ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01719445FPPUpdated Nov 4, 2024

The Food Phone Project

An observational study in Comparison of Energy Intake Methods, sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-04.

Sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
53
Ages
12 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Primary Aim of the project is to modify the RFPM for adolescents and to address the concerns identified by the reviewers of the first grant application. We will then test the RFPM's validity (accuracy) compared to the validity of pen-and-paper food records.

Read the detailed description

The Primary Aim of the project is to modify the RFPM for adolescents and to address the concerns identified by the reviewers of the first grant application. We will then test the RFPM's validity (accuracy) compared to the validity of pen-and-paper food records. Our experience and the literature indicate that the RFPM is acceptable and feasible in school settings. Following modification of the RFPM and pilot testing with 4 adolescents, we will test the reliability and validity of both the RFPM and food records when used by 60 adolescents (12 to 18 years of age). During one week, participants will use the RFPM and during another week they will use food records (the order will be balanced across participants). The accuracy of each method will be examined by comparing energy and nutrient intake (collectively referred to as food intake or FI) to three gold standards: 1) doubly labeled water or DLW (energy intake only, or EIDLW), 2) a laboratory-based test meal (FILaboratory), and 3) food intake during lunch in a school cafeteria (FISchool). User-satisfaction and participant burden will also be compared between methods, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will determine if and under what conditions one method is more cost-effective than the other.

02

Conditions studied

  • Comparison of Energy Intake Methods

Keywords

  • Energy Intake
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Pennington Biomedical Research Center is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

50 adolescents will be recruited.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • boy or girl of any race
  • age 12 to 18 years, inclusive
  • willing to use the RFPM for one week and pen-and-paper food records for one week
  • willing to complete one laboratory-based food test during week 3
  • willing to use the RFPM and food records during the laboratory-based test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-weight unstable (>1.1 pounds weight change in one week based on regressed daily body weights).

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • RFPM/Paper and Pen Method
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Doubly Labeled Water (DLW)

    Doubly labeled water will be used to measure total daily energy expenditure (TEE) and Energy Intake.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM)

    In brief, adolescents will be trained to use a Smartphone and the Food Image App to capture images of their food selection and plate waste and to send the data packets to Food Photo II via the wireless network.

    Time frame: 7 days

Other outcomes

  1. Pen-and-paper Food Records

    Participants will be instructed how to keep a food record and estimate portion size during a session at the Center. Participants will also receive a packet containing the food protocol outline, food record form, guide to portion sizes, guidelines for description of foods, and tips for recording food intake. Participants will be instructed to record everything they eat or drink, recording the food item, portion size, time of consumption, and meal designation.

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hochsmann C, Diktas HE, Myers CA, Dorling JL, Rood JC, Greenway F, Champagne CM, Apolzan JW, Martin CK. The validity of measuring energy and nutrient intake with the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2026 Jul 25;124(3):101452. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2026.101452. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42501948 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01719445
Responsible party
Corby K. Martin (Principal Investigator, Pennington Biomedical Research Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2014
Completion
Aug 2014
Last update
Nov 4, 2024

Study contacts

Corby K Martin, PhD
principal investigator · Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion