CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01670214Updated Feb 17, 2016

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in the Refractory Migraine

An interventional study of pulsed electromagnetic field in Refractory Migraine, sponsored by Niyayesh Clinic. Completed at 1 site in Iran, Islamic Republic of. Open to participants aged 17 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-17.

Sponsored by Niyayesh Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) as prophylactic treatment may prevent the attacks of migraine or decrease them even in the patients with refractory migraine.

Read the detailed description

Migraine is most common among patients who seek medical care for headache. The prevalence of migraine is around 10 % in Iran. The many studies of migraine pathophysiology imply that the brain of migraine patient is impaired in term of cerebral circulation and baseline activity of brain stem, monoaminergic system and cortex. Then headache is only a sign of the changes that occur in the brain to rid hazardous conditions. Based on this theory many electrophysiological and imaging abnormalities that were appeared in the brain before the aura or the headache were diminished in the early phases of the attack. It means the changes concurrent with headache are associated with a quasi normalization of cortical information processing. The different pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments have proposed for migraine management. But some patients do not satisfactorily respond to or cannot tolerate current evidence-based treatments. This group of patients is often said to have refractory migraine (RM). Thus according to the enigmatic pathophysiology of migraine, a comprehensive treatment that affected all contributing factors in the migraine with minimal side effects is not provided yet.

Extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF MFs) as non-pharmacological treatment of migraine had good effect with weak evidence in the control of migraine. Recently based on extensive studies in the bioeffects of the low frequency electromagnetic field we can hope that this method can respond to many human disorders is unsolvable. The purpose of this study is to apply the best effective treatment protocol of ELF-MF on brain and circulatory system is extracted by using the latest findings of studies of low-frequency electromagnetic fields as intervention and apply it for refractory migraine patients in the form of a randomized one-blind placebo- controlled trial study. The evaluation of interventions is done subjectively (migraine dairy and MIDAS). Also we consider follow up period to confirm results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractory Migraine

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • RM
  • R-CM
  • based on ICHD-2 criteria
03

In context

Migraine Disorders

1,528 studies on the registry are indexed under Migraine Disorders; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 80 across 1,175 interventional studies indexed under Migraine Disorders.

Browse Migraine Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Niyayesh Clinic as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Primary Diagnosis A. ICHD-II migraine or chronic migraine Refractory B. Headaches cause significant interference with function or quality of life despite modification of triggers, lifestyle factors, and adequate trials of acute and preventive medicines with established efficacy.

  1. Failed adequate trails of preventive medicines, alone or in combination from at least 2 of 4 drug classes:

    • Beta-blockers
    • Anticonvulsants
    • Tricyclics
    • Calcium channel blockers
  2. Failed adequate trials of abortive medicines from the following classes, unless contraindicated:

    • Both a triptan and DHE intranasal or injectable formulation
    • Either nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or combination analgesics
    • Adequate trial Period of time during which an appropriate dose of medicine is administered, typically at least 2 months at optimal or maximum-tolerated doses, unless terminated early due to adverse effects
    • Modifiers With or without medication overuse, as defined by ICHD-2
    • With significant disability, as defined by MIDAS > 11
    • [DHE = dihydroergotamine; ICHD = International Classification of Headache Disorders;MIDAS = Migraine Disability Assessment]
    • The prophylactic medications have been discontinued at least one month prior to enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • epilepsy
  • malignancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pulsed electromagnetic field

    parameters of the pulsed electromagnetic field are frequency:10 Hz, intensity 4-5 mT, 6 sessions phase 1 treatment and added 6 sessions for phase 2 treatment (3 sessions per week)

    Procedure: pulsed electromagnetic field

  • Placebo comparator
    pulsed electromagnetic field

    patients are placed under off instrument while who is kept blind to know it for 6 sessions (3 sessions per week).

    Procedure: pulsed electromagnetic field

Interventions

  • Procedurepulsed electromagnetic field

    parameters of the pulsed electromagnetic field are frequency:10 Hz, intensity 4-5 mT, 6 sessions( 2 week) for placebo and phase 1 treatment ( 3 sessions in week) and added 6 sessions for phase 2 treatment. the solenoid diameter of instrument is 70 cm is placed around the head.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MIDAS

    migraine disability score

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. headache frequency

    Time frame: 4 months

  3. headache duration

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. headache intensity

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. medications

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. missed work

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Niyayesh clinic
    Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • B Hatef, B Majdoleslam, M Toghae, F Hashemirad. The Prophylactic Treatment of PEMF in the Refractory Migraine Headache, Double-Blind, Parallel Placebo-Controlled Study. CEPHALALGIA 33(s8): 98-99, 2013
  • Boshra Hatef, Fahime Hashemirad, Gholam Hossein Meftahi, Leila Simorgh, Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi, Forough Rahimi, Mansoureh ToghaThe efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic field in refractory migraine headaches: a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group. international journal of clinical trial 3(1): 24-31, 2016

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01670214
Lead sponsor
Niyayesh Clinic
Collaborators
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Boshra Hatef (Phd student of physiotherapy, Tarbiat Modarres University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2012
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Oct 2013
Last update
Feb 17, 2016

Study contacts

Boshra Hatef, Phd student PT,TMU
principal investigator · Niyayesh Clinic
mansoore toghae, prof. neurology,TUMS
study director · sina hospital of Medical Science University of Tehran

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion