ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01661621Updated Jun 25, 2014Results posted

Antimuscarinics as the First-line Treatment for Male With IPSS-V/S≤1

A Phase 4 interventional study of Detrusitol 4 mg QD and Doxazosin 4 mg QD in Bladder Outlet Obstruction, sponsored by Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to male participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-25.

Sponsored by Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
395
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective randomized, open label, controlled, double arm, post-marketing study to compare the treatment efficacy of first-line antimuscarinics and α-blockers monotherapy for men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS-T) ≥8) and IPSS voiding-to-storage subscore ratio (IPSS-V/S) ≤1.

Read the detailed description
  1. STUDY PROCEDURE

1.1.General Study Design This study is a prospective randomized, open label, controlled, double arm, post-marketing study to compare the treatment efficacy of first-line antimuscarinics and α-blockers monotherapy for men with moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS-T ≥8) and IPSS-V/S ≤1.

1.2. Study Visits and Evaluations

1.2.1 Screening Visit (Baseline, 1 day to 1 week of the first treatment day).

1.2.1.1 Explain the nature of the study and have patients to read and sign an Informed Consent Form.

1.2.1.2 Screen patients for inclusion/exclusion criteria. 1.2.1.3 Medical History of lower urinary tract symptoms and previous treatment modalities.

1.2.1.4 Vital signs monitoring, general physical examinations of all systems (including digital rectal examination), serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA), and urinalysis.

1.2.1.5 Record Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), IPSS (IPSS-T, IPSS voiding (IPSS-V), and IPSS storage (IPSS-S)), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OAB-SS), and quality of Life index (QoL-I)scores.

1.2.1.6 Obtain maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, postvoid residual volume (PVR), total prostate volume (TPV), and transitional zone index (TZI).

1.2.1.7 Randomized assigned patients into 2 groups; men in one group received Doxazosin 4 mg QD, and those in the other group received Detrusitol 4 mg QD.

1.2.2 First Evaluation Visit (2 weeks after the initial treatment) 1.2.2.1 Vital signs monitoring and record adverse events. 1.2.2.2 Record PPBC, IPSS (IPSS-T, IPSS-V, IPSS-S), OAB-SS and QoL. 1.2.2.3 Check urinalysis for urinary tract infection if patient has symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infection.

1.2.2.4 Check Qmax, voided volume, and PVR.

1.2.3 Second Evaluation Visit (4 weeks after the treatment). 1.2.3.1 Vital signs monitoring and record adverse events. 1.2.3.3 Check urinalysis for urinary tract infection if patient has symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infection.

1.2.3.4 Check Qmax, voided volume, and PVR.

1.2.4 Third Evaluation Visit (3 months after the treatment). 1.2.4.1 Vital signs monitoring and record adverse events. 1.2.4.2 Record PPBC, IPSS (IPSS-T, IPSS-V, IPSS-S), OAB-SS and QoL. 1.2.4.3 Check urinalysis for urinary tract infection if patient has symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infection.

1.2.4.4 Check Qmax, voided volume, and PVR.

1.3. Withdrawal Criteria

Patients with any of the following conditions may be withdrawn from the trial:

1.3.1. Patients decide to withdraw their consent. 1.3.2. Patients indicate the status of lack of efficacy which is of clinical significance judged by the investigators that may lead to permanent damage to the patients.

1.3.3. Investigators consider that there is of safety concerns for the patients to remain in the trial (such as development severe medical disease).

1.3.4. Lost of follow-up or death. 1.3.5. PVR≥300 mL

1.4. Concomitant Treatments Investigator will try to minimize the concomitant medications for the patients during the trial duration. However, patients are allowed to continue taking stable medication in stable dose for diseases other than genitourinary system.

1.5. Prohibited medication

Patients are not allowed to take any of the following medications during the study:

  1. Anticholinergics other than test drug
  2. Alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers
  3. Tricyclic anti-depressants
  4. Calcium channel blockers
  5. Skeletal muscle relaxant
  6. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors
02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Outlet Obstruction

Keywords

  • Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
  • International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
  • Antimuscarinics
  • α-blockers
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 395 is above the median of 88 across 30 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction studies →

Lead sponsor

Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men aged ≥40 years with lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS ≥8)
  • Patient or his/her legally acceptable representative has signed the written form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease and such as congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, poorly controlled hypertension, not able to receive regular follow-up
  • Patients with urinary retention, urodynamically proven detrusor underactivity or PVR ≥250 mL
  • Patients with known active urinary tract infection, urinary stone or
  • Patients with history of urethral injury or transurethral surgery for prostate or bladder
  • Patients have laboratory abnormalities at screening including:

    1. (AST) >3 x
    2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 x upper limit of normal range
    3. Patients have abnormal serum creatinine level >2 x upper limit of normal range
  • Patients with any other serious disease or condition considered by the investigator not suitable for entry into the trial
  • Patients participated drug trial within 1 month before entering this study
  • Patients with major psychiatric illness or drug abuse
  • Patients taken medication such as alpha-blocker, antimuscarinic or 5 alpha-reductase (5AR) inhibitor within 6 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
395 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1

    Antimuscarinics (Detrusitol 4 mg QD)

    Drug: Detrusitol 4 mg QD

  • Experimental
    Group 2

    α-blockers (Doxazosin 4 mg QD)

    Drug: Doxazosin 4 mg QD

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Global Response Assessment (GRA) After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy Using global response assessment (GRA) to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1month. The global response assessment on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 "No problems at all" to 6 "Many severe problems". Changes of the global response assessment (GRA) improved or reduction by 1 points. Change = Baseline minus Month 1 value Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, dry eye, blurred vision, constipation, dizziness or general weakness

    Time frame: 1 month after initial treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy: Using the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is an 7 symptom questions including 4 voiding questions (IPSS-voiding), 3 storage questions (IPSS-Storage) The symptom score have 6-point scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Almost always". Total IPSS score = IPSS-voiding + IPSS-Storage Rang = 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Mild = 0 to 7; Moderate = 8 to 19; Severe = 20 to 35 Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  2. The Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax) After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy: Net change used the the maximum flow rate (Qmax) in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  3. The Voided Volume After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy: Net change used the the voided volume in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  4. The Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy: Net change used the the postvoid residual volume (PVR) in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  5. The IPSS Subscore (IPSS Voiding) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy: Using the the IPSS subscore (IPSS Voiding) questionnaires to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. The IPSS subscore (IPSS Voiding) questionnaires is a 4 symptom questions. The symptom score have 6-point scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Almost always". Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total IPSS Voiding score can therefore range from 0 to 20 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  6. The IPSS Subscore (IPSS Storage) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy: Using the the IPSS subscore (IPSS Storage) to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. The IPSS subscore (IPSS Storage) is a 3 symptom questions. The symptom score have 6-point scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Almost always". Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total IPSS Storage score can therefore range from 0 to 15 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  7. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Score After the Treatment Day

    Efficacy: Using the the the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) quality of life (QoL) score to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1month. The IPSS quality of life question score on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 "Delighted" to 6 "Terrible". IPSS-QoL ranges 0 to 6 (Delighted to Terrible) Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

07

Results

Posted Jun 25, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1Group 2
Started116279
Completed116279
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Global Response Assessment (GRA) After the Treatment Day

Efficacy Using global response assessment (GRA) to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1month. The global response assessment on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 "No problems at all" to 6 "Many severe problems". Changes of the global response assessment (GRA) improved or reduction by 1 points. Change = Baseline minus Month 1 value Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, dry eye, blurred vision, constipation, dizziness or general weakness

Time frame:
1 month after initial treatment
Reported as:
Number · participants
The Global Response Assessment (GRA) After the Treatment Day
participantsGroup 1Group 2
GRA≥189218
GRA<12761
SecondaryThe International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day

Efficacy: Using the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is an 7 symptom questions including 4 voiding questions (IPSS-voiding), 3 storage questions (IPSS-Storage) The symptom score have 6-point scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Almost always". Total IPSS score = IPSS-voiding + IPSS-Storage Rang = 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Mild = 0 to 7; Moderate = 8 to 19; Severe = 20 to 35 Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day
units on a scaleGroup 1Group 2
Baseline14.8 ± 5.4018.0 ± 6.47
1 month11.2 ± 6.8110.8 ± 6.36
SecondaryThe Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax) After the Treatment Day

Efficacy: Net change used the the maximum flow rate (Qmax) in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · mL/s
The Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax) After the Treatment Day
mL/sGroup 1Group 2
Baseline13.1 ± 8.1011.4 ± 5.95
1 month13.6 ± 7.9013.6 ± 6.63
SecondaryThe Voided Volume After the Treatment Day

Efficacy: Net change used the the voided volume in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · mL
The Voided Volume After the Treatment Day
mLGroup 1Group 2
Baseline212.5 ± 168.8244.0 ± 148.3
1 month231.6 ± 163.6268.3 ± 150.7
SecondaryThe Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) After the Treatment Day

Efficacy: Net change used the the postvoid residual volume (PVR) in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · mL
The Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) After the Treatment Day
mLGroup 1Group 2
Baseline50.1 ± 62.653.9 ± 58.7
1 month60.4 ± 60.442.9 ± 49.3
SecondaryThe IPSS Subscore (IPSS Voiding) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day

Efficacy: Using the the IPSS subscore (IPSS Voiding) questionnaires to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. The IPSS subscore (IPSS Voiding) questionnaires is a 4 symptom questions. The symptom score have 6-point scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Almost always". Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total IPSS Voiding score can therefore range from 0 to 20 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The IPSS Subscore (IPSS Voiding) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day
units on a scaleGroup 1Group 2
Baseline5.31 ± 3.5112.3 ± 4.37
1 month4.84 ± 4.756.49 ± 4.97
SecondaryThe IPSS Subscore (IPSS Storage) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day

Efficacy: Using the the IPSS subscore (IPSS Storage) to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1 month. The IPSS subscore (IPSS Storage) is a 3 symptom questions. The symptom score have 6-point scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Almost always". Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The total IPSS Storage score can therefore range from 0 to 15 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The IPSS Subscore (IPSS Storage) Questionnaires After the Treatment Day
units on a scaleGroup 1Group 2
Baseline9.51 ± 3.055.70 ± 3.09
1 month6.40 ± 3.474.31 ± 2.80
SecondaryThe International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Score After the Treatment Day

Efficacy: Using the the the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) quality of life (QoL) score to compare the efficacy in Group 1 and Group 2 from baseline to 1month. The IPSS quality of life question score on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 "Delighted" to 6 "Terrible". IPSS-QoL ranges 0 to 6 (Delighted to Terrible) Safety: Systemic adverse events such as difficult urination, dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation, dry eye, dizziness, or general weakness

Time frame:
Baseline and 1 month
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Score After the Treatment Day
units on a scaleGroup 1Group 2
Baseline3.91 ± 1.013.88 ± 0.82
1 month2.82 ± 1.182.82 ± 0.96

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1—0/116 (0%)18/116 (15.5%)
Group 2—0/279 (0%)33/279 (11.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGroup 1Group 2
DizzinessGeneral disorders12/1160/279
Dry mouthGeneral disorders0/11613/279
Blurred visionGeneral disorders0/11610/279
General weaknessGeneral disorders3/1160/279
PalpitationGeneral disorders3/1160/279
Dry eyeGeneral disorders0/1167/279
ConstipationGeneral disorders0/1163/279

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group 1Group 2Total
Mean68.4 ± 11.365.6 ± 10.566.4 ± 10.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Female000
Male116279395
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Taiwan116279395
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
    Hualien, 970, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available. PubMed 11857671 ↗
  • Chapple CR, Roehrborn CG. A shifted paradigm for the further understanding, evaluation, and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: focus on the bladder. Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.018. Epub 2006 Feb 17. PubMed 16530611 ↗
  • Athanasopoulos A, Gyftopoulos K, Giannitsas K, Fisfis J, Perimenis P, Barbalias G. Combination treatment with an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic for bladder outlet obstruction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2253-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067541.73285.eb. PubMed 12771763 ↗
  • Lee JY, Kim HW, Lee SJ, Koh JS, Suh HJ, Chancellor MB. Comparison of doxazosin with or without tolterodine in men with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction and an overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):817-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05039.x. PubMed 15476515 ↗
  • Kaplan SA, Roehrborn CG, Rovner ES, Carlsson M, Bavendam T, Guan Z. Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 15;296(19):2319-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.19.2319. Erratum In: JAMA. 2007 Mar 21:297(11):1195. JAMA. 2007 Oct 24;298(16):1864. PubMed 17105794 ↗
  • Kaplan SA, McCammon K, Fincher R, Fakhoury A, He W. Safety and tolerability of solifenacin add-on therapy to alpha-blocker treated men with residual urgency and frequency. J Urol. 2009 Dec;182(6):2825-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.023. Epub 2009 Oct 17. PubMed 19837435 ↗
  • Chung DE, Te AE, Staskin DR, Kaplan SA. Efficacy and safety of tolterodine extended release and dutasteride in male overactive bladder patients with prostates >30 grams. Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Mar 5. PubMed 20206978 ↗
  • Chung SD, Chang HC, Chiu B, Liao CH, Kuo HC. The efficacy of additive tolterodine extended release for 1-year in older men with storage symptoms and clinical benign proastatic hyperplasia. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Apr;30(4):568-71. doi: 10.1002/nau.20923. Epub 2011 Feb 22. PubMed 21344494 ↗
  • Blake-James BT, Rashidian A, Ikeda Y, Emberton M. The role of anticholinergics in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2007 Jan;99(1):85-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06574.x. Epub 2006 Oct 9. PubMed 17026588 ↗
  • Martin-Merino E, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Masso-Gonzalez EL, Roehrborn CG. Do oral antimuscarinic drugs carry an increased risk of acute urinary retention? J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 15. PubMed 19683302 ↗
  • McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, Donnell RF, Foster HE Jr, Gonzalez CM, Kaplan SA, Penson DF, Ulchaker JC, Wei JT. Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1793-803. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.074. Epub 2011 Mar 21. PubMed 21420124 ↗
  • Djavan B, Margreiter M, Dianat SS. An algorithm for medical management in male lower urinary tract symptoms. Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Jan;21(1):5-12. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834100ef. PubMed 21045704 ↗
  • Kaplan SA, Roehrborn CG, Abrams P, Chapple CR, Bavendam T, Guan Z. Antimuscarinics for treatment of storage lower urinary tract symptoms in men: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;65(4):487-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02611.x. Epub 2011 Jan 7. PubMed 21210910 ↗
  • Athanasopoulos A, Chapple C, Fowler C, Gratzke C, Kaplan S, Stief C, Tubaro A. The role of antimuscarinics in the management of men with symptoms of overactive bladder associated with concomitant bladder outlet obstruction: an update. Eur Urol. 2011 Jul;60(1):94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.054. Epub 2011 Apr 9. PubMed 21497434 ↗
  • Chapple C. Antimuscarinics in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Jan;20(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283330862. PubMed 19875964 ↗
  • Liao CH, Chung SD, Kuo HC. Diagnostic value of International Prostate Symptom Score voiding-to-storage subscore ratio in male lower urinary tract symptoms. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 May;65(5):552-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02638.x. PubMed 21489080 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01661621
Lead sponsor
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
Responsible party
Hann-Chorng Kuo (Department of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2012
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Aug 2013
Results posted
Jun 25, 2014
Last update
Jun 25, 2014

Study contacts

Hann-Chorng Kuo, M.D.
principal investigator · Department of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital and Tzu Chi University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Tolterodine · Doxazosin

Start the discussion