CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01739920Updated Jan 25, 2017

Comparative Efficacy of Different Regimens of PVPI 5% Eye Drops Instillation in Reducing Conjunctival Bacterial Flora

A Phase 4 interventional study of Povidone-iodine and Saline Solution in Eye Infections, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-25.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2011, registered Nov 2012).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
124
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present study intends to assess the efficacy of 3 drops of 5% povidone-iodine (PVPI) eyedrops in reducing the bacterial flora in a conjunctival sac fundus compared to the standard procedure consisting of the application of 1 PVPI eyedrop 2 min before any intraocular surgical procedure.

Read the detailed description

Studies have demonstrated that the external bacterial flora of the patients in most cases is the actual source of infection. The objective of antisepsis is to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of microorganisms in the surgical field at the time of surgery. The eyelids and the conjunctiva are considered to be quite common sources of bacteria that can lead to endophthalmitis. Thus, it is believed that by reducing the number and growth of bacteria on the ocular surface and adnexa before surgery, the risk of postoperative infection would be lower. Povidone-iodine 5% eye drops has been used in preoperative cataract surgery to prevent endophthalmitis and is the standard prophylactic action in preventing postoperative endophthalmitis being widely compared with other antibiotic eye drops and their associations. The standard procedure of prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis corresponds to applying a single drop of povidone-iodine 2min before any intraocular surgical procedure. However, few studies have assessed the effectiveness of povidone-iodine 5% eye drops using different dosing regimens to achieve the best bactericidal effect. The aim of this study is to investigate different dosages with respect to the use of povidone-iodine drops to optimize the effectiveness of the agent, ensuring the best exogenous endophthalmitis prophylaxis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Eye Infections

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Povidone-Iodine
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Endophthalmitis
  • Preoperative procedures
03

In context

Eye Infections

34 studies on the registry are indexed under Eye Infections; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 124 is close to the median of 116 across 21 interventional studies indexed under Eye Infections.

Browse Eye Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,005 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • No systemic or ocular infection;
  • Absence of auto-imune disease or immunosuppressive therapy;
  • No use of systemic or topic antibiotics in the last 30 days;
  • No previous ocular surgery or trauma in the study eye in the last 30 days;
  • No history of allergy to povidone iodine;
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of blepharitis, ectropion, entropion, trichiasis or distichiasis;
  • Diabetes Mellitus;
  • Any systemic condition that, at the discretion of the investigators, would facilitate or contribute to infection, such as influenza;
  • Inability to understand and sign the informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Povidone-iodine

    1 drop of povidone-iodine 5% will be instilled at time zero, 20-minute and 28-minute study period.

    Other: Povidone-iodine

  • Active comparator
    Povidone-iodine and Saline Solution

    1 drop of saline solution 0.9% will be instilled at time zero and 20-minute. At 28-minute will be instilled 1 drop of Povidone-iodine 5%.

    Other: Povidone-iodine · Other: Saline Solution

Interventions

  • OtherPovidone-iodine

    Povidone iodine 5% drop will be instilled into conjunctival sac.

  • OtherSaline Solution

    1 drop of saline solution 0.9% will be instilled into conjunctival sac.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of negative cultures after treatment in both groups

    Conjunctival swab will be obtained five minutes before and 30 minutes after the first povidone iodine drop will be instilled into the conjunctival sac of study eye. Conjunctival swabs were incubated aerobically in enriched Thioglycolate liquid medium (meat broth) and in three solid culture media (Agar Chocolate, Trypticase Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood, and Agar Sabouraud).

    Time frame: At 30-minute study period, a conjunctival sac swab will be obtained

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in corneal thickness change between groups.

    Corneal paquimetry will be performed before and after procedure using OcuScan Alcon RXP (Alcon, Fortworth, Texas).

    Time frame: At 35-minute study period.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto
    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14048-900, Brazil
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 25, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01739920
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Collaborators
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible party
Leticia Fernandes Barroso (MD, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 4, 2012
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2014
Completion
Apr 2015
Last update
Jan 25, 2017

Study contacts

Rodrigo Jorge, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo
Leticia F Barroso, MD
principal investigator · Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, USP

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion