Sunnyvale, California, United States
  • 2109
    Tampa, Florida, United States
  • 2107
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • 2102
    Lexington, Kentucky, United States
  • 2118
    Advance, North Carolina, United States
  • 2117
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • 2103
    Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
  • 2101
    Roanoke, Virginia, United States
  • 2104
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
  • 1204
    Gera, Germany
  • 1607
    Gdansk, Poland
  • 1603
    Krakow, Poland
  • 1609
    Olsztyn, Poland
  • 1804
    Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 1805
    Dubnica Nad Vahom, Slovakia
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01744496
Lead sponsor
UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2012
Start date
Nov 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Jan 2014
Results posted
Dec 2, 2014
Last update
May 1, 2015

Study contacts

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
study director · +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion