A Phase 4 interventional study of Calcitriol and Placebo in Diabetic Nephropathy, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Status unknown at 2 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-13.
Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Screening
Worldwide, the most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) is diabetes. Unlike the past, in south korea, diabetes account for more than 40% of ESRD. According to WHO reports in 1998, 100 million people had type 2 diabetes in 1997, and there is expected to increase by 300 million people in 2025. In addition, the expected survival time of patients with diabetes increase compared to previous. In the future, ESRD due to type 2 diabetes is expected to have a significant impact on the health industry. Therefore, prevention of progression to CKD and ESRD in diabetic patients is important to aspect of national health and economic problems. How to stop the progression of diabetic nephropathy is part of modern medicine to be solved.
Strict glycemic control, blood pressure regulation, and use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers inhibit the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Microalbuminuria in diabetic patients has been recognized as a predictor of progression of diabetic nephropathy. Thus, the prevention of elevated urinary albumin excretion is an important therapeutic target for the prevention of renal and cardiovascular events.
In patients with diabetes and hypertension, the drugs that block the RAS are used to treat proteinuria, but still a large number of patients with proteinuria are uncontrolled. In addition, ACE inhibitors or ARB agents actually have a limited effect on reducing the risk of cardiovascular or renal outcome. Also, sulodexide or pentoxyphylline which is reducing proteinuria have some weak evidence in terms of efficacy and safety. Therefore, the introduction of new alternative drugs are required.
Already several study reported that calcitriol or paricalcitol in the renal injury model have renopreventive effect. In addition, in diabetic renal injury mice model reported that vitamin D receptor deficiency leads to glomerulosclerosis. Inhibition of the RAS with combination of paricalcitol and RAS inhibitors effectively prevent renal injury in diabetic nephropathy. Recently, Dick de Zeeuw et al reported that addition of paricalcitol to RAS inhibition safely lower residual albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Recent studies reported that elevated concentrations of serum markers of the TNFα and Fas-pathways are strongly associated with decreased renal function in diabetic patients. However, the role of these markers in early progressive renal function decline are not clear. Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify the renoprotective effect as an new treatment of activated vitamin D (Calcitriol) indicating the TNF-α-related anti-inflammatory action and to seek the role as an important biomarker that the changes of TNFR in diabetic nephropathy can predict response to treatment.
3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 276 is above the median of 70 across 2,640 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.
Browse Kidney Diseases studies →Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.
Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Calcitriol
Drug: Calcitriol
Placebo
Drug: Placebo
dosage of 0.5mcg administered orally once daily for 12 month
Changes in renal function with proteinuria
Comparison of in GFR level from baseline Comparison of proteinuria amount checked by random urine protein/creatinine ratio
Time frame: 12 month after administration
changes in sTNFR and TNF-related proteins
Comparison of serum TNFR1, TNFR2 levels from baseline
Time frame: 12 months after administration
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seoul National University Hospital