ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01598818Updated Sep 1, 2023

First-Sight Refractive Error Correction in the Developing World

An observational study in Vision Loss, sponsored by University of Nebraska. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-01.

Sponsored by University of Nebraska · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
7 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of the First-Sight refractive kit designed to provide refractive correction of simple hyperopia, myopia and astigmatism with autorefraction.

Read the detailed description

In remote and underserved areas, a patient may have limited or no access to eye specialists or healthcare facilities that offer equipment to provide standard refraction and purchase corrective lenses. First Sight Refracting system (FSR) is designed specifically to be used in remote and underserved areas. FSR is not considered the standard of care in the US. FSR is a portable refraction and lens-frame dispensing system with low cost of production. As a kit, it contains +/- 6.00 diopters of corrective lenses, color coordinated flipper, - 1.25 diopter astigmatism lens, visual acuity chart, astigmatic eye chart, measuring tape to measure the distance of the subject to the eye charts, pupillary distance ruler to measure for the frame size of the glasses to be dispensed, and lint free gloves. The kit comes with two standard frames. The corrective lenses are designed to be placed in the frames that can be readily dispensed to the patient after the refraction is done. The refraction technique is simple and straightforward and any healthcare worker in remote and underserved areas can provide the test and dispense glasses at no cost.

This is the third phase of First Sight refractive study to be done in Haiti. Adult and children subjects will be recruited during their routine examinations and/or visual acuity screenings at the Justinien Hospital. The proposed study will compare the visual acuity measurements obtained from the First Sight refraction system (test procedure) with the visual acuity measurements obtained from the autorefraction (standard care). The international study will recruit 150 subjects which will test FSR's effectiveness as a refracting tool of choice to be used in remote and underserved areas. Data from this study will be compared with the US studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vision Loss

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Vision Nearsighted
  • Vision Farsighted
03

In context

Vision Disorders

360 studies on the registry are indexed under Vision Disorders; 84 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 126 across 97 observational studies indexed under Vision Disorders.

Browse Vision Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Nebraska is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 67 are open to participants now.

Of its 83 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 53 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Population with refractive error between -4.50 to +4.50 diopter spherical error and astigmatism up to 1.50 diopters.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be 7 years of age and older
  • Healthy subjects with no known ocular trauma, no surgery, ocular disease or pathology that would prevent obtainment of best correctable visual acuity to 20/30.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refractive error greater than (+)/(-) 6.00 diopter, or astigmatism greater than 1.50 diopters.
  • Known ocular (corneal, lenticular, vitreal, or retinal) pathology that may limit best correctable visual acuity.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Visual acuity

    Comparison of best visual acuity and refraction using the First Sight Refractive System with autorefraction in subjects with refractive error.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the best visual acuity and refraction results using the First Sight Refraction System to standard auto-refraction in subjects with hyperopia.

    A refractive error of +0.50 to +4.50 diopter spherical error and asitgmatism of 1.50 diopters will be assessed.

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the best visual acuity and refraction results using the First Sight Refractive System to autorefraction in myopia.

    A refractive error of -0.50 to -4.50 diopter spherical error and up to 1.50 astigmatism will be compared.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198-5540, United States
  • Justinien Hospital
    Cap-Haïtien, Haiti
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2012 to primary completion in Jan 2014, 20 months.

Of 51 non-industry observational studies under Vision Disorders, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 42. This study's 20 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 58 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 11, 2012
First posted
May 15, 2012
StartActual
May 11, 2012
Primary completionActual
Jan 13, 2014
CompletionActual
Jan 13, 2014
Last update
Sep 1, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01598818
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 15, 2012
Start date
May 11, 2012
Primary completion
Jan 13, 2014
Completion
Jan 13, 2014
Last update
Sep 1, 2023

Study contacts

Michael Feilmeier, MD
principal investigator · University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion