ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01721681Updated Apr 2, 2018Results posted

A Study to Investigate Bio Product Laboratory Ltd (BPL's) Factor X in the Prophylaxis of Bleeding in Children <12 Years

A Phase 3 interventional study of FACTOR X in Factor X Deficiency, sponsored by Bio Products Laboratory. Completed at 3 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged Up to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-02.

Sponsored by Bio Products Laboratory · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of FACTOR X in the prevention of bleeding when given as routine prophylaxis over 12 months.

The secondary objectives of the study are:

  1. To assess the pharmacokinetics of FACTOR X after a single dose of 50 IU/kg.
  2. To assess the safety of FACTOR X when given as routine prophylaxis over 6 months (26 weeks).
02

Conditions studied

  • Factor X Deficiency
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Bio Products Laboratory is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children with hereditary severe or moderate FX deficiency (FX:C \<5 IU/dL), based on their lowest reliable FX:C recorded.
  2. Children under 12 years old, whose parent/guardian has given .
  3. Children with a history of severe bleeding e.g.: intracranial haemorrhage, before starting prophylactic therapy, OR a mutation in the F10 gene causing a documented severe bleeding phenotype.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Children must not suffer from liver disease, renal disease, or other coagulopathy or thrombophilia
  2. Children must have no history or suspicion of inhibitors to factor X.
  3. Children who have known or suspected to the medicinal product or its .
  4. Children with a history of unreliability or non-cooperation.
  5. Children who are participating or have taken part in another trial within the last 30 days.
  6. Children planning more than 4 weeks' continuous absence from the locality of the investigational site, between the Screening Visit and the End of Study Visit at approximately 6 months (26 weeks) post-Baseline.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FACTOR X

    At the Baseline Visit, eligible children will receive a bolus dose of 50 IU/kg FACTOR X. After the Baseline Visit, children will be treated with FACTOR X prophylactically for a period of 6 months (26 weeks). A dosing regimen of 40-50 IU/kg twice a week is recommended, but is not mandatory. Each dose of FACTOR X must not exceed 60 IU/kg.

    Biological: FACTOR X

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Number of Participants With Excellent Reduction in Bleeding When Given FACTOR X as Routine Prophylaxis Over 6 Months

    The Investigator's assessment of the efficacy of FACTOR X in reduction/prevention of bleeding when given as routine prophylaxis over 6 months. The efficacy was assessed according to tabulated criteria; Excellent, good, poor, unassessable.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety of FACTOR X: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events

    One of the secondary objectives was to assess the safety of FACTOR X when given as routine prophylaxis over 6 months (26 weeks). The general strategy of the safety evaluation was to examine the summaries for any trends. No formal hypothesis was carried out. The number of participants who experienced Adverse Events is provided.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Pharmacokinetics: FX:C Incremental Recovery

    One of the secondary objectives was to assess the pharmacokinetics (FX:C incremental recovery 30 minute post-dose at the Visit 1 (Baseline) and the End of Study Visit after a single dose of 50 IU/kg). The overall mean IR calculated for both visits is presented in the outcome measure table.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and End of Study Visit, 30 minutes post-dose

07

Results

Posted Mar 7, 2018
Limitations and caveats
2 subjects completed less than 26 weeks in the study. The subjects were re-enrolled and data from their first treatment cycle was excluded from the Per-Protocol analysis. 9 unique subjects were enrolled even though there were 11 treatment cycles

Participant flow

Two subjects completed less than 26 weeks in the study. The subjects were re-enrolled and data from their first treatment cycle was excluded from the per-protocol analysis. 9 unique subjects were enrolled event though there were 11 treatment cycles.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOverall Study
Started9
Completed9
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Number of Participants With Excellent Reduction in Bleeding When Given FACTOR X as Routine Prophylaxis Over 6 Months

The Investigator's assessment of the efficacy of FACTOR X in reduction/prevention of bleeding when given as routine prophylaxis over 6 months. The efficacy was assessed according to tabulated criteria; Excellent, good, poor, unassessable.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Number of Participants With Excellent Reduction in Bleeding When Given FACTOR X as Routine Prophylaxis Over 6 Months
ParticipantsOverall Study
The Number of Participants With Excellent Reduction in Bleeding When Given FACTOR X as Routine Prophylaxis Over 6 Months9
SecondarySafety of FACTOR X: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events

One of the secondary objectives was to assess the safety of FACTOR X when given as routine prophylaxis over 6 months (26 weeks). The general strategy of the safety evaluation was to examine the summaries for any trends. No formal hypothesis was carried out. The number of participants who experienced Adverse Events is provided.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Safety of FACTOR X: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events
ParticipantsOverall Study
Safety of FACTOR X: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events8
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: FX:C Incremental Recovery

One of the secondary objectives was to assess the pharmacokinetics (FX:C incremental recovery 30 minute post-dose at the Visit 1 (Baseline) and the End of Study Visit after a single dose of 50 IU/kg). The overall mean IR calculated for both visits is presented in the outcome measure table.

Time frame:
Baseline Visit and End of Study Visit, 30 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · IU/dL
Pharmacokinetics: FX:C Incremental Recovery
IU/dLOverall Study
Pharmacokinetics: FX:C Incremental Recovery1.74 (1.66 to 1.82)

Adverse events

Collected over From signing of informed consent form until 28 days post-last dose. For subjects who had received FACTOR X on compassionate use prior to study entry, retrospective adverse events data was collected as part of medical history.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Human Coagulation FACTOR X—1/9 (11.1%)3/9 (33.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventHuman Coagulation FACTOR X
Lower Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/9
Influenza AInfections and infestations1/9
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventHuman Coagulation FACTOR X
AneamiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/9
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/9
High Temperature/FeverGeneral disorders3/9
ColdInfections and infestations3/9
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/9
Viral InfectionInfections and infestations2/9
CoryzalInfections and infestations2/9
Parvovirus IgM, no symptomsInvestigations1/9
Pain In Back Of LegMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/9
Intermittent Low Grade FeverGeneral disorders1/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Human Coagulation FACTOR X
<=18 years9
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Human Coagulation FACTOR X
Female5
Male4
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Human Coagulation FACTOR X
United Kingdom9
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Addenbrookes Hospital
    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital
    London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
  • Sheffield Children's Hospital
    Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2015, a primary completion of Oct 2016 and a completion of Oct 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2018, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 25, 2012
First posted
Nov 6, 2012
Start
Apr 2015
Primary completionActual
Oct 2016
CompletionActual
Oct 2016
Results first posted
Mar 7, 2018
Last update
Apr 2, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01721681
Lead sponsor
Bio Products Laboratory
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2012
Start date
Apr 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Oct 2016
Results posted
Mar 7, 2018
Last update
Apr 2, 2018

Study contacts

Ri Liesner, Dr
principal investigator · Great Ormond Street Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Factor X

Start the discussion