CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01685814Updated Apr 27, 2023

Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) for Induction in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Followed by Response-adapted Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance

A Phase 3 interventional study of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and autologous stem cell transplant in Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital. Status unknown at 32 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-27.

Sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2023), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
406
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose this study utilizing Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) as comparator arm for Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) with the latter being considered a novel "standard" as an induction protocol, since response in general occurs early after starting treatment we decided to choose three cycles of either induction regimen.

Together with the "novel compounds", tandem high-dose melphalan is still the standard of care; it seems desirable to re-address the question of the number of transplant (single vs. double high-dose melphalan) procedures required in the context of triplet-induction protocols utilizing at least one of the novel compounds.

Thus, the question to be asked in the current protocol is whether immediate lenalidomide maintenance (i.e. following one cycle of high-dose therapy) as an investigational agent will result in identical progression free survival (PFS) when compared to tandem high-dose melphalan with deferred maintenance therapy.

Despite induction with novel compounds, approximately 25 - 40% of patients will be in less than very good partial response. Very recently, achievement of less than VGPR was confirmed to negatively impact on both PFS as well as overall survival (OS). Therefore, allogeneic stem cell transplantation is considered the standard of care in patients with suboptimal response to a first autograft.

In the current protocol, the standard for favourable responders (tandem-autologous transplant) is combined with 3 years of lenalidomide maintenance. This approach will be investigated for patients with less than VGPR following a first autotransplant and compared to the current standard of intensification in poor responders (allogeneic transplantation).

02

Conditions studied

  • Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

  • multiple myeloma
  • autologous stem cell transplant
  • allogeneic stem cell transplant
  • lenalidomide
  • bortezomib
03

In context

Multiple Myeloma

3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 406 is above the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.

Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →

Lead sponsor

Wuerzburg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
  • Patients willing and able to undergo autologous and allogeneic transplantation
  • no previous systemic therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (dexamethasone at a cumulative dose of 320 mg; plasmapheresis/dialysis without concomitant chemotherapy, local irradiation of bone lesions; and surgical intervention is accepted as pretreatment)
  • Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma according to common diagnostic criteria including presence of CRAB and measurable disease parameters
  • Cardiac ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 50%
  • Corrected DLCO of at least 50% ; alternatively pO2 [art.] of at least 70mmHg
  • Karnofsky performance status of greater or equal to 50%
  • adequate bone marrow function
  • adequate serum chemistry values
  • Use of adequate contraception for female subjects with childbearing potential and male subjects
  • Bone marrow sample available for analysis of molecular cytogenetics
  • Able to administer low molecular-weight heparin as a prophylactic anticoagulation therapy for the first three months(applicable for subjects randomized to RAD) and able to administer ASS 100 mg/d (applicable for subjects randomized to VRD)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk
  • History of myocardial infarction; NYHA Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias; concomitant pericarditis or peri-/myocarditis
  • Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 28 days of baseline
  • Greater or equal to Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy on clinical examination within 14 days before enrollment
  • Known intolerance of boron
  • Hypersensitivity to acyclovir or similar anti-viral drug
  • Prior malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical, breast or prostate cancer
  • HIV positive, active hepatitis B, C or D viral infection, known CMV reactivation/active infection, EBV reactivation/active infection or treponema pallidum infection
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Non-secretory MM
  • Clinically relevant active infection or serious co-morbid medical conditions
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
406 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    single stem cell transplant, 3-year lenalidomide maintenance

    Arm A

    Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant

  • Experimental
    tandem autologous transplant, lenalidomide maintenance

    Arm B

    Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant

  • Active comparator
    allogeneic stem cell transplant, lenalidomide maintenance

    Arm C

    Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant · Biological: allogeneic stem cell transplant

  • Experimental
    tandem autologous transplant

    Arm D

    Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant

Interventions

  • DrugLenalidomide, Bortezomib

    Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy

  • Biologicalautologous stem cell transplant
  • Biologicalallogeneic stem cell transplant
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary efficacy endpoint for the induction phase is the rate of patients with CR at first restaging

    Time frame: within 8 days after end of last induction cycle ((Day 92(RAD); Day 71(VRD))

  2. In the consolidation phase the primary efficacy endpoint for comparison II (response <VGPR after first ASCT) is the PFS rate

    Time frame: 3 years after the first ASCT, calculated from day 1 of ASCT.

Secondary outcomes

  1. ORR following 3 cycles of induction treatment (VRD vs RAD)

    Time frame: within 8 days after end of last induction cycle

  2. CR and ORR at the end of the whole treatment programme

    Time frame: at the end of the whole treatment programme (approx. 8 years)

  3. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: 8 years from study entry

  4. Incidence, severity and relationship of SAEs

    Time frame: 30 days post last dosing of study drug

  5. Numbers of hospital stays and hospitalization days

    Time frame: within two years from second restaging

07

Study locations

32 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Med. Klinik IV, Hämatologie u. Onkologie
    Aachen, 52074, Germany
  • Schön Klinik Starnberger See, Hämatologie und Onkologie
    Berg, 82335, Germany
  • Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Hämatologie, Onkologie u. Tumorimmunologie
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin I
    Bremen, 28177, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik 5
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Malteser Krankenhaus St. Franziskus-Hospital, medizinische Klinik I
    Flensburg, 24939, Germany
  • Klinikum der Johann Woflgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Mai
    Frankfurt am Main, 60596, Germany
  • Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH Medizinische Klinik I
    Frankfurt/Oder, 15236, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Abteilung für Innere Medizin I
    Freiburg, 79106, Germany
  • Universitätmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin C
    Greifswald, 17475, Germany
  • St. Marien-Hospital gem. GmbHKna
    Hamm, 59071, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes Innere Medizin I
    Homburg/Saar, 66421, Germany
  • Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Klinikum für Innrere Medizin II
    Jena, 07747, Germany
  • Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe Medizinische Klinik III, Abt. Hämatologie u. Onkologie
    Karlsruhe, 76133, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, II. Med. Poliklinik
    Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II im städtischen Krankenhaus Kiel
    Kiel, 24116, Germany
  • Stiftungsklinikum Mittelrhein GmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin
    Koblenz, 56068, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Medizinische Klinik I
    Lübeck, 23538, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim medizinische Klinik III
    Mannheim, 68167, Germany
  • Klinikum Schwabing
    München, 80804, Germany
  • Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern
    München, 81366, Germany
  • III. Med. Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München
    München, 81675, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster, Medizinische Klinik u. Poliklinik A
    Münster, 48149, Germany
  • Klinikum Nürnberg Nord, 5. Medizinische LKinik, Onkologie/Hämatologie
    Nürnberg, 90419, Germany
  • Klinikum Oldenburg GmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin II
    Oldenburg, 26133, Germany
  • Uniklinikum Regensburg, Abteilung für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie
    Regensburg, 93053, Germany
  • Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Abt. Hämatologie, Onkologie u. Palliativmedizin
    Stuttgart, 70376, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm,Klinik für Innere Medizin III
    Ulm, 89081, Germany
  • Schwarzwald-Baar Klinkum Villingen-Schwennigen GmbH
    Villingen-Schwenningen, 78048, Germany
  • Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Klinik Innere Medizin III
    Wiesbaden, 65199, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Wuerzburg, Medizinische Klinik II
    Wuerzburg, 97080, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01685814
Lead sponsor
Wuerzburg University Hospital
Collaborators
ClinAssess GmbH, Celgene Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2012
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 27, 2023

Study contacts

Stefan Knop, MD
study director · Wuerzburg University Hospital
Hermann Einsele, MD
principal investigator · Wuerzburg University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion