ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01684033Updated Apr 17, 2014Results posted

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Marketed Multi-Purpose Solutions for Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses - Study 1

An interventional study of Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS and Biotrue™ MPS in Myopia, Hyperopia and Contact Lens Comfort, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-17.

Sponsored by Alcon Research (part of Alcon) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
207
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Opti-Free® PureMoist® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) compared to Biotrue™ Multipurpose Solution (MPS) in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.

Read the detailed description

In this 2-period crossover study, eligible participants were randomized to either Opti-Free® PureMoist® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution or Biotrue™ Multipurpose Solution in Period 1 for use with their habitual contact lenses, after which they switched to the alternate solution in Period 2. Each period was 30 days in length. A 2-day washout period during which participants refrained from using a multi-purpose contact lens solution preceded Period 1 and Period 2.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myopia
  • Hyperopia
  • Contact Lens Comfort

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • multi-purpose solution
  • silicone hydrogel
  • contact lenses
  • comfort
  • Opti-Free
  • Biotrue
03

In context

Myopia

1,007 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 210 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 207 is above the median of 80 across 803 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.

Browse Myopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 624 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 100 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Wear single vision sphere silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CooperVision™ Biofinity®, Alcon® Air Optix® Aqua, Bausch+Lomb® PureVision™ or ACUVUE® Oasys™) on a daily wear basis (a minimum of 8 hours per day, 5 days a week) for at least one month prior to Visit 1;
  • Willing to wear lenses on a daily wear basis (a minimum of 8 hours per day, 5 days a week) for the duration of the study, and wear lenses for 16 hours on two days during the study;
  • Must have habitually used a Biguanide preserved multi-purpose solution (other than Biotrue) for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1;
  • Vision correctable to 20/30 Snellen (feet) or better in each eye at distance with pre-study contact lenses at Visit 1;
  • Have access, capability and willingness to review and answer text messages;
  • Read, sign, and date IRB/IEC approved informed consent and privacy document before enrollment;
  • Willing to follow the study procedures and visit schedule;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need to wear lenses on an extended wear (i.e. overnight) basis during the study;
  • Known sensitivity or intolerance to Biguanide, polyquaternium-1 (POLYQUAD), or ALDOX preserved lens care products;
  • Monocular (only one eye with functional vision) or fit with only one lens;
  • Wearing toric or multifocal contact lenses or fit with monovision;
  • Use of additional lens care products other than a Biguanide preserved multipurpose solution such as daily or enzyme cleaners within the one week prior to Visit 1;
  • Use of topical ocular over-the-counter (OTC) or prescribed topical ocular medications, with the exception of rewetting drops, within 7 days prior to Visit 1;
  • Abnormal ocular condition observed during the Visit 1 slit-lamp examination;
  • Current or history of ocular infections or severe inflammation within 6 months prior to Visit 1;
  • Ocular surgery within the 12 months prior to Visit 1;
  • Participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days of enrollment;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
207 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    PureMoist - Biotrue

    Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS used first, followed by Biotrue™ MPS. Each product used as indicated for 30 days with participant's habitual contact lenses.

    Device: Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS · Device: Biotrue™ MPS · Device: Habitual contact lenses

  • Other
    Biotrue - PureMoist

    Biotrue™ MPS used first, followed by Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS. Each product used as indicated for 30 days with participant's habitual contact lenses.

    Device: Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS · Device: Biotrue™ MPS · Device: Habitual contact lenses

Interventions

  • DeviceOpti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS

    Also known as: OPTI-FREE® PureMoist™

  • DeviceBiotrue™ MPS

    Also known as: Biotrue™

  • DeviceHabitual contact lenses

    Silicone hydrogel contact lenses per participant's habitual brand, prescription, and replacement schedule worn on a daily wear basis for at least 8 hours a day, 5 days a week for the duration of the study. During the washout period, the contact lenses were worn on a daily disposable basis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Corneal Staining

    Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.

    Time frame: Day 30

  2. Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Day 30

    Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30

07

Results

Posted Apr 17, 2014

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from 5 study centers located in the US, 3 study centers located in the UK, and 2 study centers located in Germany.

Period 1, First 30 Days
Participant flow — Period 1, First 30 Days
MilestonePureMoist - BiotrueBiotrue - PureMoist
Started9999
Completed9598
Not completed41
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Noncompliance10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Period 2, Second 30 Days
Participant flow — Period 2, Second 30 Days
MilestonePureMoist - BiotrueBiotrue - PureMoist
Started9598
Completed9498
Not completed10
Withdrew: Adverse event10

Outcome measures

PrimaryCorneal Staining

Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Corneal Staining
Units on a scalePureMoistBiotrue
Corneal Staining1.9 ± 2.302.8 ± 2.62
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Day 30

Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0), Day 30
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Day 30
units on a scalePureMoistBiotrue
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Day 300.7 ± 2.591.6 ± 2.91

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AE) were collected for the duration of the study (4 months). AEs were elicited by non-direct questioning of the participant and spontaneous reporting by the participant. AEs were recorded at every visit.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PureMoist—0/196 (0%)0/196 (0%)
Biotrue—0/194 (0%)0/194 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

This analysis population includes all participants who were exposed to a study regimen (test or control).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PureMoist / Biotrue
Mean31.7 ± 11.48
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PureMoist / Biotrue
Female151
Male47
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01684033
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 12, 2012
Start date
Nov 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Results posted
Apr 17, 2014
Last update
Apr 17, 2014

Study contacts

Jessie Lemp, MS
study director · Alcon Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion