CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01716377HELPUpdated Apr 13, 2017

Healing With Venlafaxine After Injury (HELP)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Venlafaxine in Neck Pain, sponsored by Rhode Island Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-13.

Sponsored by Rhode Island Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the potential efficacy of venlafaxine administration in reducing acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain in individuals presenting to the ED for evaluation after motor vehicle collision.

Participants: Participants will consist of 60 patients between the ages of 18-50 who present to the ED within 12 hours post-motor vehicle collision. Patients who report a neck pain score > 6 will be screened for further eligibility.

Procedures (methods): Using a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial design, 60 high risk patients will be randomized to venlafaxine vs. placebo in the ED. The ability of venlafaxine to decrease acute and persistent musculoskeletal neck pain will be assessed during serial short-term telephone follow-ups as well as more in-depth follow-ups at 6 weeks, 4 months, and 6 months post-MVC.

Read the detailed description

Results from both animal and human studies suggest that treatment with the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs) venlafaxine may reduce post-MVC pain. In addition, venlafaxine has been shown to be beneficial in reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and in some patients PTSD symptoms may contribute to reinforcing pain persistence after trauma.

This phase IIB pilot trial will screen patients presenting to the ED after MVC for the presence of severe axial pain (>4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale). Sixty of these "high risk" patients will be randomized to venlafaxine vs. placebo, and the ability of venlafaxine to decrease acute and persistent musculoskeletal axial pain will be assessed.

Results will be used to design a large-scale RCT assessing the efficacy of venlafaxine intervention in decreasing acute and persistent musculoskeletal pain in high-risk patients presenting to the ED after minor MVC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neck Pain
  • Musculoskeletal pain
  • Venlafaxine
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Rhode Island Hospital is the lead sponsor of 187 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 18 and 59
  • Presents to ED within 24 hours of MVC
  • ED axial pain score greater than or equal to 4 (0-10 NRS)
  • Clinically sober
  • Willing to provide a blood sample
  • Has a telephone
  • Has regular access to Internet and an email address
  • Able to speak and read English
  • Permanent US citizen or has a green card
  • Blood pressure reading(s) in ED that, when considered in the context of patient past and current history, in the investigator's judgment does not exceed acceptable level

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Axial pain score greater than 0 in the past month (0-10 NRS)
  • Clinically unstable
  • Fracture (other than fracture of the phalanges)
  • Substantial soft tissue injury
  • Hepatic failure (acute or chronic)
  • Renal failure (acute or chronic)
  • Coronary artery disease, including previous MI, Angina, PCTA, etc.
  • History of glaucoma
  • Previous congestive heart failure
  • History of seizure disorder
  • History of mania or psychotic disorder
  • History of suicidal ideation
  • Prisoner
  • History and behavior indicates, in the investigator's judgment, that the participant would likely be noncompliant with the study
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would indicate that the patient in unsuitable for the study (e.g. might interfere with the study, confound interpretation, or endanger patient)
  • Currently taking a monoamine oxidase inhibitor
  • Currently taking medication with substantial interaction with venlafaxine, or which could confound interpretation of study results
  • Breastfeeding
  • If female, either not postmenopausal (having menses within past year), or, if childbearing potential, positive pregnancy test prior to randomization and not using a medically acceptable form of contraception
  • Exceeds acceptable chronic daily opioid use prior to MVC
  • Previously on venlafaxine
  • Previous allergic reaction to venlafaxine
  • Antidepressant use within 2 weeks of study start (4 week if Prozac)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    37.5mg QD 1 week 75mg QD 1 week 150mg QD 8 weeks 75mg QD 1 week 37.5mg QD 1 week

    Drug: Venlafaxine

  • Active comparator
    Venlafaxine

    37.5mg QD 1 week 75mg QD 1 week 150mg QD 8 weeks 75mg QD 1 week 37.5mg QD 1 week

    Drug: Venlafaxine

Interventions

  • DrugVenlafaxine

    Sixty patients who present following a minor motor vehicle collision will be randomized to venlafaxine vs. placebo, and the ability of venlafaxine to decrease acute and persistent musculoskeletal neck pain will be assessed.

    Also known as: Effexor

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average neck pain

    The primary outcome variable is average neck pain (0 - 10 numeric rating pain score recorded from patient) after study drug initiation through Day 31.

    Time frame: 0-31 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chronic neck pain

    The secondary outcome variable is average neck pain (0 - 10 numeric rating pain score recorded from patient) between study day 38 through 6 months.

    Time frame: Study day 38 through 6 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Spectrum Health
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01716377
Lead sponsor
Rhode Island Hospital
Collaborators
Mayday Fund, University of North Carolina, University of Cincinnati, Baystate Medical Center
Responsible party
Francesca Beaudoin (Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 29, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Last update
Apr 13, 2017

Study contacts

Samuel A McLean, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Jeffrey Jones, MD
principal investigator · Spectrum Health Hospitals
Kirsten Rindal, MD
principal investigator · University of Rochester
Gregory Fermann, MD
principal investigator · University of Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion