An interventional study of one of two possible colon preparation regimens in Colonoscopy Preparation, sponsored by Clinical Hospital Colentina. Completed at 2 sites in Romania. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-12-24.
Sponsored by Clinical Hospital Colentina · Not applicable and Interventional
The investigators intend to study the impact of two different preparation regimens for colonoscopy (PEG vs sodium picosulphate) on the quality of the endoscopy as well as patient tolerability.
Clinical Hospital Colentina is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: one of two possible colon preparation regimens
Drug: one of two possible colon preparation regimens
Patients are randomized to receive one of the two different preparation regimens for colonoscopy usually employed in our unit, polyethylene glycol or sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate
Also known as: Fortrans, Picoprep
colon preparation
the impact of colon preparation as assessed by the endoscopist (scale from 1 to 4, 1 representing the worst and 4 the best prepared colon) on the quality of the endoscopic examination
Time frame: 24 h
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Clinical Hospital Colentina