ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01679106Updated May 23, 2016

The Effects of Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Catheters on Postoperative Pain After Renal Transplantation

An interventional study of TAP catheter with Ropivicaine and Fentanyl IV PCA and placebo TAP catheter in Pain, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-23.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was terminated
Study closed because of low enrolment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Up to 174 patients undergoing renal transplantation will be randomized to one of two groups. Randomization will be based on computer-generated codes using random block sizes ranging from 4 to 8.

Group 1: TAP catheter with continuous infusion of Ropivicaine Group 2: Fentanyl IV PCA

The TAP catheter will be removed 48 hours postoperatively. Following removal, the pain scores will be assessed at 60 and 72 hours postoperatively to determine any prolonged analgesic benefit. In addition, the presence of any pain at the incision site will be noted at the 1 month surgical follow-up to determine any evidence of chronic pain.

The investigators hypothesis is that unilateral kidney transplant patients with a continuous TAP catheter will have decreased pain scores and opioid usage compared to those receiving standard analgesic therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • renal transplant
  • flank incision
03

In context

Pain

2,450 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 945 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 70 across 2,101 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 831 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient is >18 years of age
  • The patient has provided written informed consent and understands the explanation of the protocol.
  • The patient is scheduled to have a unilateral renal transplant with a flank incision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged \<18.
  • Patients with a known allergy to amide local anesthetics or para-aminobenzoic acid.
  • Patients who are unable to understand the verbal analog pain scale.
  • Patients who decline participation.
  • Patients with a midline abdominal incision.
  • Combined transplants, ie. Kidney-pancreas
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Fentanyl IV PCA and placebo TAP catheter

    Patients will receive Fentanyl IV PCA and placebo TAP catheter.

    Other: Fentanyl IV PCA and placebo TAP catheter

  • Active comparator
    TAP catheter with continuous infusion of Ropivicaine

    Patients will receive TAP catheter with continuous infusion of Ropivicaine for up to 48 hours after surgery.

    Other: TAP catheter with Ropivicaine

Interventions

  • OtherTAP catheter with Ropivicaine

    Patients will receive TAP catheter with continuous infusion of Ropivicaine.

  • OtherFentanyl IV PCA and placebo TAP catheter

    Patients will receive placebo TAP catheter with Fentanyl IV PCA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of continuous TAP analgesia and pain scores

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: day 1

  2. Effect of TAP analgesia and opioid requirements

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Effect of continuous TAP analgesia on pain scores

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: Day 2

  4. effect of continuous TAP analgesia on pain scores

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: Day 3

  5. Effect of continuous TAP analgesia on pain scores

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Effect of TAP analgesia on opioid requirements

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: Day 2

  7. Effect of TAP analgesia on opioid requirements

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: Day 3

  8. Effect of TAP analgesia on opioid requirements

    The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of a continuous TAP analgesia on postoperative analgesia (as defined by pain scores and opioid requirements) in patients undergoing renal transplantation, compared to standard analgesic management (IV PCA).

    Time frame: Day 30

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2012, a primary completion of May 2014 and a completion of May 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2012
First posted
Sep 5, 2012
Start
Aug 2012
Primary completionActual
May 2014
CompletionActual
May 2014
Last update
May 23, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01679106
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2012
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
May 2014
Completion
May 2014
Last update
May 23, 2016

Study contacts

Ehab Farag, M.D.
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion