CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01646372Updated Apr 28, 2017

Does Instruction on Cognitive Aid Use Improve Performance and Retention of Skills?

An interventional study of Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching and Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training in Long-term Retention of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills, sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-28.

Sponsored by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether formal instruction on the use of cognitive aids in managing a crisis will result in better longterm retention of knowledge and skills. In particular, this study examines the impact of cognitive aid teaching on the Advanced Cardiac Life Support course.

02

Conditions studied

  • Long-term Retention of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills

Keywords

  • Medical Education
  • Cognitive Aid
  • Crisis Resource Management
  • Advanced Cardiac Life Support
  • Skills Retention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Post-graduate Medical trainee in departments of Anesthesia, Emergency Medicine, Critical Care, Family Medicine, Internal Medicine
  • Has taken ACLS Course at least once

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Never taken ACLS Course
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    This group gets a simulation based ACLS refresher as treatment, but no access to cognitive aids for any of the tests.

    Other: Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching

  • Active comparator
    2nd Control Group

    This group receives a standard Simulation based ACLS refresher as the intervention, like the control group. No mention is made of Cognitive Aids in the teaching, but they are available during the post-test and retention post-test.

    Other: Standard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Aid Group

    This group receives Cognitive Aid based teaching as the intervention. They also have access to cognitive aids for post-test and retention post-test

    Other: Cognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training

Interventions

  • OtherStandard Simulation Based ACLS Refresher Teaching

    45min-1 hour time. 15 minutes didactic review of 2010 ACLS guidelines followed by practice simulated megacodes

  • OtherCognitive Aid based ACLS Refresher training

    45min-1 hour time. 15 minutes didactic review of 2010 ACLS guidelines followed by simulated ACLS megacode practice focused on the use of Cognitive Aids to guide management.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ACLS Megacode Examination Scale Score

    Simulated scenarios will be videotaped. These will be scored according to the ACLS megacode testing checklist by trained video raters

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anesthesia Non-Technical Skills Scale (ANTS)

    Simulated Scenarios will be videotaped. Videos will be scored by trained raters according to the validated Anesthesia Nontechnical Skills Scale.

    Time frame: 6 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Ottawa Hospital
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01646372
Lead sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
The Academy for Innovation in Medical Education, The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 20, 2012
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2016
Completion
Jan 31, 2017
Last update
Apr 28, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion