CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01646216Updated Jan 14, 2019Results posted

Long Term Split Belt Treadmill Training for Stroke Recovery

An interventional study of Split belt treadmill in Stroke and Hemiparesis, sponsored by Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-14.

Sponsored by Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether split belt or conventional treadmill training can be used to treat walking pattern deficits from stroke and to determine whether this improves gait asymmetry and metabolic efficiency.

Read the detailed description

Coordination between the legs during walking is often disrupted after neurological injury, resulting in asymmetric gait patterns. Recent data shows that walking patterns can be altered through treadmill training, even after central nervous system damage. The investigators have studied short-term adaptation of inter-limb coordination during walking using a split-belt treadmill to control speed of the two legs independently. Our findings demonstrate that walking patterns are adaptable. The investigators have also shown that people with cerebral damage from stroke can benefit in the short-term to correct asymmetric walking patterns. Since all of our previous work has focused on single training sessions or up to 4 week training sessions, the investigators would like to study long-term effects of split belt treadmill training. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to prepare for a clinical trial of split-belt treadmill training to treat walking pattern deficits from cerebral damage. The investigators will gather data to determine whether different types of treadmill training on a custom split-belt treadmill are likely to change/improve walking symmetry as well as metabolic efficiency.

The investigators will study adults with cerebral damage due to stroke. Subjects with hemiparesis will undergo training 3 times a week for a total of 33 training session. These 33 sessions will be broken into 3 blocks of 11 sessions. After each block of 11 sessions an evaluation will be done to record any gait improvements. Training for the subjects with hemiparesis will either be conventional treadmill walking (both legs moving at the same speed) or split-belt treadmill walking (with one leg moving faster than the other). These studies will provide important new information about normal mechanisms of locomotor adaptation, as well as providing a new rehabilitation tool for people with asymmetric gait patterns. Note that this study is not an aerobic conditioning program since subjects will work well below their age-adjusted target heart rate; it is instead a retraining program aimed at teaching people a new inter-limb coordination pattern as well as to determine whether this training can influence the subject's body's ability to use its intake of oxygen more efficiently. This study is also critical for developing procedural reliability processes, calculating effect sizes, training clinical staff, and determining other salient clinical variables in preparation for a randomized clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • treadmill
  • walking
  • hemiparesis
  • training
03

In context

Stroke

7,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,006 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 50 across 5,370 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • stroke or hemiparesis (>6 months post stroke)
  • able to walk but has residual gait deficit (including those who walk with a cane or walker)
  • This is their first and only stroke
  • Able to walk for 5 minutes at their self-paced speed
  • Adults age 20-80

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cerebellar signs (e.g.ataxic hemiparesis)
  • Any neurologic condition other than stroke
  • Insulin dependent diabetes
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Peripheral artery disease with claudication
  • Pulmonary or renal failure
  • Unstable angina
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (>190/110 mmHg)
  • Dementia
  • Severe aphasia
  • Orthopedic or pain conditions that limit walking
  • Total joint replacement in the lower extremities
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Split-belt treadmill training

    Split-belt treadmill exercise

    Behavioral: Split belt treadmill

Interventions

  • BehavioralSplit belt treadmill

    A split belt treadmill is like a typical treadmill that is seen in the gym, except that this treadmill has two belts that move instead of just one. One leg goes on one belt and the other leg uses the other belt. The belt speeds can be set to move at the same speed, making this treadmill similar to any regular treadmill, but, belt speeds can also be set so that one belt moves a little faster than the other. The belts are never set at a running or jogging speed, only a self-paced walking speed regardless of whether the belts are both going the same or slightly different speeds.

    Also known as: Woodway Split Belt Treadmill, Company: Woodway USA, Inc

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Baseline Step Length Symmetry. That is, Whether the Steps With Right and Left Legs Are the Same Length.

    Subjects will either walk on a special mat that records their step lengths, or will wear special markers on the feet and body to record their step lengths.

    Time frame: After training (week 14), and 3 months after training

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Baseline Oxygen Intake

    This is the change in metabolic power that is required of a subject to walk at their self selected walking speed on the treadmill. Metabolic power was measured at baseline, post training, and three months after training. We report the difference between post training and baseline and three months and baseline.

    Time frame: Post training (week 14), and 3 months follow up

  2. Walking Speed

    Subjects walked on an electronic walkway and walking speed was calculated by total distance divided by total time.

    Time frame: Baseline, post training, and 3 month follow up.

07

Results

Posted May 4, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Some subjects could not complete all of the tasks. Recruitment was also challenging.

Participant flow

All subjects recruited were 6 months or more post stroke. During 2012-2016 recruitment was done by the following means: Subjects were referred by local physicians and recruited from databases of previous studies. Flyers were disseminated locally. Presentations were made at local stroke support groups.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSplit-belt Treadmill ExerciseTied-belt Treadmill Exercise
Started1717
Completed64
Not completed1113
Withdrew: Baseline step length difference (<5cm)1010
Withdrew: Did not complete training02
Withdrew: Investigator decision11

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Baseline Step Length Symmetry. That is, Whether the Steps With Right and Left Legs Are the Same Length.

Subjects will either walk on a special mat that records their step lengths, or will wear special markers on the feet and body to record their step lengths.

Time frame:
After training (week 14), and 3 months after training
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Change in Baseline Step Length Symmetry. That is, Whether the Steps With Right and Left Legs Are the Same Length.
ratioSplit-belt, Mild DisabilitySplit-belt, Moderate DisabilitySplit-belt Severe DisabilityTied-belt, Severe DisabilityTied-belt Mild Disability
Post training0.001 (0.001 to 0.001)-0.078 (-0.101 to -0.055)-0.045 (-0.057 to -0.033)0.144 (-0.765 to 0.233)-0.034 (-0.034 to -0.034)
Follow up0.010 (0.007 to 0.013)-0.075 (-0.091 to -0.058)-0.124 (-0.221 to -0.028)-0.096 (-0.412 to 0.125)-0.027 (-0.027 to -0.027)
SecondaryChange in Baseline Oxygen Intake

This is the change in metabolic power that is required of a subject to walk at their self selected walking speed on the treadmill. Metabolic power was measured at baseline, post training, and three months after training. We report the difference between post training and baseline and three months and baseline.

Time frame:
Post training (week 14), and 3 months follow up
Reported as:
Mean · ml/kg/min
Change in Baseline Oxygen Intake
ml/kg/minSplit-belt, Mild DisabilitySplit-belt, Moderate DisabilitySplit-belt Severe DisabilityTied-belt, Severe DisabilityTied-belt Mild Disability
Change at post training0.82 (0.13 to 1.5)-.61 (-.79 to -.43)0.65 (-.59 to 1.89)4.616 (NA to NA)-2.272 (NA to NA)
Change at follow up0.86 (0.26 to 1.46)-0.84 (-0.9 to -0.79)-0.85 (-0.85 to NA)4.009 (NA to NA)-2.675 (NA to NA)
SecondaryWalking Speed

Subjects walked on an electronic walkway and walking speed was calculated by total distance divided by total time.

Time frame:
Baseline, post training, and 3 month follow up.
Reported as:
Mean · meters per second (m/s)
Walking Speed
meters per second (m/s)Split-belt, Mild DisabilitySplit-belt, Moderate DisabilitySplit-belt Severe DisabilityTied-belt, Severe DisabilityTied-belt Mild Disability
Baseline1.22 ± 00.5 ± 0.090.11 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.061.08 ± 0
Post training1.17 ± 0.020.55 ± 0.100.16 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.021.10 ± 0
Follow-up (3 months)1.15 ± 0.020.63 ± 0.260.15 ± 0.020.16 ± 0.051.22 ± 0

Adverse events

Collected over 4 years, 9 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Split-belt Treadmill Exercise0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
Tied-belt Treadmill Exercise0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Split-belt Treadmill ExerciseTied-belt Treadmill ExerciseTotal
Mean60.8 ± 11.759.2 ± 14.360 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Split-belt Treadmill ExerciseTied-belt Treadmill ExerciseTotal
Female011
Male639
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Split-belt Treadmill ExerciseTied-belt Treadmill ExerciseTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino6410
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Split-belt Treadmill ExerciseTied-belt Treadmill ExerciseTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White639
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Split-belt Treadmill ExerciseTied-belt Treadmill ExerciseTotal
United States6410
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Motion Analysis Lab in the Kennedy Krieger Institute
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 30, 2013

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01646216
Lead sponsor
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA), University of Maryland, VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Amy J. Bastian, Ph.D. (Dr. Amy J Bastian, Ph.D., PT, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2012
Start date
Jun 7, 2012
Primary completion
Feb 24, 2017
Completion
Sep 30, 2017
Results posted
May 4, 2018
Last update
Jan 14, 2019

Study contacts

Amy J Bastian, PhD, PT
principal investigator · Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion