CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01664117Updated Apr 4, 2016Results posted

An Observational Study in Clinical Practice Management of Patients With Biological Drugs in Monotherapy

An observational study in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 41 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-04.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
210
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational multicenter study will evaluate the management of disease and safety in clinical practice in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis receiving any biological therapies in monotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 210 is above the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
  • Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or other biological drugs
  • Patients treated with biologic DMARDs alone for at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not willing or unable to give written informed consent for participation in this study
  • Patients who are participating in any clinical trial at the time of this study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
210 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • bDMARD Monotherapy

    Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) will be treated with bDMARD (biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug) monotherapy under routine clinical practice conditions at rheumatology clinics

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Level of Education Completed

    Level of education completed is a component of socio-demographic characteristics. It is recorded as cannot read, no formal education, primary education or equivalent, general secondary education, vocational education, and higher education or equivalent. Data were collected at study entry (Single visit study)

    Time frame: At Visit 1 (Single visit study)

  2. Number of Participants With Smoking Habits

    Smoking habits is a component of socio-demographic characteristics. Participants' smoking status is recorded as non-smoker, smoker, and ex-smoker at Visit 1.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  3. Smoking-habit for Smokers or Ex-smokers (Packs in Years)

    Smoking-habit included number of pack per years is reported.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  4. Smoking-habit or Smokers or Ex-smokers (Smoking/Quit Smoking )

    Smoking-habit included years of smoking/quit smoking is reported for participants.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  5. Mean Time of Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Onset of rheumatoid arthritis is a component of clinical characteristics.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  6. Number of Participants With Family History of Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Family history is a component of clinical characteristics. Participants who had a family history of rheumatoid arthritis is recorded as yes/no. Also, family history related to parents, siblings, aunts and uncles, grandparents, or other is recorded.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  7. Number of Participants With Co-morbidities

    Co-morbidity is a component of clinical characteristics It included stroke, heart failure (grades I, II, III or IV), ischemic heart disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, osteoporosis, interstitial lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, serious infections, tuberculosis, hematological malignancies, solid tumors and others. Participants were assessed into categories with associated co-morbidities as yes and no.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  8. Number of Participants With Extra-articular Manifestations at Visit 1

    Extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) are a component of of clinical characteristics EAMs are symptoms and diseases that occur in parts of the body other than joints. These included the presence of amyloidosis (rare disease that results from the buildup of misfolded proteins), anemia (deficiency of red cells in the blood), heart complications, lung complications, rheumatoid nodules (local swelling), felty's syndrome (presence of rheumatoid arthritis, an enlarged spleen, and an abnormally low white blood cell count), and secondary Sjogren's (an autoimmune disorder that damages moisture-producing glands, making it difficult to produce saliva and tears). Participants were assessed into categories with extra-articular Manifestations as yes, no and missing nos.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  9. Mean Number of Painful and Swollen Joints at Visit 1

    Participants were assessed for painful and swollen joints at Visit 1. Painful joint is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It reflects the amount of inflamed synovial tissue.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  10. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 1

    The Physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  11. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 1

    Patient global assessment of disease activity visual analog scale is assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  12. Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters Values Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1

    Hematology parameters are considered as one of the component of clinical characteristics. Hematology parameters included white blood cells (WBC), platelets, red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  13. Number of Participants With Biochemistry Parameters Values Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1

    Biochemistry parameters is considered as one of the component of clinical characteristics. Biochemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), triglycerides, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and total lipids.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  14. Number of Participants With Presence/Absence Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Protein Antibodies

    Rheumatoid Factor (RF) is the auto antibody directed against Immunoglobulin G and its concentration is observed in human serum or plasma. Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Protein Antibodies (Anti-CCP) antibodies are auto antibodies (antibodies directed against 1 or more of an individual's own proteins) that are frequently detected in the blood of rheumatoid arthritis participants.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  15. Number of Participants With C-reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1

    The test for C-reactive Protein (CRP) is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultra-sensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  16. Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Visit 1

    Participants assessed their pain using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as "unbearable pain"

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  17. Number of Participants With Joint Damage at Visit 1

    Number of participants with joint damage is recorded as yes and no.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  18. Mean Score on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count at Visit 1

    Disease activity score (DAS) 28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  19. Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score by Categorization at Visit 1

    DAS28 is divided into 4 categories as: remission \<2.6, low activity 2.6-3.2, moderate 3.2-5.1 and high \>5.1.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  20. Mean Score on Clinical Disease Activity Index at Visit 1

    Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) of participants is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of number of painful joint, number of swollen joint, patient's VAS (0-10 cm) assessment, physician global VAS assessment (0-10 cm). The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  21. Number of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity by Categorization at Visit 1

    CDAI is divided into 4 categories as: remission \<2.8, low activity 2.8-10, moderate 10-22 and high\>22.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  22. Mean Score on Simple Disease Activity Index at Visit 1

    Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is calculated by sum of number of painful joint and swollen joint count, patient and physician global assessment of disease activity (VAS 0-10 cm), and level of C-reactive protein in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicates greater affect due to disease activity.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  23. Number of Participants With Simple Disease Activity Index Score by Categorization at Visit 1

    SDAI is divided into 4 categories as: remission (\<3.3), low activity (3.3-11), moderate activity (11-26) and high activity (\>26).

    Time frame: At Visit 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Prescribed First Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy Before the Study

    Number of participants prescribed with first synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy (sDMARD) in monotherapy and in a combination before the study was presented.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  2. Mean Time Between Diagnosis and Prescription of First Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug or First Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug

    Mean time in months at Visit 1 between diagnosis and prescription of first sDMARD/ first bDMARD was presented.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  3. Number of Participants Who Received Each sDMARD Before The Study

    Number of participants who previously received sDMARDs before the study in at Visit 1 was reported. sDMARDS included azathioprine, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, gold salts, chloroquine, leflunomide, ciclosporin, methotrexate, and chlorambucil medications.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  4. Number of Participants Who Received Last sDMARD Prescribed Before the Study

    Number of participants who previously received sDMARDs before the study in at Visit 1 was reported. sDMARDS included azathioprine, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, gold salts, leflunomide, ciclosporin, methotrexate, and leflunomide + methotrexate.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  5. Number of Participants Prescribed First bDMARD Before the Study

    Number of participants prescribed first bDMARD before the study was presented.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  6. Number of Participants Who Received Each bDMARD Before the Study

    Number of participant who received bDMARD (etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, adalimumab, abatacept, tocilizumab, rituximab) before the study was reported in at Visit 1.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  7. Mean Time Between the Last sDMARD and bDMARD Received at Visit 1

    Mean time between the last sDMARD and bDMARD received at Visit 1 was presented in months.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  8. Number of Participants With Changing the Previous sDMARD/ bDMARD

    Any reasons for changing the previous sDMARD/bDMARD treatment were recorded as lack of efficacy, adverse events, intolerance, clinical improvement and other. There may be more than one reason for changing sDMARD/ bDMARD per participant.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  9. Number of sDMARD and bDMARDs Received Before the Study Treatment (bDMARD Monotherapy)

    Number of sDMARD and bDMARDs received by Participants before the study was presented

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  10. Number of Participants Received sDMARD, sDMARD+ bDMARD or bDMARD Immediately Before the Study Treatment

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  11. Number of Participants Discontinued the Previous Treatment and Started the Study Treatment

    The reasons for changing the previous sDMARD, sDMARD+ bDMARD or bDMARD treatment and starting the study treatment were recorded as lack of efficacy, adverse events, intolerance, clinical improvement, and other.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  12. Median Time Taking the Biologic Agent in Monotherapy Before the Study Treatment

    Median time in months taking the Biologic Agent in monotherapy before the study was presented.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  13. Number of Participants Treated With Concomitant Medications Before the Study

    Participants received concomitant medications (corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAID\], and other treatment) before the study were presented.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  14. Number of Participants Received Current bDMARD Treatment at the Time of the Study

    Current bDMARD treatment included etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, tocilizumab, rituximab and certolizumab.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  15. Number of Participants Received Other Concomitant Treatments With the Current bDMARD Monotherapy

    Other treatments included corticosteroids, NSAIDs and corticosteroid + NSAID.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  16. Number of Participants With Reasons for Starting Current Biologic Monotherapy

    The reasons for changing current biologic treatment were recorded as lack of efficacy, adverse events, intolerance, clinical improvement and other.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  17. Number of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab, Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor and Other as a Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

    Participants who received tocilizumab, Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and Other treatment of monotherapy were reported.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  18. Mean Time of bDMARD Monotherapy Started at the Time of the Study Since Onset of RA

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  19. Number of sDMARD and bDMARDs Received Before the Study Treatment (Tocilizumab or Other Biologic Agent)

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  20. Mean Score on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simple Disease Activity Index by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

    Mean score of DAS28 index, CDAI index, and SDAI index were recorded for participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study.

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  21. Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Activity Based on Disease Activity Score, Clinical Disease Activity Index Score and Simple Disease Activity Index Score

    Mean score of categorization (remission/low activity and moderate/high activity) of DAS28 index, CDAI index, and SDAI index was recorded for participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study .

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  22. Mean Number of Joint Count for Painful Joints and Swollen Joints by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

    Participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study were assessed for a number of painful joints (NPJ) and swollen joints (NSJ).

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  23. Number of Participants Falling Within Reference Values For C-reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

    Participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study were assessed for C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).

    Time frame: At Visit 1

  24. Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to a Change of Treatment

    An Adverse Event was considered as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Adverse events were collected as a reason for the change to monotherapy.

    Time frame: At the time of change of treatment

  25. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events

    An Any Adverse Events (AEs) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered to be related to the medicinal product. An Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Time frame: At the time of change of treatment (to the current treatment)

07

Results

Posted Apr 4, 2016

Participant flow

A total of 210 participants were enrolled from 38 rheumatology units in Spain. This study was conducted between June 2012 and June 2013.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonebDMARD Monotherapy
Started209
Completed209
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Level of Education Completed

Level of education completed is a component of socio-demographic characteristics. It is recorded as cannot read, no formal education, primary education or equivalent, general secondary education, vocational education, and higher education or equivalent. Data were collected at study entry (Single visit study)

Time frame:
At Visit 1 (Single visit study)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Level of Education Completed
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Cannot read01
No formal education15
Primary education or equivalent86
General secondary education59
Vocational education17
Higher education or equivalent28
Missing03
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Smoking Habits

Smoking habits is a component of socio-demographic characteristics. Participants' smoking status is recorded as non-smoker, smoker, and ex-smoker at Visit 1.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Smoking Habits
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Non-smoker170
Smoker15
Ex-smoker23
Missing01
PrimarySmoking-habit for Smokers or Ex-smokers (Packs in Years)

Smoking-habit included number of pack per years is reported.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Years
Smoking-habit for Smokers or Ex-smokers (Packs in Years)
YearsbDMARD Monotherapy
Number of pack-years, smoker, n = 15120.20 ± 138.33
Number of pack-years, ex-smoker, n = 23122.26 ± 122.08
PrimarySmoking-habit or Smokers or Ex-smokers (Smoking/Quit Smoking )

Smoking-habit included years of smoking/quit smoking is reported for participants.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Years
Smoking-habit or Smokers or Ex-smokers (Smoking/Quit Smoking )
YearsbDMARD Monotherapy
Years smoking/quit smoking, smoker, n = 1518.73 ± 9.84
Years smoking/quit smoking, ex-smoker, n = 239.35 ± 8.39
PrimaryMean Time of Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Onset of rheumatoid arthritis is a component of clinical characteristics.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Years
Mean Time of Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis
YearsbDMARD Monotherapy
Mean Time of Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis13.45 ± 8.77
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Family History of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Family history is a component of clinical characteristics. Participants who had a family history of rheumatoid arthritis is recorded as yes/no. Also, family history related to parents, siblings, aunts and uncles, grandparents, or other is recorded.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Family History of Rheumatoid Arthritis
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Yes15
No160
Unknown34
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Co-morbidities

Co-morbidity is a component of clinical characteristics It included stroke, heart failure (grades I, II, III or IV), ischemic heart disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, osteoporosis, interstitial lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, serious infections, tuberculosis, hematological malignancies, solid tumors and others. Participants were assessed into categories with associated co-morbidities as yes and no.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Co-morbidities
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Yes109
No100
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Extra-articular Manifestations at Visit 1

Extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) are a component of of clinical characteristics EAMs are symptoms and diseases that occur in parts of the body other than joints. These included the presence of amyloidosis (rare disease that results from the buildup of misfolded proteins), anemia (deficiency of red cells in the blood), heart complications, lung complications, rheumatoid nodules (local swelling), felty's syndrome (presence of rheumatoid arthritis, an enlarged spleen, and an abnormally low white blood cell count), and secondary Sjogren's (an autoimmune disorder that damages moisture-producing glands, making it difficult to produce saliva and tears). Participants were assessed into categories with extra-articular Manifestations as yes, no and missing nos.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Extra-articular Manifestations at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Yes59
No148
Missing02
PrimaryMean Number of Painful and Swollen Joints at Visit 1

Participants were assessed for painful and swollen joints at Visit 1. Painful joint is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It reflects the amount of inflamed synovial tissue.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Number of joints
Mean Number of Painful and Swollen Joints at Visit 1
Number of jointsbDMARD Monotherapy
Painful joints1.92 ± 3.00
Swollen joints0.84 ± 2.07
PrimaryPhysician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 1

The Physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 1
Units on a scalebDMARD Monotherapy
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 12.49 ± 1.96
PrimaryPatient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 1

Patient global assessment of disease activity visual analog scale is assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 1
Units on a scalebDMARD Monotherapy
Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Visit 13.11 ± 2.13
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Hematology Parameters Values Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1

Hematology parameters are considered as one of the component of clinical characteristics. Hematology parameters included white blood cells (WBC), platelets, red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin, hematocrit, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters Values Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
WBC, n = 183159
Platelets, n = 180165
RBC, n = 170145
Hemoglobin, n = 192173
Haematocrit, n = 174157
Neutrophils, n = 180140
Basophils, n = 169164
Eosinophils, n = 168153
Lymphocytes, n = 173150
Monocytes, n = 168152
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Biochemistry Parameters Values Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1

Biochemistry parameters is considered as one of the component of clinical characteristics. Biochemistry parameters included alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), triglycerides, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and total lipids.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Biochemistry Parameters Values Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
ALT, n = 184172
AST, n = 172162
Triglycerides, n = 144130
Total cholesterol, n = 156104
HDL, n = 10182
LDL, n = 10276
Total lipids, n = 2321
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Presence/Absence Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Protein Antibodies

Rheumatoid Factor (RF) is the auto antibody directed against Immunoglobulin G and its concentration is observed in human serum or plasma. Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Protein Antibodies (Anti-CCP) antibodies are auto antibodies (antibodies directed against 1 or more of an individual's own proteins) that are frequently detected in the blood of rheumatoid arthritis participants.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Presence/Absence Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Protein Antibodies
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
RF - positive for presence125
RF - negative for presence42
RF - not available42
Anti-CCP antibodies - positive for presence80
Anti-CCP antibodies - negative for presence35
Anti-CCP antibodies - not available94
PrimaryNumber of Participants With C-reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1

The test for C-reactive Protein (CRP) is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultra-sensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With C-reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Falling Within Reference Values at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
CRP180
ESR162
PrimaryPatient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Visit 1

Participants assessed their pain using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as "unbearable pain"

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Visit 1
Units on a scalebDMARD Monotherapy
Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Visit 13.09 ± 2.14
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Joint Damage at Visit 1

Number of participants with joint damage is recorded as yes and no.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Joint Damage at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Yes154
No55
PrimaryMean Score on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count at Visit 1

Disease activity score (DAS) 28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Mean Score on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count at Visit 1
Units on a scalebDMARD Monotherapy
Mean Score on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count at Visit 12.70 ± 1.09
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Disease Activity Score by Categorization at Visit 1

DAS28 is divided into 4 categories as: remission \<2.6, low activity 2.6-3.2, moderate 3.2-5.1 and high \>5.1.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Disease Activity Score by Categorization at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Remission104
Low activity43
Moderate activity59
High activity03
PrimaryMean Score on Clinical Disease Activity Index at Visit 1

Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) of participants is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of number of painful joint, number of swollen joint, patient's VAS (0-10 cm) assessment, physician global VAS assessment (0-10 cm). The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76, where lower scores indicate less disease activity.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Mean Score on Clinical Disease Activity Index at Visit 1
Scores on a scalebDMARD Monotherapy
Mean Score on Clinical Disease Activity Index at Visit 18.36 ± 6.94
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity by Categorization at Visit 1

CDAI is divided into 4 categories as: remission \<2.8, low activity 2.8-10, moderate 10-22 and high\>22.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity by Categorization at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Remission33
Low activity118
Moderate activity52
High activity06
PrimaryMean Score on Simple Disease Activity Index at Visit 1

Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is calculated by sum of number of painful joint and swollen joint count, patient and physician global assessment of disease activity (VAS 0-10 cm), and level of C-reactive protein in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86, where higher scores indicates greater affect due to disease activity.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Mean Score on Simple Disease Activity Index at Visit 1
Scores on a scalebDMARD Monotherapy
Mean Score on Simple Disease Activity Index at Visit 18.76 ± 7.06
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Simple Disease Activity Index Score by Categorization at Visit 1

SDAI is divided into 4 categories as: remission (\<3.3), low activity (3.3-11), moderate activity (11-26) and high activity (\>26).

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Simple Disease Activity Index Score by Categorization at Visit 1
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Remission42
Low activity110
Moderate activity53
High activity04
SecondaryNumber of Participants Prescribed First Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy Before the Study

Number of participants prescribed with first synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy (sDMARD) in monotherapy and in a combination before the study was presented.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Prescribed First Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy Before the Study
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
First sDMARD as monotherapy209
First sDMARD as combination27
SecondaryMean Time Between Diagnosis and Prescription of First Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug or First Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug

Mean time in months at Visit 1 between diagnosis and prescription of first sDMARD/ first bDMARD was presented.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Months
Mean Time Between Diagnosis and Prescription of First Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug or First Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug
MonthsbDMARD Monotherapy
sDMARD, n = 20919.53 ± 52.75
bDMARD, n = 12689.81 ± 86.35
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Received Each sDMARD Before The Study

Number of participants who previously received sDMARDs before the study in at Visit 1 was reported. sDMARDS included azathioprine, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, gold salts, chloroquine, leflunomide, ciclosporin, methotrexate, and chlorambucil medications.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Who Received Each sDMARD Before The Study
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Azathioprine10
Penicillamine5
Sulfasalazine47
Hydroxychloroquine48
Gold salts48
Chloroquine27
Leflunomide130
Ciclosporin16
Methotrexate197
Chlorambucil1
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Received Last sDMARD Prescribed Before the Study

Number of participants who previously received sDMARDs before the study in at Visit 1 was reported. sDMARDS included azathioprine, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, gold salts, leflunomide, ciclosporin, methotrexate, and leflunomide + methotrexate.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Received Last sDMARD Prescribed Before the Study
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Azathioprine1
Penicillamine1
Sulfasalazine13
Hydroxychloroquine10
Gold salts1
Leflunomide62
Ciclosporin1
Methotrexate119
Leflunomide + methotrexate1
SecondaryNumber of Participants Prescribed First bDMARD Before the Study

Number of participants prescribed first bDMARD before the study was presented.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Prescribed First bDMARD Before the Study
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Number of Participants Prescribed First bDMARD Before the Study126
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Received Each bDMARD Before the Study

Number of participant who received bDMARD (etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, adalimumab, abatacept, tocilizumab, rituximab) before the study was reported in at Visit 1.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Received Each bDMARD Before the Study
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Etanercept58
Infliximab48
Golimumab2
Adalimumab61
Abatacept10
Tocilizumab4
Rituximab16
Anakinra2
Certolizumab2
SecondaryMean Time Between the Last sDMARD and bDMARD Received at Visit 1

Mean time between the last sDMARD and bDMARD received at Visit 1 was presented in months.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Months
Mean Time Between the Last sDMARD and bDMARD Received at Visit 1
MonthsbDMARD Monotherapy
sDMARD, n=649.39 ± 19.96
sDMARD + Biologic agent, n=951.78 ± 9.06
Monotherapy, n=5036.69 ± 32.54
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Changing the Previous sDMARD/ bDMARD

Any reasons for changing the previous sDMARD/bDMARD treatment were recorded as lack of efficacy, adverse events, intolerance, clinical improvement and other. There may be more than one reason for changing sDMARD/ bDMARD per participant.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Changing the Previous sDMARD/ bDMARD
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
sDMARD, Lack of efficacy, n = 209343
sDMARD, Adverse events, n = 209135
sDMARD, Intolerance, n = 20925
sDMARD, Clinical improvement, n = 2097
sDMARD, Other, n = 20940
bDMARD, Lack of efficacy, n = 126155
bDMARD, Adverse events, n = 12638
bDMARD, Intolerance, n = 1265
bDMARD, Clinical improvement, n = 1262
bDMARD, Other, n = 12610
SecondaryNumber of sDMARD and bDMARDs Received Before the Study Treatment (bDMARD Monotherapy)

Number of sDMARD and bDMARDs received by Participants before the study was presented

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Number of sDMARD/bDMARD
Number of sDMARD and bDMARDs Received Before the Study Treatment (bDMARD Monotherapy)
Number of sDMARD/bDMARDbDMARD Monotherapy
Number of sDMARD received before the study, n=2092.63 ± 1.36
Number of bDMARD received before the study, n=1261.67 ± 0.93
SecondaryNumber of Participants Received sDMARD, sDMARD+ bDMARD or bDMARD Immediately Before the Study Treatment
Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Received sDMARD, sDMARD+ bDMARD or bDMARD Immediately Before the Study Treatment
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
sDMARD64
sDMARD+ bDMARD95
bDMARD50
SecondaryNumber of Participants Discontinued the Previous Treatment and Started the Study Treatment

The reasons for changing the previous sDMARD, sDMARD+ bDMARD or bDMARD treatment and starting the study treatment were recorded as lack of efficacy, adverse events, intolerance, clinical improvement, and other.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Discontinued the Previous Treatment and Started the Study Treatment
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Lack of efficacy128
Adverse events21
Intolerance16
Clinical improvement22
Other22
SecondaryMedian Time Taking the Biologic Agent in Monotherapy Before the Study Treatment

Median time in months taking the Biologic Agent in monotherapy before the study was presented.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Median · Months
Median Time Taking the Biologic Agent in Monotherapy Before the Study Treatment
MonthsbDMARD Monotherapy
Etanercept, n = 1429.4 (0.7 to 95.9)
Infliximab, n = 931.9 (8.2 to 118.9)
Golimumab, n = 159.5 (59.5 to 59.5)
Adalimumab, n = 1516 (2.0 to 47.9)
Abatacept, n = 418.6 (14.3 to 27.6)
Tocilizumab, n = 110.1 (10.1 to 10.1)
Rituximab, n = 64.1 (0.0 to 34.9)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Treated With Concomitant Medications Before the Study

Participants received concomitant medications (corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAID\], and other treatment) before the study were presented.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Treated With Concomitant Medications Before the Study
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Corticosteroids140
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories drugs128
Other treatment19
SecondaryNumber of Participants Received Current bDMARD Treatment at the Time of the Study

Current bDMARD treatment included etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, tocilizumab, rituximab and certolizumab.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Received Current bDMARD Treatment at the Time of the Study
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Etanercept39
Infliximab3
Adalimumab26
Abatacept8
Tocilizumab122
Rituximab8
Certolizumab3
SecondaryNumber of Participants Received Other Concomitant Treatments With the Current bDMARD Monotherapy

Other treatments included corticosteroids, NSAIDs and corticosteroid + NSAID.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Received Other Concomitant Treatments With the Current bDMARD Monotherapy
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Corticosteroids39
NSAID48
Corticosteroid + NSAID42
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Reasons for Starting Current Biologic Monotherapy

The reasons for changing current biologic treatment were recorded as lack of efficacy, adverse events, intolerance, clinical improvement and other.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Reasons for Starting Current Biologic Monotherapy
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Lack of efficacy128
Adverse events21
Intolerance22
Clinical improvement22
Other16
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab, Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor and Other as a Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

Participants who received tocilizumab, Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and Other treatment of monotherapy were reported.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Received Tocilizumab, Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor and Other as a Monotherapy at the Time of the Study
participantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Tocilizumab122
ANTI-TNF71
Other16
SecondaryMean Time of bDMARD Monotherapy Started at the Time of the Study Since Onset of RA
Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · years
Mean Time of bDMARD Monotherapy Started at the Time of the Study Since Onset of RA
yearsbDMARD Monotherapy
Tocilizumab, n = 12211.34 ± 7.95
Other, n = 8710.23 ± 9.30
SecondaryNumber of sDMARD and bDMARDs Received Before the Study Treatment (Tocilizumab or Other Biologic Agent)
Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Number of sDMARD/bDMARDs/Other
Number of sDMARD and bDMARDs Received Before the Study Treatment (Tocilizumab or Other Biologic Agent)
Number of sDMARD/bDMARDs/OtherbDMARD Monotherapy
No. of sDMARDs tocilizumab before the study,n=1222.59 ± 1.47
Other before the study, n=872.69 ± 1.20
bDMARDs-Tocilizumab before the study,n=1221.34 ± 1.10
bDMARDs-Other before the study, n=870.53 ± 0.87
SecondaryMean Score on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simple Disease Activity Index by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

Mean score of DAS28 index, CDAI index, and SDAI index were recorded for participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study.

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Mean Score on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simple Disease Activity Index by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study
Units on a scaleTocilizumabOther Treatments
DAS282.52 ± 1.062.97 ± 1.07
CDAI8.66 ± 7.307.94 ± 6.42
SDAI8.94 ± 7.348.52 ± 6.67
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorization of Disease Activity Based on Disease Activity Score, Clinical Disease Activity Index Score and Simple Disease Activity Index Score

Mean score of categorization (remission/low activity and moderate/high activity) of DAS28 index, CDAI index, and SDAI index was recorded for participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study .

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Activity Based on Disease Activity Score, Clinical Disease Activity Index Score and Simple Disease Activity Index Score
participantsTocilizumabOther Treatments
DAS28-Remission/low activity9057
DAS28-Moderate/high activity3230
CDAI- Remission/low activity8467
CDAI- Moderate/high activity3820
SDAI- Remission/low activity8468
SDAI- Moderate/high activity3819
SecondaryMean Number of Joint Count for Painful Joints and Swollen Joints by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

Participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study were assessed for a number of painful joints (NPJ) and swollen joints (NSJ).

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Mean · Number of joints
Mean Number of Joint Count for Painful Joints and Swollen Joints by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study
Number of jointsTocilizumabOther Treatments
Mean number of NPJ2.16 ± 3.301.57 ± 2.51
Mean number of NSJ0.96 ± 2.320.68 ± 1.65
SecondaryNumber of Participants Falling Within Reference Values For C-reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study

Participants who received biologic agent in monotherapy at the time of the study were assessed for C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).

Time frame:
At Visit 1
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Falling Within Reference Values For C-reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate by Biologic Agent in Monotherapy at the Time of the Study
participantsTocilizumabOther Treatments
Falling Within Reference Values For CRP11070
Falling Within Reference Values For ESR10854
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to a Change of Treatment

An Adverse Event was considered as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Adverse events were collected as a reason for the change to monotherapy.

Time frame:
At the time of change of treatment
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to a Change of Treatment
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to a Change of Treatment96
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events

An Any Adverse Events (AEs) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered to be related to the medicinal product. An Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame:
At the time of change of treatment (to the current treatment)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsbDMARD Monotherapy
Any AEs27
Any SAEs07

Adverse events

Collected over At the time of change of treatment (to the current treatment). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
bDMARD Monotherapy—7/209 (3.3%)27/209 (12.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventbDMARD Monotherapy
ThrombopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/209
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/209
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/209
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders1/209
Pancreatitis acuteGastrointestinal disorders1/209
Pancreatitis chronicGastrointestinal disorders1/209
JaundiceHepatobiliary disorders1/209
Lung infectionInfections and infestations1/209
Transaminase value increasedInvestigations1/209
Interstitial pneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/209
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventbDMARD Monotherapy
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders11/209
Transaminases increasedInvestigations11/209
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders10/209

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)bDMARD Monotherapy
Mean57.61 ± 13.59
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)bDMARD Monotherapy
Female173
Male36
08

Study locations

41 sites
  • Vitoria, Alava 01009, Spain
  • Elche, Alicante 03203, Spain
  • Oviedo, Asturias 33006, Spain
  • Zafra, Badajoz 06300, Spain
  • Sabadell, Barcelona 08208, Spain
  • Viladecans, Barcelona 08840, Spain
  • Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz 11407, Spain
  • Vinaroz, Castellon 12500, Spain
  • Cenes de la vega, Granada 18190, Spain
  • Granda, Granada 18190, Spain
  • San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa 20080, Spain
  • Ibiza, Islas Baleares 07800, Spain
  • Inca, Islas Baleares 07300, Spain
  • Manacor (Islas Baleares), Islas Baleares 07500, Spain
  • Jaén, Jaen 23007, Spain
  • La Coruna, La Coruña 15006, Spain
  • Alcala de Henares, Madrid 28805, Spain
  • Benalmadena, Malaga 29630, Spain
  • Vigo, Pontevedra 36214, Spain
  • Gandia, Valencia 46700, Spain
  • Alicante, 03010, Spain
  • Burgos, 06006, Spain
  • Caceres, 10310, Spain
  • Cordoba, 14001, Spain
  • Girona, 17007, Spain
  • Madrid, 28006, Spain
  • Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Madrid, 28222, Spain
  • Madrid, 28905, Spain
  • Malaga, 29005, Spain
  • Murcia, 30008, Spain
  • Palencia, 34005, Spain
  • Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • Sevilla, 41018, Spain
  • Tenerife, 38010, Spain
  • Toledo, 45004, Spain
  • Valencia, 46015, Spain
  • Valladolid, 47005, Spain
  • Zamora, 49022, Spain
  • Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01664117
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 14, 2012
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Apr 4, 2016
Last update
Apr 4, 2016

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion