ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01603797Updated Oct 3, 2012

Guided Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain Patients

An interventional study of Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy in Chronic Pain, sponsored by Gerhard Andersson. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-03.

Sponsored by Gerhard Andersson · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study was to investigate if guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)would help chronic pain patients.

Read the detailed description

The present study investigates internet-delivered ACT for persons with chronic pain. The use of internet as a delivery format for interventions could be a way of overcome many barriers (financial obstacles, reluctance to seek treatment and paucity of clinicians trained in ACT) that hinder persons with chronic pain to seek or receive adequate help. Persons were randomized to either treatment for 7 weeks or to a control group who were invited to participate in a moderated online discussion forum. Follow up data was collected six months after the treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • internetdelivered CBT
  • chronic pain
  • acceptance and commitment therapy
  • mindfulness
  • guided self help
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,999 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 706 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is above the median of 60 across 2,209 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Gerhard Andersson is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • that participants had undergone medical investigation (within one year)
  • had regular access to the internet
  • had functional impairment caused by chronic pain
  • had internet access

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ongoing medical investigations or treatment that could interfere with participation in the study, such as planned surgery and suffering from acute physical or psychological conditions
  • not fluent in the Swedish language
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Internet delivered ACT

    Internet delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), 7 weeks treatment

    Behavioral: Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy

  • Active comparator
    Online discussion forum

    Active wait-list condition. Were offered to participate in a moderated online discussion forum. After post-treatment assessment the control group were offered treatment.

    Behavioral: Guided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralGuided internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy

    The treatment program consisted of seven sections and was based on ACT.The first part was about creative hopelessness and was followed in the next section by an introduction to willingness and to the process of acceptance of pain. Information and assignments about committed action and values were also part of the treatment program. Mindfulness exercises were a regular feature in the program. The last part was about how to maintain learned strategies but also an evaluation of the program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)

    CPAQ consists of 20 items divided into two subscales: activity engagement and pain willingness. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (never true) to 6 (always true). Higher scores denote greater activity engagement and pain willingness. Studies show acceptable reliability (α =.72-.92).

    Time frame: One week pre- and post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)

    HADS contains 14 items and evaluates severity of symptoms of depression and anxiety without contamination of scores of physical symptomatology.

    Time frame: One week pre- and post- treatment

  2. The Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

    The CSQ contains 50 items divided into eight scales measuring different cognitive and behavioural coping strategies and has been widely used by chronic pain patients. The coping strategies scales are: diverting attention, re-interpreting pain sensations, coping self-statements, ignoring sensations, praying and hoping, catastrophizing and increased behavioral activities

    Time frame: One week pre- and post- treatment

  3. Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S)

    The Swedish version of MPI (MPI-S) consists of 34 items divided into 8 scales. The first section addresses: Pain Severity, Interference, Life Control, Affective Distress and Support. The second section addresses the patient's perception of how significant others respond to their displays of pain: Punishing Responses, Solicitous Responses and Distracting Responses.

    Time frame: One week pre- and post- treatment

  4. The Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (PAIRS)

    PAIRS assess beliefs and attitudes associated with the experience of chronic pain and one's ability to function despite pain. It consists of 15 personal statements that reflect thoughts, attitudes and opinions about pain.

    Time frame: One week pre- and post- treatment

  5. Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)

    QOLI consists of 32 items for assessing life satisfaction. The assessment yields an overall score and profile in 16 areas of life; health, self-esteem, goals and values, money, work, play, learning, creativity, helping, love, friends, children, relatives, home, neighborhood, and community.

    Time frame: One week pre- and post- treatment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bendelin N, Bjorkdahl P, Risell M, Nelson KZ, Gerdle B, Andersson G, Buhrman M. Patients' experiences of internet-based Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 6;21(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03198-1. PubMed 32252707 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01603797
Lead sponsor
Gerhard Andersson
Responsible party
Gerhard Andersson (Professor, Linkoeping University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 22, 2012
Start date
Feb 2010
Primary completion
May 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Last update
Oct 3, 2012

Study contacts

Gerhard Andersson, Professor
study director · Linkoeping University
Monica Buhrman, MSc
principal investigator · Uppsala University
Timo Hursti, PhD
study chair · Uppsala University
Torsten Gordh, Professor
study chair · Uppsala University
Tomas Furmark, Professor
study chair · Uppsala University
Astrid Skoglund, MSc
study chair · Uppsala University
Josefin Husell, MSc
study chair · Uppsala University
Kristina Bergström, MSc
study chair · Uppsala University
Nina Bendelin, MSc
study chair · Linkoeping University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion