CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01600105Updated Feb 7, 2020Results posted

Detection of Liver Fibrosis With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Perfusion MRI in Chronic Liver Disease, sponsored by Bachir Taouli. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-07.

Sponsored by Bachir Taouli · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
276
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with chronic liver disease are at high risk of developing liver scarring (fibrosis), with ultimate risks of cirrhosis and liver cancer that may require liver transplant. The investigators would like to develop non invasive advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques (MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography) to assess the degree of liver damage in patients with chronic liver disease. These techniques combined could reach high diagnostic performance for detection of liver fibrosis; and could decrease the number of liver biopsies, which have risks and sample only a small portion of the liver.

Read the detailed description

Patients with chronic hepatitis have increased risks of liver damage, including fibrosis and cirrhosis, which may eventually lead to hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation. These diseases are/will be the source of enormous health care costs and morbidity/mortality in the US.

Most hepatologists still rely on liver biopsy findings in patients newly diagnosed with chronic hepatitis, which enables the assessment of liver damage (fibrosis and inflammation). Liver biopsy has limitations, including cost, invasiveness, poor patient acceptance, limited sampling, inter-observer variability and is difficult to repeat.

Non invasive tests to capture the extent of liver damage at a larger scale are urgently needed. These will gain more acceptance among patients and hepatologists.

In this proposal, the investigators would like to test and validate non invasive MRI methods based on advanced MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography techniques for the detection of fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis. In order to improve the diagnostic performance of MRI, the investigators would like to build and validate a predictive model based on advanced functional MRI metrics (diffusion, perfusion and elastography). If validated, this novel non invasive algorithm will not only decreases the number of liver biopsies, but also enable earlier diagnosis of liver fibrosis when antiviral treatment is more effective, and enable a comprehensive evaluation of the liver (to assess for cirrhosis, portal hypertension and hepatocellular cancer).

This could significantly reduce the cost of care, could become a useful tool for testing new antifibrogenic and antiviral drugs in chronic viral hepatitis, and could be used to follow patients for detection of progression to cirrhosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Liver Disease

Keywords

  • liver fibrosis
  • liver cirrhosis
  • chronic hepatitis
  • magnetic resonance imaging
03

In context

Liver Diseases

2,081 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases; 390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 276 is above the median of 50 across 1,323 interventional studies indexed under Liver Diseases.

Browse Liver Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Bachir Taouli as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic liver disease (including viral hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, non alcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, etc..)
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Liver biopsy (percutaneous or transjugular or surgical) performed within 6 months, as part of routine clinical care.
  • Liver transplant or liver resection performed within 6 months, as part of routine clinical care.
  • Patient is able to give informed consent for this study and agrees to provide a blood sample

Control group

  • Patients without history of liver disease and healthy volunteers
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Subject is able to give informed consent for this study and agrees to provide a blood sample

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
  • Contra-indications to MRI
  • Electrical implants such as cardiac pacemakers or perfusion pumps
  • Ferromagnetic implants such as aneurysm clips, surgical clips, prostheses, artificial hearts, valves with steel parts, metal fragments, shrapnel, tattoos near the eye, or steel implants
  • Ferromagnetic objects such as jewelry or metal clips in clothing
  • Pregnant subjects
  • Pre-existing medical conditions including a likelihood of developing seizures or claustrophobic reactions.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
276 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Perfusion MRI

    chronic liver disease who underwent/will undergo liver biopsy or will undergo liver transplant or liver resection as part of standard care during the previous 6 months.

    Drug: Perfusion MRI

Interventions

  • DrugPerfusion MRI

    1) Assess the role of a new FDA approved blood pool gadolinium contrast agent (gadofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus) for the measurement of liver MR Perfusion, compared to extra-cellular contrast agents.

    Also known as: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, Perfusion MRI (adofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PV Flow

    Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow - forward flow during systole and early diastole, and flow reversal after atrial contraction.The average PV area was extracted, and PV flow was computed as the multiplication of area and velocity.

    Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)

  2. PV Velocity

    Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow Velocity - The mean velocity of the region of interest (ROI) was extracted for each one of the 25 phase images, and the time average was computed.

    Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)

  3. LS-MRE for Sub-Study I

    Sub-Study I Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.

    Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)

  4. True Diffusion Parameter (D)

    Sub-Study II True Diffusion Parameter - D- describes water diffusion in tissue independently from the effects of capillary perfusion; it is obtained from bi-exponential fitting of MRI diffusion signal acquired over a range of high and low diffusion-weighting factors (b-values) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min) Scan

  5. LS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study II

    Sub-Study II Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  6. LS-TE

    Sub-Study II Liver Stiffness with transient elastography (TE) (LS-TE) - a non-invasive modality of liver fibrosis detection: a shear wave is sent into the liver through a small transducer attached to an ultrasound probe, and the velocity of the wave is measured as it passes through the liver; shear wave velocity is then converted to stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

    Time frame: Fasting transient elastography, average duration 10 min

  7. MTT

    Sub-Study II Mean Transit Time (MTT) - Liver Mean Transit Time of Contrast Agent through the tissue of interest from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Liver Upslope From DCE-MRI

    Sub-Study III Liver Upslope of MRI signal is defined as peak concentration to the time to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI. Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  2. Liver Time to Peak (TTP) for PH

    Sub-Study III Liver Time to Peak (TTP) is defined as the time in seconds to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  3. LS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study III

    Sub-Study III Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  4. Spleen Volume

    Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  5. Spleen Caudocranial Diameter

    Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  6. PH Imaging Score

    Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension imaging composite score (based on the presence of varices, spleen size, presence of ascites). The imaging score is based on the number of variceal sites (0: absence of varices, 1: one variceal site, 2: two variceal sites, and 3: 3 or more variceal sites), volume of ascites (0: no ascites, 1: minimal perihepatic and perisplenic fluid, 2: intraperitoneal fluid without marked abdominal wall distension, and 3: fluid causing marked abdominal wall distension), and maximum craniocaudal diameter of the spleen (0: size less than 13 cm, 1: size between 13 and 15 cm, 2: size between 15 and 20 cm, and 3: size greater than 20 cm). Score from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating worse disease. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  7. LSLU

    Sub-Study III Liver Stiffness to Liver Upslope ratio (LSLU) Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  8. Liver DV

    Sub Study III Liver Distribution Volume (DV) is the distribution volume of contrast agent in the tissue of interest defined as a percentage ratio of gadolinium material volume to the volume of the liver tissue of interest, as derived from DCE-MRI; in the case of a contrast agent with extracellular distribution, DV measures the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular volume. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

  9. Spleen TTP

    Sub Study III Spleen Time To Peak (TTP) - time to reach peak gadolinium concentration in spleen tissue of interest, derived from DCE-MRI. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

    Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

07

Results

Posted Mar 11, 2019

Participant flow

Recruitment began in May 2010, with enrollment from October 2010 through February 2017. Patients were recruited from the Division of Liver Diseases or from the Surgical Oncology Clinic at Mount Sinai.

Total Participants
Participant flow — Total Participants
MilestoneChronic Liver Disease PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Started25521
Completed21411
Not completed4110
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: No images in pacs100
Withdrew: Insufficient image quality3010
Sub Study I
Participant flow — Sub Study I
MilestoneChronic Liver Disease PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Started1921
Completed1911
Not completed010
Withdrew: Insufficient image quality010
Sub Study II
Participant flow — Sub Study II
MilestoneChronic Liver Disease PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Started650
Completed600
Not completed50
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: No images in pacs10
Withdrew: Insufficient image quality30
Sub Study III
Participant flow — Sub Study III
MilestoneChronic Liver Disease PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Started390
Completed340
Not completed50
Withdrew: Insufficient image quality50
Sub Study IV
Participant flow — Sub Study IV
MilestoneChronic Liver Disease PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Started418
Completed418
Not completed00
Sub Study V
Participant flow — Sub Study V
MilestoneChronic Liver Disease PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Started520
Completed500
Not completed20
Withdrew: Poor image quality20

Outcome measures

PrimaryPV Flow

Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow - forward flow during systole and early diastole, and flow reversal after atrial contraction.The average PV area was extracted, and PV flow was computed as the multiplication of area and velocity.

Time frame:
Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
Reported as:
Mean · ml/s
PV Flow
ml/sChronic Hep C PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Fasting16.0 ± 6.115.5 ± 4.2
Postprandial23.2 ± 8.527.1 ± 10.2
PrimaryPV Velocity

Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow Velocity - The mean velocity of the region of interest (ROI) was extracted for each one of the 25 phase images, and the time average was computed.

Time frame:
Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
Reported as:
Mean · cm/s
PV Velocity
cm/sChronic Hep C PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Fasting10.5 ± 3.211.5 ± 2.8
Postprandial12.8 ± 4.614.4 ± 3.2
PrimaryLS-MRE for Sub-Study I

Sub-Study I Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.

Time frame:
Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
Reported as:
Mean · kPa
LS-MRE for Sub-Study I
kPaChronic Hep C PatientsHealthy Volunteers
Fasting4.9 ± 1.41.8 ± 0.2
Postprandial5.0 ± 1.22.0 ± 0.2
PrimaryTrue Diffusion Parameter (D)

Sub-Study II True Diffusion Parameter - D- describes water diffusion in tissue independently from the effects of capillary perfusion; it is obtained from bi-exponential fitting of MRI diffusion signal acquired over a range of high and low diffusion-weighting factors (b-values) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min) Scan
Reported as:
Mean · 10^-3 mm^2/s
True Diffusion Parameter (D)
10^-3 mm^2/sPerfusion MRI
F0-F21.06 ± 0.21
F3-F40.94 ± 0.16
PrimaryLS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study II

Sub-Study II Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Mean · kPa
LS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study II
kPaPerfusion MRI
F0-F22.88 ± 0.91
F3-F45.16 ± 0.95
PrimaryLS-TE

Sub-Study II Liver Stiffness with transient elastography (TE) (LS-TE) - a non-invasive modality of liver fibrosis detection: a shear wave is sent into the liver through a small transducer attached to an ultrasound probe, and the velocity of the wave is measured as it passes through the liver; shear wave velocity is then converted to stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame:
Fasting transient elastography, average duration 10 min
Reported as:
Mean · kPa
LS-TE
kPaPerfusion MRI
F0-F29.55 ± 6.85
F3-F421.44 ± 17.86
PrimaryMTT

Sub-Study II Mean Transit Time (MTT) - Liver Mean Transit Time of Contrast Agent through the tissue of interest from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
MTT
secondsPerfusion MRI
F0-F211.6 ± 8.1
F3-F418.8 ± 9.1
SecondaryLiver Upslope From DCE-MRI

Sub-Study III Liver Upslope of MRI signal is defined as peak concentration to the time to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI. Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · mmol/(L.s))
Liver Upslope From DCE-MRI
mmol/(L.s))Perfusion MRI
HVPG <5mmHg0.011 ± 0.011
HVPG>=5mmHg0.0007 ± 0.0007
HPVG<10mmHg0.011 ± 0.007
HPVG>=10mmHg0.0006 ± 0.004
SecondaryLiver Time to Peak (TTP) for PH

Sub-Study III Liver Time to Peak (TTP) is defined as the time in seconds to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · seconds
Liver Time to Peak (TTP) for PH
secondsPerfusion MRI
HVPG<5mmHg40.99 ± 22.20
HVPG>=5mmHg53.02 ± 31.8
HVPG<10mmHg41.47 ± 25.76
HVPG>=10mmHg69.45 ± 41.98
SecondaryLS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study III

Sub-Study III Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · kPa
LS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study III
kPaPerfusion MRI
HVPG<5mmHg2.31 ± 2.8
HVPG>=5mmHg5.14 ± 2.57
HVPG<10mmHg3.88 ± 3.16
HVPG>=10mmHg5.86 ± 6.71
SecondarySpleen Volume

Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · cm^3
Spleen Volume
cm^3Perfusion MRI
HVPG<5mmHg246 ± 252
HVPG>=5mmHg441 ± 629
SecondarySpleen Caudocranial Diameter

Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · cm
Spleen Caudocranial Diameter
cmPerfusion MRI
HVPG<5mmHg11.6 ± 2.8
HVPG>=5mmHg14.0 ± 4.8
SecondaryPH Imaging Score

Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension imaging composite score (based on the presence of varices, spleen size, presence of ascites). The imaging score is based on the number of variceal sites (0: absence of varices, 1: one variceal site, 2: two variceal sites, and 3: 3 or more variceal sites), volume of ascites (0: no ascites, 1: minimal perihepatic and perisplenic fluid, 2: intraperitoneal fluid without marked abdominal wall distension, and 3: fluid causing marked abdominal wall distension), and maximum craniocaudal diameter of the spleen (0: size less than 13 cm, 1: size between 13 and 15 cm, 2: size between 15 and 20 cm, and 3: size greater than 20 cm). Score from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating worse disease. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
PH Imaging Score
score on a scalePerfusion MRI
HVPG<5mmHg0 ± 1
HVPG>=5mmHg2 ± 5.25
HVPG<101 ± 1.5
HVPG>=104 ± 4.5
SecondaryLSLU

Sub-Study III Liver Stiffness to Liver Upslope ratio (LSLU) Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · kPa*s*L/mmol
LSLU
kPa*s*L/mmolPerfusion MRI
HVPG<5mmHg192.72 ± 195.65
HVPG>=5mmHg830.28 ± 971.68
HVPG<10mmHg363.68 ± 855.01
HVPG>10mmHg871.82 ± 1354.31
SecondaryLiver DV

Sub Study III Liver Distribution Volume (DV) is the distribution volume of contrast agent in the tissue of interest defined as a percentage ratio of gadolinium material volume to the volume of the liver tissue of interest, as derived from DCE-MRI; in the case of a contrast agent with extracellular distribution, DV measures the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular volume. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · percentage of liver volume
Liver DV
percentage of liver volumePerfusion MRI
HVPG<10mmHg47.28 ± 24.29
HVPG>=10mmHg77.25 ± 111.01
SecondarySpleen TTP

Sub Study III Spleen Time To Peak (TTP) - time to reach peak gadolinium concentration in spleen tissue of interest, derived from DCE-MRI. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Time frame:
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Reported as:
Median · seconds
Spleen TTP
secondsPerfusion MRI
HVPG<10mmHg15.46 ± 16.65
HVPG>=10mmHg44.90 ± 40.69

Adverse events

Collected over 6 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sub Study 1 Chronic Hep C Patients0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)
Sub Study 1 Health Volunteers0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Sub Study II0/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)2/60 (3.3%)
Sub Study III0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)
Total Participants of the Substudies0/124 (0%)0/124 (0%)2/124 (1.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSub Study 1 Chronic Hep C PatientsSub Study 1 Health VolunteersSub Study IISub Study IIITotal Participants of the Substudies
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/190/111/600/341/124
FaintingNervous system disorders0/190/111/600/341/124

Baseline characteristics

This is the overall participants who completed the study. Substudies were conducted with participants pulled from the overall enrollment. There was no overall study with outcome measures for the overall enrollment

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Mean53.8 (19 to 82)30.6 (19 to 42)51.8 (19 to 82)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Sub Study I Chronic Hepatitis C patients55.8 (34 to 68)30.6 (19 to 42)46.5 (19 to 68)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Sub Study II55 (23 to 69)—55 (23 to 69)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Sub Study III53 (26 to 74)—53 (26 to 74)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Sub Study IV53 (21 to 70)29 (19 to 39)48 (19 to 70)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Sub Study V57 (22 to 82)—57 (22 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Female83588
Male1316137
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Perfusion MRIHealthy VolunteersTotal
Chronic Hepatitis C patients — Female257
Chronic Hepatitis C patients — Male17623

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Jajamovich GH, Dyvorne H, Donnerhack C, Taouli B. Quantitative liver MRI combining phase contrast imaging, elastography, and DWI: assessment of reproducibility and postprandial effect at 3.0 T. PLoS One. 2014 May 19;9(5):e97355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097355. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24840288 ↗
  • Dyvorne HA, Jajamovich GH, Bane O, Fiel MI, Chou H, Schiano TD, Dieterich D, Babb JS, Friedman SL, Taouli B. Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to transient elastography and serum markers for liver fibrosis detection. Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):659-66. doi: 10.1111/liv.13058. Epub 2016 Feb 7. PubMed 26744140 ↗
  • Wagner M, Hectors S, Bane O, Gordic S, Kennedy P, Besa C, Schiano TD, Thung S, Fischman A, Taouli B. Noninvasive prediction of portal pressure with MR elastography and DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen: Preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct;48(4):1091-1103. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26026. Epub 2018 Apr 11. PubMed 29638020 ↗
  • Jajamovich GH, Calcagno C, Dyvorne HA, Rusinek H, Taouli B. DCE-MRI of the liver: reconstruction of the arterial input function using a low dose pre-bolus contrast injection. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 29;9(12):e115667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115667. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25546176 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 16, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01600105
Lead sponsor
Bachir Taouli
Responsible party
Bachir Taouli (Associate Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 16, 2012
Start date
Oct 2010
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2017
Completion
Jul 31, 2017
Results posted
Mar 11, 2019
Last update
Feb 7, 2020

Study contacts

Bachir Taouli, MD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion