ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01653951Updated Jul 20, 2015

Comparative Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Diabetes Management in the Uninsured

An interventional study of nurse-led care management or peer-led self management in Diabetes, sponsored by Summa Health System. Completed. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-20.

Sponsored by Summa Health System · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The results of the pre-pilot and pilot studies will be used to determine the feasibility of a fully powered trial that will test the effectiveness of two different approaches to diabetes management in an uninsured diabetic population who receives their care from a community based free clinic, namely nurse-directed interdisciplinary care management compared to peer-led self management. Effective programs for the uninsured diabetic will benefit both the individual and society by preventing serious illness, decreasing mortality and disability, decreasing medical debt, stimulating economic growth, improving business productivity, reducing job lock, decreasing health disparities, improving quality of life, and reducing cost shifting by decreasing uncompensated care. Findings will be generalizable to uninsured and insured patients across a wide spectrum of chronic conditions.

Read the detailed description

The randomized pre-pilot and pilot studies will inform the design of a fully powered trial that will test the effectiveness of a nurse-led interdisciplinary care management intervention (CM) for improving hemoglobin A1c in uninsured diabetic patients who receive their primary medical care from a community-based free clinic compared to similar patients who undergo peer-led self management (SM). The comparative effectiveness of these approaches has not been tested in a randomized trial.

To ensure the success of the pilot study the investigators will perform a 6 month pre-pilot study using 10 patients per group. This pre-pilot will be used to establish protocols covering enrollment, HIPAA, consent, interventions and outcome measurement. The subsequent 1 year pilot will be used to demonstrate feasibility, estimate recruitment, attendance and follow up, refine inclusion criteria, provide power analysis, optimize the interventions and determine appropriate secondary outcomes for a fully powered trial. For the pilot, thirty patients will be randomized to the CM intervention for the first 6 months. Major components of the nurse-led CM model include: 1) assessment and goal setting for self-management; 2) education for self efficacy and productive clinical encounters; 3) access to specialist care via an interdisciplinary team; 4) evidence-based treatment recommendations responsive to patients' goals; and 5) care coordination by a nurse care manager. From 6-12 months patients will return to usual clinic care.

The 30 patients randomized to the SM group will be invited to attend weekly peer-led SM training broadly based on the Stanford University Diabetes Self-management Program's Train the Trainer Model. The training will occur over 6 weeks and will cover topics common to most chronic disease SM programs including: goal setting, self-management of chronic conditions, making action plans, feedback and problem solving, handling emotions, symptom management techniques, communication with health care providers, medications and making treatment decisions. The peer advisors and a nurse will then lead 1 hour monthly group sessions for the remainder of the first 6 months for review/revision of action plans, review of self management techniques and ongoing social persuasion and modeling. From 6-12 months patients will return to usual clinic care.

For the pilot, outcome measures will be obtained at 6 and 12 months. For this pilot, the investigators will not test any hypotheses. Instead, effect sizes and confidence intervals will be calculated for each outcome. These results will be used for power analysis. The results will also allow us to see which interventions are most effective on which outcomes and allow us to optimize the interventions to have the greatest impact on the primary outcome, hemoglobin A1c. Cost effectiveness will be determined in a fully powered trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes

Browse trials for

03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

11,090 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 80 across 8,491 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Summa Health System is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients will be eligible if they are between the ages of 25 and 75,
  • have a diagnosis of diabetes (type II) with a hemoglobin A1c >[7.0] There will be no exclusions based on gender, race or ethnicity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have no other illness that would dominate their care (e.g., terminal cancer, numerous exacerbations of CHF), and
  • are not pregnant.
  • patients must have no cognitive impairment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nurse-led care management

    Nurse-led care management involves a nurse care manager who performs a comprehensive assessment of the patient then presents those assessment findings to an interdisciplinary team. The team makes care recommendations that are implemented by the care manager in collaboration with the patient's PCP.

    Other: nurse-led care management or peer-led self management

  • Experimental
    peer-led self managment

    Peer-led self management follows the chronic disease self management model where peer counselors lead self management classes for 6 weeks, then conduct monthly support groups

    Other: nurse-led care management or peer-led self management

Interventions

  • Othernurse-led care management or peer-led self management
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. hemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: change from baseline at 6 months for pre-pilot and change from baseline at 6 months and change from baseline at 12 months for pilot

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2011, a primary completion of Apr 2015 and a completion of Apr 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 20, 2012
First posted
Jul 31, 2012
Start
Aug 2011
Primary completionActual
Apr 2015
CompletionActual
Apr 2015
Last update
Jul 20, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01653951
Lead sponsor
Summa Health System
Responsible party
Edward Scott (Physician, Summa Health System) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2012
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Last update
Jul 20, 2015

Study contacts

Edward D Scott, MD
principal investigator · Summa Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion