An interventional study of Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS and Biotrue™ MPS in Myopia, Hyperopia and Contact Lens Comfort, sponsored by Alcon Research. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-04-17.
Sponsored by Alcon Research (part of Alcon) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Opti-Free® PureMoist® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) compared to Biotrue™ Multipurpose Solution (MPS) in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.
In this 2-period crossover study, eligible participants were randomized to either Opti-Free® PureMoist® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution or Biotrue™ Multipurpose Solution in Period 1 for use with their habitual contact lenses, after which they switched to the alternate solution in Period 2. Each period was 30 days in length. A 2-day washout period during which participants refrained from using a multi-purpose contact lens solution preceded Period 1 and Period 2.
1,007 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 210 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 207 is above the median of 80 across 803 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.
Browse Myopia studies →Alcon Research is the lead sponsor of 624 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 100 (90%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS used first, followed by Biotrue™ MPS. Each product used as indicated for 30 days with participant's habitual contact lenses.
Device: Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS · Device: Biotrue™ MPS · Device: Habitual contact lenses
Biotrue™ MPS used first, followed by Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS. Each product used as indicated for 30 days with participant's habitual contact lenses.
Device: Opti-Free® PureMoist® MPDS · Device: Biotrue™ MPS · Device: Habitual contact lenses
Also known as: OPTI-FREE® PureMoist™
Also known as: Biotrue™
Silicone hydrogel contact lenses per participant's habitual brand, prescription, and replacement schedule worn on a daily wear basis for at least 8 hours a day, 5 days a week for the duration of the study. During the washout period, the contact lenses were worn on a daily disposable basis.
Corneal Staining
Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Day 30
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Day 30
Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 30
Participants were recruited from 5 study centers located in the US, 3 study centers located in the UK, and 2 study centers located in Germany.
| Milestone | PureMoist - Biotrue | Biotrue - PureMoist |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 99 | 99 |
| Completed | 95 | 98 |
| Not completed | 4 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Noncompliance | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Milestone | PureMoist - Biotrue | Biotrue - PureMoist |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 95 | 98 |
| Completed | 94 | 98 |
| Not completed | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 | 0 |
Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.
| Units on a scale | PureMoist | Biotrue |
|---|---|---|
| Corneal Staining | 1.9 ± 2.30 | 2.8 ± 2.62 |
Corneal staining in both eyes was assessed during slit lamp examination using flourescein dye. Each of five corneal regions (central, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior) was graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (patch). The corneal fluorescein staining score was calculated as the total of the five regions. The score ranged from 0 (no staining in any region) to 20 (patch staining in all five regions). The corneal staining of the worse eye was analyzed.
| units on a scale | PureMoist | Biotrue |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Day 30 | 0.7 ± 2.59 | 1.6 ± 2.91 |
Collected over Adverse events (AE) were collected for the duration of the study (4 months). AEs were elicited by non-direct questioning of the participant and spontaneous reporting by the participant. AEs were recorded at every visit.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| PureMoist | — | 0/196 (0%) | 0/196 (0%) |
| Biotrue | — | 0/194 (0%) | 0/194 (0%) |
This analysis population includes all participants who were exposed to a study regimen (test or control).
| Age, Continuous(years) | PureMoist / Biotrue |
|---|---|
| Mean | 31.7 ± 11.48 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | PureMoist / Biotrue |
|---|---|
| Female | 151 |
| Male | 47 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.