CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01740349Updated Jul 11, 2013

Evaluation Of The Pillcam™ Colon Capsule Endoscopy (Pcce-2) In Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

An observational study in Pediatrics, Colon Capsule Endoscopy, sponsored by Azienda Policlinico Umberto I. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-11.

Sponsored by Azienda Policlinico Umberto I · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective pilot study of 30 pediatric subjects, that are indicated for standard colonoscopy due to follow-up of ulcerative colitis (UC), examines the Given Diagnostic System and the PillCam Colon Capsule in comparison to standard colonoscopy.

This study aims

  1. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of PillCam ™ Colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) with standard colonoscopy in the evaluation of colon in pediatric ulcerative colitis.
  2. To evaluate the safety of PillCam ™ Colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in pediatric age.
02

Conditions studied

  • Pediatrics, Colon Capsule Endoscopy
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 105 across 247 observational studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Policlinico Umberto I is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The Given® Diagnostic System offers an alternative approach for endoscopic visualization of the colon using capsule endoscopy, a swallowable device which contains imagers, light sources, a power source and a RF transmitter. Advantages of the Given® Diagnostic System include the elimination of the need for conscious sedation, the minimally invasive, painless nature of the exam, and the ability to pursue normal daily activities immediately following the procedure. This prospective pilot study will evaluate the performance of PCCE in visualizing the colon of children with UC. All subjects to be enrolled will be appropriate candidates for standard colonoscopy based on their clinical indication.

Each subject will undergo PCCE. PCCE results will be compared with that of a colonoscopy procedure.

Eligibility criteria

ELIGIBILITY Ages Eligible for Study: 6-18 Years Genders Eligible for Study: Both Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Inclusion criteria:

Subjects must meet one the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into this proposed study:

  • diagnosis of UC made at least 3 months before the enrolment;
  • subject was referred for standard colonoscopy and endoscopic follow-up in Ulcerative colitis
  • signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria

The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from study enrollment:

  • Subject has dysphagia
  • Subject has renal insufficiency
  • Subject is known or suspected structuring CD.
  • Subject has a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electro medical devices.
  • Subject is expected to undergo MRI examination within 7 days after ingestion of the capsule.
  • Subject has had prior abdominal surgery of the gastrointestinal tract other than uncomplicated procedures that would be unlikely to lead to bowel obstruction based on the clinical judgment of the investigator.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • 30 children with UC

    This prospective pilot study of 30 pediatric subjects, that are indicated for standard colonoscopy due to follow-up of ulcerative colitis (UC), examines the Given Diagnostic System and the PillCam Colon Capsule in comparison to standard colonoscopy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of PillCam ™ Colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) with standard colonoscopy in the evaluation of colon in pediatric ulcerative colitis.

    Accuracy parameters (sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV) of PCCE compared to standard colonoscopy in pediatric Ulcerative Colitis.

    Time frame: Day 3 (after colonoscopy and CCE-2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the safety of PillCam ™ Colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in pediatric age.

    Number, type and severity of adverse events with both PCCE and standard colonoscopy

    Time frame: Day 3 (after colonoscopy and CCE-2)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sapienza - University of Rome
    Rome, 00161, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Oliva S, Di Nardo G, Hassan C, Spada C, Aloi M, Ferrari F, Redler A, Costamagna G, Cucchiara S. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in pediatric ulcerative colitis: a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2014 Jun;46(6):485-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365413. Epub 2014 Apr 28. PubMed 24777427 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01740349
Lead sponsor
Azienda Policlinico Umberto I
Responsible party
Giovanni Di Nardo (EVALUATION OF THE PILLCAM™ COLON CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY (PCCE) IN PEDIATRIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 4, 2012
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Feb 2013
Last update
Jul 11, 2013

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion