ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01675908Updated Mar 3, 2022

Trial Comparing Metal Versus Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary Decompression

An interventional study of Stent Dysfunction and Complications in Obstructive Jaundice and Pancreatic Cancer, sponsored by AdventHealth. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-03.

Sponsored by AdventHealth · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Compare the performance of full covered metal stents and plastic stents for preoperative biliary decompression

Read the detailed description

Covered self expandable metal stents (CSEMS) are three times larger in diameter than 10 Fr plastic stents. When compared to plastic stents, randomized trials have shown longer patency and fewer stent-related complications for CSEMS. The investigators hypothesize that placement of CSEMS would be a better treatment option for preoperative biliary decompression in patients with pancreatic cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Jaundice
  • Pancreatic Cancer
03

In context

Jaundice, Obstructive

62 studies on the registry are indexed under Jaundice, Obstructive; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 75 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Jaundice, Obstructive.

Browse Jaundice, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

AdventHealth is the lead sponsor of 113 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (40%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with pancreatic cancer and mass in the head of pancreas causing jaundice.
  2. Patients 19 yrs of age and older
  3. Serum > 2mg/dl
  4. CT: No evidence of distant or local vascular invasion (tumor surrounding portal or mesenteric vessels for more than 180 degrees of their circumference or an irregular vessel margin).

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. score \< 60
  2. Prior (ERCP or PTC) attempts at biliary decompression for the same indication
  3. Tumor-related gastric outlet obstruction (vomiting and oral intake of \< 1L/day)
  4. Ongoing or planned therapy
  5. Cholangitis at presentation or coagulopathy needing reversal medication
  6. Post-surgical anatomy
  7. Multiple extra-hepatic biliary strictures or concomitant stricture in liver hilum
  8. Failed ERCP's (Definition: Inability to deploy a biliary stent thereby requiring a PTC or surgery).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Metal stent

    Patients randomized to one cohort will undergo placement of fully covered self expandable metal stents. The rates (%) of stent dysfunction and complications will be evaluated.

    Procedure: Stent Dysfunction · Procedure: Complications

  • Active comparator
    Plastic Stent

    At ERCP, a 10Fr plastic stent will be placed in the bile duct. The rates (%) of stent dysfunction and complications will be evaluated.

    Procedure: Stent Dysfunction · Procedure: Complications

Interventions

  • ProcedureStent Dysfunction

    Rate of stent dysfunction (%) which includes persistent hyperbilirubinemia or cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by another ERCP.

  • ProcedureComplications

    Rates of procedural complications (%) such as pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage during stent placement will be assessed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complications related to stent dysfunction

    Evaluate the rates of complications (%) related to stent dysfunction which include persistent hyperbilirubinemia and cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by a repeat ERCP.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural complications

    This will be measured as proportion of patients who encounter a procedural complication (%) during ERCP that includes pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Florida Hospital
    Orlando, Florida 32814, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — A manuscript will be developed following completion of the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2012 to primary completion in Aug 2019, 83 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 28, 2012
First posted
Aug 30, 2012
StartActual
Aug 22, 2012
Primary completionActual
Aug 21, 2019
CompletionActual
Aug 21, 2019
Last update
Mar 3, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01675908
Lead sponsor
AdventHealth
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2012
Start date
Aug 22, 2012
Primary completion
Aug 21, 2019
Completion
Aug 21, 2019
Last update
Mar 3, 2022

Study contacts

shyam varadarajulu, MD
principal investigator · Florida Hospital Center for Interventional Endoscopy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion