CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01629303CONSTIMODUpdated Jul 23, 2015

Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Modulation in Severe Refractory Constipation

A Phase 2 interventional study of sacral nerve modulation in Constipation, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 11 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-23.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Subjects with refractory chronic constipation are offered two conventional therapeutic strategies: either medical treatment, either surgery (in the case of medication failure). Nevertheless, a procedure less invasive than surgery could be an alternative strategy: the sacral nerve modulation. This procedure consists in stimulating the nerves which control the contractions of the colon and so the defecation phenomenon. Several open trials have suggested that sacral nerve modulation may be effective in reducing constipation and related symptoms. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of the sacral nerve stimulation in patients with constipation.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of constipation is 2-27% in Western countries. For patients failing medical treatment (laxatives, biofeedback), a surgical solution may be considered (subtotal colectomy). But results are variable and it puts them at risk of functional sequelae.

Sacral nerve modulation is a minimally invasive procedure compared with the standard surgical support (colectomy) and reversible, which consists in two stages. First, a 3-week temporary stimulation test allows verifying the efficacy of neuromodulation. If the test is positive, the stimulating electrode is definitely implanted. Risks related to the procedure (infection, pain) are much smaller than those associated with a conventional surgical support.

Non comparative studies conducted with 19 and 62 patients showed that 40-73% of implanted patients have an improvement of their constipation and could benefit of permanent implantation with good results in medium term.

The primary objective of the investigators study is to evaluate the short-term efficacy (percentage of responders at 2 months) of sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of severe chronic constipation.

This is a cross-over designed, double-blinded, French multicenter clinical trial, including two periods: 2 months of stimulation ON and 2 months of stimulation OFF. Between these two periods, a 15-days period of "wash-out" will be respected during which all patients will be in OFF mode (4.5 months in total). This period of 4.5 months will be extended by a follow-up period of 7 months during which all patients will be treated (stimulation ON).

If this trial showed efficiency of this procedure, patients with severe refractory constipation could benefit of a sacral nerve modulation test before considering a surgical treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Constipation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • constipation
  • sacral nerve modulation
03

In context

Constipation

1,018 studies on the registry are indexed under Constipation; 139 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 850 interventional studies indexed under Constipation.

Browse Constipation studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Constipation defined by at least two of the following criteria :

    • Frequency of 2 stools or less per week
    • Severe outlet constipation, i.e. need to use digital extraction or enemas more than 25% of time
    • Sensation of incomplete evacuation more than 25% of time
  • Refractory constipation since at least 1 year to medical treatment (drug treatment and/or biofeedback) conducted in the centre (failure or intolerance to laxative osmotic treatments, stimulants, and prucalopride) for which surgery is discussed
  • Patients supported in the centre for at least 3 months before inclusion
  • Patients having social security system
  • Patients having read and signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Constipation secondary to ano-rectal malformation, surgical sequel, colorectal or anal organic lesions, or pelvi-perineal static disorder indicated for surgical treatment
  • Constipation secondary to neurological pathology and/or concomitant treatments intake (opiates, anticholinergic agents)
  • Partial colectomy history
  • Patients in whom implantation of stimulating electrode is impossible due to anatomical reasons (e.g. sacral agenesis)
  • Pregnant female patients or with childbearing potential without adequate contraceptive barrier (oestrogen-progesterone contraceptives or intra-uterine device)
  • Skin disease associated with a risk of infection - in the opinion of the investigator
  • Patient with pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Patient exposed to resonance magnetic imaging
  • Psychiatric disease incompatible with use of the treatment - in the opinion of the investigator
  • Patient misunderstanding oral and written French language
  • Patient participating to another study
  • Patients who don't complete the first diary without missing data (concerning items used to define the primary endpoint)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm on-off

    After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position OFF during 8 weeks. Then all the stimulators are switched OFF for 15 days. Finally stimulators are switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks

    Procedure: sacral nerve modulation

  • Experimental
    Arm off-on

    After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON during 8 weeks. Then all the stimulators are switched OFF for 15 days. Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF during 8 weeks

    Procedure: sacral nerve modulation

Interventions

  • Proceduresacral nerve modulation

    After the definitive implantation, stimulators are placed in position ON (arm on-off) or OFF (arm off-on) for the first arm and in position OFF for the second arm during 8 weeks. Then all the stimulators are switched OFF (both first and second arms) for 15 days. Finally stimulators are maintained in position OFF for the first arm and switched ON for the second arm during 8 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients showing a positive response to sacral nerve stimulation at 2 months

    Percentage of patients showing a positive response to sacral nerve stimulation during the period " ON " compared with the period " OFF " based on an objective assessment of the number of feces and their characteristics

    Time frame: 2 months of the stimualtion period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical characteristics, manometry data, Wexner score of responders to stimulation during the temporary stimulation test (period before the permanent implantation)

    Time frame: 3 weeks between temporary and permanent implantations

  2. Clinical characteristics, manometry data, Wexner score of responders to short-term stimulation

    Time frame: 2 months after permanent implantation

  3. Efficacy of neuromodulation

    Efficacy of neuromodulation (percentage of positive responders) at 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year after permanent implantation

  4. Manometry data, Wexner, QoL and EVA scores, time of colonic transit of responders to prolonged stimulation

    Time frame: 1 year after permanent implantation

  5. To evaluate the investigator opinion about the neuromodulation response, using the patient diary.

    Time frame: 1 year after permanent implantation

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • Service d' Hépato-gastro-entérologie
    CHU de Limoges, Limoges 87000, France
  • Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive
    Bordeaux, 33075, France
  • Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie - CHU estaing
    Clermont Ferrand, 63000, France
  • Service de gastroentérologie - AP HP
    Colombes, 92000, France
  • Service de Chirurgie générale - CHU de Grenoble
    Grenoble, 38000, France
  • Service d'exploration fonctionnelle digestive -Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Lyon, 69000, France
  • Service de gastroentérologie - hopital nord -AP-HM
    Marseille, 13000, France
  • : Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne. Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD
    Nantes, 44000, France
  • SMAD CHU Pontchaillou -Rennes
    Rennes, 35000, France
  • Service de physiologie digestive, urinaire, respiratoire et sportive - CHU de rouen
    Rouen, 76000, France
  • Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et explorations fonctionnelles digestives - CHU de Tours
    Tours, 37000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zerbib F, Siproudhis L, Lehur PA, Germain C, Mion F, Leroi AM, Coffin B, Le Sidaner A, Vitton V, Bouyssou-Cellier C, Chene G; CONSTIMOD study investigators. Randomized clinical trial of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory constipation. Br J Surg. 2017 Feb;104(3):205-213. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10326. Epub 2016 Oct 25. PubMed 27779312 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01629303
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2012
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Nov 2013
Completion
Jan 2015
Last update
Jul 23, 2015

Study contacts

Frank ZERBIB, Professor
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux
Genevieve CHENE, Professor
study chair · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion