CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01712009NOLANUpdated Jan 30, 2018Results posted

NOLAN: Naproxen or Loratadine and Neulasta

A Phase 2 interventional study of Naproxen and Loratadine in Bone Pain in Stage I - III Breast Cancer, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 83 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-30.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to estimate the difference in bone pain between breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim and either no prophylactic intervention, prophylactic naproxen, or prophylactic loratadine.

Read the detailed description

In this study, the investigational products are naproxen, a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), and loratadine, an anti-histamine. Both agents are being investigated as prophylactic medications to reduce the incidence and/or severity of bone pain in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis.

Pegfilgrastim treatment is used to stimulate bone marrow to produce more neutrophils to help fight infections in patients undergoing chemotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Pain in Stage I - III Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Chemotherapy
  • Neulasta
  • Pegfilgrastim
  • Naproxen
  • Loratadine
  • Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)
  • Anti-histamine
  • Bone Pain
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,543 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 600 is above the median of 72 across 9,302 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Age 18 years or over

  • Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Female with newly diagnosed, not previously treated with chemotherapy, stage I-III breast cancer
  • Medically eligible to safely receive adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pegfilgrastim, naproxen and loratadine as determined by the investigator
  • Creatinine ≤ 1.5 X upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Planning to receive at least 4 cycles of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Planning to receive prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim starting in the first cycle and continuing throughout each chemotherapy cycle of the treatment period
  • Subject has provided informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of other malignancy within the past 5 years, with the following exceptions:

    • Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna without evidence of disease
    • Adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
  • Planning to receive weekly chemotherapy
  • Ongoing chronic pain, or other painful conditions requiring treatment (including immediate post-operative treatment of surgical or procedural-associated pain) as determined by the investigator
  • Chronic oral steroid use. Premedication related to the administration of chemotherapy, and use of anti-emetics is allowed, per usual clinical practice
  • Chronic use of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) or oral antihistamines outside of those dictated by the randomization groups outlined in the protocol, with the following exception:

    • Chronic oral aspirin use for cardiovascular-related indications
  • Prior chemotherapy treatment for cancer within 5 years of current breast cancer diagnosis
  • Prior use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)
  • History of clinically significant gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, history of GI ulcers or active GI bleeding within 6 months prior to randomization
  • History of clinically significant bleeding disorders, thromboembolism within 6 months prior to randomization
  • Currently enrolled in, or less than 30 days since ending, another clinical trial which includes language directing G-CSF (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, other) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (sargramostim) use
  • Currently enrolled in, or less than 30 days since ending, another interventional clinical trial which includes a blinded treatment or blinded treatment arm (whether or not the subject is randomized to the blinded arm)
  • Currently enrolled in, or less than 30 days since ending, another interventional clinical trial which includes the use of any agent not currently considered to be standard therapy for the adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment of stage I-III breast cancer based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Breast Cancer
  • Currently enrolled in, or less than 30 days since ending, any pain intervention study
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating or of reproductive potential not willing to employ an effective method of birth control during treatment and for 17 days after discontinuing study treatment
  • History or evidence of any other clinically significant disorder, condition or disease (with the exception of those outlined above) that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Amgen, if consulted, would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prophylactic naproxen

    Participants received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in addition to prophylactic naproxen 500 mg orally twice a day (BID) for 5 days in each of the 4 cycles, beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration.

    Drug: Naproxen · Biological: Pegfilgrastim · Drug: Chemotherapy

  • Experimental
    Prophylactic loratadine

    Participants received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in addition to prophylactic loratadine 10 mg once a day (QD) for 5 days in each of the 4 cycles, beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration.

    Drug: Loratadine · Biological: Pegfilgrastim · Drug: Chemotherapy

  • Other
    No prophylactic treatment

    Participants received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim prophylaxis.

    Biological: Pegfilgrastim · Drug: Chemotherapy

Interventions

  • DrugNaproxen
  • DrugLoratadine
  • BiologicalPegfilgrastim

    Commercially available pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®) will be used in the study, and is considered background therapy. Pegfilgrastim is administered as a single 6 mg subcutaneous injection 24 hours to 72 hours after completion of chemotherapy.

    Also known as: Neulasta®

  • DrugChemotherapy

    The choice of chemotherapy regimen (agent, dose, and schedule) is at the discretion of the treating physician.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) in Cycle 1

    Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event (AE) reporting.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (approximately 4 weeks, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) by Cycle (2-4) and Across Cycles

    Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event (AE) reporting.

    Time frame: Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (approximately 4 weeks each, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Severe Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

    Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event reporting. Severe bone pain is defined as grade 3 or 4 according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3 grading criteria: Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, and Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling.

    Time frame: Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (approximately 4 weeks each, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)

  3. Mean Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

    Participants completed a brief bone pain survey once per day for 5 days beginning the day they received their pegfilgrastim injection. The bone pain survey collected the severity of pain using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) scale. Mean patient-reported bone pain values are the average of each participant's bone pain values across survey days 1-5 within each cycle. Across all cycles the mean is the average of each patient-reported bone pain value across all survey days 1-5 and across all cycles. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment as explanatory term was used.

    Time frame: Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)

  4. Maximum Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

    Participants completed a brief bone pain survey once per day for 5 days beginning the day they received their pegfilgrastim injection. The bone pain survey collected the severity of pain using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) scale. Maximum patient-reported bone pain is the maximum of each participant's bone pain values across survey Days 1-5 within each cycle. Across all cycles the maximum is the maximum of each patient-reported bone pain value across all survey days 1-5 and across all cycles. An ANOVA model with treatment as explanatory term was used.

    Time frame: Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)

  5. Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Patient-reported Bone Pain

    Patient-reported bone pain AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule with bone pain scores from day 1 to 5 for each cycle. The AUC across cycles is the average of AUCs across the cycle.

    Time frame: Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)

  6. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Severity was graded using CTCAE version 3. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal; • life threatening; • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • congenital anomaly/birth defect; • other medically important serious event. The investigator assessed each adverse event for relatedness to investigational product(s) or other protocol-required therapies.

    Time frame: From first dose of investigational product (IP, naproxen or loratidine) or first dose of pegfilgrastim (Peg), whichever occurred first, until 30 days after last dose, up to 24 weeks.

07

Results

Posted Mar 9, 2016

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 83 centers in the United States. The first participant enrolled on 01 November 2012 and the last participant enrolled on 20 November 2014.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Started198200202
Received pegfilgrastim191196200
Received naproxen / loratadine0193198
Completed160171181
Not completed382921
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject24158
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up201
Withdrew: Decision by sponsor121412

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) in Cycle 1

Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event (AE) reporting.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 (approximately 4 weeks, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) in Cycle 1
percentage of participantsNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) in Cycle 146.6 (39.4 to 53.9)40.3 (33.4 to 47.5)42.5 (35.6 to 49.7)
Statistical analysis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Naproxen 500 mg BID · Difference: -6.3 · 95% CI -16.7 to 4.1Naproxen minus No Prophylaxis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · Difference: -4.1 · 95% CI -14.5 to 6.3Loratadine minus No Prophylaxis
  • Naproxen 500 mg BID vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · Difference: 2.2 · 95% CI -8.0 to 12.4Loratadine minus Naproxen
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) by Cycle (2-4) and Across Cycles

Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event (AE) reporting.

Time frame:
Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (approximately 4 weeks each, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Bone Pain (All Grades) by Cycle (2-4) and Across Cycles
percentage of participantsNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)34.3 (27.3 to 41.7)34.4 (27.5 to 41.9)34.7 (28.0 to 41.9)
Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)33.9 (26.8 to 41.7)34.1 (27.1 to 41.6)36.2 (29.3 to 43.5)
Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)40.7 (33.1 to 48.7)40.2 (32.8 to 48.0)38.0 (30.9 to 45.5)
Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)63.4 (56.1 to 70.2)59.2 (52.0 to 66.1)61.0 (53.9 to 67.8)
Statistical analysis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Naproxen 500 mg BID · Difference: -4.2 · 95% CI -14.4 to 6.0Naproxen minus No Prophylaxis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · Difference: -2.4 · 95% CI -12.5 to 7.8Loratadine minus No Prophylaxis
  • Naproxen 500 mg BID vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · Difference: 1.8 · 95% CI -8.3 to 12.0Loratadine minus Naproxen
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Severe Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

Bone pain data were captured as part of standard adverse event reporting. Severe bone pain is defined as grade 3 or 4 according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3 grading criteria: Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, and Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling.

Time frame:
Cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 (approximately 4 weeks each, depending on the chemotherapy dosing interval)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Severe Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles
percentage of participantsNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)4.7 (2.2 to 8.8)3.1 (1.1 to 6.5)4.5 (2.1 to 8.4)
Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)1.1 (0.1 to 4.0)1.7 (0.3 to 4.8)0.0 (0.0 to 1.9)
Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)1.8 (0.4 to 5.2)1.1 (0.1 to 4.0)0.0 (0.0 to 1.9)
Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)1.9 (0.4 to 5.3)0.6 (0.0 to 3.3)0.0 (0.0 to 2.0)
Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)5.8 (2.9 to 10.1)4.1 (1.8 to 7.9)4.5 (2.1 to 8.4)
Statistical analysis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Naproxen 500 mg BID · Difference: -1.7 · 95% CI -6.5 to 3.2Naproxen minus No Prophylaxis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · Difference: -1.3 · 95% CI -6.1 to 3.6Loratadine minus No Prophylaxis
  • Naproxen 500 mg BID vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · Difference: 0.4 · 95% CI -4.1 to 4.9Loratadine minus Naproxen
SecondaryMean Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

Participants completed a brief bone pain survey once per day for 5 days beginning the day they received their pegfilgrastim injection. The bone pain survey collected the severity of pain using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) scale. Mean patient-reported bone pain values are the average of each participant's bone pain values across survey days 1-5 within each cycle. Across all cycles the mean is the average of each patient-reported bone pain value across all survey days 1-5 and across all cycles. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment as explanatory term was used.

Time frame:
Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Mean Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles
units on a scaleNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)2.2 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.1
Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)1.7 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.1
Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)1.6 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.1
Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)1.7 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.1
Across all Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)1.9 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Naproxen 500 mg BID · ANOVA · p = 0.0881 · Ls mean difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.0Naproxen minus No Prophylaxis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · ANOVA · p = 0.0443 · Ls mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.7 to -0.0Loratadine minus No Prophylaxis
  • Naproxen 500 mg BID vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · ANOVA · p = 0.8007 · Ls mean difference: -0.0 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.3Loratadine minus Naproxen
SecondaryMaximum Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles

Participants completed a brief bone pain survey once per day for 5 days beginning the day they received their pegfilgrastim injection. The bone pain survey collected the severity of pain using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) scale. Maximum patient-reported bone pain is the maximum of each participant's bone pain values across survey Days 1-5 within each cycle. Across all cycles the maximum is the maximum of each patient-reported bone pain value across all survey days 1-5 and across all cycles. An ANOVA model with treatment as explanatory term was used.

Time frame:
Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Maximum Patient-reported Bone Pain by Cycle and Across Cycles
units on a scaleNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)3.9 ± 0.23.3 ± 0.23.0 ± 0.2
Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)3.0 ± 0.22.4 ± 0.22.6 ± 0.2
Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)2.7 ± 0.22.2 ± 0.22.5 ± 0.2
Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)2.8 ± 0.22.1 ± 0.22.1 ± 0.2
Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)4.7 ± 0.24.2 ± 0.24.1 ± 0.2
Statistical analysis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Naproxen 500 mg BID · ANOVA · p = 0.1466 · Ls mean difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.2Naproxen minus No Prophylaxis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · ANOVA · p = 0.0411 · Ls mean difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -1.3 to -0.0Loratadine minus No Prophylaxis
  • Naproxen 500 mg BID vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · ANOVA · p = 0.5689 · Ls mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.5Loratadine minus Naproxen
SecondaryArea Under the Curve (AUC) for Patient-reported Bone Pain

Patient-reported bone pain AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule with bone pain scores from day 1 to 5 for each cycle. The AUC across cycles is the average of AUCs across the cycle.

Time frame:
Five consecutive days during each cycle beginning on the day of pegfilgrastim administration (Day 2, 3, or 4 of each cycle)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale * days
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Patient-reported Bone Pain
units on a scale * daysNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Cycle 1 (n=191, 196, 200)9.3 ± 0.77.7 ± 0.67.0 ± 0.6
Cycle 2 (n=178, 180, 193)7.3 ± 0.75.6 ± 0.65.9 ± 0.5
Cycle 3 (n=165, 176, 188)6.8 ± 0.75.5 ± 0.66.1 ± 0.6
Cycle 4 (n=162, 169, 179)7.2 ± 0.75.2 ± 0.65.6 ± 0.6
Across All Cycles (n=191, 196, 200)8.0 ± 0.66.6 ± 0.56.3 ± 0.5
Statistical analysis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Naproxen 500 mg BID · ANOVA · p = 0.0775 · Ls mean difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -3.0 to 0.2Naproxen minus No Prophylaxis
  • No Prophylaxis vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · ANCOVA · p = 0.0329 · Ls mean difference: -1.6 · 95% CI -3.1 to -0.1Loratadine minus No Prophylaxis
  • Naproxen 500 mg BID vs Loratadine 10 mg QD · ANOVA · p = 0.7572 · Ls mean difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -1.7 to 1.2Loratadine minus Naproxen
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Severity was graded using CTCAE version 3. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal; • life threatening; • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • congenital anomaly/birth defect; • other medically important serious event. The investigator assessed each adverse event for relatedness to investigational product(s) or other protocol-required therapies.

Time frame:
From first dose of investigational product (IP, naproxen or loratidine) or first dose of pegfilgrastim (Peg), whichever occurred first, until 30 days after last dose, up to 24 weeks.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
participantsNo ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QD
Any adverse event188192194
Worst grade of ≥ 2164169168
Worst grade of ≥ 3747363
Worst grade of ≥ 4183020
Serious adverse events343014
Fatal adverse events000
AE leading to discontinuation from study353
SAE leading to discontinuation from study132
Any adverse event related to IP0307
SAE related to IP010
AE related to IP leading to discontinuation of IP090
SAE related to IP leading to discontinuation of IP010
Any adverse event related to pegfilgrastim8796105
SAE related to pegfilgrastim401
AE related to / leading to discontinuation of Peg636
SAE related to / leading to discontinuation of Peg100

Adverse events

Collected over From first dose of investigational product (naproxen or loratidine) or first dose of pegfilgrastim, whichever occurred first, until 30 days after last dose, up to 24 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
No Prophylactic Intervention—34/196 (17.3%)184/196 (93.9%)
Naproxen 500mg BID—30/193 (15.5%)190/193 (98.4%)
Loratadine 10mg QD—14/198 (7.1%)193/198 (97.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 68
Most frequent serious events
EventNo Prophylactic InterventionNaproxen 500mg BIDLoratadine 10mg QD
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/1966/1933/198
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders6/1963/1931/198
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/1964/1930/198
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/1963/1932/198
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/1962/1930/198
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/1962/1930/198
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/1962/1930/198
SepsisInfections and infestations1/1962/1930/198
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1962/1930/198
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/1960/1932/198
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 52
Most frequent other events
EventNo Prophylactic InterventionNaproxen 500mg BIDLoratadine 10mg QD
FatigueGeneral disorders120/196110/193128/198
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders98/196118/193100/198
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders68/19685/193106/198
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders60/19677/19366/198
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders67/19675/19371/198
Bone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders56/19655/19363/198
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders42/19660/19340/198
HeadacheNervous system disorders49/19654/19348/198
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders32/19643/19329/198
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders36/19634/19339/198

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set included all participants based on the randomization treatment group who received primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)No ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QDTotal
Mean54.8 ± 10.753.2 ± 11.754.6 ± 10.954.2 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)No ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QDTotal
Female191196200587
Male0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)No ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QDTotal
Hispanic/Latino1315937
Not Hispanic/Latino178181191550
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)No ProphylaxisNaproxen 500 mg BIDLoratadine 10 mg QDTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native1001
Asian3317
Black (or African American)33272383
Multiple0011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1001
White148166173487
Other5027
08

Study locations

83 sites
  • Research Site
    Muscle Shoals, Alabama 35661, United States
  • Research Site
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Research Site
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Research Site
    Santa Maria, California 93454, United States
  • Research Site
    Santa Rosa, California 95403, United States
  • Research Site
    Torrance, California 90501, United States
  • Research Site
    Whittier, California 90603, United States
  • Research Site
    Denver, Colorado 80210, United States
  • Research Site
    Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
  • Research Site
    Littleton, Colorado 80122, United States
  • Research Site
    Norwich, Connecticut 06360, United States
  • Research Site
    Stamford, Connecticut 06902, United States
  • Research Site
    Boynton Beach, Florida 33426, United States
  • Research Site
    Daytona Beach, Florida 32114, United States
  • Research Site
    Daytona Beach, Florida 32117, United States
  • Research Site
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308, United States
  • Research Site
    Lakeland, Florida 33805, United States
  • Research Site
    New Port Richey, Florida 34652, United States
  • Research Site
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • Research Site
    Stuart, Florida 34994, United States
  • Research Site
    Augusta, Georgia 30901, United States
  • Research Site
    Thomasville, Georgia 31792, United States
  • Research Site
    Elmhurst, Illinois 60126, United States
  • Research Site
    Gurnee, Illinois 60031, United States
  • Research Site
    Mount Vernon, Illinois 62864, United States
  • Research Site
    Skokie, Illinois 60076, United States
  • Research Site
    Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
  • Research Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46237, United States
  • Research Site
    South Bend, Indiana 46601, United States
  • Research Site
    Sioux City, Iowa 51101, United States
  • Research Site
    Waterloo, Iowa 50702, United States
  • Research Site
    Hutchinson, Kansas 67502, United States
  • Research Site
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • Research Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Research Site
    Mount Sterling, Kentucky 40353, United States
  • Research Site
    Paducah, Kentucky 42003, United States
  • Research Site
    Alexandria, Louisiana 71301, United States
  • Research Site
    Lafayette, Louisiana 70503, United States
  • Research Site
    Marrero, Louisiana 70072, United States
  • Research Site
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • Research Site
    Cumberland, Maryland 21502, United States
  • Research Site
    Randallstown, Maryland 21133, United States
  • Research Site
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Research Site
    Westminster, Maryland 21157, United States
  • Research Site
    Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States
  • Research Site
    Battle Creek, Michigan 49017, United States
  • Research Site
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • Research Site
    Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56303, United States
  • Research Site
    Jackson, Mississippi 39202, United States
  • Research Site
    Jefferson City, Missouri 65101, United States
  • Research Site
    Kansas City, Missouri 64132, United States
  • Research Site
    Saint Joseph, Missouri 64507, United States
  • Research Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63136, United States
  • Research Site
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Research Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68106, United States
  • Research Site
    Nashua, New Hampshire 03060, United States
  • Research Site
    Denville, New Jersey 07834, United States
  • Research Site
    East Syracuse, New York 13057, United States
  • Research Site
    Johnson City, New York 13790, United States
  • Research Site
    Gastonia, North Carolina 28054, United States
  • Research Site
    Hickory, North Carolina 28602, United States
  • Research Site
    Pinehurst, North Carolina 28374, United States
  • Research Site
    Massillon, Ohio 44646, United States
  • Research Site
    Zanesville, Ohio 43701, United States
  • Research Site
    Bend, Oregon 97701, United States
  • Research Site
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
  • Research Site
    Langhorne, Pennsylvania 19047, United States
  • Research Site
    Florence, South Carolina 29506, United States
  • Research Site
    Watertown, South Dakota 57201, United States
  • Research Site
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620, United States
  • Research Site
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421, United States
  • Research Site
    Corpus Christi, Texas 78404, United States
  • Research Site
    Corpus Christi, Texas 78412, United States
  • Research Site
    Plano, Texas 75093, United States
  • Research Site
    Ogden, Utah 84403, United States
  • Research Site
    Chesapeake, Virginia 23320, United States
  • Research Site
    Spokane, Washington 99208, United States
  • Research Site
    Huntington, West Virginia 25701, United States
  • Research Site
    Janesville, Wisconsin 53548, United States
  • Research Site
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
  • Research Site
    Racine, Wisconsin 53405, United States
  • Research Site
    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • Research Site
    Weston, Wisconsin 54476, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirshner JJ, McDonald MC 3rd, Kruter F, Guinigundo AS, Vanni L, Maxwell CL, Reiner M, Upchurch TE, Garcia J, Morrow PK. NOLAN: a randomized, phase 2 study to estimate the effect of prophylactic naproxen or loratadine vs no prophylactic treatment on bone pain in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Apr;26(4):1323-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3959-2. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed 29147854 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01712009
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2012
Start date
Nov 1, 2012
Primary completion
Mar 18, 2015
Completion
Mar 18, 2015
Results posted
Mar 9, 2016
Last update
Jan 30, 2018

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion