CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01588275RESTUpdated May 15, 2018

MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS

An interventional study of mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) (SomnoDent) and Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen. Completed at 3 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-15.

Sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) versus Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in patients with moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).

Read the detailed description

Study design: In a randomized parallel controlled study 86 patients will be randomly assigned to either MRA therapy or CPAP therapy. Group A receives MRA. Group B receives CPAP. The total duration of the study is 12 months. Measurements will be done at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months.

Intervention: Group A will be treated with a bibloc MRA (Somnodent). The mandible will be set at 70% of the patient's maximum advancement and will be adjusted to the convenience of the patient. Titration will be continued until symptoms abate or until further advancement causes discomfort.

Group B will be treated with CPAP. Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately. Patients are fitted with a comfortable CPAP mask before titration of the CPAP-pressure. For CPAP-titration, patients are instructed to adopt their own typical sleeping habits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Keywords

  • cost-effectiveness
  • effectiveness
  • treatment
  • CPAP
  • MRA
  • compliance
03

In context

Sleep Apnea Syndromes

2,162 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 86 is above the median of 53 across 1,386 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes.

Browse Sleep Apnea Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Groningen is the lead sponsor of 609 studies on the registry; 174 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals who have been subjected to polysomnography and are diagnosed as having moderate (AHI 15-30) OSAS;
  • Aged ≥ 18 years;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical and psychological criteria:

  • Patients previously treated for OSAS (e.g. CPAP, MRA);
  • Morphologic abnormalities of the upper airway (e.g., a compromised nasal passage, enlarged tonsils or adenoids, or upper airway soft-tissue or craniofacial abnormality);
  • Reported or documented unstable endocrine dysfunction (hypothyroidism, acromegaly, or pituitary adenoma); Reported or documented severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity
  • Clinically concurrent cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, heart failure,cardiac arrhythmias)
  • CVA within 6 months prior to randomisation
  • Daytime respiratory insufficiency
  • Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (GOLD 3 or 4; FEV1 / FVC \< 70% and FEV1 \< 50%);
  • Other diseases that may impact the evaluation of the results of the study according to the investigator's judgement.
  • Reported or documented psychological condition precluding informed consent (e.g., mental retardation, depression or schizophrenia);

Whether the patient has unstable endocrine dysfunction, severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity or a psychological condition precluding informed consent, will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical record.

Dental exclusion criteria:

  • Extensive periodontal disease or tooth decay;
  • Active temporomandibular joint disease (including severe bruxism);
  • Restrictions in mouth opening (\< 25mm) or advancement of the mandible \<5mm);
  • Partial or complete edentulism (less than eight teeth in upper or lower jaw).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
86 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    MRA therapy

    During 12 months patients will be treated with a bibloc MRA (SomnoDent® MAS, SomnoMed Australia/Europe AG). The MRA will be customized by certified dentists or dental-specialists experienced in the field of dental sleep medicine.

    Device: mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) (SomnoDent)

  • Active comparator
    CPAP therapy

    During 12 months patients will be treated with Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).Treatment with CPAP prevents upper airway collapse by pneumatically "splinting" the upper airway during sleep.

    Procedure: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Interventions

  • Devicemandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) (SomnoDent)

    bibloc MRA type SomnoDent starting at 70% protrusion of the mandibula

    Also known as: bibloc SomnoDent

  • ProcedureContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

    Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction and quality adjusted life years

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction measured during polysomnography and quality adjusted life years (QALYs)

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life

    EQ5D, SF-36, FOSQ questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  2. Change in Cardiovascular risk

    smoking status, change from baseline ambulant blood pressure measurements after 12 months, blood samples, urine sample, accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in skin tissue

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  3. Change in polysomnographic outcomes

    total sleep time, sleep efficiency, minimal oxyhemoglobin saturation, arousals, sleep stages

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  4. Change in activities of daily living

    Total distance on 6 minutes walking test Number of steps measured with pedometer

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  5. Compliance

    objective compliance by reading out devices subjective compliance by questionnaire

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Side effects

    self-reported side effects from device dental and maxillofacial side-effects from both MRA and CPAP

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
    Leeuwarden, Fryslan 8901 BR, Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Groningen
    Groningen, 9700 RB, Netherlands
  • Martini Ziekenhuis Groningen
    Groningen, 9700 RM, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Uniken Venema JAM, Knol-de Vries GE, van Goor H, Westra J, Hoekema A, Wijkstra PJ. Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of a mandibular advancement device and continuous positive airway pressure in moderate obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Jun 1;18(6):1547-1555. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9908. PubMed 35088708 ↗
  • de Vries GE, Hoekema A, Claessen JQPJ, Stellingsma C, Stegenga B, Kerstjens HAM, Wijkstra PJ. Long-Term Objective Adherence to Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Nov 15;15(11):1655-1663. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8034. PubMed 31739856 ↗
  • de Vries GE, Hoekema A, Vermeulen KM, Claessen JQPJ, Jacobs W, van der Maten J, van der Hoeven JH, Stegenga B, Kerstjens HAM, Wijkstra PJ. Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of a Mandibular Advancement Device Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Oct 15;15(10):1477-1485. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7980. PubMed 31596213 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01588275
Lead sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Collaborators
VitalAire Nederland BV, SomnoMed Goedegebuure
Responsible party
Grietje E de Vries, MSc (researcher/project leader, University Medical Center Groningen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 30, 2012
Start date
May 24, 2012
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2017
Completion
Dec 31, 2017
Last update
May 15, 2018

Study contacts

Grietje E de Vries, MSc
study chair · University Medical Center Groningen
Peter J Wijkstra, PhD
principal investigator · University Medical Center Groningen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion