A Phase 3 interventional study of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and autologous stem cell transplant in Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma, sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital. Status unknown at 32 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-27.
Sponsored by Wuerzburg University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The investigators propose this study utilizing Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) as comparator arm for Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) with the latter being considered a novel "standard" as an induction protocol, since response in general occurs early after starting treatment we decided to choose three cycles of either induction regimen.
Together with the "novel compounds", tandem high-dose melphalan is still the standard of care; it seems desirable to re-address the question of the number of transplant (single vs. double high-dose melphalan) procedures required in the context of triplet-induction protocols utilizing at least one of the novel compounds.
Thus, the question to be asked in the current protocol is whether immediate lenalidomide maintenance (i.e. following one cycle of high-dose therapy) as an investigational agent will result in identical progression free survival (PFS) when compared to tandem high-dose melphalan with deferred maintenance therapy.
Despite induction with novel compounds, approximately 25 - 40% of patients will be in less than very good partial response. Very recently, achievement of less than VGPR was confirmed to negatively impact on both PFS as well as overall survival (OS). Therefore, allogeneic stem cell transplantation is considered the standard of care in patients with suboptimal response to a first autograft.
In the current protocol, the standard for favourable responders (tandem-autologous transplant) is combined with 3 years of lenalidomide maintenance. This approach will be investigated for patients with less than VGPR following a first autotransplant and compared to the current standard of intensification in poor responders (allogeneic transplantation).
3,632 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 745 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 406 is above the median of 41 across 2,907 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.
Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →Wuerzburg University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Arm A
Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant
Arm B
Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant
Arm C
Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant · Biological: allogeneic stem cell transplant
Arm D
Drug: Lenalidomide, Bortezomib · Biological: autologous stem cell transplant
Induction: two versus one novel drug maintenance: lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy
The primary efficacy endpoint for the induction phase is the rate of patients with CR at first restaging
Time frame: within 8 days after end of last induction cycle ((Day 92(RAD); Day 71(VRD))
In the consolidation phase the primary efficacy endpoint for comparison II (response <VGPR after first ASCT) is the PFS rate
Time frame: 3 years after the first ASCT, calculated from day 1 of ASCT.
ORR following 3 cycles of induction treatment (VRD vs RAD)
Time frame: within 8 days after end of last induction cycle
CR and ORR at the end of the whole treatment programme
Time frame: at the end of the whole treatment programme (approx. 8 years)
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 8 years from study entry
Incidence, severity and relationship of SAEs
Time frame: 30 days post last dosing of study drug
Numbers of hospital stays and hospitalization days
Time frame: within two years from second restaging
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Wuerzburg University Hospital