CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01637311Updated Jul 11, 2012

Peroral Endoscopic Remyotomy for Failed Heller Myotomy

An interventional study of POEM in Esophageal Achalasia, sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-07-11.

Sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2012), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder, which is characterized clinically by symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss and chest pain. With respect to long-term efficacy, Heller myotomy (HM) using an open or a laparoscopic approach has gained wide acceptance as the procedure of choice for the management of patients with primary achalasia in recent years. Although good or excellent long-term symptomatic response rates can be achieved in more than 90% of patients undergoing HM, recurrence or persistence of symptoms occurs in approximately 20%. Controversy exists regarding the therapy of patients with failed success after HM. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has recently been described as a new minimally invasive endoscopic myotomy technique intending a permanent cure from primary achalasia. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of POEM for patients with failed HM.

Read the detailed description
  1. Patients were eligible for enrollment in the study if they were age greater than 18 years and had recurrence/persistence of symptoms after primary HM with an Eckardt symptom score ≥ 4. The diagnosis of achalasia was made on the basis of the absence of peristalsis and on impaired relaxation of the LES on established methods (barium swallow, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)). Exclusion criteria were severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious disease leading to unacceptable surgical risk, pseudoachalasia, and megaesophagus (diameter of > 7 cm).
  2. All patients were scheduled for a follow-up visit at 1 month after POEM for EGD and manometry. Symptoms were assessed 1 month after treatment in the clinic and every 3 months thereafter via telephone questionnaires.
  3. The primary outcome of the study was therapeutic success (a reduction in the Eckardt score to ≤3) at the follow-up assessment. The secondary outcomes included procedure-related adverse events, LES pressure on manometry pre- and post POEM, reflux symptoms and medication use before and after POEM, and procedure-related parameters such as procedure time, hospital stay, and myotomy length.
02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Achalasia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Peroral endoscopic myotomy
  • Heller myotomy
  • persistent/recurrent achalasia.
03

In context

Esophageal Achalasia

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Achalasia; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal Achalasia.

Browse Esophageal Achalasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 638 studies on the registry; 285 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than 18 years
  • Recurrence/persistence of symptoms after primary HM with an Eckardt symptom score ≥ 4
  • The diagnosis of achalasia was made on the basis of the absence of peristalsis and on impaired relaxation of the LES on established methods (barium swallow, manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious disease leading to unacceptable surgical risk
  • Pseudoachalasia
  • megaesophagus (diameter of > 7 cm)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Failed HM

    Patients were eligible for enrollment in the study if they were age greater than 18 years and had recurrence/persistence of symptoms after primary HM with an Eckardt symptom score ≥ 4.

    Procedure: POEM

Interventions

  • ProcedurePOEM

    Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has recently been described as a new minimally invasive endoscopic myotomy technique intending a permanent cure from primary achalasia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Therapeutic success (a reduction in the Eckardt score to ≤3)

    Time frame: Symptoms were assessed 1 month after treatment in the clinic and every 3 months thereafter via telephone questionnaires.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedure-related adverse events

    Time frame: All patients were scheduled for a follow-up visit at 1 month after POEM for EGD.

  2. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure on manometry

    Time frame: All patients were scheduled for a follow-up visit at 1 month after POEM for EGD and manometry

  3. Reflux symptoms and medication use before and after POEM

    Time frame: Symptoms were assessed 1 month after treatment in the clinic and every 3 months thereafter via telephone questionnaires.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
    Shanghai, 200032, China
    • Ping-Hong Zhou, MD,PhD · Contact · zhou1968@yahoo.cn · (+86)-21-64041990
    • Ping-Hong Zhou, MD,PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Eckardt AJ, Eckardt VF. Treatment and surveillance strategies in achalasia: an update. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;8(6):311-9. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.68. Epub 2011 Apr 26. PubMed 21522116 ↗
  • Zaninotto G, Costantini M, Portale G, Battaglia G, Molena D, Carta A, Costantino M, Nicoletti L, Ancona E. Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of failures after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):186-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00005. PubMed 11807357 ↗
  • Gockel I, Junginger T, Eckardt VF. Persistent and recurrent achalasia after Heller myotomy: analysis of different patterns and long-term results of reoperation. Arch Surg. 2007 Nov;142(11):1093-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.11.1093. PubMed 18025339 ↗
  • Iqbal A, Tierney B, Haider M, Salinas VK, Karu A, Turaga KK, Mittal SK, Filipi CJ. Laparoscopic re-operation for failed Heller myotomy. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):193-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00564.x. PubMed 16722998 ↗
  • Duffy PE, Awad ZT, Filipi CJ. The laparoscopic reoperation of failed Heller myotomy. Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1046-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8570-y. Epub 2003 May 7. PubMed 12730729 ↗
  • Rakita S, Villadolid D, Kalipersad C, Thometz D, Rosemurgy A. Outcomes promote reoperative Heller myotomy for symptoms of achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2007 Oct;21(10):1709-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9226-8. Epub 2007 Apr 14. PubMed 17440784 ↗
  • Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30. PubMed 20354937 ↗
  • von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H, Werner YB, Pace A, Kersten JF, Much CC, Schachschal G, Mann O, Keller J, Fuchs KH, Rosch T. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):411-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.388. Epub 2011 Nov 8. PubMed 22068665 ↗
  • Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P, Xu M, Cai M, Li L, Shi Q, Yao L. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3267-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2336-y. Epub 2012 May 19. PubMed 22609984 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01637311
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2012
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2012 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2014 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 11, 2012

Study contacts

Ping-Hong Zhou, MD,PhD
Contact
zhou1968@yahoo.cn
(+86)-21-64041990
Ping-Hong Zhou, MD,PhD
study director · Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion