CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01650714Updated May 14, 2015

Endoscopic Full Thickness Biopsy, Gastric Wall.

An interventional study of Full thickness gastric biopsy and Full thickness gastric biopsy in Gastroparesis, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-14.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed study will assess the efficacy and safety of the innovative endoscopic technique for the acquisition of full thickness gastric muscle wall biopsies. Having access to full thickness biopsies will allow an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal diseases such as functional gastrointestinal disorders, gastroparesis, pseudoobstruction and other motility disorders. This information is essential to development of more targeted and effective therapy than currently available. Despite the high prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders and its significant impact on social and health care costs, the underlying cause is not well understood and there is no effective specific treatment to successfully alleviate patient symptoms.

Read the detailed description

Our group has studied a new endoscopic method using a submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap (SEMF) technique to acquire full thickness gastric tissues successfully and safely in preclinical studies.

The proposed study will assess the efficacy and safety of the innovative endoscopic technique for the acquisition of full thickness gastric muscle wall biopsies. Having access to full thickness biopsies will allow an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal diseases such as functional gastrointestinal disorders, gastroparesis, pseudoobstruction and other motility disorders. This information is essential to development of more targeted and effective therapy than currently available. Despite the high prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders and its significant impact on social and health care costs, the underlying cause is not well understood and there is no effective specific treatment to successfully alleviate patient symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroparesis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Gastroparesis

307 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroparesis; 68 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 44 across 202 interventional studies indexed under Gastroparesis.

Browse Gastroparesis studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Symptomatic refractory idiopathic gastroparesis:

    1. The refractory nature of symptoms (e.g. based on nutritional failure, consideration for enteral or parenteral nutrition) will be determined by the physician/gastroenterologist who is the primary care provider for the patient's gastroparesis.
    2. Patients will have documentation within the last 2 years of delayed gastric emptying with >30% retained gastric contents at 4 hours based on 296 kcal solid-liquid, fat-containing standard meal gastric emptying test.
    3. The patient's physician will determine if this procedure may potentially provide prognostic and therapeutic options.
  2. Age > 18 and \< 70 years old
  3. Hemoglobin (Hb) > 10g, platelets >150,000 and prothrombin time- international normalized ratio (INR) \<1.5
  4. Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior oropharyngeal, esophageal, gastric or small bowel surgery
  2. Esophageal stricture
  3. Prior abdominal radiation therapy
  4. Prior feeding tube placement
  5. Coagulopathy
  6. Use of Coumadin or anti-platelet drugs e.g. Plavix, steroids or immunosuppressive drugs
  7. Pregnancy -
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Full thickness gastric biopsy

    Full thickness gastric biopsy

    Other: Full thickness gastric biopsy · Procedure: Full thickness gastric biopsy

Interventions

  • OtherFull thickness gastric biopsy
  • ProcedureFull thickness gastric biopsy
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with successful endoscopic full thickness gastric resection

    Success of the endoscopic resection will be defined by efficacy and safety: 1) Efficacy is defined as obtaining a full thickness resection and 2) Safety is defined as the absence of serious adverse events.

    Time frame: one week after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55902, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01650714
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Elizabeth Rajan (MD, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 26, 2012
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Last update
May 14, 2015

Study contacts

Elizabeth Rajan, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion