A Phase 4 interventional study of Perfusion MRI in Chronic Liver Disease, sponsored by Bachir Taouli. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-07.
Sponsored by Bachir Taouli · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Patients with chronic liver disease are at high risk of developing liver scarring (fibrosis), with ultimate risks of cirrhosis and liver cancer that may require liver transplant. The investigators would like to develop non invasive advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques (MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography) to assess the degree of liver damage in patients with chronic liver disease. These techniques combined could reach high diagnostic performance for detection of liver fibrosis; and could decrease the number of liver biopsies, which have risks and sample only a small portion of the liver.
Patients with chronic hepatitis have increased risks of liver damage, including fibrosis and cirrhosis, which may eventually lead to hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation. These diseases are/will be the source of enormous health care costs and morbidity/mortality in the US.
Most hepatologists still rely on liver biopsy findings in patients newly diagnosed with chronic hepatitis, which enables the assessment of liver damage (fibrosis and inflammation). Liver biopsy has limitations, including cost, invasiveness, poor patient acceptance, limited sampling, inter-observer variability and is difficult to repeat.
Non invasive tests to capture the extent of liver damage at a larger scale are urgently needed. These will gain more acceptance among patients and hepatologists.
In this proposal, the investigators would like to test and validate non invasive MRI methods based on advanced MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography techniques for the detection of fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis. In order to improve the diagnostic performance of MRI, the investigators would like to build and validate a predictive model based on advanced functional MRI metrics (diffusion, perfusion and elastography). If validated, this novel non invasive algorithm will not only decreases the number of liver biopsies, but also enable earlier diagnosis of liver fibrosis when antiviral treatment is more effective, and enable a comprehensive evaluation of the liver (to assess for cirrhosis, portal hypertension and hepatocellular cancer).
This could significantly reduce the cost of care, could become a useful tool for testing new antifibrogenic and antiviral drugs in chronic viral hepatitis, and could be used to follow patients for detection of progression to cirrhosis.
2,081 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases; 390 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 276 is above the median of 50 across 1,323 interventional studies indexed under Liver Diseases.
Browse Liver Diseases studies →This is the only study on the registry with Bachir Taouli as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Control group
Exclusion Criteria:
chronic liver disease who underwent/will undergo liver biopsy or will undergo liver transplant or liver resection as part of standard care during the previous 6 months.
Drug: Perfusion MRI
1) Assess the role of a new FDA approved blood pool gadolinium contrast agent (gadofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus) for the measurement of liver MR Perfusion, compared to extra-cellular contrast agents.
Also known as: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, Perfusion MRI (adofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus)
PV Flow
Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow - forward flow during systole and early diastole, and flow reversal after atrial contraction.The average PV area was extracted, and PV flow was computed as the multiplication of area and velocity.
Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
PV Velocity
Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow Velocity - The mean velocity of the region of interest (ROI) was extracted for each one of the 25 phase images, and the time average was computed.
Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
LS-MRE for Sub-Study I
Sub-Study I Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.
Time frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
True Diffusion Parameter (D)
Sub-Study II True Diffusion Parameter - D- describes water diffusion in tissue independently from the effects of capillary perfusion; it is obtained from bi-exponential fitting of MRI diffusion signal acquired over a range of high and low diffusion-weighting factors (b-values) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min) Scan
LS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study II
Sub-Study II Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
LS-TE
Sub-Study II Liver Stiffness with transient elastography (TE) (LS-TE) - a non-invasive modality of liver fibrosis detection: a shear wave is sent into the liver through a small transducer attached to an ultrasound probe, and the velocity of the wave is measured as it passes through the liver; shear wave velocity is then converted to stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
Time frame: Fasting transient elastography, average duration 10 min
MTT
Sub-Study II Mean Transit Time (MTT) - Liver Mean Transit Time of Contrast Agent through the tissue of interest from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Liver Upslope From DCE-MRI
Sub-Study III Liver Upslope of MRI signal is defined as peak concentration to the time to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI. Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Liver Time to Peak (TTP) for PH
Sub-Study III Liver Time to Peak (TTP) is defined as the time in seconds to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
LS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study III
Sub-Study III Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Spleen Volume
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Spleen Caudocranial Diameter
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
PH Imaging Score
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension imaging composite score (based on the presence of varices, spleen size, presence of ascites). The imaging score is based on the number of variceal sites (0: absence of varices, 1: one variceal site, 2: two variceal sites, and 3: 3 or more variceal sites), volume of ascites (0: no ascites, 1: minimal perihepatic and perisplenic fluid, 2: intraperitoneal fluid without marked abdominal wall distension, and 3: fluid causing marked abdominal wall distension), and maximum craniocaudal diameter of the spleen (0: size less than 13 cm, 1: size between 13 and 15 cm, 2: size between 15 and 20 cm, and 3: size greater than 20 cm). Score from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating worse disease. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
LSLU
Sub-Study III Liver Stiffness to Liver Upslope ratio (LSLU) Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Liver DV
Sub Study III Liver Distribution Volume (DV) is the distribution volume of contrast agent in the tissue of interest defined as a percentage ratio of gadolinium material volume to the volume of the liver tissue of interest, as derived from DCE-MRI; in the case of a contrast agent with extracellular distribution, DV measures the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular volume. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Spleen TTP
Sub Study III Spleen Time To Peak (TTP) - time to reach peak gadolinium concentration in spleen tissue of interest, derived from DCE-MRI. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Time frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Recruitment began in May 2010, with enrollment from October 2010 through February 2017. Patients were recruited from the Division of Liver Diseases or from the Surgical Oncology Clinic at Mount Sinai.
| Milestone | Chronic Liver Disease Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 255 | 21 |
| Completed | 214 | 11 |
| Not completed | 41 | 10 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: No images in pacs | 10 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Insufficient image quality | 30 | 10 |
| Milestone | Chronic Liver Disease Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 19 | 21 |
| Completed | 19 | 11 |
| Not completed | 0 | 10 |
| Withdrew: Insufficient image quality | 0 | 10 |
| Milestone | Chronic Liver Disease Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 65 | 0 |
| Completed | 60 | 0 |
| Not completed | 5 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: No images in pacs | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Insufficient image quality | 3 | 0 |
| Milestone | Chronic Liver Disease Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 39 | 0 |
| Completed | 34 | 0 |
| Not completed | 5 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Insufficient image quality | 5 | 0 |
| Milestone | Chronic Liver Disease Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 41 | 8 |
| Completed | 41 | 8 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Chronic Liver Disease Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 52 | 0 |
| Completed | 50 | 0 |
| Not completed | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Poor image quality | 2 | 0 |
Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow - forward flow during systole and early diastole, and flow reversal after atrial contraction.The average PV area was extracted, and PV flow was computed as the multiplication of area and velocity.
| ml/s | Chronic Hep C Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Fasting | 16.0 ± 6.1 | 15.5 ± 4.2 |
| Postprandial | 23.2 ± 8.5 | 27.1 ± 10.2 |
Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow Velocity - The mean velocity of the region of interest (ROI) was extracted for each one of the 25 phase images, and the time average was computed.
| cm/s | Chronic Hep C Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Fasting | 10.5 ± 3.2 | 11.5 ± 2.8 |
| Postprandial | 12.8 ± 4.6 | 14.4 ± 3.2 |
Sub-Study I Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.
| kPa | Chronic Hep C Patients | Healthy Volunteers |
|---|---|---|
| Fasting | 4.9 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| Postprandial | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
Sub-Study II True Diffusion Parameter - D- describes water diffusion in tissue independently from the effects of capillary perfusion; it is obtained from bi-exponential fitting of MRI diffusion signal acquired over a range of high and low diffusion-weighting factors (b-values) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
| 10^-3 mm^2/s | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| F0-F2 | 1.06 ± 0.21 |
| F3-F4 | 0.94 ± 0.16 |
Sub-Study II Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
| kPa | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| F0-F2 | 2.88 ± 0.91 |
| F3-F4 | 5.16 ± 0.95 |
Sub-Study II Liver Stiffness with transient elastography (TE) (LS-TE) - a non-invasive modality of liver fibrosis detection: a shear wave is sent into the liver through a small transducer attached to an ultrasound probe, and the velocity of the wave is measured as it passes through the liver; shear wave velocity is then converted to stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa) Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
| kPa | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| F0-F2 | 9.55 ± 6.85 |
| F3-F4 | 21.44 ± 17.86 |
Sub-Study II Mean Transit Time (MTT) - Liver Mean Transit Time of Contrast Agent through the tissue of interest from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Fibrosis State/Score: F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis
| seconds | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| F0-F2 | 11.6 ± 8.1 |
| F3-F4 | 18.8 ± 9.1 |
Sub-Study III Liver Upslope of MRI signal is defined as peak concentration to the time to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI. Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
| mmol/(L.s)) | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG <5mmHg | 0.011 ± 0.011 |
| HVPG>=5mmHg | 0.0007 ± 0.0007 |
| HPVG<10mmHg | 0.011 ± 0.007 |
| HPVG>=10mmHg | 0.0006 ± 0.004 |
Sub-Study III Liver Time to Peak (TTP) is defined as the time in seconds to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg
| seconds | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<5mmHg | 40.99 ± 22.20 |
| HVPG>=5mmHg | 53.02 ± 31.8 |
| HVPG<10mmHg | 41.47 ± 25.76 |
| HVPG>=10mmHg | 69.45 ± 41.98 |
Sub-Study III Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
| kPa | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<5mmHg | 2.31 ± 2.8 |
| HVPG>=5mmHg | 5.14 ± 2.57 |
| HVPG<10mmHg | 3.88 ± 3.16 |
| HVPG>=10mmHg | 5.86 ± 6.71 |
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
| cm^3 | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<5mmHg | 246 ± 252 |
| HVPG>=5mmHg | 441 ± 629 |
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
| cm | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<5mmHg | 11.6 ± 2.8 |
| HVPG>=5mmHg | 14.0 ± 4.8 |
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension imaging composite score (based on the presence of varices, spleen size, presence of ascites). The imaging score is based on the number of variceal sites (0: absence of varices, 1: one variceal site, 2: two variceal sites, and 3: 3 or more variceal sites), volume of ascites (0: no ascites, 1: minimal perihepatic and perisplenic fluid, 2: intraperitoneal fluid without marked abdominal wall distension, and 3: fluid causing marked abdominal wall distension), and maximum craniocaudal diameter of the spleen (0: size less than 13 cm, 1: size between 13 and 15 cm, 2: size between 15 and 20 cm, and 3: size greater than 20 cm). Score from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating worse disease. Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
| score on a scale | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<5mmHg | 0 ± 1 |
| HVPG>=5mmHg | 2 ± 5.25 |
| HVPG<10 | 1 ± 1.5 |
| HVPG>=10 | 4 ± 4.5 |
Sub-Study III Liver Stiffness to Liver Upslope ratio (LSLU) Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
| kPa*s*L/mmol | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<5mmHg | 192.72 ± 195.65 |
| HVPG>=5mmHg | 830.28 ± 971.68 |
| HVPG<10mmHg | 363.68 ± 855.01 |
| HVPG>10mmHg | 871.82 ± 1354.31 |
Sub Study III Liver Distribution Volume (DV) is the distribution volume of contrast agent in the tissue of interest defined as a percentage ratio of gadolinium material volume to the volume of the liver tissue of interest, as derived from DCE-MRI; in the case of a contrast agent with extracellular distribution, DV measures the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular volume. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
| percentage of liver volume | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<10mmHg | 47.28 ± 24.29 |
| HVPG>=10mmHg | 77.25 ± 111.01 |
Sub Study III Spleen Time To Peak (TTP) - time to reach peak gadolinium concentration in spleen tissue of interest, derived from DCE-MRI. Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
| seconds | Perfusion MRI |
|---|---|
| HVPG<10mmHg | 15.46 ± 16.65 |
| HVPG>=10mmHg | 44.90 ± 40.69 |
Collected over 6 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub Study 1 Chronic Hep C Patients | 0/19 (0%) | 0/19 (0%) | 0/19 (0%) |
| Sub Study 1 Health Volunteers | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) |
| Sub Study II | 0/60 (0%) | 0/60 (0%) | 2/60 (3.3%) |
| Sub Study III | 0/34 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) |
| Total Participants of the Substudies | 0/124 (0%) | 0/124 (0%) | 2/124 (1.6%) |
| Event | Sub Study 1 Chronic Hep C Patients | Sub Study 1 Health Volunteers | Sub Study II | Sub Study III | Total Participants of the Substudies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 0/19 | 0/11 | 1/60 | 0/34 | 1/124 |
| FaintingNervous system disorders | 0/19 | 0/11 | 1/60 | 0/34 | 1/124 |
This is the overall participants who completed the study. Substudies were conducted with participants pulled from the overall enrollment. There was no overall study with outcome measures for the overall enrollment
| Age, Continuous(years) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 53.8 (19 to 82) | 30.6 (19 to 42) | 51.8 (19 to 82) |
| Age, Customized(years) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub Study I Chronic Hepatitis C patients | 55.8 (34 to 68) | 30.6 (19 to 42) | 46.5 (19 to 68) |
| Age, Customized(years) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub Study II | 55 (23 to 69) | — | 55 (23 to 69) |
| Age, Customized(years) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub Study III | 53 (26 to 74) | — | 53 (26 to 74) |
| Age, Customized(years) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub Study IV | 53 (21 to 70) | 29 (19 to 39) | 48 (19 to 70) |
| Age, Customized(years) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub Study V | 57 (22 to 82) | — | 57 (22 to 82) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 83 | 5 | 88 |
| Male | 131 | 6 | 137 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Perfusion MRI | Healthy Volunteers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic Hepatitis C patients — Female | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Chronic Hepatitis C patients — Male | 17 | 6 | 23 |
5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.